Research Analysis - in educational computing Analysis by: Blair Copeland Presented to: Gerald Knezek, PhD CECS 6510.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT QUALITY AND COST? The factors that lead to increased student learning and increased student.
Advertisements

Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations Kevin Yee Faculty Center for Teaching & Learning, University of Central Florida Research Question For oral presentations,
Part II Sigma Freud & Descriptive Statistics
Part II Sigma Freud & Descriptive Statistics
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Rubrics “You need to learn what rubrics are and how they can help you do a better job.
By : Zohreh Saadati Background and Purpose.
Jeff Beard Lisa Helma David Parrish Start Presentation.
Issues and Concerns in the Instruction of Computer Programming Reginald E. Myrick, Department of Math and Computer Science, Lincoln University, PA.
Gender Difference on Academic Workload and Committed Relationships Mallory Van Lin and Amanda Barnes, Advisor: Susan Wolfgram Research Problem In today's.
Health-related quality of life in diabetic patients and controls without diabetes in refugee camps in Gaza strip: a cross-sectional study By: Ashraf Eljedi:
Written Instructional Materials Chapter 6 Instructors and Their Jobs W.R. Miller and M.F. Miller.
Lesson Planning. Successful Lessons Engaging and challenging Attaining the goals and objectives Exciting and fun Connecting learning content with students’
Treatment Effects: What works for Whom? Spyros Konstantopoulos Michigan State University.
The effective teacher’s characteristics as perceived by students by Charles Bélanger (Canada) Bernard Longden (U.K.)
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
Classroom Climate and Students’ Goal Structures in High-School Biology Classrooms in Kenya Winnie Mucherah Ball State University Muncie, Indiana, USA June,
Chapter 7 Correlational Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Chapter 9 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Understanding Inclusion Kristin McChesney. Review…  Based on the article, what is the definition – or concept – of inclusion?  The generally accepted.
Promoting Social Emotional Competence Promoting Children’s Success: Helping Children Make Transitions Between Activities.
Research Methods. Research Projects  Background Literature  Aims and Hypothesis  Methods: Study Design Data collection approach Sample Size and Power.
Assessing, and Leading a Schoolwide Culture iDEAL: Inspiring, Developing, Empowering, Assessing, and Leading a Schoolwide Independent Reading Culture.
Dr. Bonnie J. Faddis & Dr. Margaret Beam RMC Research Fidelity of Implementation and Program Impact.
Development and Validation of Elder’s Satisfaction Questionnaire for patients Attending Dental Clinics By: Marjan Haghi PhD student in Gerontology University.
EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.
Chapter 15 Correlation and Regression
Cluster Analysis Forming Groups within the Sample of Respondents.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Using Just-in-Time Teaching for Large Course Instruction Kevin J. Apple James O. Benedict James Madison University.
. Relationship between Types of Sex Education and High Risk Sexual Behavior Andrea M. Anderson & Kaitlyn Harlander Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University.
Assessment of an Arts-Based Education Program: Strategies and Considerations Noelle C. Griffin Loyola Marymount University and CRESST CRESST Annual Conference.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
Quantitative SOTL Research Methods Krista Trinder, College of Medicine Brad Wuetherick, GMCTE October 28, 2010.
Classroom management Scenario 10: Giving praise and reward Behaviour Scenarios Resources to support Charlie Taylor’s Improving Teacher Training for Behaviour.
10/29/2015 Exploring the Persuasiveness of “Just-in-time” Motivational Messages for Obesity Management Persuasive 2008, Oulu, Finland. Megha Maheshwari.
An Introduction to Statistics and Research Design
Single Factor or One-Way ANOVA Comparing the Means of 3 or More Groups Chapter 10.
One-Way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10th Edition
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Mehmet Dali Öztürk, Ph.D. 3CSN and ELI Collaborate: Data Collection Workshop September 6, 2013.
Bonds and bridges: The relative importance of relations with peers and faculty for college student achievement Sandra Dika, PhD Assistant Research Professor.
Self-Determination for Individuals with Cognitive Disabilities Center for Self-Determination Laura Huber Marshall College of Education University of Colorado.
Definition Title: Motivation and Attitude toward Integrated Instruction through Technology in College-level EFL Reading and Writing in Taiwan Integrated.
Researching Technology in South Dakota Classrooms Dr. Debra Schwietert TIE Presentation April 2010 Research Findings.
Measurement Experiment - effect of IV on DV. Independent Variable (2 or more levels) MANIPULATED a) situational - features in the environment b) task.
Realism and Naturalness: A Potential Model for Understanding Physical and Social Presence.
Chapter 6 How Do Harry and Rosemary Wong Use Responsibilities and Procedures to Establish Class Discipline?
TGMD-2 DATA ANALYSIS PEP 310 JAYNA ROWLAND, TAYLOR FRY, THOMAS TREADWAY.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEANS AND BETWEEN PROPORTIONS.
By Ambreen Anis Nagori Course Facilitator Dr.Iffet Sultana M.Ed First Semester (Inclusive Education) Iqra University.
Lesson Planning in the Elementary Classroom By: Sara Peck.
Lesson 3 Measurement and Scaling. Case: “What is performance?” brandesign.co.za.
FACTOR ANALYSIS & SPSS. First, let’s check the reliability of the scale Go to Analyze, Scale and Reliability analysis.
Beginning Social Communication Middle School: Lesson two.
Technology in Context: The case of Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Technology in the Maldives Ali Shameem & Thomas C. Hammond Lehigh University College of.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Issues in Evaluating Educational Research
University of Akron – Akron, OH For further information
Between-Subjects, within-subjects, and factorial Experimental Designs
Group Comparisons What is the probability that group mean differences occurred by chance? With Excel (or any statistics program) we computed p values to.
Layers of Evaluation & Meaningfulness of Results
Teachers as “Activators of Learning” and “Evaluators of Impact”
Blended Learning
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
Presentation transcript:

