Adam Para, Fermilab, February 16, 2010 1. Who Cares? What is the Problem? 2 Dual Readout Total Absorption calorimeter has very good energy resolution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NUCP 2371 Radiation Measurements II
Advertisements

High Resolution Hadron Calorimetry with Dual Readout Adam Para, Fermilab Trends in Photon Detectors, Trieste, June 3, 2008.
Neutron detectors and spectrometers 1) Complicated reactions → strong dependency of efficiency on energy 2) Small efficiency → necessity of large volumes.
Adam Para, October 14, 2005 First look at PFA/clustering with RPC-based calorimeter Progress Report.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Adam Para, Fermilab, March 23, Methodology  Use Hadr01 example  In G4SteppingVerbose::StepInfo() select all the steps with inelastic processes.
Particle interactions and detectors
Detection of Gamma-Rays and Energetic Particles
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Analysis report th. Friday H.Yim To apply efficiency correction on the data spectrum, DEMONS code is investigated and modified.
Nuclear Physics Lesson 13
Results from PHENIX on deuteron and anti- deuteron production in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Joakim Nystrand University of Bergen for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Search for spontaneous muon emission from lead nuclei with OPERA bricks M. Giorgini, V. Popa Bologna Group OPERA Collaboration Meeting, LNGS, 19-22/05/2003.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
Tests of scintillators CsI, CsI(Na), BGO, NaI(Tl) CsI(Tl)
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
Simulation of the DHCAL Prototype Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory American Linear Collider Workshop: Ithaca, NY, July , 2003 Fe absorber Glass.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
Sep. 26 tt, 2013 Hans Wenzel: 18 th Geant 4 Collaboration Meeting, Seville 1 Using Geant4 to predict properties and performance of future high-precision.
Cherenkov radiation and Cherenkov detectors in the Cherenkov laboratory A.S.Belousov Lebedev Physical Instirute Russian Academy of sciences Report on the.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
ALCPG October 25 th 2007 Hans Wenzel Calorimetry in slic How-to Motivation for dual readout Calorimeter What are our requirements Why did we choose SLIC.
Planar Dual Readout Calorimetry Studies Progress Report G. Mavromanoulakis, A. Para, N. Saoulidou, H. Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu,Fermilab Tianchi Zhao, University.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Adam Para, Krzysztof Genser, Hans Wenzel,Fermilab ALCPG, Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
The photon A “particle” of light A “quantum” of light energy The energy of a given photon depends on the frequency (color) of the light.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
Study of Sampling Fractions Shin-Shan Yu, A P, Hans Wenzel, October 18, 2006.
Medical Imaging Radiation I. Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century (Paperback)by Bettyann Kevles Bettyann Kevles E=mc2: A Biography.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
proton mass, m p = x kg = u neutron mass, m n = x kg = u electron mass, m e = x 10.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Monday, Oct. 16, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Monday, Oct. 16, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Total Electron.
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
Some remarks on (mis)identification: separation of pions from electrons Answer the question of the feasibility of p_bar p  e + e - Answer the question.
David Argento (some aspects of) cosmogenic nuclide production.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
18-23 July 2006J. Hauptman Vancouver LCW06 4th Calorimeter Plans (or dual readout is wonderful, but what are its problems) 1. Electrons and photons limited.
Calibration of uniformity between LYSO crystals Zhigang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS The Third International Workshop on the High.
1 Calorimetry studies for future lepton colliders Andrea Delgado, Texas A&M University SIST Program Final Presentation, Fermilab August 2013.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Spallation Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
E. Auffrey, A.Benaglia, P. Lecoq, M. Lucchini, A.Para CALOR 2016, D AEGU, R EPUBLICK OF K OREA May 19, 2016 Also TICAL ERC Grant, P. Lecoq et al.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Electromagnetic Physics Working Group discussion
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Where are we? What do we want to do next? Some thoughts
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Content Heavy ion reactions started fragmenting nuclei in the 1980’s. Its study taught us that nuclear matter has liquid and gaseous phases, phase.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Testbeam comparisons arXiv:
Dual-Readout Calorimeter: DREAM
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
proton mass, mp neutron mass, mn electron mass, me
Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

Adam Para, Fermilab, February 16,

Who Cares? What is the Problem? 2 Dual Readout Total Absorption calorimeter has very good energy resolution. This is true because the correlation between S and C is very good. We have used S (scintilation) proportional to I (ionization energy loss). What are possible pitfalls or shortcomings of the simulation?

