Agenda  Opening Remarks - NIRB  NIRB Presentation: NLCA 12.8.2 Reconsideration of the Meadowbank Gold Mine Project Certificate  General questions on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Advertisements

Transport Canada Submission to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Respecting the Meadowbank Gold Project March 2006.
NIRB Public Hearing on Condition 32 of the Meadowbank Project Certificate No. 004 Baker Lake – April 28, 29, 30 Presentation to NIRB by the Government.
Carolyn Dunn Environmental Assessment Division Healthy Environments Consumer Safety Branch Health Canada High Lake Mine Pre-Hearing Conference December.
PROPONENT INVOLVEMENT IN CONSULTATION Presentation to the Geology Matters Community Engagement Workshop October 30, 2012 Consultation with the Mi’kmaq.
HATCH ACRES MEADOWBANK GOLD PROJECT REVIEW OF CUMBERLAND’S FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) Submission to Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB)
The BC Oil & Gas Commission Proactively Participating in Project Decision Making Processes James O’Hanley Deputy Commissioner.
Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.
Baker Lake Community Information Session Public Hearing Decision September 1, 2009.
Nunavut Impact Review Board NLCA Reconsideration of Condition 32 of the Meadowbank Gold Mine Project Certificate Public Hearing Introductory Presentation.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD Targeting Increased Effectiveness in a Changing Landscape Nunavut Mining Symposium, Iqaluit, April 17, 2012.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
National Energy Board Office national de l’énergie Pipeline Approvals in the Mackenzie Valley Jann Atkinson Environmental Specialist Applications Unit,
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
City Council Meeting January 18, Background  Staff receiving increasing number of inquiries regarding installation of wireless telecommunications.
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
1 Pre-Hearing Conference November 6-10, 2011 Submissions of BIM on Process Issues.
Mineral Development Advisory Group (MDAG) Hope Bay Project &Doris North Newmont Mining Corporation Mineral Development Advisory Group (MDAG) Hope Bay Project.
Nunavut Water Board (NWB) NWB’s Community Session Presentation for Type “A” Licence 1AR-NAN0914 Renewal-Amendment Application 1 October 8 - 9, 2014 Public.
Hope Bay Mining Ltd Doris North Project/ Phase II MDAG Meeting Oct 27, 2010 Cambridge Bay, NU.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Nunavut Water Board (NWB) Community Presentation Type “A” Water Licence Process for Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation’s (BIMC) Mary River Project Community.
KIVALLIQ WILDLIFE BOARD, RANKIN INLET AND CHESTERFIELD HTO NIRB: MELIADINE GOLD PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) TECHNICAL COMMENTS.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
IRRPCC Meeting Albuquerque, NM November 8,  Clarification needed on applicability of these roads into the IRR Inventory  Assignment given to IRRPCC.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment Ukraine: Trade and Human Development Igor Burakovsky, Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting (Ukraine) 14.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
0 Tadas Matulionis Lietuvos Energija AB Strategic planning manager Minsk, December 07, 2007 Environmental Impact Assessment of a New Nuclear Power Plant.
Assessing Effects on Human Health Meadowbank Gold Project Margaux Brisco Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearings, Baker Lake, Nunavut March 27 to 31,
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
THE DORIS NORTH WATER LICENSE APPLICATION, PUBLIC HEARING Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut August 2007.
Disclosure of Preliminary Screening to MVEIRB In Nunavut all screenings are conducted by the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB). NIRB conducts screening.
Agenda  Opening Remarks - NIRB  NIRB Presentation: NLCA Reconsideration of the Meadowbank Gold Mine Project Certificate  General questions on.
Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited1 Meadowbank All Weather Private Access Road AEM Position on Condition 32 of the Project Certificate.
Nunavut Impact Review Board Presentation of Technical Submission AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project March 2015 Transport Canada.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Meadowbank Gold Project: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada’s Final Hearing Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board March 27 – 31, 2006.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
2006 Socio-economic component CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.  Baseline  Impact Assessment  Mitigation and Benefit Enhancement  Monitoring  Intervener Comments.
Proposed Amendment to Project Certificate (Condition 32) Meadowbank Private Access Road INAC's Comments to NIRB Baker Lake, Nunavut [ April 28-30, 2009.
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY. How has (NLCA) been met? a) whether the project would enhance and protect the existing and future well-being of the residents.
Regarding the M EADOWBANK G OLD P ROJECT and All-Weather Private Access Road at the Baker Lake Community Hall Saturday April 25 & Sunday April 26 from.
Formative assessment of the Engineering Design process Review questions in handout Write brief, informal answers to each question.
Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Agnico Eagle Mines Limited – Meliadine Gold Project August 21 – 27, 2014 Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Transport Canada.
KNK5 wmoEp5 vtmp5 GwmoEp5H kNo1k5 ne6tbw5 ckE5]giz “A” wm6j5 Mwnodt5 W5J]y5 b5hjz X=8M8 xwC8 s/C4ys6t5 fxS]En8 GX=8M8f5H k9]l/4 WoExz Community Session.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
By: Alyssa Kaiser and Celia Rozanski. Before the Act Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental policy Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration February 5, 2010 Deline. Ecological Integrity Policy GBLWMPSLUP (a): All activities in the GBLW must be consistent with.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing Rankin Inlet, Nunavut May 18-19, 2010 Water License #3BM-GRA----, Government of Nunavut, Dept. of Community and Government.
MEADOWBANK WATER LICENSE RENEWAL NWB 2AM MEA0815 January 14-15, 2015, Community of Baker Lake, NU Hutchinson Environmental Sciences Ltd.
PUBLIC HEARING ᑭᖑᓪᓕᐅᑉ ᑐᓵᓂᐅᑉ ᐊᓯᐊᖑᕈᖕᓇᖅᑐᑦ
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting Cambridge Bay, NU January 28-29,
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
MADRID – BOSTON PROPOSAL PHASE 2 OF THE HOPE BAY PROJECT
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Meadowbank Water License Renewal
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
Notice of Public Hearing
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.’s Whale Tail Pit Expansion Project
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board ‘s Final Hearing for the Whale Tail Expansion Project August 27, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Agenda  Opening Remarks - NIRB  NIRB Presentation: NLCA Reconsideration of the Meadowbank Gold Mine Project Certificate  General questions on NIRB presentation  Presentations by:  Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd  Government of Nunavut  General questions on Parties’ presentations  Roundtable discussion of issues related to Reconsideration of Condition 32  Discussion of procedural matters pertaining to the Public Hearing to be held April 28-30, 2009 in Baker Lake  Closing Remarks

