Nov. 22~24, 2004 1st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia1 Wing Rock Dynamics and Differential Flatness W. LU F.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Root Locus Diagrams Professor Walter W. Olson
Advertisements

Lecture 3: Signals & Systems Concepts
I NTRODUCTION TO R OBOTICS CPSC Lecture 5B – Control.
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
Feedback Control Systems
NONLINEAR BACKSTEPPING CONTROL WITH OBSERVER DESIGN FOR A 4 ROTORS HELICOPTER L. Mederreg, F. Diaz and N. K. M’sirdi LRV Laboratoire de Robotique de Versailles,
Design of LFC using Optimal Control Theory The optimal controller is designed to minimize the quadratic performance index of the following form For linear.
Robust and Efficient Control of an Induction Machine for an Electric Vehicle Arbin Ebrahim and Dr. Gregory Murphy University of Alabama.
Exponential Tracking Control of Hydraulic Proportional Directional Valve and Cylinder via Integrator Backstepping J. Chen†, W. E. Dixon‡, J. R. Wagner†,
1 In this lecture, a model based observer and a controller will be designed to a single-link robot.
A De-coupled Sliding Mode Controller and Observer for Satellite Attitude Control Ronald Fenton.
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
עקיבה אחר מטרה נעה Stable tracking control method for a mobile robot מנחה : ולדיסלב זסלבסקי מציגים : רונן ניסים מרק גרינברג.
ME 746 Spring Dynamic Models Differential Equations in State-Variable Form.
AAE 666 Final Presentation Spacecraft Attitude Control Justin Smith Chieh-Min Ooi April 30, 2005.
February 24, Final Presentation AAE Final Presentation Backstepping Based Flight Control Asif Hossain.
Performance Guarantees for Hazard Based Lateral Vehicle Control
On-Orbit Assembly of Flexible Space Structures with SWARM Jacob Katz, Swati Mohan, and David W. Miler MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA
ECE Introduction to Control Systems -
Silvia Ferrari Princeton University
Space Indexed Flight Guidance along Air Streams Mastura Ab Wahid, Hakim Bouadi, Felix Mora-Camino MAIA/ENAC, Toulouse SITRAER20141.
Asymptotic Techniques
Nonlinear Systems: an Introduction to Lyapunov Stability Theory A. Pascoal, April 2013 (draft under revision)
Automatic Control Theory-
Chapter 7 Control Systems Design by Root-Locus Method 7.1 Introduction -The primary objective of this chapter is to present procedures for the design and.
Ch. 6 Single Variable Control
1. 2 Outline 1.Introduction 2.Modeling 3.Simulation 4.Implementation 5.Demo 6.Conclusion.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
MAE505: Robotics Final Project – Papers Review. Presented By: Tao Gan Advisor: Dr. Venkat Krovi. Main Topic: Nonholonomic-Wheel Mobile Robot (WMR). Sub-Topics:
Variants of the 1D Wave Equation Jason Batchelder 6/28/07.
2-1 (a),(b) (pp.50) Problem: Prove that the systems shown in Fig. (a) and Fig. (b) are similar.(that is, the format of differential equation is similar).
1 In this lecture we will compare two linearizing controller for a single-link robot: Linearization via Taylor Series Expansion Feedback Linearization.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Performance & Stability Analysis.
To clarify the statements, we present the following simple, closed-loop system where x(t) is a tracking error signal, is an unknown nonlinear function,
Introduction to ROBOTICS
Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC). MRAS The Model-Reference Adaptive system (MRAS) was originally proposed to solve a problem in which the performance.
September Bound Computation for Adaptive Systems V&V Giampiero Campa September 2008 West Virginia University.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
1 Chap 6 The Compensation of the linear control systems P553.
1 Chapter 11 Compensator Design When the full state is not available for feedback, we utilize an observer. The observer design process is described and.
Nonlinear Predictive Control for Fast Constrained Systems By Ahmed Youssef.
Control systems KON-C2004 Mechatronics Basics Tapio Lantela, Nov 5th, 2015.
CL A UAV Control and Simulation Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program Quarterly Review - October, 2000.
Control and Synchronization of Chaos Li-Qun Chen Department of Mechanics, Shanghai University Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Shanghai.
Model of Reluctance Synchronous Motor
Chapter 4 A First Analysis of Feedback Feedback Control A Feedback Control seeks to bring the measured quantity to its desired value or set-point (also.

