GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole 17-21 June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 1 GHRSST 2013 Annual Meeting 17–21 June, 2013, Woods Hole, MA Preliminary analyses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Oslo, Norway - Nov 2007 GHRSST/Medspiration and the SST Temperature Climate Data Record Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic.
Advertisements

Improvements to the NOAA Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Product Suite Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz, Prabhat Koner.
JPSS and GOES-R SST Sasha Ignatov
15 May 2009ACSPO v1.10 GAC1 ACSPO upgrade to v1.10 Effective Date: 04 March 2009 Sasha Ignatov, XingMing Liang, Yury Kihai, Boris Petrenko, John Stroup.
March 6, 2013iQuam v21 In situ Quality Monitor (iQuam) version 2 Near-real time online Quality Control, Monitoring, and Data Serving tool for SST Cal/Val.
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
GHRSST XI Science Team Meeting, ST-VAL, June 2010, Lima, Peru Recent developments to the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) and SST validation with In situ.
1 Overview LTSRF Status GHRSST Reanalysis Example L4 Analyses Future Activities GlobColour Connection Villefranche sur mer,
Satellite SST Radiance Assimilation and SST Data Impacts James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA Sea Surface Temperature Science.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
8 November 2010SST Science Team Meeting1 Towards Community Consensus SSTs and Clear-Sky Radiances from AVHRR SST Science Team Meeting 8-10 November 2010,
1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)
Progress in Data Merging/Gridding & CDR and Differences Between Global SST Averages in Gridded Data Sets Alexey Kaplan Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
1 Overview LTSRF Status GHRSST Reanalysis Example L4 Analyses Future Activities Beijing, October 2006 The GODAE High Resolution.
4 June 2009GHRSST-X STM - SQUAM1 The SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting 1-5 June 2009, Santa Rosa, CA Alexander “Sasha” Ignatov*,
MISST FY1 team meeting April 5-6, Miami, FL NOAA: Gary Wick, Eric Bayler, Ken Casey, Andy Harris, Tim Mavor Navy: Bruce Mckenzie, Charlie Barron NASA:
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CLOUD MASK AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR SST WITHIN THE ADVANCED CLEAR SKY PROCESSOR.
S-NPP EDR Validated Maturity Readiness Review 3-4 September 2014, College Park, MD Validated Stage 3 SST Maturity Review Alexander Ignatov And STAR JPSS.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Number of match-ups Mean Anomaly Fig. 3. Time-series of night MUT SST anomaly statistics compared to daily OISST SST. SST from different platforms mostly.
Quantifying the effect of ambient cloud on clear-sky ocean brightness temperatures and SSTs Korak Saha 1,2, Alexander Ignatov 1, and XingMing Liang 1,2.
GOES-R AWG 2 nd Validation Workshop 9-10 January 2014, College Park, MD GOES-R and JPSS SST Monitoring System Sasha Ignatov, Prasanjit Dash, Xingming Liang,
Real time Arctic SST retrieval from satellite IR data issues and solutions(?) Pierre Le Borgne, Gérard Legendre, Anne Marsouin, Sonia Péré, Hervé Roquet.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
GHRSST XIV STM – AUS TAG. Woods Hole 18 June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 1 GHRSST 2013 Annual Meeting – AUS TAG breakout session 18 June, 2013, Woods Hole, MA SQUAM.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Team Sasha Ignatov (STAR)
1 SST Near-Real Time Online Validation Tools Sasha Ignatov (STAR) AWG Annual Meeting June 2011, Ft Collins, CO.
Monitoring/Validation of HR SSTs in SQUAM GHRSST-XV, 2-6 June 2014, Cape Town, South Africa 1 The 15 th GHRSST 2014 meeting, ST-VAL Breakout session 2–6.
Which VIIRS product to use: ACSPO vs. NAVO GHRSST-XV, 2-6 June 2014, Cape Town, South Africa 1 Prasanjit Dash 1,2, Alex Ignatov 1, Yuri Kihai 1,3, John.
AMSR-E SSTs in the Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE : A US contribution to GHRSST-PP Research, Data, and Impacts.
1 RTM/NWP-BASED SST ALGORITHMS FOR VIIRS USING MODIS AS A PROXY B. Petrenko 1,2, A. Ignatov 1, Y. Kihai 1,3, J. Stroup 1,4, X. Liang 1,5 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR,
