ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
Linear Collider Machine Protection Issues M. Palmer Injection System Injector Damping Rings Bunch Compressor and Transfer Sections Main LINAC Beam Delivery.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
ML / RTML WG Summary N.Solyak, K.Kubo, A.Latina AWLC 2014 – Fermilab – May 16, 2014.
8/28/07RTML EDR KOM1 Cornell Plans for RTML EDR Work G. Dugan Cornell LEPP.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
Global Design Effort Dubna, 5 June 2008 Part I of Summary for WG C/D Conveners: Ewan Paterson (SLAC), Nikolay Solyak (FNAL), Andrei Seryi (SLAC), Masao.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Failure modes & Beam loss studies in ILC Bunch compressor and main linac Arun Saini Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory ALCW’15, Tsukuba, KEK, Japan,
The International Linear Collider and the Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics Barry Barish Caltech Lomonosov Conference 20-Aug-2015 ILC.
Simulations Group Summary K. Kubo, D. Schulte, N. Solyak for the beam dynamics working group.
Failure modes & beam loss (discussion) Nikolay Solyak (with input from Nick Walker)
N.Solyak, RTMLALCPG 2009,Albuquerque, Oct.2 1 ILC RTML Upgrade in SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab.
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Emittances Normalised r.m.s. Emittances at Damping Ring Extraction Horizontal Emittance (  m) Vertical Emittance (  m)
N.Solyak, RTMLILC AD&I meeting, DESY, May 28-29, Single-stage Bunch Compressor Nikolay Solyak Fermilab.
GDE Main Linac and RTML Beam Dynamics Conveners: Nikolay Solyak, Cris Adolphsen, Kyioshi Kubo April 20, Room 303, 14:30 – 18:00.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
Design of a one-stage bunch compressor for ILC PAL June Eun-San Kim.
Emittance preservation in the RTML of ILC and CLIC Andrea Latina (CERN) Nikolay Solyak (FNAL) LCWS University of Texas at Arlington - Oct
HINS Linac Simulations : Benchmarking, Jitter and Stripping. Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop.
Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Spin Tracking at the ILC Positron Source with PPS-Sim POSIPOL’11 V.Kovalenko POSIPOL’11 V. Kovalenko 1, G. Moortgat-Pick 1, S. Riemann 2, A. Ushakov 1.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Some Aspects on Compton Scheme Positron Source Study Wanming Liu ANL Tsunehiko OMORI KEK.
Baseline Technical Review – Central Region Accelerator Systems
Dark Current and Radiation Shielding Studies for the ILC Main Linac
Estimate AC power for TeV Upgrade
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Status and Plan of GDE Design Work (Including Road Map for RDR)
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Update on Dark current generation in ILC Main Linac
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini

Damping Rings Polarised electron source Polarised positron source Ring to Main Linac (RTML) e- Main Linac (incl. bunch compressor Beam Delivery System (BDS) & physics detectors e+ Main Linac (incl. bunch compressor) Beam dump ILC schematics N. Walker ILC PAC TDR review 2 Total length (500 GeV) 30.5 km SCRF ML (RTML) 22.2 km RTML_BC 2.8 km Positron source 1.1 km BDS / IR 4.5 km Damping Rings 3.2 km

Outline Discussion of Discrepancies between EDMS Lattice and TDR lattice of Bunch Compressor An Insight view of Bunch compressor section ( BC1 to BC2) –Tracking nominal bunch (3sigma); acceptance plot –Aperture limitations.Beam losses at Wiggler in BC1 even for nominal operation during tracking of 4sigma (Gaussian). List of critical failure modes under studies –Discussion of a case of RF Phase errors in Bunch Compressor (BC1) section. 3

Bunch Compressor : EDMS lattice vs. TDR Lattice EDMS Lattice is received from M.Woodley. TDR lattice was used for studies published in TDR report. 4 ParametersEDMS LatticeTDR Lattice BC1 startBC2 startBC2 EndBC1 startBC2 startBC2 end dp/p, % σ z, mm E (GeV) Grad/RF Phase (MV/m)/ deg 18.0 / / / / Total Length

Nominal operation of BC 5 Longitudinal Phase Space Transverse Beam Size (x,y) Lost Particles Tracking of 4 sigma Gaussian Distribution of Beam results in Beam losses at Wiggler in BC1 Horizontal aperture/ radius of wiggler magnets is 12.7 mm ? (should be X/Y = 400mm x 25mm) Transverse Beam Size (x,y) Longitudinal acceptance Lost

Topics Under Studies: Failure Modes In order to understand single bunch loss scenarios we need to study different failure modes and to quantify their severity at critical locations: Failure Modes in Bunch Compressor and Main Linac : –RF Phase and Amplitude Errors –Magnet failure –BPM and steering magnets failure 6

A Case Study: RF Phase errors in BC1-(1) 7 RF Phases in all cavities in BC1 are changed from deg to 0 0 degree. Complete beam is lost at wiggler magnet at 56 m in BC1. RMS Transverse beam size at lost location :  x = 262  m  y 6.1  m. Beam power density is lower than critical power density. Lost Particles

A Case Study: RF Phase errors in BC1-(2) 8 RF Phases in all cavities in BC1 are changed from deg to degree. Majority of particles are lost in BC1. RMS Transverse beam size at lost location :  x = 523  m  y 7.8  m. Beam power density is lower than critical power density. Lost Particles

A Case Study: RF Phase errors in BC1-(3) 9 Longitudinal Phase Space when RF Phases in Cavities are 0 0 Longitudinal Phase Space when RF Phases in Cavities are Longitudinal phase space of the beam just before beam get lost

Summary and next steps Need to update Bunch compressor lattice files in EDMS database –M. Woodley will update BC1&BC2 lattices, incl. apertures –Treaty point before between RTML and ML (BC) –Sergei Seletskiy will perform update in BC2 and extraction dump lines (not highest priority) Extensive studies are required to understand criticality of failure modes. It will help –To quantify various failure modes in terms of their severity –To design better Machine Protection System Different scenario of dark current generation in CM is completed (reported). Fluka model of CM will start next (with help of KEK (and SLAC/ M.Santano) 10