Lecture 14: Pole placement (Regulator Problem) 1.
(COEN507) LECTURE III SLIDES By M. Abdullahi
12 th international conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic control and computer engineering 1 Sousse, Tunisia, December 18-20, 2011 Flatness.
1 Lu LIU and Jie HUANG Department of Mechanics & Automation Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 December, Systems Workshop on Autonomous.
Introduction Control Engineering Kim, Do Wan HANBAT NATIONAL UNIVERSITY.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 7. Forced Response Errors Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Laboratory.
Instructor: Chen-Hsiung Yang Dynamic System Modeling Analysis and Control 動態系統建模分析與控制 Lecture1 Introduction to System Dynamics.
A Simple Fuzzy Excitation Control System for Synchronous Generator International conference on emerging trends in electrical and computer technology, p.p.
SYNCHRONIZATION OF BILATERAL TELEOPERATION SYSTEMS WITH INPUT SATURATION Department of Mechatronics in GIST Seung-Ju Lee Advisor: pf. Hyo-Sung Ahn.
Laplace Transforms Chapter 3 Standard notation in dynamics and control
Control Systems EE 4314 Lecture 12 March 17, 2015
Arbin Ebrahim and Dr. Gregory Murphy University of Alabama
MAE505: Robotics Final Project – Papers Review.
Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
University of Bridgeport
Alfred Lynam February 7, 2008 Dynamics and Control Architecture of Control System: Controller Prototypes AAE 450 Spring 2008 Dynamics and Control.
Continuous-time Sliding Mode Control
Overview of Control System
Stability Analysis of Linear Systems
Chapter 7 Inverse Dynamics Control
Exercise 1 For the unit step response shown in the following figure, find the transfer function of the system. Also find rise time and settling time. Solution.
Presentation transcript:

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia1 Wing Rock Dynamics and Differential Flatness W. LU F. Mora-Camino A. Acha ï bou

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 2 Outline Introduction  Wing Rock Dynamics  Differential Flatness Flatness Based Controller Design  Flatness of Wing Rock Dynamics  Control Law Design  Simulation Results Conclusion

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 3 Wing Rock Dynamics A rolling oscillation motion due to loss of damping at high angle-of-attack. High swept delta wing/arrow wing with slender body configurations Breakdown of asymmetrical flow/vortex (unpredictable theoretically) High nonlinearity CFD/Experiments efforts (mathematical model)

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 4 Supersonic Transport Aircrafts

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 5 Differential Flatness (1) Origin  Differential flatness has been first introduced by M. Fliess, J. Lévine, P. Martin, P. Rouchon. Definition  A system is said to be differentially flat if and only if the state and input can be determined by a set of variables, called flat output, which may possess physical meanings. Application  The control input of a flat system can be determined from a given trajectory of the flat output.

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 6 Differential Flatness (2) A nonlinear system given as: is differentially flat if there exists a vector such that Numerous nonlinear systems have been proved to be differentially flat.

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 7 Flatness of Wing Rock Dynamics (1) Mathematical Model  Proposed by Hsu and Lan

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 8 Flatness of Wing Rock Dynamics (2) Differential Equations

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 9 Flat output of Wing Rock Dynamics Roll angle is a flat output:

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 10 Control Law Design (1) Trajectory based control Law  Open-loop control Performing output tracking of inherently stable systems  Close-loop control Enhance output tracking capability for stable systems Perform output tracking of inherently unstable systems

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 11 Control Law Design (2) Linearized System

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 12 Control Law Design (3) Close-loop control law Error dynamics Characteristic polynomial

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 13 Control Law Design (4) Control command Example of given output trajectory

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 14 Simulation Results (1)

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 15 Simulation Results (2)

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 16 Conclusions The wing rock dynamics, according to the retained model, is shown to be differentially flat. The flatness approach demonstrates a comparatively simple way to design an effective non control law for the wing rock motion. The proposed close-loop controller can stabilize the wing rock dynamics Large overshoot can emerge for small control gains. High-gain control can enhance the capability to track the desired trajectory at the expense of the saturation of actuators.

Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia 17 Question...