GHRSST XI Meeting, IC-TAG Breakout Session, 22 June 2010, Lima, Peru Cross-monitoring of L4 SST fields in the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM)
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
Request for SST Beta Maturity 23 February 2013, College Park, MD Request for SST Beta Maturity Sasha Ignatov – SST Lead John Stroup – SST Technical Liaison.
1 Overview LTSRF Status GHRSST Reanalysis Example L4 Analyses Future Activities D.C., Nov 2006 Long Term Stewardship and Reanalysis.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Monitoring of IR Clear-sky Radiances over Oceans for SST (MICROS) Alexander.
24 January th AMS Symposium on Future Operational Environmental Satellite Systems 22 – 26 January 2012, New Orleans, LA NPP VIIRS SST Algorithm.
2 November 2011JPSS SST at STAR 1 2 nd NASA SST Science Team Meeting 2 – 4 November 2011, Miami Beach, FL Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) SST Algorithm.
Quality Flags: Two separate sets of QFs are provided in IDPS Product: (1) SST QFs; and (2) VIIRS Cloud Mask. Analyses were aimed at identifying a suitable.
CLIMAR-III, Gdynia, Poland, May 2008 Advances in the AVHRR Pathfinder Sea Surface Temperature Climate Data Record and its Connections with GHRSST Reanalysis.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
Report from the Australian Regional Data Assembly Centre Helen Beggs 1, Leon Majewski 2 and Justin Freeman 1 1 Centre for Australian Weather and Climate.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Advanced Clear-Sky Processor.
Use of high resolution global SST data in operational analysis and assimilation systems at the UK Met Office. Matt Martin, John Stark,
9th June 2008 GHRSST-9, Perros-Guirec SST framework at European level Medspiration, Marine Core Services & SAF O&SI Status and products Jean-François Piollé.
How to Access Data from the Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature (GHRSST) at the Global Data Assembly Center (GDAC) and the Long Term Stewardship.
Martin Rutherford Technical Director Oceanography and Meteorology Royal Australian Navy 02 Jun 2009 Towards a Bias Corrected L4 Median.
International GHRSST User Symposium Santa Rosa, California, USA 28-29th May 2009 MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures Peter J Minnett & Robert H. Evans With.
2 Jun 09 UNCLASSIFIED 10th GHRSST Science Team Meeting Santa Rosa, CA 1 – 5 June Presented by Bruce McKenzie Charlie N. Barron, A.B. Kara, C. Rowley.
1 March 2011iQuam GHRSST DV-WG, HL-TAG and ST-VAL Meeting 28 February – 2 March 2011, Boulder, CO In situ Quality Monitor (iQuam) Near-real time.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder Versions 5 & 6 SST field to various reference fields Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’
© Crown copyright Met Office Report of the GHRSST Inter-Comparison TAG (IC-TAG) Matt Martin GHRSST XI meeting, Lima, Peru, June 2010.
Edward Armstrong Jorge Vazquez Mike Chin Mike Davis James Pogue JPL PO.DAAC California Institute of Technology 28 May 2009 GHRSST Symposium, Santa Rosa,
1 Santa Rosa, CA, June 2009 Kenneth S. Casey, Tess Brandon NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center Nick Rayner Met Office Hadley Centre June 2010 GHRSST.
Validation in Arctic conditions Steinar Eastwood (met.no) David Poulter (NOCS) GHRSST9, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP SST, days mean.
Prototyping SST Retrievals from GOES-R ABI with MSG SEVIRI Data Nikolay V. Shabanov 1,2, (301)
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Systematic biases in satellite SST observations.
29 May 2009GHRSST User's Symp - SQUAM1 The SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) 1 st GHRSST Int’l User’s Symposium May 2009, Santa Rosa, CA Alexander “Sasha”
L2P and L3 SST data produced by EUMETSAT/OSI SAF and EC/MyOcean
Monitoring of SST Radiances
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
SST – GSICS Connections
NOAA Report on Ocean Parameters - SST Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 9 Author: Sasha Ignatov.
Using Double Differences in MICROS for Cross-Sensor Consistency Checks
Towards Understanding and Resolving Cross-Platform Biases in MICROS
Radiometric Consistency between AVHRR, MODIS, and VIIRS in SST Bands
Presentation transcript:

