Georgia DFCS Outcome- Based Permanency Initiative A Proposal to Introduce Performance- Based Contracting and Partner for CFSR Success.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

Expedited Family Reunification Project
Co-Occurring Service Array Psychiatric Evaluation Medication Monitoring Clinical Consultation Family Therapy Individual Therapy / Individual Therapy-Crisis.
Breastfeeding: A WIC Priority
Care Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
Support Services Webinar Presenter: Walker E. Solomon II. Michelle Farrington, TaJuanna Taylor Presentation to: Regional Accounting Staff, DFCS Contract.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
  Shane’s Story.
Katie A. Agreement Child Welfare and Mental Health working together will provide:  Intensive home and community based mental health services to children.
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Sacramento County RBS Reform Structure and Process March 2009.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Chapter 257 of the Acts of 2008 Provider Information & Dialogue Session: DMH.
Department of Child Services, Services and Outcomes 1/19/15.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
Treatment Parents and Therapists: working together to help children Utah Youth Village Talon Greeff.
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency An Overview.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
Northern Virginia Crisis Stabilization Services for Children and Youth Status Report Regional Partnership Meeting November 19, 2010.
1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
1 What does your Provider Organization need to know and get ready for DFCS Opportunities?
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY14 1 st and 2 nd Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the rights of neglected and abused children. I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #2 Models and Levels of Care.
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
A NEW RESOURCE FOR RECONNECTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX AND ENDURING NEEDS Residentially Based Services.
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY15 1 st and 2 nd Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
Managing Residential Care to Improve Permanency Outcomes Presented by: Dr. Peter Mendelson, Chief, Bureau of Behavioral Health and Medicine, DCF Lori Szczygiel,
Questions & Answers about Extending Foster Care to Age 21 THP-Plus Institute November 8, 2010 Oakland, CA.
Georgia DFCS Performance- Based Contracting Partnership through Accountability Goal 1 - Safety 1.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Child Welfare Title IV-E Waivers. Parental Substance Abuse and Child Maltreatment: Evaluation Results from the NH IV-E Waiver Project Glenda Kaufman Kantor,
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY14 3 rd and 4 th Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
Los Angeles County Proposed RBS Demonstration Project RBS Forum Sacramento, CA September 4/5, 2008.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
Adoption Selection: Caseworker, Local or Central Committee Developed by Portland State University Center for Improvement of Child and Family Services Child.
CIVIL COMMITMENT: Network Service Provider Responsibilities.
FOSTER CARE SERVICES Replicating Hope for Children Prepared by Wes Salsbury Foster Care Replication Committee.
1 OPUOM Office of Provider Utilization and Outcome Management.
Georgia DFCS Performance-Based Contracting Online Reporting Requirements Overview Presenters: Catrecia Stokes, DHS, DFCS, OPUOM Dawn Reed, Care Solutions,
1 Mayview Regional Service Area Planning Process Stakeholder’s Meeting February 15, 2008.
Provider Summit: Preparing for Tomorrow Today Promoting shared responsibility through the outcomes-focused purchasing of evidence-based services.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Safe Families for Children Safe Families for Children
How to Survive A RCCL Relicensure Tanya Coleman, MSW Specialist Surveyor Supervisor Stronger Families for a Stronger Georgia February/March 2016.
In “it” for the money? Financing Child Safety, Permanency, and Well-being January 2014.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ken Berrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seneca Center for Children and Families
STRONG FAMILIES SELF- SUFFICENT STABLE RELIANT SUPPORTIVE.
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Presentation transcript:

Georgia DFCS Outcome- Based Permanency Initiative A Proposal to Introduce Performance- Based Contracting and Partner for CFSR Success

Goals of Project  Improve performance on CFSR outcomes related to reunification and permanency for children in foster care  Broaden the availability of intensive home-based programming across the state  Provide community partners with more opportunities to share in the responsibility and reward of accomplishing critical initiatives  Introduce performance-based concepts through an optional annex to current RBWO contracts

