1 QXF / SQXF heater design update M. Marchevsky (12/03/13)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
Advertisements

F. BORGNOLUTTI Oct. 16 th 2012 Winding Test plan for the MQXF Cable.
Have you ever held a wire that has current flowing through it? If so what did you notice about it? The wire gets hot. The increase in temperature causes.
MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Heat transfer in SIS 300 dipole MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke.
Current and Resistance JH
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
3 Nov 2006S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection of the 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. 3 November 2006.
A novel model for Minimum Quench Energy calculation of impregnated Nb 3 Sn cables and verification on real conductors W.M. de Rapper, S. Le Naour and H.H.J.
Overview of main results from first HQ02a test For HQ meeting 7/30/13.
Coil parts & Instrumentation issues for LQ/HQ coils tested at Fermilab HQ/LHQ coil parts task force.
1 QXF heater design: current status and the path forward M. Marchevsky (LBNL) 03/06/2014 D.W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi (LBNL), G. Ambrosio (FNAL)
Susana Izquierdo Bermudez. OUTLINE 1. Margin and MIITs overview 2. Quench study based on FNAL 11T tests results 1. Longitudinal quench propagation 2.
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
Design optimization of the protection heaters for the LARP high-field Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles M. Marchevsky, D. W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi, Lawrence Berkeley.
1 QXF heater parameters G. Chlachidze, M. Marchevsky March 13, 2014.
QXF Cable Status D.R. Dietderich Conductor Working Group Video Meeting, Sept. 17, 2014.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 Coil Design and Fabrication Miao Yu February 17,
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IR Quad Heaters.
QXF instrumentation trace development
QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013.
EXAMPLE 27.1: A copper wire carries a current of 10 A. It has a cross- sectional area of 0.05 cm 2. Estimate the drift velocity of the electrons.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
Test Program and Results Guram Chlachidze for FNAL-CERN Collaboration September 26-27, 2012 Outline Test program Quench Performance Quench Protection Magnetic.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
MQXF Q1/Q3 Conductor Procurement A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
1 Quench Protection Workshop - 04/29/2014 QXF heater design M. Marchevsky, D.W. Cheng (LBNL) E. Todesco (CERN) T. Salmi (Tampere UT) G. Chalchidze, G.
Solenoids.
AT/MTM, August 2004 Quench Test Results obtained with The Local Quench Antennas on selected magnets M. Calvi S. Kouzue A. Forrester E. Floch P. Pugnat.
HQM01 Test Summary Outline -Magnet Instrumentation and Shim System -SG Data -Short Sample Limits -Quench Training at 4.6 K and 2.2 K -Ramp rate and Temperature.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
CONSTRUCTION  The dc machines used for industrial electric drives have three major parts. Field system Armature and Commutator. Field system  The field.
Quench Protection Maximum Voltages G. Ambrosio, V. Marinozzi, M. Sorbi WG Video-Mtg January 14, 2015.
QXF Coil Insulation during Each Step QXF Coil WG Miao Yu 08/22/2013.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 SQXF Coil Design and Fabrication Winding and Curing Miao Yu February 17,
MQXF protection: work in progress and plans Vittorio Marinozzi 9/23/ QLASA calibration with HQ02 data.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Protection heater design for MQXF outer layer *Using long Super- Heating Stations for ensuring quenhces at low currents* Tiina Salmi, Tampere.
Heaters for the QXF magnets: designs and testing and QC M. Marchevsky (LBNL)
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
LQM01 Test Summary Guram Chlachidze LARP CM16 Montauk, NY May 16-18, 2011.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
MQXFS1 Protection heater delays vs. Simulations 9 May 2016 Tiina Salmi, Tampere university of technology Acknowledgement: Guram Chlachidze (FNAL), Emmanuele.
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
QXF Coil Fabrication & Tooling Reaction / Impregnation
MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals
Protection of FCC 16 T dipoles
MMI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed
CERN Conductor and Cable Development for the 11T Dipole
Quench protection of the MAGIX high-order correctors
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Voltage tap layout and quench antenna options for the long QXF magnet
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Electrical Quality Control (QC): coil to coil parts
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Presentation transcript:

1 QXF / SQXF heater design update M. Marchevsky (12/03/13)

2 Design criteria (I) Based on heater tests of HQ01-HQ02, the heater power density is < 100 W/cm 2, as the delay time t d to quench reaches “saturation” at around this value. In fact, power density of W/cm 2 appears to be acceptable.  Geometry QXF winding dimensions: Outer layer: Pole MT: mm Midplane MT: mm Inner layer: Pole MT: 9.19 mm Midplane MT mm Length (straight section): SQXF: 1.0 m (IL), 1.07 m (OL) MQXF: 3.9 m QXF: 6.7 m Cable twist pitch: 109 mm  Heater power density:  Quench propagation time We assume conservatively the normal zone propagation velocity to be  10 m/s, which will define time to quench t q a segment between two consecutive heating stations

3 Design criteria (II)  Maximum operating voltage Per P. Fessia “Electrical test guidelines” document (p. 10), 450 V is the standard operational voltage of the LHC Q.H. power supply. The FNAL Q.H. supplies operate at maximum voltage of 350 V. We therefore take this number as the upper limit to determine the heating power. As a design point, we assume that this maximum voltage should be sufficient to provide for 100 W/cm 2 heat power density across the “heating station” elements for the longest (QXF) magnet.  Electrical insulation strength Assuming the maximal quench voltage of 1000 V, the The Coil-to-Heater insulation should sustain up to 1980 V in air (“Electrical test guidelines” document, p. 11). Vq, V VQH-Coil (air), V

