FCC ramp – first stab Mike Lamont. I’(t) = 0 to avoid a voltage discontinuity “it has been shown that if I’(t) is kept low at the end of the snapback,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

CEPC BoosterDesign CEPC Booster Design FCC Week 2015, March, 2015 Marriot Georgetown Hotel Huiping Geng Presented for Chuang Zhang.
SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
Accelerator Magnets Luca Bottura CERN Division LHC, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
1 / 27 L.Angrisani University of Naples Federico II, ITALY 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva,
E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.
Magnetic Behavior of LHC Correctors: Issues for Machine Operation W. Venturini Delsolaro AT-MTM; Inputs from A. Lombardi, M. Giovannozzi, S. Fartoukh,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Field Quality Working Group-14/12/04 - Stephane Sanfilippo AT-MTM-AS Field Quality measurements at cold. Standard program v.s extended tests. Presented.
Operational overhead of moving to higher energies Mike Lamont Thanks for input to: Jan Uythoven,Markus Zerlauth, Ralph Assmann, Mirko Pojer.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Fk. Bordry AB/PO Ability of the converter s to follow the reference function (static, dynamics) I1 I2 I3 Static part is covered by the static definition.
E. Todesco FIELD MODEL AT 7 TEV N. Aquilina, E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland On behalf of the FiDeL team CERN, 17 th June.
Field Description of the LHC FiDeL - Status and Plan Presented by L. Bottura based on contributions of many MARIC and LHCCWG
Geneva, 12/06/ Results of Magnetic Measurements on MQXC 02 L. Fiscarelli on behalf of TE/MSC/MM section
Massimo GiovannozziChamonix XV, January Electrical circuits required for the minimum workable LHC during commissioning and first two years.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Field Model for the Multipoles Factory FQWG, 17/3/2004 S.Amet, L.Deniau, M.Haverkamp, L.Larsson, T.Pieloni, S.Sanfilippo, M. Schneider, R. Wolf, G.Ambrosio.
Ramping & Snapback Andy Butterworth AB/RF Chamonix XIV 17 January 2005.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Chromaticity correction (without RCS.A78B2) Thanks to: F. Roncarolo, E.Todesco, M.Lamont, J.Wenninger.
AT-MEL, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 R.Wolf-LHCCWG Magnet Setup Cycling for LHC R. Wolf for the FQWG et al. Contents -Overview -Details of individual cycles.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
AT-MAS/SC A. Verweij 21 Mar 2003 Present Status and Trends of Cable Properties and Impact on FQ Workshop on Field Quality Steering of the Dipole Production.
How precisely can we control our magnets? Experience and impact on the expected control of machine parameters (tune and chromaticity) Thanks to: M.Lamont,
Feb 20 th 2003 Pierre Bauer1 - Tevatron RunII Meeting REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF POSSIBLE MAGNET RELATED ISSUES IN THE TEVATRON G. Annala, P. Bauer, R.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
E. Todesco CAN WE IMPROVE THE MAGNETIC CYCLE/MODEL AND THEIR EFFECTS? E. Todesco For the FiDeL team: C. Alabau Pons, L. Bottura, M. Buzio, L. Deniau, L.
E. Todesco ENERGY OF THE LHC AFTER LONG SHUTDOWN 1 ( ) C. Lorin, E. Todesco and M. Bajko CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues.
7 th March 2008 Magnet Modelling N. Sammut On behalf of the FIDEL Working Group.
Beam-Beam simulation and experiments in RHIC By Vahid Ranjbar and Tanaji Sen FNAL.
Ramping faster? Mike Lamont Ralph Steinhagen. I’(t) = 0 to avoid a voltage discontinuity “it has been shown that if I’(t) is kept low at the end of the.
“ Decay & snapback in main LHC dipoles vs injection current”, LUMI-05, Arcidosso, 1 September 2005, Page 1/4 During ramps, boundary-induced.
Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.
An Alternative to Grahame Rees’ Isochronous FFAG Lattice for the Acceleration of Muons from 10 – 20 GeV Horst Schönauer, CERN Proposed FFAG-type Muon Accelerators:
FCC related MDs. Faster LHC ramp MD Brennan Goddard; Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci; Wolfgang Bartmann; Florian Burkart; Francesco Maria Velotti; Mike Lamont;
E. Todesco THE LHC MAGNETIC MODEL AT 6.5 TEV E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With contributions from N. Aquilina, L. Bottura, R. De Maria, L. Deniau,
Measurement of LHC Superconducting Dipole and Quadrupole Magnets in Ramp Rate Conditions G.Deferne, CERN Aknowledgements: M. Di Castro, S. Sanfilippo,
ICFA mini-Workshop on Beam Commissioning for High Intensity Accelerators Yasuhiro Watanabe (J-PARC / JAEA) Tracking between bending and quadrupole families.
17 th April 2007 Nicholas J. Sammut Decay Prediction and Minimisation During LHC Operation University of Malta Field Quality Working Group with several.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
LHC Commissioning with Beam
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
Space charge studies at the SPS
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Chromaticity decay and snapback
Tune and Chromaticity: Decay and Snapback
Results of the LHC Prototype Chromaticity Measurement
Tune and Chromaticity Measurements during the 10 A/s Ramp(s)
Field model deliverables for sector test and commissioning: when and what? The implementation of an accurate magnetic model will be vital for efficient.
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
JLEIC R&D Review: Other R&D
Cycle-to-cycle reproducibility and magnet modeling.
Phase Adjustments: K vs
Design Study of the CEPC Booster
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
On reproducibility From several inputs of N. Sammut, S. Sanfilippo, W. Venturini Presented by L. Bottura LHCCWG
Presentation transcript:

