The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Advertisements

Long-range beam-beam compensation at HL-LHC Tatiana Rijoff, Frank Zimmermann ColUSM # /03/2013.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Simulations that Explain and Predict Beam-Beam Effects in the Tevatron Alexander Valishev Fermilab, Batavia, IL LARP Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Compensation.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Beam-Beam Optimization for Fcc-ee at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk 11 December 2014, CERN.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Oliver Boine-FrankenheimSIS100-4: High current beam dynamics studies SIS 100 ‘high current’ design challenges o Beam loss in SIS 100 needs to be carefully.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
1 BeamBeam3D: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Beam-Beam Simulations for RHIC and LHC J. Qiang, LBNL Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Compensation July 2-4, 2007, SLAC, Menlo Park, California.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Beam-beam studies in the LHC and new projects T. Pieloni for the LHC and HL-LHC Beam-Beam Teams ICFA mini-workshop on "Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders”
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
General guidelines for SixTrack The code options aim at being general with no implicit assumptions to avoid misunderstanding (overhead for the user) and.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Beam-beam deflection during Van der Meer scans
Simplified Modeling of Space Charge Losses in Booster at Injection Alexander Valishev June 17, 2015.
Status of Head-on Beam-Beam Compensation BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program A. Valishev, FNAL 09 April 2009 LARP CM12.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Beam-beam effects for round and flat optics: DA simulations D.Banfi, J.Barranco, T.Pieloni, A.Valishev Acknowledgement: R.DeMaria,M.Giovannozzi,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Beam-Beam head-on Limit J. Barranco, X. Buffat, T. Pieloni, C. Tambasco, J. Qiang, K. Ohmi, M. Crouch for the Beam-Beam team BI BSRT Team George and Enrico.
Six-dimensional weak-strong simulations of head-on compensation in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam.
1 Task particle simulations studies: progress report M. Giovannozzi Objectives To study the field quality tolerances for new magnetic elements for.
Principle of Wire Compensation Theory and Simulations Simulations and Experiments The Tevatron operates with 36 proton bunches and 36 anti-proton bunches.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
WP2: Beam dynamics and optics Workflow between Work Packages 1 O. Brüning – BE-ABP WP2 HL-LHC meeting 17. November 2011.
Criteria for dynamic aperture limits and impact of the multipolar errors: summary of the simulations with beam-beam for levelling scenarios at 5 and 7.5x10.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Beam-Beam simulation and experiments in RHIC By Vahid Ranjbar and Tanaji Sen FNAL.
RHIC head-on beam-beam compensation with e-lens N. Abreu, W. Fischer, Y. Luo, C. Montag, G. Robert-Demolaize J. Alessi, E. Beebe, A. Pikin 1. Introduction.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
BNL trip  Goal of the BNL-FERMILAB- CERN collaboration  The codes  BB tune foot-prints  DA studies.
Beam-beam simulations with large synchrotron tune for strong RF focusing scheme D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov (LNF) SBSR Workshop LNF, Frascati, 7-8 November.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Weak-strong simulations with non-Gaussian “strong” beam
Beam Beam effects for JLEIC
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Beam-beam Studies, Tool Development and Tests
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
100th FCC-ee Optics Design Meeting
Report on Electron Polarization Study
Presentation transcript:

The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement Fermi Research Alliance, LLC operates Fermilab under Contract DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the US Department of Energy. This work was partially supported by the US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP). Weak-strong beam-beam simulations for HL-LHC A.Valishev (Fermilab/US LARP) and T.Pieloni (CERN) for WP2 Task th HiLumi WP2 TL Meeting July 8, 2013 Acknowledgments: D.Banfi, J.Barranco, S.Fartoukh, B.Muratori, K.Ohmi, D.Shatilov, S.White, F.Zimmermann

HL-LHC Beam-Beam Study Evaluate beam-beam for HL-LHC scenarios, identify minimum requirements –  *, crossing scheme, compensation Evaluate limitations Evaluate limitations Luminosity leveling techniques Luminosity leveling techniques Develop self-consistent simulations of beam-beam with other dynamical effects Develop self-consistent simulations of beam-beam with other dynamical effects But mostly rely on weak-strong simulations as a well- tested approach But mostly rely on weak-strong simulations as a well- tested approach Support new ideas Support new ideas 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations2

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations3 Strategy Use a variety of methods and move from the least time- consuming simulations to more elaborate multiparticle tracking Use a variety of methods and move from the least time- consuming simulations to more elaborate multiparticle tracking FMA – Tune footprint and resonances (very fast) FMA – Tune footprint and resonances (very fast) Dynamic Aperture (fast) Dynamic Aperture (fast) Full-scale multi-particle simulation of intensity and emittance life time (slow) Full-scale multi-particle simulation of intensity and emittance life time (slow) Simplify the simulated system where possible Simplify the simulated system where possible e.g. no long-range for studies of certain aspects of head-on e.g. no long-range for studies of certain aspects of head-on Task members use different codes and tools Task members use different codes and tools Converge on a number of common cases for benchmarking Converge on a number of common cases for benchmarking

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations4 People and Tools T.Pieloni, D.Banfi, J.Baranco, B.Muratori – SixTrack T.Pieloni, D.Banfi, J.Baranco, B.Muratori – SixTrack D.Shatilov, A.Valishev – Lifetrac D.Shatilov, A.Valishev – Lifetrac K.Ohmi K.Ohmi