Service Array Participants should provide document an array of services to youth and their community-based resource (family,kinship, etc) with a goal of permanency. These services should include, but are not limited to:  Family counseling  Individual counseling  School-based reintegration activities  Crisis intervention services  Case management activities as indicated  Aftercare service coordination as indicated

Minimum Standards All children participating in this program must be approved by the Office of Provider Utilization and Outcomes Management Complete a social history for all youth and family members associated with the identified placement to ensure the appropriateness of the placement Develop an individualized unification and permanency plan based on the assessment results and the youth, families and DFCS Case Manager’s input. Each barrier to reunification in the assessment should be addressed in order to ensure safety and successful transition

Minimum Standards cont. Submit copies of the assessment and the developed Permanency Plan to the DFCS Case Manager Staff to client ratio of no greater than 1:6 with staff possessing a masters degree or bachelors degree plus two years experience working with emotionally troubled youth and their families Supervisor to staff ratio of no greater than 1:4 with supervisors possessing a masters degree or bachelors degree plus three years working with emotionally troubled youth and their families A licensed clinical professional must provide consultative oversight to all therapeutic services provided to the family

Minimum Standards cont. 24/7 on-call availability clients No fewer than three successful over-night home visits must occur prior to permanent step-down After permanent step-down has occurred there must be a minimum of two face to face visits per week with the youth and family. Attendance at all court dates related to the client Participation in all Family Team Meetings Coordination of monthly visitation with siblings and parents

Reporting and Evaluation Provide a monthly report to the case manager which documents the services provided and outlines progress made and continuing barriers to permanency. Provide a monthly report to OPUOM which outlines raw data related to the population being served and outlines progress made and continuing barriers to reunification. Services should result in at least 70% of accepted children be placed in a permanent living environment and that 80% of those children remain stable at the six-month anniversary of their discharge from the program. Outcomes will be tracked by the Provider Utilization and Outcomes Management Unit of DFCS and reviewed with all providers during monthly G meetings.

Incentive-Based Payments Providers are paid performance incentives as they reach certain benchmarks. Calculation of performance incentives is determined by extended budgeted expenses over expected length of stay and adjusting up for risk. Averages are based on review of similar programs in other states. Based on anticipated average expenses of $72.50 per day. Expected length of participation in the program is contingent upon the anticipated barriers to reunification. Older children with longer lengths of care will be given greater consideration with respect to risk.

Option 1 Children 13+ years of age who have been in custody 24+ months 5 mos transition work = $11,020 6 mos post transition work = $13,224 3 mos post discharge tracking =$1,200 ________________________________________________ Total cost per case $25,444 Include 35% risk adjustment brings total possible revenue per case to $34,349.

Option 2 All children not meeting option 1 criteria 3 mos transition work = $6,612 5 mos post transition work = $11,020 3 mos post discharge tracking =$1,200 ________________________________________________ Total cost per case $19,014 Include 30% risk adjustment brings total possible revenue per case to $24,718

Performance Benchmarks Providers are paid performance incentives as they reach benchmarks along a timeline. Once a benchmark is reached a performance incentive is awarded for that achievement. The awarded revenue is retained even if progress stalls or Regression occurs. The benchmarks are as follows:  Payment 1 – Step-down to permanent placement (enrollment in school, parental supervision and safety plan submitted)  Payment 2 – Discharge (school or vocational attendance 80% of the time during the past 30 days, zero incidents of serious physical aggression in the last 30 days)  Payment 3 – 90 days post-discharge

Payment Schedule Option 2  Payment 1 - $7,000  Payment 2 – $12,000  Payment 3 - $6,000 _______________________ Total $25,000 Option 1  Payment 1 - $12,000  Payment 2 – $14,000  Payment 3 - $9,000 _______________________ Total $35,000

Discussion Questions?