UNIT 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring and evaluation is the process of examining progress against institution’s goals or plan.  The term SM &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Advertisements

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Improve your Club’s project design and implementation Presented by: Ulrike Neubert SIE PD Ann-Christine Soderlund SIE APD.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
Rules of the Game Form groups of 6-8 persons The 1 st table to signal may answer - correct answers = +10 points - incorrect answer = -10 points You may.
Programming Techniques and Skills for Advisory Leaders Ralph Prince and Roger Rennekamp, Ph.D. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service.
WM Software Process & Quality Generic Processes - Slide #1  P. Sorenson SPiCE Reference Model - how to read Chapter 5 Capability Levels (process.
EDU555 CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION ENCIK MUHAMAD FURKAN MAT SALLEH WEEK 4 CURRICULUM EVALUATION.
Computer Integrated assessment. Computer integrated assessment Measurement, testing, assessment and evaluation What is the difference?
Setting the success criteria to evaluate project success Tiina Lell
6. Penilaian Kurikulum The Meaning of Evaluation 1.Evaluation is a process or group of processes by which evaluators gather data in order to make decisions.
Enhancing assessment capacity For teachers of Authority and Authority-registered subjects.
Nine steps of a good project planning
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT IN TANZANIA. STAGE 1 Service Delivery Survey - MDAs have to undertake these surveys which focus on external customers and are.
Business Analysis and Essential Competencies
Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions April 1-3, 2009 Sinaia Criteria for.
SITUATION ANALYSIS. CONTENT Why do we do a situation analysis? What needs to be achieved? Steps in development of the Situation analysis Defining provisional.
QUICK OVERVIEW - REDUCING REOFFENDING EVALUATION PACK INTRODUCTION TO A 4 STEP EVALUATION APPROACH.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
Demonstrating Effectiveness Background and Context.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
Program Evaluation.
Training and Development Prof R K Singh AIMA CME.
Exercise 1 Tor Stålhane IDI / NTNU. Intro The strength of ISO 9001 and many other standards is that they focus on “What shall be done” and leave “How.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
QOS_ISO/ TS_20021 BSC Balanced ScoreCard QOS Quality Operating System.
Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
What is Social Accountability? “Social Accountability is an approach initiated by the community for collective responsibility of all stakeholders in ensuring.
Chapter 6: High-Leverage Practice 1: Formative Evaluation.
BSBPMG508A Manage Project Risk 11.6 Monitor and Control Risks Adapted from PMBOK 4 th Edition InitiationPlanning ExecutionClose Monitor Control The process.
Governance Orientation. Governance Model 1 Principles maintain future orientation and outcomes focus Board representing the ownership capture decisions.
Chapter 4 Test Design Techniques MNN1063 System Testing and Evaluation.
EVALUATION RESEARCH To know if Social programs, training programs, medical treatments, or other interventions work, we have to evaluate the outcomes systematically.
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation A useful Tool for Research Projects’ Administrators and Managers Folajogun V. Falaye. (Professor of Educational Research.
Submitted By: Tanveer Khan M.Tech(CSE) IVth sem.  The ISO 9000 standards are a collection of formal International Standards, Technical Specifications,
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
Staff development for technology- enhanced learning and assessment an institutional overview Carol Russell.
Chapter 23: Overview of the Occupational Therapy Process and Outcomes
Performance Appraisal Determinants and obstacles Definition Importance Uses Process of appraisal Methods Goal setting Sources Errors.
Agenda  Purpose  Processes  Deliverables  Executing Activities 4.3.
Copyright © 2005 Avicenna The Great Cultural InstituteAvicenna The Great Cultural Institute 1 Student Assessment.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Alternative Assessment (Portfolio)
Evaluation and Accountability
WEEK 4 CURRICULUM EVALUATION
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Evaluation and Accountability
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
Monitoring and Evaluation
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Thinking through PROGRAMME Theory
Assessment Day Strategy
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

UNIT 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring and evaluation is the process of examining progress against institution’s goals or plan.  The term SM & E is used when an institution monitors and evaluates itself.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring looks at the progress against a set of indicators that have been selected to show whether the plan is implemented successfully and that it is having the intended effect.  Evaluation examines whether the planned activities were effective in reaching the goal as well as finding whether the right goals have been set.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring 1. It is the process of regular or periodic measurement of program inputs, activities, and outputs during the program implementation. 2. It is the management technique by which extension agents collect data on the way in which the extension program is implemented and the problems it encountered in trying to stay in the right track.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION 3. Monitoring focuses on project’s inputs, activities, management and outputs to improve the operation of the project as designed. 4. Monitoring is concerned with day by day observation and initial effects. It focuses on inputs and outputs often quantifiable.

 Objectives of monitoring 1. To identify the problems and its solution in time during program implementation. 2. To complete program activities in time. 3. To achieve maximum out put from available resources and machineries. 4. To maintain the quality in execution of planned activities.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION Evaluation  It is the process of determining to what extent objectives or goals of the program have been realized.  It is the process of judging the worth or value of a program. The judgment is formed by comparing evidences (what the program “is”) with criteria (what the program “should be “).

MONITORING AND EVALUATION  It is the process of assessing the degree through which one is achieving his objectives.  It is the process of delineating, obtaining and providing useful information for judging decision alternatives.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Objective and types of evaluation

MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Criteria for evaluation

MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Criteria for evaluation

MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Criteria for evaluation