Sketched-Truss Recognition Tutoring System: Improved Student Learning through Active Learning and Immediate Student Feedback, NSF DUE-0942400, 3/10-2/13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confidential - Pearson © 2009 Pearson & The University of Alabama.
Advertisements

Project Lead The Way For Fremont Junior High School.
Classroom Assessment Techniques for Early Alert of Students At Risk Carleen Vande Zande, Ph.D. Academic Leaders Workshop.
Gifted and Talented Education (G.A.T.E.)
Teaching Freshman Calculus-Based Physics Using the LOGIC Model Amin Jazaeri, Ph.D. COS Science Accelerator & School of Physics, Astronomy and Computational.
Evaluation of the Impacts of Math Course Placement Improvement Achieved through a Summer Bridge Program John R. Reisel, Leah Rineck, Marissa Jablonski,
Global Enterprise Technology - Curriculum Workshop School of Information Studies Syracuse University D. Christopher Kayes, PhD Associate Professor of Management.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Design for Engineering Unit 2 Engineering Design and Problem Solving Annette Beattie April 10, 2006 Engineering Design ETP 2006 – Annette Beattie This.
Evaluating Online Tutorials for Data Structures and Algorithms Courses June 24, Simin Hall, PhD Mechanical Engineering Prof. Clifford A. Shaffer,
This presentation and its materials are based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement Number HRD Any.
Faculty Workshops Series
Network Routing Algorithms Patricia Desire Marconi Academy, CPS IIT Research Mentor: Tricha Anjali This material is based upon work supported by the National.
Jill Snyder The Wheatlands Elementary School Oswego CUSD #308 IIT Research Mentor: Dr. Cindy Hood This material is based upon work supported by the National.
Network Routing Algorithms Patricia Désiré Marconi Academy, CPS IIT Research Mentor: Dr. Tricha Anjali This material is based upon work supported by the.
SEAS Acad Mtg – 8/26/03Prof. Frank Sciulli Introduction - Physics SEAS Academic Meeting l Intro: Frank Sciulli – Professor in the Physics Dept. u Lecturing.
TABLE 1: Comparison of scores from the year the immediate feedback format was used to the previous year when multi-format exams were used. * p < 0.05 compared.
Hybrid Fuel Cell Vehicles Followup Bob Thomas, Stephen Ha, Walter Kondratko IIT RET team This material is based upon work supported by the National Science.
T. Stevens, G. Harris, Z. Aguirre-Munoz, and L. Cobbs Southern Right Delta (ΣΡΔ'09) Gordons Bay, South Africa, December 3, 2009.
Engineering Design Process ETP 2005 – Brian Vance This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No
Systems Engineer An engineer who specializes in the implementation of production systems This material is based upon work supported by the National Science.
FAMA COLLEGE Private provider of Higher Education in Kosovo The institution commenced its activity from 2003/04 academic year active students
Sketching Technique ETP 2005 – Dan Houston This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Any opinions,
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,
Engineering Design By Brian Nettleton This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Any opinions,
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Understanding of the fundamentals ◦ By the end of the class, 70% of the students will be able to:  Correctly draw freebody diagrams of 2D truss structures.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
Being Smart with Graphs This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL Any opinions, findings,
Data Management for Large STEP Projects Michigan State University & Lansing Community College NSF STEP PI Meeting March 15, 2012 Workshop Session I-08.
Numerical Methods Part: Simpson Rule For Integration.
University “Politehnica” of Bucharest I-TRACE PROJECT 2nd Partners Meeting, Potsdam, June 8-9, 2006 Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Agent Systems Laboratory.
The Use of Blogs in Learning and Teaching E-Learning Conference East London International Convention Centre 31 October – 1 November 2011 Mmampho Gogela.
Computer Aided Design By Brian Nettleton This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Any opinions,
Professors’ eyes only… You may be surprised to learn… …that over 25% of all undergraduate students do not utilize their required course material. …student.
Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright.
“Measuring That Which Is Valued”: Implementing and Managing Efficient Formative Assessment and Evaluation of Library Instruction Carol A. Leibiger Alan.
Unit 3 Inventions and Innovations. ETP 2006 – Jeff Pegg This material is based upon work supported the National Science foundation under Grant No
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No and Any opinions, findings, and conclusions.
