Comparison of energy loss formalisms Marco van Leeuwen, UU TECHQM meeting LBNL, 15-16 Dec 2008.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Π 0 production in Cu+Au at PHENIX Sarah Campbell for the PHENIX Collaboration Sept 23, 2014 Hot Quarks Sarah Campbell -- Hot Quarks

Advertisements

W. A. Horowitz Quark Matter 2005 A Promising Solution to the Elliptic Quench Puzzle at RHIC William A. Horowitz Columbia University August 4-5, 2005.

TJH: ISMD 2005, 8/9-15 Kromeriz, Czech Republic TJH: 1 Experimental Results at RHIC T. Hallman Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD Kromeriz, Czech Republic.

Effects of minijet degradation on hadron observables in heavy-ion collisions Lilin Zhu Sichuan University QPT2013, Chengdu.

Recombination for JET Shower MC: Status and Discussion Rainer Fries Texas A&M University JET NLO & MC Meeting Wayne State University, August 23, 2013 On.

References to Study the New Matter. Study QGP in different Centrality Most Central events (highest multiplicity), e.g. top 5% central, i.e. 5% of the.

Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.

M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy quark energy loss puzzle at RHIC Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University.

Quark recombination in high energy collisions for different energies Steven Rose Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mentor: Dr. Rainer Fries Texas A&M University.

High-p T spectra and correlations from Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions in STAR Marco van Leeuwen, LBNL for the STAR collaboration.

We distinguish two hadronization mechanisms:  Fragmentation Fragmentation builds on the idea of a single quark in the vacuum, it doesn’t consider many.

#: 1... and your jet energy loss calculation? What drives you? aka Perturbative jet energy loss mechanisms: Learning from RHIC, extrapolating to LHC Simon.

Oana Catu, Yale University for the STAR Collaboration Quark Matter 2008, February 4-10, Jaipur, India System size dependence of dihadron correlations and.

Single & Dihadron Suppression at RHIC and LHC Xin-Nian Wang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Last call for prediction for LHC, CERN, May 29-June 2,2007.

Centrality-dependent pt spectra of Direct photons at RHIC F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner.

WWND 03/13/06 N Grau1 Jet Correlations from PHENIX Focus entirely on A+A collisions High-trigger p T correlations –Can we do jet tomography? Low-trigger.

Radiative energy loss Marco van Leeuwen, Utrecht University.

STAR Back-to-Back Di-Jet Triggered Multi-Hadron Correlations as Medium Probes in STAR Back-to-Back Di-Jet Triggered Multi-Hadron Correlations as Medium.

Interaction between jets and dense medium in heavy-ion collisions Rudolph C. Hwa University of Oregon TsingHua University, Beijing, China May 4, 2009.

Status of the TECHQM ‘brick problem’ Marco van Leeuwen, Utrecht University.

Marco van Leeuwen, Marta Verweij, Utrecht University Energy loss in a realistic geometry.

A NLO Analysis on Fragility of Dihadron Tomography in High Energy AA Collisions I.Introduction II.Numerical analysis on single hadron and dihadron production.

Steffen A. RHIC #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The Protons Puzzle at RHIC - the demise of pQCD? Recombination.

Heavy-to-light ratios as a test of medium-induced energy loss at RHIC and the LHC N. Armesto Quark Matter 2005: 18th International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic.

Anomaly of over ratios in Au+Au collision with jet quenching Xiaofang Chen IOPP, CCNU Collaborator: Enke Wang Hanzhong Zhang Benwei Zhang Beijing Mar.

What can we learn from/about QCD energy loss? (From an experimentalists point of view) Marco van Leeuwen, Utrecht University TECHQM meeting, 6-10 July.

High-p T results from ALICE Marco van Leeuwen, Utrecht University, for the ALICE collaboration.

7/7/09 William Horowitz WHDG Brick and Comparing WHDG to ASW-SH William Horowitz The Ohio State University July 7, 2009 With many thanks to Brian Cole,

1 Search for the Effects of the QCD Color Factor in High-Energy Collisions at RHIC Bedanga Mohanty LBNL  Motivation  Color Factors  Search for Color.

Jet energy loss at RHIC and LHC including collisional and radiative and geometric fluctuations Simon Wicks, QM2006 Work done with Miklos Gyulassy, William.

1 A NLO Analysis on Fragility of Dihadron Tomography in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Enke Wang Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University.

Di-parton probes of hot QCD matter Marco van Leeuwen, LBNL.

Comparing energy loss models Marco van Leeuwen Utrecht University What have we learned from the TECHQM brick problem? With many contributions from TEHCQM.

Nuclear Many-Body Physics at High Energies: from Fixed Target Experiments to the EIC Ivan Vitev T-2, Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Steffen A. BassDynamics of Hadronization #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The baryon puzzle at RHIC Recombination + Fragmentation.

Kang Seog Lee Chonnam National University, Korea Dynamical Recombination model of QGP Introduction – recombination model Dynamic recomination calculation.

Inclusive Diffraction at HERA Marcella Capua – INFN and Calabria University Small X and Diffraction FNAL Chicago (USA) 17 – 20 September 2003 on behalf.