Recent Sixtrack development (1/2) Run environment at Run environment at Huge resources – more than 500k jobs Huge resources – more than 500k jobs New post-processing (x200 in performance) New post-processing (x200 in performance) New file infrastructure New file infrastructure Crab Cavity Crab Cavity Strong bunch tilting implemented Strong bunch tilting implemented Frequency Map Analysis Frequency Map Analysis Sussix analysis of Sixtrack tracking data Sussix analysis of Sixtrack tracking data 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations5

Recent Sixtrack development (2/2) Verification of 6D beam-beam implementation (ongoing) Verification of 6D beam-beam implementation (ongoing) Code logic checked Code logic checked Actual implementation is tested with simulations Actual implementation is tested with simulations Tune shift vs. x-angle Tune shift vs. x-angle Synchrotron side bands Synchrotron side bands 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations6

Selected Sixtrack results (1/6) 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations7 Possibility to have with Sixtrack Frequency map analysis Short run modified and ready for release

Selected Sixtrack results (2/6) 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations8 The 6D BB lens seems working correctly, no problems found. Weighted slices location Synchrotron side bands

Selected Sixtrack results (3/6) 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations9 Tune shifts versus crossing angle

Selected Sixtrack results (4/6) 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations10 Preliminary Different types of optics without multipole errors

Selected Sixtrack results (5/6) 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations11  *=10 cm with multipole errors Preliminary

Selected Sixtrack results (6/6) 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations12 Tune  *=10 cm with/without multipole errors Preliminary

Sixtrack next steps Verify DA without beam-beam to agree with Task 2.3 results Verify DA without beam-beam to agree with Task 2.3 results Beam-beam + multipole errors Beam-beam + multipole errors Beam-beam + Crab Cavities Beam-beam + Crab Cavities Beam-beam + Crab Cavities + multipoles Beam-beam + Crab Cavities + multipoles Beam-beam + noise Beam-beam + noise … 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations13

Recent Lifetrac development Element-by-element tracking fully implemented Element-by-element tracking fully implemented Drift-kick with thin multipole, dipole edge, solenoid, orbit corr. Drift-kick with thin multipole, dipole edge, solenoid, orbit corr. Streamlined mad-x mask file -> Lifetrac input file conversion Streamlined mad-x mask file -> Lifetrac input file conversion Implemented closed orbit calculation Implemented closed orbit calculation Checked the agreement of DA without beam- beam with Task 2.3 results on a test case from Massimo Checked the agreement of DA without beam- beam with Task 2.3 results on a test case from Massimo 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations14

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations15 Selected Lifetrac results (1/) S.White, A.Valishev HL-LHC lattice without magnetic errors (only chroma sextupoles) DA based on 10 6 tracking turns. N p =2×10 11,  =2.5  m

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations16 Selected Lifetrac results (2/) D.Banfi, A.Valishev HL-LHC lattice without magnetic errors (only chroma sextupoles) DA based on 10 6 tracking turns.  *=0.15m,  =590  rad,  =2.5  m

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations17 Selected Lifetrac results (3/)  *=15cm  =590  rad  p/p=0  z =7.5cm  *=33cm  =590  rad  p/p=0  z =4cm D.Shatilov, A.Valishev Linear HL-LHC lattice (no sextupoles) + beam-beam (head-on & long-range) DA based on 10 6 tracking turns, FMA – 2 13 turns

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations18 Selected Lifetrac results (4/) HL-LHC lattice without magnetic errors (only chroma sextupoles) DA based on 10 6 tracking turns.  *=0.15m,  =590  rad,  =2.5  m DA is ok with BB tune shift of  = at A/  = 12.5 with full crab on, no multipole errors

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations19 Selected Lifetrac results (5/) Multi-particle simulation  N >500 hr,   =18 hr,  L =150 hr

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations20 Selected Lifetrac results (6/) Some margin at beginning of fill – can reduce x-angle? Some margin at beginning of fill – can reduce x-angle? 15% margin at end of fill with  =480  rad should allow some emittance growth 15% margin at end of fill with  =480  rad should allow some emittance growth What happens at intermediate steps? What happens at intermediate steps?

Lifetrack next steps Beam-beam + multipole errors Beam-beam + multipole errors Beam-beam + Crab Cavities Beam-beam + Crab Cavities Beam-beam + Crab Cavities + multipoles Beam-beam + Crab Cavities + multipoles Beam-beam + noise Beam-beam + noise … 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations21

Effects of Noise K. Ohmi 8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations22

8 Jul A.Valishev, Weak-strong simulations23 Summary Both Sixtrack and Lifetrac seem to be ready for physics production Both Sixtrack and Lifetrac seem to be ready for physics production Good agreement between two codes Good agreement between two codes Several cases studied with beam-beam only and simulations with multipoles have begun Several cases studied with beam-beam only and simulations with multipoles have begun 6D kick in Sixtrack checked 6D kick in Sixtrack checked ‘New’ scenario challenging in terms of bb ‘New’ scenario challenging in terms of bb Preliminary results encouraging – DA at  =0.033 is ok but some emittance growth is observed (mitigate by tune adjustment?) Preliminary results encouraging – DA at  =0.033 is ok but some emittance growth is observed (mitigate by tune adjustment?) We should be able to address the ‘New 2 ’ scenario fairly quickly We should be able to address the ‘New 2 ’ scenario fairly quickly The missing piece is wire compensation The missing piece is wire compensation