12.8.2, Condition 32, and Impact Assessment  Impacts assessed during the NIRB’s Review of the Meadowbank Project  How/will impacts change if Condition 32 and/or access restrictions are reconsidered?  Project Certificate designed to address and mitigate impacts identified as pertaining to the AWPAR during the Review  Conditions 31, 33, 34, 35, 51, 52,  Commitments 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 104, 112

12.8.2, Condition 32, and Impact Assessment  Discussion of the potential use of road  Timing and nature of non-mine related access  HTO approval- feasible? For what purposes?

Issues for the Public Hearing 1. Impacts on Traditional uses 2. Confirming Requests of Proponent and Hamlet 3. Environmental Impacts 4. Socio-economic Impacts 5. Public safety, regulation and maintenance 6. Private landowner 7. Public easement 8. Other

Issues for the Public Hearing 1. Based upon the present Project Certificate, how has the AWPAR impacted upon traditional harvesting activities in a manner that was not anticipated at the time the Project Certificate was issued? 2. Confirmation of the terms of each reconsideration requested by: a. The Proponent, and b. The Hamlet

Issues for the Public Hearing i.What are the specific changes requested to the Project Certificate? ii.How and when will the public be permitted to use the road, and under what terms and conditions? iii.How will the terms and conditions for public use of the road be communicated and enforced? iv. Will the proposed changes affect the construction of the road? v.Requirements under the Mine Safety Act and/or other worker/occupational safety regulations

Issues for the Public Hearing 3. For both 2(a) and (b), what are the potential environmental impacts of the proposed changes to the Project Certificate and the public use of the road under 2 (i-v) above, and how will these be assessed? 4. For both 2(a) and (b), what are the potential socio- economic impacts of the proposed changes to the Project Certificate and the public use of the road under 2 (i-v) above, and how will these be assessed? 5. For both 2(a) and (b), based upon the proposed public use of the road, are the terms and conditions for use within the current Project Certificate sufficient to ensure public safety, and do the Federal, Territorial, or Municipal governments have roles in regulating and/or maintaining the road?

Issues for the Public Hearing 6. Based upon the proposed public use of the road, does a private landowner (KIA) have any responsibilities related to the road? 7. Do the public easements as set out in Schedule (4) and (5) of the NLCA affect the NIRB’s decision on the reconsideration? a. Is the existing AWPAR located in the same location as described in Schedule (4) or (5) of the NLCA? 8. Other?

Issues for the Public Hearing 1. Impacts on Traditional uses 2. Confirming Requests of Proponent and Hamlet 3. Environmental Impacts 4. Socio-economic Impacts 5. Public safety, regulation and maintenance 6. Private landowner 7. Public easement 8. Other

NIRB’s Correspondence of January 27, 2009: Process Considerations for the Public Hearing 1. Identification of the issues to be dealt with at the Public Hearing, to include statements which clearly define these issues; 2. The schedule for the Public Hearing exchange of information; 3. Intervenor identification and registration; 4. Technical reports and other documents required for the Public Hearing; 5. Special procedures, if any, to be followed at the Public Hearing; and 6. Any other matters that may aid in the simplification of the hearing.