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 1 GHRSST 2013 Annual Meeting 17–21 June, 2013, Woods Hole, MA Preliminary analyses of Metop AVHRR, MODIS and VIIRS SST products in SQUAM Prasanjit Dash 1,2, Alexander Ignatov 1, Yury Kihai 1,3, Boris Petrenko 1,3, John Stroup 1,4,John Sapper 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS, NCWCP College Park, MD 2 Colorado State Univ, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA) 3 GST, Inc, MD, USA 4 STG, Inc, MD, USA ( s: SQUAM objective: A global, web-based, community, quasi NRT, monitor for SST producers & users !

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 2 Major SST data providers: Projects and international group Contributions/Support Level-2 SST: VIIRS/AVHRR/MODIS -NESDIS SST Team : ACSPO (GAC: 5 platforms, FRAC: Metop-A & B, VIIRS: NPP, MODIS: Terra/Aqua) -P. LeBorgne, H. Roquet : O&SI SAF Metop-A FRAC -D. May, B. McKenzie : NAVO SEATEMP -S. Jackson : IDPS (NPP) Level-3 SST: AVHRR/(A)ATSR: -K. Casey, R. Evans, J. Vazquez, E. Armstrong: PathFinder v5.0 -C. Merchant: ARC (ongoing effort – next meeting) Level 4 SSTs: -R. Grumbine, B. Katz : RTG (Low-Res & Hi-Res) -R. Reynolds, V. Banzon : OISSTs (AVHRR & AVHRR+AMSRE) -M. Martin, J. R. Jones : OSTIA foundation, GHRSST Median Product Ensemble, OSTIA Reanalysis -D. May, B. McKenzie : NAVO K10 -J.-F. Piollé, E. Autret : ODYSSEA -E. Maturi, A. Harris, J. Mittaz : POES-GOES blended -B. Brasnett : Canadian Met. Centre, 0.2  foundation -Y. Chao : JPL G1SST -H. Beggs : ABOM GAMSSA -M. T. Chin, J. Vazquez, E. Armstrong : JPL MUR L4s in SQUAM pipeline: J. Hoyer: DMI OISST; S. Ishizaki: MGDSST; C. Gentemann: RSS products; J. Cummings: NCODA GHRSST support: Craig Donlon, Peter Minnett, Alexey Kaplan Definitions of levels: L2: at observed pixels (satellite) L3: gridded with gaps (satellite) L4: gap-free gridded, time-averaged CMC

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 3 Locate this website: Google: “SST + SQUAM” SQUAM – Web interface L2: The SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM), J.Tech, 27, , 2010 L4: GHRSST Analysis fields intercomparison, DSR-2, 77–80, 31–43, 2012

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 4 Outline 1. What is available in SQUAM ? - brief intro (revisit!) ; newer products a)Maps, Histograms, Stat. time-series, Dependence (daily & time-series) b)Compare monthly stats [available online, access anytime anywhere and explore!] 2. Case study examples: 2.1. Aggregated (long-term) maps of ΔT S : a)Any persistent cloud leakage/algorithm deficiency? 2.2. IDPS VIIRS and ice mask 2.3. WUCD event in VIIRS bands and effect on SST 2.4. Correlation in “independent” L2 SSTs: choose an L4 ref. – a)Simulated study preliminary thoughts b)Real satellite (T S ) and reference (T R ) fields 3. Summary and future plans

