- a Rewarding Results National Grant Promoting Medical Group IT through Pay for Performance January 14, 2003 UC Health Care IT Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 California Quality Collaborative Accelerating Improvement of the Commercial Delivery System Neil A. Solomon, MD Clinical Director, CQC.
Advertisements

2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Standard 3 Plan and Manage Care NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
Aetna and PCMH Improving Employee Health through Patient- Centered Medical Homes Morristown, New Jersey October 12, 2010 Aetna’s experience with Patient-Centered.
Leveraging a Single Platform - Connecting a Statewide Healthcare Ecosystem Michigan Association of Health Plans Rick Murdock Executive Director Michigan.
Computerization of the practice Grzegorz Margas, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Family Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Proposed Rule
Regional Variation and Diabetes/Heart Disease Management in California Pay for Performance Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Integrated Healthcare Association: Statewide Pay for Performance (P4P) Collaborative Ron Bangasser, MD Dolores Yanagihara, MPH National P4P Summit – Preconference.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
1.01 E LECTRONIC M EDICAL R ECORD S YSTEMS AND D ISEASE R EGISTRIES : S ELECTION A LONG THE S PECTRUM Wayne T. Pan, MD Medical Director Choosing a Chronic.
What will it Take to Improve Care for Chronic Illness for the Population? Ed Wagner, MD, MPH MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation Center for Health.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
California Pay for Performance: Understanding the Impact of Provider Incentives for Quality Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
© 2006 All rights reserved. 1 The Silicon Valley Health Information Technology Pay for Performance Collaborative The National Pay for Performance Summit.
1 Lessons From the Managed Care Experience of the Community Health Center Network Ralph Silber Chief Executive Officer, CHCN March 16, 2012.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Employer Initiatives in Disease Management Peter V. Lee Pacific Business Group on Health NATIONAL DISEASE MANAGEMENT SUMMIT May 13, 2003 – Baltimore, MD.
Brown & Toland Medical Group National Pay for Performance Summit “Pay for Performance Pushes EMR Adoption” Stan Padilla, M.D. Vice-President, Medical Services.
Data Collection and Aggregation: Making It Work for Your P4P Program Dolores Yanagihara, MPH Integrated Healthcare Association February 27, 2008 National.
An Integrated Healthcare System’s Approach to ACOs Chuck Baumgart, M.D., Chief Medical Officer Presbyterian Health Plan David Arredondo, M.D., Executive.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Rewarding Performance: Three-Year Results from California's Statewide Pay-for-Performance Experiment Cheryl L. Damberg, PhD, Kristiana Raube, PhD, Stephanie.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
EHRs and Meaningful Use: The Case for Semantics Ram D. Sriram Chief, Software and Systems Division Information Technology Laboratory
Measuring and Reporting Patients’ Experiences with Their Doctors Process, Politics and Public Reports in Massachusetts Melinda Karp MHQP Director of Programs.
Performance Measurement Sets Dolores Yanagihara Program Development Manager IHA.
1 CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. ® Registered trademark of the Blue Cross and.
Interoperability Showcase In collaboration with IHE Use Case 3 Care Theme: Leveraging National Healthcare Registries in Care Delivery Biosurveillance Monitoring.
Exploring How Hospitals and Their Physicians Can Work Together Toward the Interoperability of Health Information Brian Yeaman MD CMIO NRHS Physician Informatics.
11 Creating Value from EMR Investment Kevin Maben, MD, FAAP Associate Medical Information Officer Presbyterian Healthcare Services.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
- a Rewarding Results National Grant Pay for Performance: Driving Improvement through Provider Recognition & Reward MCOL Healthcare Web Summit Participating.
California Pay for Performance: Reporting First Year Results and The Business Case for IT Investment Lance Lang, MD Health Net, California November 18,
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Grassroots Physician Perspective of ACO Transition
The Value of a Healthcare Community Network Early Implementation Experience Rick MacCornack, Ph.D. Director of Quality Improvement Northwest Physicians.
Pay for Performance in BCBS Plans Nationally June 22, 2005 National Press Club Bruce E. Landon, M.D., M.B.A.
Benton Community Health Center January 2008 Benton Community Health Center  Total Number of Sites – 4  Initial Condition of Focus – Diabetes  Number.
__________________________________________________ California Office of the Patient Advocate Business, Transportation & Housing Agency 2005 HMO Report.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
Quality and Incentives: Value-Based Purchasing, Pay for Performance and Transparency Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
The California Pay for Performance Program Stephen Shortell, Ph.D., MPH Dean, School of Public Health University of California at Berkeley National Pay.
The Patient-Centered Medical Home: A Work in Progress Alliance for Health Reform Briefing Washington D.C. September 22, 2008 Diane R. Rittenhouse, MD,
CHCS Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc. Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc. Nikki Highsmith Center for Health Care Strategies June 7, 2007 Pay.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
The Business Case for P4P Douglas Allen MD., MMM. Chief Medical Officer Greater Newport Physicians IPA.
Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield Collaboration on Quality: A Foundation Built on Trust Michael Pekas, M.D. Medical Director Joel Hasenwinkel Director,
1 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Experience with the Patient Centered Medical Home Michigan Purchasers Health Alliance September 17, 2009 Thomas J.
dWise Healthcare Bangalore
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Figure 1. Only 28 Percent of U.S. Primary Care Physicians Have Electronic Medical Records; Only 19 Percent Have Advanced IT Capacity.
More-Moni Clinics, Inc. Technology Plan Beyond 2014.
Pay for Performance- California Style Jack Rodnick, MD Conference on Practice Improvement Denver, Colorado November 10, 2006.
Geographic Variation in Healthcare and Promotion of High-Value Care Margaret E. O’Kane November 10, 2010.
© 2006 All rights reserved. 1 The Silicon Valley Health Information Technology Pay for Performance Collaborative The National Pay for Performance Summit.
Patient-Centered Clinical Method
Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH
G:/CorpSvc/APowerpoint//SM/MANAGED_CARE_ONLINE_HEALTHWEBSUMMIT_1202
A Case Study from California: Pay for Performance Incentives and the Adoption of Information Technology Tom Williams Integrated Healthcare Association.
Health Information Systems: Functional Capacity
Patient-Centered Clinical Method
Presentation transcript:

