Figure 1 Superhelical path and base-pair-step parameters for NCP147 DNA. a, Structural alignment of the NCP147 (gold) and best-fit, ideal superhelix (red)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nucleosome Positioning Histones and DNA Bending. DNA packaging 3 X 10 9 base pairs in human genome ~1 m if unraveled Compacted into nucleus –100  m in.
Advertisements

© red ©
1- B DNA -- Genome 2- Double helix -- Relaxed form 3- Antiparallel -- Super coil 4- Major groove -- Histone like proteins 5- Minor groove -- Nucleosome.
DNA stiffness and ability to be bent What role does this play for binding of proteins? Example: 434 repressor; this is a protein from the 434.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
BamA POTRA Domain Interacts with a Native Lipid Membrane Surface
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Local Geometry and Elasticity in Compact Chromatin Structure
DNA stiffness and ability to be bent What role does this play for binding of proteins? Example: 434 repressor; this is a protein from the.
Topological Polymorphism of the Two-Start Chromatin Fiber
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
DNA Nanomechanics in the Nucleosome
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Atsushi Matsumoto, Wilma K. Olson  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Caspase-3 by XIAP
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Electrostatic Free Energy Landscapes for DNA Helix Bending
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
DNA Minor Groove Sensing and Widening by the CCAAT-Binding Complex
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Structures of Two Repeats of Spectrin Suggest Models of Flexibility
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Crystal Structure of an IHF-DNA Complex: A Protein-Induced DNA U-Turn
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Minsun Hong, Mayuree Fuangthong, John D. Helmann, Richard G. Brennan 
Carlos R. Escalante, Leyi Shen, Dimitris Thanos, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Agnes Noy, Anthony Maxwell, Sarah A. Harris  Biophysical Journal 
Julian Gough, Cyrus Chothia  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Structural Basis for Cooperative DNA Binding by CAP and Lac Repressor
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 Superhelical path and base-pair-step parameters for NCP147 DNA. a, Structural alignment of the NCP147 (gold) and best-fit, ideal superhelix (red) paths. The NCP147 DNA structure is superimposed (gold). The left view is down the superhelix axis and the right view is rotated 90° around the pseudo-two-fold axis (vertical). Ideal superhelix r=41.9Å p=25.9Å Angle/bp=4.53° NCP147 not uniform due to 1.Anisotropic flexibility of DNA 2.Local structural features 3.Underlying histone effects Idealized superhelix: 1.67 superhelical turns/133.6bp (1.84 turns/147bp) = 600° Real superhelix: 1333° iCAT=4.53°×cos  (CAT; roll) iSAT=4.53°×sin  (SAT; tilt) Sum of all roll×cos  + tilt×sin  = 897°

Figure 1 (b) Roll, tilt, shift, slide and twist base-pair-step parameters. The base-pair-step values plotted are the means for the two halves of the symmetrical sequence (shown above, with the dyad position labelled '0'). The iCAT and iSAT curves (red) show the roll and tilt contributions to the ideal superhelix curvature. The minor-groove blocks show base-pair-step shift alternation (pink in shift and tilt) or kinks (orange in roll, slide and twist). The primary bound-phosphate groups are indicated above the base sequence by pointers (numbered as the 5' phosphate of the adjacent base) showing the strand direction (dark, 3' 5'; light, 5' 3') and the interacting histone motif (L1, loop 1; L2, loop 2; A1, 1). The tilt component contributes only 77% of that for the cumulative iSAT The roll component contributes only 222% of that for the cumulative iCAT Look at parameters at positions where minor or major grove points in Major groove (+) roll (-) twist = underwinding Minor groove (-) roll Smooth only where H3-H4 contacts Large alternation in shift (relieves steric interference between base edges [see Fig 2B])see Fig 2B Associated with GC and GG/CC base steps Sharp kinks where H2A/H2B contacts Kinking in minor groove (see also Fig 2C):see also Fig 2C Always CA/TG base step High slide/high twist values Related to cross-strand purine-purine clash

Figure 2 DNA bending in the NCP147 DNA. Structures (left) and schematic representations (right) stress uniformity of curvature in the major-groove blocks (red) (a), and alternating shift values (b) and localization of curvature in kinks in minor-groove blocks (c) (yellow for one representative double-helical turn). Also indicated are the primary bound-phosphate groups (green), the block-junction phosphate groups (white) and the DNA axes for the NCP147 (gold) and ideal (white) superhelices. The contributions of base-pair-step curvature to superhelix bending are listed with base-pair numbers (centre).

Figure 3 Oscillation of the base-pair- tip parameter for NCP147 DNA. a, Correlation of base-pair tip and PPa, plotted as in Fig. 1b. Excess base- pair-step roll (purple) into the superhelix is a consequence of oscillating base-pair-tip angles (black). PPa (blue) is the difference between PPa values for the two phosphodiester chains at a single base pair. b, Coupling between PPa, tip and excess roll. PPa is the component of the phosphate– phosphate distance that lies in the plane containing the local superhelical path. Rotation of a base pair along its tip axis (red) in the direction indicated decreases PPa on the inside and increases it on the outside of the superhelix. Excess roll for a base-pair step is the difference between the tip angles for the two contributing base pairs. The DNA blocks shown are from SHL0.0 and SHL0.5. The tip angle (rotation around long axis) of two basepairs = roll The tip angle alternates in the core DNA Maxima at positions where the minor/major groove faces sideways Minima 5bp later This increases the component of the P-P distance in the plane of the superhelix (PP a ) on the outside Decreases PP a on the inside

Figure 4 Structural alignments of the histone-fold DNA-binding motifs and bound-phosphate groups. The motifs are L1 (a), L2 (b) and A1 (c). For each, the main-chain C atoms of H4, H2A and H2B were aligned with those for H3. The resulting primary bound-phosphate group (Pi) and 3'-adjacent phosphate group (Pi+1) positions are shown (H3, blue; H4, green; H2A, yellow; H2B, red) with respect to the H3 main-chain and interacting groups. Completely conserved (pink) and partly conserved (cyan) hydrogen bonds and interactions (yellow) with the minor-groove arginine side chain (mR) are shown. Place P i by aligning L1 or L2 or  1 of H2A, H2B and H4 with H3 rms P i L1 = 1.27Å rms P i L2 = 1.39Å A1 variation of P i and P i+1 larger May be due to location between phosphate groups May tolerate sequence variation Also allow bp between A1 and adjacent L1/L2 Allow DNA “stretching”

Twist = 34.5° ≈ 10.43bp/turn (“laboratory reference frame”)  The twist contribution of a superhelix can be approximated by 2  sin  In a (-) superhelix, the contribution is (-) Thus the twist measured relative to the cylinder is laboratory reference frame - 2  sin  /N  10.43bp/turn - 2  sin(-5.62°)/78.9bp = 10.3bp/turn (“local frame” = OH cleavage frequency in core) In 146bp cores, values of and were measured Due to accommodation of 11-12bp stretches at different regions of the core Distorted region centered on A1 and bound by adjacent L1L2 regions This ability of a nucleosome to “absorb” an additional 1-2bp, can by used to adjust linker lengths as required for higher-order structures