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 5 MapsHistogramsTime-seriesDependenciesHovmöller Night: Suomi-NPP VIIRS (ACSPO) L2 minus OSTIA L4, 08 Jun 2013 Deviation from T R is flat & close to 0 Residual Cloud/Aerosol leakages seen in the Tropics, mid-latitudes 1. SQUAM – modules

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 6 MapsHistogramsTime-seriesDependenciesHovmöller Night: Suomi-NPP VIIRS (IDPS) L2 minus OSTIA L4, 08 Jun SQUAM – modules more cloud leakages limb cooling Two processors applied to the same satellite data; More HR Level-2 SST analyses at:

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 7 Shapes close to Gaussian for both processors IDPS shows somewhat higher Std Dev for comparable # of obs Also range (max – min) for IDPS is higher indicating more outliers Domain performance stat close to expected 1. SQUAM – modules MapsHistogramsTime-seriesDependenciesHovmöller Night 08 June 2013 ACSPO VIIRS minus OSTIA IDPS VIIRS minus OSTIA

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 8 MapsHistogramsTime-seriesDependenciesHovmöller 1. SQUAM – modules **Monthly validation wrt. Drifters (night) a)OSI SAF and ACSPO Metop-A closely track each other – and ACSPO MODIS b)ACSPO VIIRS is consistent; IDPS VIIRS shows larger variance **new functionality

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 9 Outline 1. What is available in SQUAM ? - brief intro (revisit!) ; newer products a)Maps, Histograms, Stat. time-series, Dependence (daily & time-series) b)Compare monthly stats [available online, access anytime anywhere and explore!] 2. Case study examples: 2.1. Aggregated (long-term) maps of ΔT S : a)Any persistent cloud leakage/algorithm deficiency? 2.2. IDPS VIIRS ice mask 2.3. WuCd event in VIIRS bands and effect on SST 2.4. Correlation in “independent” L2 SSTs: choose an L4 ref. – a)Simulated study b)Real satellite (T S ) and reference (T R ) fields 3. Summary and future plans

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 10 Day: ACSPO Metop-A L2 minus OSTIA L4, May-2013 Deviation from T R is flat & close to 0 – (as shown before) Persistent residual cloud/aerosol leakages in tropics, mid-latitudes 2.1. Aggregated maps of ΔT S : Persistent cloud/algorithm deficiency ?

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 11 Day: OSISAF Metop-A L2 minus OSTIA L4, May Aggregated maps of ΔT S : Persistent cloud/algorithm deficiency ? more cloud leakages in the tropics, less in mid-latitudes

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA IDPS VIIRS ice mask issue Standard deviation of IDPS VIIRS SST increased in early 2012, when compared against several reference SST fields (due to sub-optimal ice mask) Increasing std dev in IDPS SST After detection and reporting by SQUAM

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 13 MapsHistogramsTime-seriesDependenciesHovmöller 19 Mar “WUCD Day” 2.3. Warm-up Cool-down event in VIIRS bands 14 Mar “Regular Day”

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 14 MapsHistogramsTime-seriesDependenciesHovmöller 2012/2/ /5/ /9/ /12/ /3/18-20 del SST wrt. OSTIA SST Std Dev wrt. OSTIA Initial large spike in global mean biases in Feb After code fixes, SST spikes reduced to ~ K. NB: these are daily global stat of VIIRS SST –OSTIA; local spikes are likely larger Large spike in global Std Dev Feb After code fixes, SST spikes not seen Warm-up Cool-down event in VIIRS bands

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA Choose an L4 as ref. based on min. corr. error (preliminary**; also presented in Lannion meeting) x: Sat_01 = SST_True + σ 1 y: Sat_02 = SST_True + σ 2 σ 1,σ 2 uncorrelated; σ corr =~0.0 State space: bivariate ρ R 2 = ~0 No linear relation between σ 1 and σ 2 Ideal case for “independent” products Residual space: bivariate ρSimulated