Possible Broadening of the Correlation due to Birks Saturation?  Any effect which, for example, would induce additional fluctuations of the amount of the observed scintillation light, while keeping the amount of Cherenkov light unchanged.  Birks suppression is a potential source of such fluctuations  Need to evaluate this effect and understand its possible contribution to the energy resolution  How would these fluctuations come about? 3 Heavily ionizing particles produce less light

Scintillation Light from Hadron Showers  Scintillation light in hadron showers is produced primarily by:  Electrons  Pions  Protons  Heavy nuclear fragments  Light produced by heavy fragments and very slow protons is suppressed  Heavy fragments are always slow, hence heavily suppressed  Protons can have a wide spectrum of energies 4

Birks Suppression 5 Using the Birks constant for BGO: electrons – full scintillation down to ~50 keV, 40% at 10 keV protons – full scintillation above 100 MeV, ~80% at 10 MeV, ~ 20% at 1 MeV deuterons - slightly more suppressed than protons Caveat: Birks suppression is material dependent. In general not measured for crystals, yet. We should make the measurements for relevant crystals.

Hadron Showers: Where does the Energy go? Take 10 GeV  - (MCNPX) 6

Shower Energy Deposition  Mostly electrons  Protons  Pions  Protons are mostly non- relativistic, but they have quite a wide spread of energies  Pions are mostly relativistic (not shown here) 7

Ionization Energy Breakdown  0, 10 GeV  -, 10 GeV  -, 100 GeV electrons pions protons  < <  < <  <  > Deuterons tritons He Heavy ions

The Ionization Energy Breakdown, Hadron Showers  Electrons – 50% -> 66% (10 – 100 GeV pions)  Pions – 14% -> 9%  Heavy ions ~ 4%  Protons – 16% -> 11% Ionization energy of pions and electrons is fully converted to scintillation Heavy ions contribute rather small fraction of the ionization energy and they are all heavily suppressed Protons are the biggest (after electrons) contributor to the ionization energy. They have broad energy distribution, hence a distribution of the suppression factors. It is important to check the simulation of the nucleons in the hadronic cascades. 9

This was all using MCNPX. But we use GEANT. What does GEANT do with hadronic showers?? 10

Nucleons, Part I: Production Spectra  Nucleons ejected from the nuclei as a result of the hadron-nucleus interaction belong to two clases:  evaporation nucleons (a.k.a. black tracks) with typical energies of few MeV  Spallation nucleons (a.k.a. grey tracks) with broad energy distribution, mean energy ~145 MeV  Sunanda is comparing the spectra and the numbers of nucleons produced in simulated hadron-nucleus interactions in GEANT with the emulsion data (in progress) 11

Nucleons, Part II: What does GEANT do with them? Low Energy Protons 12 Very low energy protons range out and they deposit their entire kinetic energy as ionization

Nucleons, Part II: What does GEANT do with them? Medium Energy Protons 13 Medium energy protons, above 200 MeV start to interact with nuclei. Most of the time some of their energy is lost (binding energy, presumably). Sometimes there is some ~140 MeV of additional energy. What is it???

Nucleons, Part II: What does GEANT do with them? Low Energy Neutrons 14 Very low energy neutrons seem to be getting some 8 MeV of additional energy.. At somewhat higher energy they interact with nuclei and some of the energy may be ‘lost’

Nucleons, Part II: What does GEANT do with them? Medium Energy Neutrons 15 Medium energy neutrons are similar to protons. They interact more with nuclei and have more of binding energy losses (no Coulomb barrier!). Thay do seem to have additional 8 MeV of energy. And, as protons, there are ocassional gains of 140 MeV

Instead of Conclusions  There is quite some work to be done to gain the full confidence in the correctness of the GEANT simulation 16