FCC ramp – first stab Mike Lamont

I’(t) = 0 to avoid a voltage discontinuity “it has been shown that if I’(t) is kept low at the end of the snapback, the bandwidth of the control system required to dynamically correct this error can be substantially reduced.” Parabolic FCC ramp From before beam…

the magnetic field error produced by inter-strand coupling current (and by other types of eddy currents) is proportional to the ramp rate B’ (t). Therefore, at a constant ramp rate the relative field error i cpl b is highest at low fields. The magnitude of this error can be optimized to be constant if the magnetic field ramp function B(t) is an exponential while ramping in such a way that with Exponential (from PN172) FCC ramp In fact:.. negligible for all harmonics

Linear – dictated by MB maximum ramp rate of 10 A/s Plus parabolic round off Linear & parabolic round-off FCC ramp

Snuggly fit the bits together FCC ramp

Snapback FCC ramp Bottura & Sammut – Cham XIV

Ramp parameterization FCC ramp

Snap-back snap-back fit:  b 3 [1-(I-I inj )/  I] 3  b3= 3.7units  I = 27A   B = 19 mT snap-back decay FCC ramp Luca Bottura

FCC ramp Snapback – Q’ Fit snapback: I(t) – MB current at time t I injection – injection value of current  b 3 and  I are fitting constants  b 3 and  I are correlated Sextupole compensation during snap-back in collaboration with FNAL – Luca Bottura

Field Model 10 Geometric MDC Saturation Residual

1545 – no corrections(t) FCC ramp Tune modulation up ramp

1580: QPH correction FCC ramp Faster ramp, faster snapback - less well compensated by model

Naked versus correction FCC ramp

Cf. FCC FCC ramp ΔI sb didt end snapback exp alphaLength Ramp [s] design e e-5653 FCC e-4156 alphaTime for 20 [A/s] Design5.9e e-5 FCC1.6e

2012 FCC ramp

FCC – ramp rate 50 A/s to 3.5 TeV FCC ramp

delta current/ramp rate : Current exp max Alpha = para length = Current end para dI/dt at end para amps over by 8.9 seconds dI/dt at 20 A: 4.5 Exponential length 33 Current end exponential deltaLinearCurrent Linear length Length round off 11.8 Total length [s] = 156 Total length [mins] = 2.6 FCC parameters – first stab FCC ramp

Staying with PELP, can compress snapback in time with a more aggressive start  Example shown has it down to around 9 s  To give a total length of around 160 s  Compare with around 105 s linear (of course not possible) Might worry about:  b3(t) correction with spool pieces  Ability to accurately measure Q’  Bandwidth of tune feedback  Other systems – RF… Given parameters – can actually measure it with beam – would be interesting to see it it scales as expected Conclusions FCC ramp