Research Analysis - in educational computing Analysis by: Blair Copeland Presented to: Gerald Knezek, PhD CECS 6510

Scree Plot The abrupt and pronounced change in slope implies that six or seven factors may be identifiable.

Factor Variance Explained Similarly checking the column for percent of variance explained shows the seven factors.

Factor Analysis

Cluster Analysis

Factor Analysis Mapping to Cluster Analysis

HICLUS Analysis

Multidimensional Scaling -ALSCAL Measure: Interval – Euclidean DistanceLevel of Measurement: Ordinal

MDPREF Analysis

Multidimensional Scaling -ALSCAL Measure: Interval – ChebychevLevel of Measurement: Ordinal

Multidimensional Comparison Measure: Interval – Chebychev vs Measure: Interval – Euclidean Space

Factor Domains Barriers Objective Learning Teaching

Factor Domains - One

Factor 1 7. Teachers need to directly influence students using technology for students to learn. 8. Students cannot complete technology objectives unless the teacher first demonstrates the objectives. 9. Teachers must directly collaborate with students for students to learn. 15. Students need strict guidelines to complete learning objectives.

Factor 1 7. Teachers need to directly influence students using technology for students to learn. 8. Students cannot complete technology objectives unless the teacher first demonstrates the objectives. 9. Teachers must directly collaborate with students for students to learn. 15. Students need strict guidelines to complete learning objectives.

Factor 1 Reliability Student Technology-Efficacy Requires Intervention  Student ability to produce effect using technology requires teaching QuestionMean Respectabl e

Factor Domains – One to Two

Factor Students spend more time getting started than learning when using technology. 13. Technology is too difficult for students to learn effectively. 14. Students only benefit from technology when instructions are specific. 17. Students interact so much they do not learn effectively.

Factor Students spend more time getting started than learning when using technology. 13. Technology is too difficult for students to learn effectively. 14. Students only benefit from technology when instructions are specific. 17. Students interact so much they do not learn effectively.

Factor 2 Reliability Barriers to Student Technology-Efficacy  Barriers to Students using Technology to produce an effect QuestionMean Minimally  Respectable

Factor Domains – Two to Three

Factor 3 1. Technology is worth the effort it takes to prepare for use in class. 6. Students learn more effectively using technology when teachers have technology training. 19. Students receive little benefit from technology unless assignments are completed.

Factor 3 1. Technology is worth the effort it takes to prepare for use in class. 6. Students learn more effectively using technology when teachers have technology training. 19. Students receive little benefit from technology unless assignments are completed.

