The Oakes Test THE MOST IMPORTANT CASE YOU WILL LEARN THIS YEAR!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Violating The Charter II CLN4U. Charter Violations If an individual feels their rights have been violated, the onus is on the individual to prove this.
Advertisements

Criminal Law: Statutory Presumptions and the Presumption of Innocence Week of October 2, 2007.
Motorcycle helmets an election issue for Sikhs Article.
1 CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 Some Notable Features. 2 PART I CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS  Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize.
J URISDICTION, E NFORCEMENT, AND G UARANTEE Charter defines the relationship between people, organizations,and companies in Canada and the government.
EVEN THOUGH THE CHARTER IS THE HIGHEST LAW, CAN IT STILL BE CHALLENGED AND CHANGED?
Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), 2002
Comparative protection of rights approach with another country.
CHAOULLI V. QUEBEC (AG), CASE SUMMARY WAIT TIMES QUEBEC’S HEALTH INSURANCE ACT (s.15) QUEBEC’S HOSPITAL INSURANCE ACT (s.11) VIOLATION OF QUEBEC’S.
Understanding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Limitations Criticisms.
EUTHANASIA IN CANADA John Keown MA DPhil PhD DCL Kennedy Institute of Ethics IBC41.
Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law The Role of Law in a Democratic Society.
APPLYING THE CHARTER.   What would society be like if we were allowed to do and say anything we like?  Irony– there are mechanisms in place to ensure.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Limitations to the Charter
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms Douglas Brown Pol Sci 220 January 2010.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Class 7 – September CANADA: Limitations on Rights and Proportionality.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Anthony Antonacci PPAL 6100 March 24,  The Facts:  David Edwin Oakes was found in possession of 8 vials of hashish oil and $ and was charged.
 Many laws were “common law” (unwritten and thought to be understood)  Many rights were abused during WWII, so after the War, rights were written down.
Should the government be able to tell you what to wear?
What The Charter Says. Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it.
The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms Law 120 Ms. Nicholson
The Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms. THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION AND THE CHARTER Charter was entrenched in the Constitution with the passage of.
Charter Cases Test Review. Reasonable Limits: No right or freedom can be absolute. There must be limits (covered in Section 1 of the charter). The person.
Canadian Constitutional Law Section B: November 19, 2011 Judicial Decisions on the Charter of Rights Course Director: Ian Greene.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Chapter 4 Page 92.
90 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 90 Background The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was entrenched (safeguarded) in the Canadian.
Various International Branches Human Rights Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Rights Freedoms Public Law (Criminal Code) United Nations United Nations.
Rights and Responsibilities
THE CHARTER:. R v. Oakes pg. 39 Question One Oakes was charged with the unlawful possession of a narcotic for the purpose of trafficking.
THE CHARTER: Lesson One. History of the Charter Before 1982, Canada had the Canadian Bill of Rights. Although it was a step in the right direction, the.
Canadian Bill of Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Constitutional review The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Human Rights Protection.
Rights, Freedoms, and Responsibilities Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
THE OAKES TEST 1. “….protects rights by ensuring that the government cannot limit rights without justification. Also, the Charter’s rights are not absolute.
Various International Branches Human Rights Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Rights Freedoms Public Law (Criminal Code) United Nations United Nations.
2.5 Resolving Infringement of the Charter
REGINA V OAKES [1986] 6/4/2018.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Judicial Interpretation
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 1 of the Charter & the Oakes Test
THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
Limitations to the Charter
CLU3M Unit 2 Rights and Freedoms
Your Rights.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
Part B: Charter Case Analysis
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Resolving Infringements of the Charter
INS AND OUTS OF THE CCRF.
Charter case study #1. Charter case study #1 This is a little review…
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 1 Reasonable Limits
The Oakes Test Revisited:
Part B: Charter Case Analysis
Section 1 Reasonable Limits
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 1 of the Charter & the Oakes Test
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
LET’S FLY THROUGH THE CHARTER
Universal Declaration of Human Rights!
Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND THE COURTS
Presentation transcript:

The Oakes Test THE MOST IMPORTANT CASE YOU WILL LEARN THIS YEAR!

The Oakes Test 1. Does the law/issue enforce an important government objective? 2. Does the law set clear and precise standards? 3. Are the person/accused's rights minimized as little as possible?

Section 1 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. What does this mean? What does this mean?

Section 1 Your rights in the Charter are guaranteed to you under the reasonable limits that are set out in Canadian law Your rights in the Charter are guaranteed to you under the reasonable limits that are set out in Canadian law The test to determine if the purpose is demonstrably justifiable is set out in the “Oakes Test” The test to determine if the purpose is demonstrably justifiable is set out in the “Oakes Test” The test is applied once the claimant has proven that one of the provisions of the Charter has been violated The test is applied once the claimant has proven that one of the provisions of the Charter has been violated The onus is on the Crown to pass the Oakes Test The onus is on the Crown to pass the Oakes Test

The Oakes Test There must be a pressing and substantial objective There must be a pressing and substantial objective This step asks whether the Government’s objective in limiting the Charter protected right is a pressing and substantial objective according to the values of a free and democratic society This step asks whether the Government’s objective in limiting the Charter protected right is a pressing and substantial objective according to the values of a free and democratic society

The Oakes Test The means must be proportional The means must be proportional The means must be rationally connected to the objective The means must be rationally connected to the objective This step asks whether the legislation’s limitation of the Charter right has a rational connection to Parliament’s objective. The means used must be carefully designed to achieve the objective. They must not be arbitrary, unfair, or based on irrational considerations. This step asks whether the legislation’s limitation of the Charter right has a rational connection to Parliament’s objective. The means used must be carefully designed to achieve the objective. They must not be arbitrary, unfair, or based on irrational considerations.

The Oakes Test The means must be proportional The means must be proportional There must be minimal impairment of rights There must be minimal impairment of rights Does the legislative means to achieve the objective impair the Charter protected right in question as minimally as possible? Are there alternative modes of furthering Parliament’s objective that infringe the right to a lesser extent? Does the legislative means to achieve the objective impair the Charter protected right in question as minimally as possible? Are there alternative modes of furthering Parliament’s objective that infringe the right to a lesser extent?

The Oakes Test The means must be proportional The means must be proportional 1. There must be proportionality between the infringement and objective This step asks whether the objective is proportional to the effect of the law. Are the measures that are responsible for limiting the Charter right proportional to the objective? Does the benefit to be derived from the legislation outweigh the seriousness of the infringement? This step asks whether the objective is proportional to the effect of the law. Are the measures that are responsible for limiting the Charter right proportional to the objective? Does the benefit to be derived from the legislation outweigh the seriousness of the infringement?