- a Rewarding Results National Grant Promoting Medical Group IT through Pay for Performance January 14, 2003 UC Health Care IT Conference

- a Rewarding Results National Grant The Perspectives Purchasers - David Hopkins, PBGH Health Plans – Gary Koehler, Blue Shield Medical Groups – Doug Allen, MD, Greater Newport Physicians IPA

- a Rewarding Results National Grant The P4P Context Pay for Performance (P4P) rewards physician groups for performance 6 HMOs participating Focus on the delegated model Commercial HMO enrollees Clinical,patient satisfaction – & IT?

- a Rewarding Results National Grant The P4P IT Debate Isn't IT part of producing the clinical data? Yes, but….. Is adequate encounter data a bonus item or entry requirement? How much is IT worth? How high do we set the bar?

- a Rewarding Results National Grant The Final Decisions About IT and P4P Encounter data threshold is an entry requirement – 2.7 pmpy? IT is important to promote IT will be 10% of the P4P score IT requirements should be fair but get harder over time

- a Rewarding Results National Grant IT Measure Criteria Meaningful Measurable Represent high value uses of IT in the clinical setting Supports physicians in delivering high quality care Evidence-based “Menu” approach

- a Rewarding Results National Grant IT Measure Requirements Group demonstrates capabilities in either or both of two key domains: 1. Clinical data set integration (group level) –any two of encounter, lab results, prescriptions, inpatient or ER, radiology 2. Clinical decision support (point of care)

- a Rewarding Results National Grant IT Measure Examples Domain 1 1. GROUP LEVEL DATA INTEGRATION  Electronic disease registry  Internally-generated electronic HEDIS measures using lab results  Care reminder lists sent to physicians

- a Rewarding Results National Grant IT Measure Examples Domain 2 2. CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT On-line lab result access for PCPs E-prescribing by PCPs Automatic drug-drug interaction check PCP electronic access to clinical notes of other physicians Electronic care reminders accessed by physicians

- a Rewarding Results National Grant IT Measure Current Capabilities Based on 2001 study of medical group infrastructure by Shortell, et al. (188 CA groups represented) 73% report having electronic data from at least 2 categories 50%(approx.) report creating disease registries (not necessarily using >1 data set) 13% report having an EMR 27% report using the Internet to communicate with chronic patients

- a Rewarding Results National Grant IT Scoring Options Total = 10% THE DARWINIANS Year 1: Any activity either domain = 5% Year 2: One activity must be Domain 2 THE SOCIAL DEMOCRATS Year 1: Any activity either domain = 10% Year 2: Any activity either domain = 5% Year 3: One activity must be Domain 2

- a Rewarding Results National Grant IT Measure Current Questions Is this the right set of menu options? How high to set the bar? –In Year 1? In Years 2-3 and beyond? How to document? How much to audit and by whom? Is there bias for med groups vs IPAs? Re encounter data, is 2.7 pmpy fair?