4 Design criteria (III) Presently, wiring of the heater is done using gauge 16 (1.32 mm) diameter copper wire, with linear resistance of  12 m  /m at 300 K. Estimated final wire temperature in adiabatic approximation for various combinations of the initial temperature and current and for the two pulse durations are shown in the tables. Simulation of the adiabatic temperature rise of a copper wire (RRR=100) of 1.32 mm diameter, carrying current I=I 0 e -t/ , where I 0 =3100 A and  =50 ms. Initial.wire temperature is 4.5 K B BBB BBB 3000BBBB  =50 ms I 0, A T 0, K  =100 ms *B = burnout Maximum current (wiring ) I 0, A

5 SQXF: periodicity with the ½ cable twist pitch Cable twist pitch, p Distance between heating stations, l Heating station width, w If p = 2 n w and l = (2n+1) w, then the supercurrent in all strands of the cable segment of length L= n l can be “interrupted” simultaneously by normal zones created using n heating stations. This can potentially improve heater efficiency, as all cable strands will get resistive and start dissipating heat at the same time. n = 5

6 SQXF: outer layer, mid-plane MT H OMMT = mm a = mm (=> mm along the cable) r1 = 3 mm L = 15 mm  = 60 deg m = 3 mm b = 33 mm 18 segments P/A (straight) = 161 W/cm 2 P/A (curved) = 136 W/cm 2 R heater = 1.60  L seg = 60.7 mm H seg = 31.7 mm 150 V,  =5*10 -7  m, d = 25  m 5 segments (303.5 mm length) will provide simultaneous quenching of all strands. Anticipated heater delay: t d  9 ms (from HQ). Using NZPV of 10 m/s and L seg = 61 mm => t q = 3 ms The entire length will be normal (conservatively) in t d + t q = 12 ms. (Per 1.07 m)

7 SQXF: outer layer, pole block MT H OPMT = mm a = mm (=> mm along the cable) r1 = 3 mm L = 6 mm  = 60 deg m = 3 mm b = 38 mm P/A (straight) = 208 W/cm 2 P/A (curved) = 176 W/cm 2 R heater = 1.40  17 segments L seg = 61.3 mm H seg = 23.9 mm 150 V,  =5*10 -7  m, d = 25  m (Per 1.07 m)

8 SQXF: inner layer, pole MT Proposal: combine mid-plane and pole block heaters in one, spanning the entire width of the inner layer winding of 45.5 mm L IMMT =30.75 mm and L IPMT =9.19 mm Entire inner layer: mm a = 10.3 mm (=> mm along the cable) r1 = 3 mm L = 30 mm  = 60 deg m = 3 mm b = 26 mm L seg = 61.3 mm H seg = 44.7 mm 16 segments P/A (straight) = 137 W/cm 2 P/A (curved) = 116 W/cm 2 R heater = 1.73  150 V,  =5*10 -7  m, d = 25  m (Per 1.00 m)

9 QXF: periodicity with the cable 2x twist pitch Cable twist pitch, p n = 19 Distance between heating stations, l Heating station width, w p = n w and l = (n+1) w

10 QXF: outer layer, mid-plane MT H OMMT = mm a = mm (=> mm along the cable) r1 = 3 mm L = 15 mm  = 60 deg m = 3 mm b = 203 mm 29 segments P/A (straight) = 69 W/cm 2 P/A (curved) = 58 W/cm 2 R heater = 5.68  L seg = 230 mm H seg = 31.7 mm 350 V,  =  m, d = 25  m Heating station density is 4x less compared to the SQXF. n = 2*109 mm / = 18 => hence all strands will be driven normal at once along every 18*L seg = 4140 mm, or  0.6 of the full coil length. Hence each strand will be driven normal at least at one spot per full coil length. Anticipated heater delay: t d  10 ms (from HQ). Using NZPV of 10 m/s and L seg = 230 mm => t q =11.5 ms The entire length will be normal (conservatively) in t d + t q = 21.5 ms (Per 6.70 m)

11 QXF: outer layer, pole block MT H OPMT = mm a = mm (=> mm along the cable) r1 = 3 mm L = 6 mm  = 60 deg m = 3 mm b = 207 mm P/A (straight) = 53 W/cm 2 P/A (curved) = 45 W/cm 2 R heater = 6.49  29 segments L seg = mm H seg = 23.9 mm 350 V,  =5*10 -7  m, d = 25  m (Per 6.70 m)

12 QXF: inner layer, pole MT Proposal: combine mid-plane and pole block heaters in one, spanning the entire width of the inner layer winding of 45.5 mm L IMMT =30.75 mm and L IPMT = 9.19 mm Entire inner layer: mm a = mm (=> mm along the cable) r1 = 3 mm L = 30 mm  = 60 deg m = 3 mm b = 195 mm L seg = mm H seg = 45.3 mm 29 segments P/A (straight) = 79 W/cm 2 P/A (curved) = 66 W/cm 2 R heater = 5.33  350 V,  =5*10 -7  m, d = 25  m (Per 6.70 m)

13 Adiabatic temperature of the heating station For the highest heating power density, as proposed for the QXF inner layer MT heater (79 W/cm 2, 65.7 A of heater current) we obtain temperature rise up to  340 K! SS304, d = 25  m, a = mm, T 0 = 5.0 K Exponential current decay with  = 50 ms is assumed