Highlights of the “Procedural Guidance” Results of transportation planning process “inform” the NEPA process. Format of planning products for inclusion.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.

Advertisements

Executive Order Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds.

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.

Expanding & Sustaining Systems of Care: New Challenges and Opportunities Presentation Beaver County (PA) System of Care: Optimizing Resources, Education.

Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-

Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.

Office of Corporate Research, Technology, and Innovation Management Federal Highway Administration SPR part II: Eligibility Jack Jernigan Office of Research,

New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:

ODOT – FHWA Environmental Performance Measures February 2012.

Organizational & Operational Management Presented by Mr. Rod Ettridge Fiscal Affairs Expert IMF 28 August 2014.

Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,

Environmental Justice: Principles, Policies, Guidance, and Effective Practices FTA Region VI Civil Rights Colloquium March 29, 2006.

NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.

Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.

BY DANNY BEER INTRO INTO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.

Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.

I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.

Colorado: Planning and Environmental Linkages Integrated Planning Work Group Peer Exchange Washington, DC – January 27, 2009.

L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.

NGA Briefing July 17, 2005 NEPA: OPEC’s Best Friend.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.

Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.

Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,

Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,

I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.

Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.

CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)  Draft year: 1970 to present day  No Amendment Years  National Legislation By: Ayli Tulberg, Period.

Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)

SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.

UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 2 Slide 1 The EIA process The EIA process comprises:  screening - to decide if and at what level EIA should be applied.

Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.

SAFETEA-LU Reauthorization Process and USDOT’s Reform Proposal November 2008 Todd Kohr Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy U.S.

Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.

Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.

Administration " The process of achieving defined goals at a defined time through the guidance, leadership & control of the efforts of a group of individuals.

1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.

1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.

PEL 101: The Tools for Adopting and Implementing a PEL Approach August 20, 2009.

SAFETEA-LU: Environmental Provisions for Transportation Planning Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project Development and Environmental Review

Methods of Administration MOA Element 3 Assurances.

Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,

Welco EPA TRIBAL PROGRAMS Cathy Villa, EPA Tribal Coordinator EPA’s Tribal Programs leads the effort to protect human health and the environment of federally.

Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.

Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.

In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.

CEQ’s Proposed NEPA Guidance Listening Session _________________________ Welcome Please Sign In Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality April.

Planning & Environment Linkages (PEL) July 20, 2011 PEL 101: The Tools for Adopting and Implementing a PEL Approach.

Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.

Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.

Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee October 13, Workforce Plan Karen.

PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.

Modification of Interagency Strategy for the Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy February 2009 Modification of Interagency Strategy.

Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.

Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.

The Role of Public Participation in Advancing Environmental Justice.

ASH ENV 333 W EEK 1 DQ 1 NEPA Check this A+ tutorial guideline at NEPA For more classes.

The Rulemaking Process

Welcome to Community Solutions: NEPA & EJ: Leveraging Federal Resources to Advance Community Environmental, Economic and Health Vitality “A Focus on.

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)

Purpose & Need Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.

Presentation transcript:

Highlights of the “Procedural Guidance” Results of transportation planning process “inform” the NEPA process. Format of planning products for inclusion in the NEPA process/documents. Level-of-detail of transportation planning products for use in the NEPA process. Involvement of Federal, Tribal, State, and local environmental, regulatory, and resource agencies in transportation planning. Procedures for using decisions or analyses from the transportation planning process in the NEPA process. FHWA/FTA considerations in reviewing planning products for acceptance in project development/NEPA.

Highlights of the “Substantive Guidance” General Issues to be Considered: – Factors for considering transportation planning products to be relied upon in NEPA. Purpose and Need: – Transportation planning’s role in shaping purpose and need statements. Alternatives: – Evaluation and elimination of alternatives during the transportation planning process. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences: – Types of planning process products and information that are useful in a project-level NEPA analysis and document. Environmental Mitigation: – Support from planning-level efforts for advanced mitigation, banking, and priorities for environmental mitigation investments.

Highlights of “Administrative Issues” Eligibility of FHWA/FTA funds for environmental studies in transportation planning. Staffing or organizational arrangements to support the acceptance of transportation planning products in the NEPA process. Use of environmental, regulatory, and resource agency liaisons and partnership agreements. Available training opportunities on the transportation planning and NEPA processes.