Francesco Noferini Bologna University Erice, Italy 31 st August 2006 Two-particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC.

Probing the properties of dense partonic matter at RHIC Y. Akiba (RIKEN) for PHENIX collaboration.

Direct photon production in heavy-ion collisions Ben-Wei Zhang T-16, Los Alamos National Laboratory Collaborator: Ivan Vitev.

Third TECHQM Collaboration Meeting, CERN July 6-10, 2009 Xin-Nian Wang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The Brick Problem in High-Twist Approximation.

Jet modifications at RHIC Marco van Leeuwen, Utrecht University.

Lecture II: spectra and di-hadrons

Jet Jet Tomography of Hot & Dense Matter Xin-Nian Wang LBNL, June 25, 2003.

Parton energy loss Marco van Leeuwen. 2 Hard probes of QCD matter Use ‘quasi-free’ partons from hard scatterings to probe ‘quasi-thermal’ QCD matter Interactions.

Near-side  correlations of high-p t hadrons from STAR Jörn Putschke for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Weisshorn (4505m),

Hydrodynamic Flow from Fast Particles Jorge Casalderrey-Solana. E. V. Shuryak, D. Teaney SUNY- Stony Brook.

Jet Hadronization in Vacuum and in the Medium Rainer Fries Texas A&M University Quark Matter 2015 Kobe, September 28, 2015 With Kyongchol Han Che Ming.

Comparing energy loss phenomenology Marco van Leeuwen Utrecht University.

Enke Wang (Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University) I.Jet Quenching in QCD-based Model II.Jet Quenching in High-Twist pQCD III.Jet Tomography.

12/16/08 William Horowitz TECHQM 2 nd Workshop, LBNL 1 DGLV : M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A733, 265 (2004) [nucl-th/ ] WHDG : S. Wicks,

Heavy quark energy loss in hot and dense nuclear matter Shanshan Cao In Collaboration with G.Y. Qin, S.A. Bass and B. Mueller Duke University.

Production of strange particles at RHIC via quark recombination C.B. Yang Institute of Particle Physics, Wuhan, China Collaborated with Rudolph C. Hwa.

M. Djordjevic 1 Light and heavy flavor phenomenology at RHIC and LHC Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade, University of Belgrade.

M. Djordjevic 1 Suppression and energy loss in Quark-Gluon Plasma Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade, University of Belgrade.

12/12/05William Horowitz Heavy Flavor Productions Workshop Role of Dynamic Geometry in Jet Tomography William Horowitz Columbia University December 12,

Duke University 野中千穂 Hadron production in heavy ion collision: Fragmentation and recombination in Collaboration with R. J. Fries (Duke), B. Muller (Duke),

Prospects for understanding energy loss in hot nuclear matter

Jet shape & jet cross section: from hadrons to nuclei

High-pT results from ALICE

Status of the TECHQM ‘brick problem’

Energy loss in a realistic geometry

tt+jets simulation comparisons

Hadron Suppression and Nuclear kT Enhancement Studied with Neutral Pions from p+C, p+Pb, and Pb+Pb Collisions at sNN = 17.3 GeV Quark Matter 2006.

Comparing energy loss models

From Particle Data Book

of Hadronization in Nuclei

Energy Loss in the Hot QCD Brick I

用重味探测夸克胶子等离子体 Heavy Flavor as a Probe of Quark-Gluon Plasma

QGP Formation Signals and Quark Recombination Model

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of energy loss formalisms Marco van Leeuwen, UU TECHQM meeting LBNL, Dec 2008

2 TECHQM `Brick Problem’ Idea: define a few ‘model systems’ to compare different calculational approaches Fixed-length homogeneous ‘brick’ of QGP: L = 2 fm, L = 5 fm Explore parton energy dependence: E = 10 GeV, E = 100 GeV (quarks) Compare models at ‘comparable phenomenology’, i.e. fixed  E/E (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4) Calculate P(  E) and P(N gluon ) (partial) results available for: WHDG/GLV, ASW/BDMPS, AMY, Higher Twist, YaJEM Note: not all models calculate P(  E)

3 Comparing P(  E) Note importance of P(0) Continuous part of P(  E) more sharply peaked for WHDG-GLV ASW-GLV and WHDG-GLV are different Due to treatment of  E/E →1? Are these differences significant?

4 L-dependence Increase L at constant : continuous part increases; peak at small values Difference WHDG-ASW persists

5 Energy-dependence Increase energy: reduces P(0), importance of  E/E → 1 Difference WHDG and ASW reduced at 100 GeV?

6 Simple folding (only ‘loss term’): Artefact in KKP parametrisation Towards phenomenology: fragmentation functions E = 10 GeV, WHDG steeper than ASW (reflects different P(  E) E = 100 GeV: shapes similar, normalisation difference?

7 Next steps Compare to other formalisms (Higher twist, AMY, YaJEM) Compare at same medium density? Calculate R AA, I AA,  -jet Use more realistic geometry Immediate future: Strategy towards future: and/or To discuss in TECHQM