The Framework for Teaching Understanding the Levels of Instructional Practice.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.

Advertisements

EDU 250 Roxanne Stansbury  It is important to learn about Danielson’s Domains because they are the framework for how we measure effective teaching.

1. On an index card, please jot down facts you already know about the Danielson FfT. Turn to someone sitting near you and share what you have written.

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.

Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching

K-3 English Language Arts Common Core State Standards Job Alike Session #2 Foundational Skills 3:00 – 4:30 & 3:30 – 5:15 “ Foundational skills are necessary.

Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson

Understanding the Rubric Presenters: Rhonda Pitts and Bridgette Blue June 18, 2012.

Danielson Rubric Kim Oakes Staff Development Specialist E2CCB/IES Kim Oakes Erie2 BOCES - Adopted ©2010 McKay Consulting, LLC.

Albuquerque Public School Fall Professional Development.

August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.

The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.

+ ESL Learning Team June 11, 2012 Allison Balter and Lindsey Mayer An Introduction to WIDA.

Lesson Planning and Preparation

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.

Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.

HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I.

K-3 English Language Arts Common Core State Standards Job Alike Session #2 Foundational Skills 3:00 – 4:30 & 3:30 – 5:15 “ Foundational skills are necessary.

Domain 1. Outcomes By the end of this session participants will: Gain a deeper understanding of Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Be able to apply their.

September 26,  Individual jot down  Partner talk  Table discussion  Whole group sharing.

Checking for Understanding: Are You With Me So Far? Presented by Peer Observers Karen Buelow Jennifer Fuerman Marianne Kenney Joe Ladow.

The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.

DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AFTERNOON SESSION: 2/18/13.

Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.

Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.

Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,

FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.

Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.

TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.

Preparing to Teach a Module Session 2 August 2014 NTI.

 Teachers will be able to identify how their everyday tasks relate to Domain 4.  Teachers will identify artifacts that relate to Domain 4.

The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?

Reflection on Practice Process Series.aspx Step 1: Highlight or circle the descriptors.

Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.

What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,

The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.

Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.

Session Materials  Wiki

Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013.

March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.

Artifact Brainstorming Domains 1 and 4 Department of Professional & Organizational Development Howard County Public School System, 2014.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.

ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Introduction and Overview Welcome !

Department of Education Professional Learning Institute GOOD TEACHING Differentiated Classroom Practice Learning for All Module 1.

Administrators Academy November 8, Improved learning Each child Each teacher Each administrator Each parent No exceptions No excuses.

Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.

COMPONENT 2B: ESTABLISHING A CULTURE FOR LEARNING Domain 2: The Classroom Environment.

Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment

Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.

Connections and Actions Utilizing coaching skills to enhance mathematics instruction Astrid FossumLee Ann Pruske Laura MalyCynthia Rodriguez MTL Sessions,

CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,

Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.

TCRP TEACHER TRAINING TCRP Overview. Agenda Objective By the end of the session all teachers will be able to: TCRP Pverview Agenda and Objectives 2 1.

Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Danielson Framework 3D – Using Assessment in Instruction.

Secondary ICT National Strategy © Crown copyright 2004 Leading ICT Teachers.

Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.

Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D

Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,

Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.

Framework For Teaching (FFT)

Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member

Defining Effective and Identifying Observation Rubric Titles

Presentation transcript:

The Framework for Teaching Understanding the Levels of Instructional Practice

Why explore the Framework for Teaching? Framework for teaching= 35% In-depth understanding is important ◦ At the heart of the Teacher Appraisal System ◦ Collegial and conversational nature builds teaching capacity and increases student achievement

Last Session Rubric included what we already know about effective instructional practice Sticky notes reflected what we see and hear and they aligned to the Danielson Framework Alignment validates what we already know

Levels Highly Effective Effective Needs Improvement or Developing Unsatisfactory What vocabulary is used differentiate between the levels?

Performance Levels: Key Words Use the Framework for Teaching Rubric Each person at the table choose one of 4 domains Scan the rubric language used to describe each component in the domain Individually list some ‘key words’ that characterize or describe each level Key words can be words you use or Danielson uses Use Handout B to record your answers

Performance Levels: Key Words Synthesize your thinking with your group and choose 2 key words that represent each level Record that on your Handout B Finally, write key words on one page each so that you have 4 pages in total Be prepared to share Highly Effective 1. 2.

UnsatisfactoryNeeds Improvement EffectiveHighly Effective Unsafe Oppositional None of the Time Attempts Awareness Some MostNearly always Metaphorically A non-swimmer. Someone who would drown. Basic swimmer. Can float. Knows the strokes. Can be competitive against other swimmers. Olympic level swimmer. Levels of Cognition Teacher Directed Student Directed