Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education Language, Knowledge, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Business Ethics for Real Estate: A. Glean
Freges The Thought Meaning of true –Grammatically appears as an adjective –So a thing cannot be true, but a picture or idea about it might be The thing.
Theories of Knowledge Knowledge is Justified-True-Belief Person, S, knows a proposition, y, iff: Y is true; S believes y; Y is justified for S. (Note:
Existentialism From Nothingness to Nietzsche to…Mudvayne.
Existentialism Existentialism became identified with a cultural movement that flourished in Europe in the 1940s and 1950s.
Science and Christianity Dave Scott and Daphne Brenner.
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Do We Need a Philosophical Account of Human Rights? Rorty ER 11, Gov E-1040 Spring 2012.
Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body 1 Empiricism Empiricism claims that the only source of knowledge about the external world is sense experience.
Enquiring in the Humanities: Using Texts. Aims for this session: 1.To develop your ability to identify and remove barriers to textual understanding in.
THERE IS NO GENERAL METHOD OR FORMULA WHICH IS ‘CORRECT’. YOU CAN PROBABLY IGNORE SOME OF THIS ADVICE AND STILL WRITE A GOOD ESSAY… BUT FOLLOWING IT MAY.
Phil 160 Kant.
Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Hassan Ismail.
Richard Rorty  2005 G. Lee Griffith, Ph. D. Grenz, S. J. (1996). A Primer on postmodernism. Grand Rapids,
Cooley’s Human Nature & The Social Order Part I Presented by Tina Quicoli.
Knowledge: Problems and Varieties N. T. Wright BISHOP OF DURHAM.
CHAPTER 3 – DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHIES
A STORED TREASURE Psalm 119:9-16. LIFE IN THE WORD IS A SOUL CLEANSING EXPERIENCE (v. 9) LIFE IN THE WORD SEEKS A SOUL- SOAKING EXPERIENCE IN THE WORD.
Belief in God’s Testimony Lamont, J. Faith in God’s Revelation in the Bible 2011 pp.1-7.
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Truth and Reality. Announcement: Tutorial Group 10 will meet next Wednesday at 2:00 Reminder: Your portfolio will be due on December 3 rd. Submit a hard.
© Michael Lacewing Faith without reason? Michael Lacewing
Is goodness without God good enough?
David Lewis Counterfactuals and Possible Worlds. David Lewis American philosopher, lived between UCLA and Princeton Modal realism.
The field of philosophy offers many different theories or points of view on the nature of these categories of reality, and on the relationships between.
Defending The Faith Series
Truth “Truth means seeing reality as it is.” –Sheed Truth means “telling it like it is” –Kreeft “Saying of what is that it is and of what is not that it.
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
An In-Depth Look at the Rhetorical Analysis Essay Question
Conclusion Chapter 14 TOK II. 3 Theories Regarding Truth (1) Correspondence Theory – truth is as it appears to be – facts are facts. (1) Correspondence.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Confirmation Bias. Critical Thinking Among our critical thinking questions were: Does the evidence really support the claim? Is there other evidence that.
Theories of Perception: Empirical Theory of Perception Berkeley’s Theory of Reality Direct Realism Moderate Thomistic Realism.
Thesis Development How to Craft Strong Thesis Statements for Your Essays.
CHAPTER 6 MORALITY AND ACTION.
B 203: Qualitative Research Techniques Interpretivism Symbolic Interaction Hermeneutics.
Today’s Lecture DON’T FORGET TO VOTE! Concluding the Upanishads.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
EXISTENCE OF GOD. Does God Exist?  Philosophical Question: whether God exists or not (reason alone)  The answer is not self-evident, that is, not known.
You Are What You Do In Search of the Good, chapter 2.
Mormons do not feel threatened by science. They are not enemies of the rational world. They are not creationist. On human conduct, they tend to stress.
Philosophy 224 What is a Theory of Human Nature?.
Worries about Ethics Norms & Descriptions. Hume’s gap In every system of morality, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remark'd, that the author.
Curriculum Matrix A Means to Theorize. The Curriculum Matrix Value is intrinsicValue is extrinsic What knowledge is of most worth? What knowing is of.
History as an Area of Knowledge.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Chapter 3: Knowledge Phenomenology & Hermeneutics
Part 2 The Presentation. What is the presentation? A student present that can be done alone or in groups A student present that can be done alone or in.
Beautiful Question Project PHL 103 Erica Michalak.
 The value of certainty.  Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis.
The Nature of Knowledge
OF METAPHORS AND MYTHS, VOICES AND VOCABULARIES, AIMS AND ADDRESSEES Chapter 1.
Teaching Writing.
Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 6424: Ethics and Diversity in Educational Organizations “I am convinced.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
Critical Theory and Philosophy “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it” Marx, Theses on.
A123 A COURSE Introduction UNIT 1: GETTING STARTED.
What is rhetoric? What you need to know for AP Language.
Mere Christianity C. S. Lewis. The Law of Human Nature Chapter 1 Two basic points: –Human beings, all over the earth, have this curious idea that they.
World Philosophy Mr. Zuercher. What is philosophy? ▪ Philosophy is critical and creative thinking about fundamental questions. – What is a person – What.
The Toulmin Method. Why Toulmin…  Based on the work of philosopher Stephen Toulmin.  A way to analyze the effectiveness of an argument.  A way to respond.
Relativism, Divine Command Theory, and Particularism A closer look at some prominent views of ethical theory.
WHAT MODELS DO THAT THEORIES CAN’T Lilia Gurova Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology New Bulgarian University.
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Conclusion – Truth and wisdom
Introduction to Epistemology
RHETORIC.
Presentation transcript:

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education Language, Knowledge, and Meaning “[A]ll vocabularies, even those which contain the words which we take most seriously, the ones most essential to our self-descriptions – are human creations, tools for the creation of such other human artifacts as poems, utopian societies, scientific theories, and future generations.” -Richard Rorty, Contingency, irony, and solidarity, p. 53 Problem #1: Language and Truth

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education -Alan W. Watts, Psychotherapy East and West “When we are talking about the order and structure of the world, we are talking about the order of our grids.”

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education “grids” = Rorty’s “final vocabularies” “All human beings carry about a set of words which they employ to justify their actions, their beliefs, and their lives…They are the words in which we tell, sometimes prospectively and sometimes retrospectively, the story of our lives. I shall call these words a person’s “final vocabulary.” - Richard Rorty, Contingency, irony, and solidarity, p. 73

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education “I shall define an ‘ironist’ as someone who fulfills three conditions: (1) She has radical and continuing doubts about the final vocabulary she currently uses, because she has been impressed by other vocabularies, vocabularies taken as final by people or books she has encountered;

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education (2) She realizes that argument phrased in her present vocabulary can neither underwrite nor dissolve these doubts;

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education (3) Insofar as she philosophizes about her situation, she does not think that her vocabulary is closer to reality than others, that it is in touch with a power not herself.

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education Ironists who are inclined to philosophize see the choice between vocabularies as made neither within a neutral and universal metavocabulary nor by an attempt to fight one’s way past appearances to the real, but simply by playing the new off against the old.” - Richard Rorty, Contingency, irony, and solidarity, p. 73

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education “I had always thought that we used language to describe the world—now I was seeing that this is not the case. To the contrary, it is through language that we create the world... And when we describe it, we create distinctions that govern our actions. To put it another way, we do not describe the world we see, but we see the world we describe.” -Joseph Jaworski, Synchronicity: The Inner Path of Leadership, p. 2

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education “What, then, is truth? A mobile army of metaphors…” -Nietzsche, On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education The glass through which we each see our world is ground by the metaphors which predispose us to see our selves and our circumstances in a certain way.

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education Metaphors & Facts “[T]he world does not provide us with any criterion of choice between alternative metaphors,…we can only compare languages or metaphors with one another, not with something beyond language called ‘fact’…” -Richard Rorty, Essays on Heidigger and Others, Philosophical Papers, p. 20

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education Just the facts…?

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education “To make sense of the notion of languages corresponding to reality would be to think that we could get outside of our language long enough to compare it with reality. But to say, with Gadamer, that our experience is essentially linguistic is just to say that that cannot be done.” -Richard Rorty, “Hermeneutics, General Studies, and Teaching,” p. 525

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education “[T]he fact that Newton's vocabulary lets us predict the world more easily than Aristotle's does not mean that the world speaks Newtonian. The world does not speak. Only we do.” -Richard Rorty, Contingency, irony, and solidarity, p. 6

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education If Rorty is right in saying that, “[T]rue assertions are simply successful moves in the social practise which Wittgenstein called a ‘language-game,’”* we arrive at our second problem: Problem #2: How are we to assign value to our claims about what is the case? *Richard Rorty, “Hermeneutics, General Studies, and Teaching,” p. 524

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education “[T]here is a middle way between reliance on a God- surrogate and on one’s individual preferences – namely, reliance on the common sense of the community to which one belongs.” “[It] does not greatly matter what the core curriculum is as long as there is one – as long as each community defines itself by adopting one…What matters is that there be some things they all have read and can do, some common subject of conversation…To pick a core curriculum is, therefore, to pick a community – or, better, to decide what sort of community one would like to see come into being.” -Richard Rorty, “Hermeneutics, General Studies, and Teaching,” pp. 527 & 532-3

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education A haunting question… The question that haunts Rorty’s postmodern pragmatism, however, is: How are we to give moral sense and existential depth to our choices among vocabularies, curricula, and communities?

Prepared by Dr. Martin Barlosky, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa EDU 5210: Philosophical Perspectives on Education asked another way… Is irony a sufficient virtue upon which to found a sustainable sense of self and a sustaining sense of community?