Factor 3 Reliability Technology Impact on Instruction  Technology Value to Instruction QuestionMean R3.86 Unacceptable 

Factor Domains – Three to Four

Factor 4 2. Support personnel do provide the resources I need so students can effectively use technology. 3. Teachers have not been effectively prepared to teach using technology. 16. Using technology allows student to collaborate to complete objectives.

Factor 4 2. Support personnel do provide the resources I need so students can effectively use technology. 3. Teachers have not been effectively prepared to teach using technology. 16. Using technology allows student to collaborate to complete objectives.

Factor 4 Reliability Resource Facilitation on Technology-Efficacy QuestionMean R Unacceptable 

Factor Domains – Four to Five

Factor Teachers spend so much time overcoming technology problems students often learn nothing from an assignment. 20. Students are often unaware of the objectives placed on technology use.

Factor Teachers spend so much time overcoming technology problems students often learn nothing from an assignment. 20. Students are often unaware of the objectives placed on technology use.

Factor 5 Reliability Teacher Barriers to Technology QuestionMean Unacceptable 

Factor Domains – Five to Six

Factor 6 5. Teachers must stay current or students cannot benefit from using technology. 11. Students have trouble staying on task when technology use is not limited. 18. Student objectives are measured only by completed assignments.

Factor 6 5. Teachers must stay current or students cannot benefit from using technology. 11. Students have trouble staying on task when technology use is not limited. 18. Student objectives are measured only by completed assignments.

Factor 6Reliability Teacher Barriers to Teaching QuestionMean R3.675 Unacceptable 

Factor Domains – Six to Seven

Factor 7 4. Technology changes too quickly for teachers to stay current.

Factor 7Reliability Barriers to Teacher Technology-Efficacy  Needs further attention and expansion. QuestionMean Cronbach’s Alpha would not produce any meaningful results with one variable.

Factor Domains Barriers Objective Learning Teaching

Suggested Factor Meaning 1. Student Technology-Efficacy Requires Intervention 2. Barriers to Student Technology-Efficacy 3. Technology Impact on Instruction 4. Resource Facilitation on Technology-Efficacy 5. Teacher Barriers to Technology Objectives 6. Teacher Barriers to Teaching Objectives 7. Barriers to Teacher Technology-Efficacy Expected Two and Got Seven???

Group Analysis Independent Samples t-Test  No Factor Significance Between Gender Teachers & Students ANOVA  Factor Two Significant F (sig.450) Barriers to Student Technology-Efficacy Grade Level Taught  Expected older & younger students would differ.

Higher Order Factor Analysis

Higher Order Factor One 2. Barriers to Student Technology-Efficacy 7. Barriers to Teacher Technology-Efficacy - Barriers to Instruction-Efficacy.

Higher Order Factor Two 4. Resource Facilitation on Technology-Efficacy - Instruction-Efficacy using Technology.

Higher Order Factor Three 3. Technology Impact on Instruction - Technology Impact on Instruction-Efficacy.

Higher Order Factor Four 1. Student Technology-Efficacy Requires Intervention 5. Teacher Barriers to Technology Objectives 6. Teacher Barriers to Teaching Objectives - Teacher Impact on Objectives. - Minimally Loaded, Likely Discard.

Higher Order Factor Analysis

Higher Order Factor One 2. Barriers to Student Technology-Efficacy 3. Technology Impact on Instruction (Negative) 7. Barriers to Teacher Technology-Efficacy - Barriers to Instruction-Efficacy.

Higher Order Factor Two 1. Student Technology-Efficacy Requires Intervention 4. Resource Facilitation on Technology-Efficacy - Instruction-Efficacy using Technology.

Higher Order Factor Three 5. Teacher Barriers to Technology Objectives 6. Teacher Barriers to Teaching Objectives - Teacher Barriers to Objectives.

Conclusion - further attention

Lessons Learned Intent was to focused on teacher’s ability to judge students ability to learn while using technology.  A multi-factored evaluation. Analysis suggest more of instruction-efficacy than student technology-efficacy  Barriers to Instruction-Efficacy  Instruction-Efficacy using Technology  Teacher Barriers to Objectives.

Future Goal Reconsider Instrument  instrument is not focused enough Define Domain  visually redefine domain and focus measure Rewrite Instrument  specific attention to domain being measured. Reanalyze instrument

Findings - students were informed results would not be published