CATS in the Classroom Spring 2007 Faculty Workshops Series Dr Aziza Ellozy Center for Learning and Teaching Copyright Notice.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
 Cody has trouble initiating a given learning task. › He has developed coping skills when he does not understand a given assignment. › He is unsure of.
Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,
Numerical Methods Multidimensional Gradient Methods in Optimization- Example
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
SRL Mechanix Session 072 Randy Brooks
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Information Retention in e-Learning De Leon Kimberly Obonyo Carolyne Penn John Yang Xiaoyan.
Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment of a High School Classroom Pilot Texas A&M University.
Using a Strategy Project to Promote Self-Regulated Learning
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Technological Design VS Engineering Design
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Discussion and Conclusion
Adaptive Lessons for Pre-Class Preparation for a Flipped Classroom
Multi-faceted Approach to Improve Learning in Pharmacokinetics
Critical - thinking Assessment Test (CAT)
Title of Poster Site Visit 2017 Introduction Results
Multi-faceted Approach to Improve Learning in Pharmacokinetics
Adaptive Lessons for Pre-Class Preparation for a Flipped Classroom
Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment of a High School Classroom Pilot Texas A&M University.
Assessment of Classroom Learning
Title of Poster Site Visit 2018 Introduction Results
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #XXXXXX. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations.
Exploring Exploratory Testing
Research-based Active-Learning Instruction in Physics
Presentation transcript:

Sketched-Truss Recognition Tutoring System: Improved Student Learning through Active Learning and Immediate Student Feedback, NSF DUE , 3/10-2/13 PI: Julie Linsey: Georgia Institute of Technology. Co-PIs: Tracy Hammond, Erin McTigue: Texas A&M University Graduate Students: Olufunmilola Atilola, Hong-hoe Kim Mechanix is a sketch recognition program that provides an efficient means for engineering students to learn how to draw truss free-body diagrams (FBDs) and open-ended truss design problems using method of joins. Students draw the FBDs, the coordinate axis, and Mechanix automatically recognizes and labels the FBD’s nodes, the students can then enter the solutions and request instant feedback from the program. Mechanix will respond and let the student know if the problem is correct or not. Evaluation Approach Combination of quantitative and qualitative In-class experimental group within an authentic classroom (freshman) with three conditions: Mechanix, WinTruss & Control. Improvement assessed by homework scores, exams, quizzes, and pre- & post- Statics Concept Inventories Focus groups to gather qualitative data: student’s opinions and suggestions for improvement of the software Benefits of Mechanix as a Learning Tool It teaches truss and free body diagram concepts Automatically grades truss design problems Offers instant feedback like a one-on-one tutor Mimics traditional pencil and paper through the use of sketch recognition software Outcomes Mechanix provide fast and automatic feedback reducing the instructor time required. The exam results show Mechanix is just as good as the WinTruss program or traditional paper and pencil. The homework results show that students who use Mechanix score significantly higher than those who don’t Mechanix is a learning tool equal to or better than traditional pencil and paper From the Focus Group discussions, the Mechanix student said that they found Mechanix fun and helpful while learning truss and free body diagram concepts. When the WinTruss students were allowed to use Mechanix, they preferred the Mechanix interface and that Mechanix was “better for teaching purposes” Summary Mechanix has great potential as a tool to increase learning in truss and free body diagram concepts Mechanix has the ability to increase instructor efficiency by providing one-on-one feedback while students are solving problems Other Grants Supporting Mechanix Development NSF EEC , NSF EEC This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation Mechanix Interface (Figure 3) A.Problem Statement B.Checklist (to scaffold & give feedback) C.Recognized Sketch D.Coordinate Axis E.Solution F.Instant Feedback Figure 3: A correct solution is drawn and entered, indicated by the complete checklist and instant feedback. Figure 2: The creative design mode where students can create their own trusses to satisfy certain design requirements Figure 1: A student uses the pen and tablet interface for Mechanix Need A learning tool is needed that can help students learn engineering concepts while gaining academic independence The novelty of the system is that it will be used to advance learning and assessment techniques while providing a natural mode of interaction during knowledge transfer between the student and instructor. Figure 6: No significant differences in the scores comparing the Mechanix, WinTruss and Control conditions Figure 7: The students in the Mechanix condition scored about the same as the students in the other conditions All traditional (HWs 1 & 2) A B C D E F