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA Correlation of “independent” L2 SSTs (preliminary) Simulated study x: Sat_01 = SST_True + σ 1 y: Sat_02 = SST_True + σ 2 σ 1,σ 2 uncorrelated; σ corr =~0.62 R 2 = ~0.39 Moderate linear relation between σ 1 and σ 2 f : correlated errors → residual R 2 (increasing) State space: bivariate ρResidual space: bivariate ρ Simulated

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 17 State space: bivariate ρResidual space: bivariate ρ x: OSI SAF = SST_True + σ OSISAF y: ACSPO = SST_True + σ ACSPO σ OSISAF,σ ACSPO uncorrelated; σ 2 corr_total = σ 2 corr_meas + σ 2 corr_algo + σ 2 corr_ref Unavoidable; same BT (M2) Should be minimized Depends on T_ref : RTG 3. Correlation of “independent” L2 SSTs (preliminary) ACSPO (y-axis) vs. OSI SAF(x-axis) for Metop-A, Night R 2 =~0.84 Ref: RTG

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA Correlation of “independent” L2 SSTs (preliminary) ACSPO (y-axis) vs. OSI SAF(x-axis) for Metop-A, Night State space: bivariate ρResidual space: bivariate ρ x: OSI SAF = SST_True + σ OSISAF y: ACSPO = SST_True + σ ACSPO σ OSISAF,σ ACSPO uncorrelated; σ 2 corr_total = σ 2 corr_meas + σ 2 corr_algo + σ 2 corr_ref Unavoidable; same BT (M2) Should be minimized Depends on T_ref : OSTIA R 2 =~0.58 Ref: OSTIA

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA Correlation of “independent” L2 SSTs (preliminary) ACSPO (y-axis) vs. OSI SAF(x-axis) for Metop-A, Night State space: bivariate ρResidual space: bivariate ρ x: OSI SAF = SST_True + σ OSISAF y: ACSPO = SST_True + σ ACSPO σ OSISAF,σ ACSPO uncorrelated σ 2 corr_total = σ 2 corr_meas + σ 2 corr_algo + σ 2 corr_ref Unavoidable; same BT (M2) Should be minimized Depends on T_ref : Drifters R 2 =~0.52 Ref: Drifters

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA Correlation of “independent” L2 SSTs (preliminary) Implications: Sheds light on choice of T ref (minimize σ 2 corr_ref ), e.g., for night, OSTIA and Drifters show comparable corr. errors (for this particular L2-combination); ensures that is it okay to use OSTIA as a reference in SQUAM. Can the individual contributions be separated ? - don’t know! – some simplifications: For same Sat, different proc (ACSPO, OSISAF): σ 2 corr_algo should be low For different Sat (e.g., M1, M2), same proc(e.g., ACSPO/OSI SAF): σ 2 corr_meas = 0. If not, then algorithm should be revisited. May be used to check if the assumption of zero correlated error is violated in related studies (e.g., Triple-C-M): σ 1 σ 2 = σ 2 σ 3 = σ 1 σ 3 = 0. ? σ 2 corr_total = σ 2 corr_meas + σ 2 corr_algo + σ 2 corr_ref

GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 21 Summary and Future Work  SQUAM currently monitors major global polar L2/3 SST products from VIIRS, MODIS, and AVHRR, and >14 L4 SST products  Two VIIRS SST products were added in Jan 2012: ACSPO and IDPS  Metop-B is generated by ACSPO and was included (OSI SAF plans?)  All SSTs are ‘more or less’ consistent  Future data additions in SQUAM o Polar: MODIS MOD29/MYD28, (A)ATSR, OSI SAF Metop-B o Geostationary: MSG, MTSAT, GOES – Preparation for GOES-R o Remaining L4 SSTs o More residual analyses (towards correlation issues, cloud leakages: EUMETSAT2013) THANK YOU!