Inclusive charm cross-section and charm hadrons production fractions F. Di Capua.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

Study of the e + e   η  process at √s = 1 GeV (main systematic error in the e + e   e + e  η analysis)
Short Baseline neutrino experiments Jaap Panman, CERN Neutrino 2004, Paris, 15 June 2004 Outline Status of oscillation experiments Charm production Summary.
Study of charm physics in neutrino scattering Di Capua Francesco University of Napoli, Italy Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2004 San Juan, Puerto Rico.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Studies of open heavy flavour production at LHCb Artur Ukleja (The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.
1 Semiexclusive semileptonic B->charmdecays C. Gatto - INFN Napoli A. Mazzacane - Universita’ di Napoli April 10, 2003.
Jaap Panman 2003 Papers in pipeline Papers, in near future Lambda_c (#2), QE cross-section (and BR into Sigma) - DRAFT exists Rare decays of D (Nicola's.
1 6 th September 2007 C.P. Ward Sensitivity of ZZ→llνν to Anomalous Couplings Pat Ward University of Cambridge Neutral Triple Gauge Couplings Fit Procedure.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Report of the Oscillation Working Group and status of Charm study 1 F. Juget – D. Duchesneau Ankara, April 1rst 2009.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Kouji Narita Nagoya University, Japan CHORUS collaboration Study of charm production in neutrino interactions.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
First Observation of B°  D*°         Decays Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang Syracuse University CLEO Plenary 05/11/01.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
WW  e ν 14 April 2007 APS April Meeting WW/WZ production in electron-neutrino plus dijet final state at CDFAPS April Meeting April 2007 Jacksonville,
Study of the semileptonic decays at 4170 MeV Koloina Randrianarivony Marina Artuso (Syracuse University)
X. C. Lou, Snowmass Charm Physics Potentials at B-factories XinChou Lou, University of Texas at Dallas Introduction Physics Topics: branching fractions,
Jaap Panman 2003 Status of Analysis and Papers ISHIGAKI meeting Overview of papers in the pipeline authors, contact persons, referees.
Charm production with neutrinos Physics motivation Results Outlook Giovanni De Lellis University of Naples (on behalf of the CHORUS Collaboration)
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
EM shower reconstruction and located neutrino event analysis Ciro Pistillo (Bern LHEP) on behalf of the Swiss OPERA groups.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
Status and results from OPERA Tomoko Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of OPERA Swiss groups of Bern and ETHZ.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
CHORUS Results on Charm Physics Belgium (Brussels, Louvain-la-Neuve), CERN, Germany (Berlin, Münster), Israel (Haifa), Italy (Bari, Cagliari, Ferrara,
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
1 Top and Tau Measurements Tim Barklow (SLAC) Oct 02, 2009.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
Studies of Charmed Particle Production and Decay in the CHORUS Experiment Emiliano Barbuto University of Salerno and INFN (Italy) For the CHORUS Collaboration.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Semileptonic D Decays from CLEO and BELLE Yongsheng Gao Southern Methodist University (CLEO Collaboration) ICHEP04, Beijing, Aug. 16 ─ 23, 2004.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
1 Recent results on  (3770) production & decays from BES/BEPC Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Neutrino DIS measurements in CHORUS DIS2004 Strbske Pleso Alfredo G. Cocco INFN – Napoli.
CCbar analysis M. Guler, METU, Ankara. 0mu/1mu selection I: If (a vertex with one TT-matched track & Parent track (at least 0ne- segment) & at least two-segment.
Charm production with neutrinos Physics motivation Results Outlook Giovanni De Lellis University of Naples (on behalf of the CHORUS Collaboration)
Measurement of fragmentation properties of charmed particle CHORUS Workshop June 2004, Rome A.Kayış Topaksu.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
10-Jun-161 LHCb MC data analysis  3µ Rare decays WG N.Sagidova Present limit : BR(  3µ) > 4·10 -8 Is it possible to improve this limit in LHCb ? How.
Two Photon Physics at Belle Augustine E. Chen BELLE Collaboration National Central University June 6, 2006 Charm 2006.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Charm production and its impact on future neutrino experiments Francesco Di Capua – INFN Napoli NuFact - Valencia 3/07/08.
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
The truth information in the hadronic samples
Results from OPERA Pablo del Amo Sánchez for the OPERA collaboration
Oleg Samoylov (JINR, AYSS’12 conf., Feb. 6-11, 2012
Summary of FMS/Jet Meetings
R Value measurement from to GeV
Search for (3770) non-DD-bar Decays
Study of charm hadroproduction Tau neutrino production at CERN SPS
Search for
Presentation transcript:

Inclusive charm cross-section and charm hadrons production fractions F. Di Capua

Charged charm summary candidatesbckgr NC1 NC3 NC ± ± ±0.1 Total CC neutrino events c+c+  1p D+D+ Ds+Ds+ 17.7± ± ±1.2  3p 40.8± ± ±1.2  5p 46.2± ± ±3.9 R=  loc ch /  loc CC 1.02± ± ±0.03  3p /  1p 2.30± ± ±0.13

[( N 1 -Nbg 1 )/  1p + (N 3 -Nbg 3 ) /  3p + … ] [ Ncc×R av ]  ch /  CC = Inclusive cross-section f i 1p = f i × BR( C i  1 p)f i 3p = f i × BR( C i  3 p)  i f i 1p  i 1p  1p =  i f i 1p  i f i 3p  i 3p  3p =  i f i 3p

 ch /  CC (%) variation of charged charm cross-section as function of charmed fractions random generation of fractions f  c+

Charmed charm fraction determination: Likelihood method Event by event probability

N cc =93807 Fit Results 1p c+c+ D+D+ Ds+Ds p p+3p  (1prong)/  CC = (2.11  0.15  0.07)%  (3prong)/  CC = (1.10  0.09  0.02)%

Inclusive cross-section  (1p+3p)/  CC = (3.2  0.17)% for effect of 5 prong: ÷  ch /  CC = (3.26  0.17 (fit)  0.12 (efficiency)  ….)% BR(C +  1 prong) =(65.1  6.4)% BR(C +  3 prong) =(33.9  3.5)% BR(C +  5 prong) =(1.0  0.2(stat)  0.2) %

charged charm production fractions f D+ =  005 f Ds+ =  f  c+ =  Topological BR BR(  c+  3 prong) =36.1  9.5 BR(D+  3 prong) =34.9  5.9

Energy dependence of charged charm cross-section only errors from fit

Energy dependence of total charm cross-section E531 Energy (GeV)

neutrino and anti-neutrino charm cross-section

Outlook other systematic effects under calculation draft in preparation Results inclusive charm cross-section charmed hadron production fractions topological branching ratios energy dependence of cross section

Energy dependence of neutral charm cross-section

selection efficiency as a function of charm momentum 3 prong 1 prong

1p c+c+ D+D+ Ds+Ds p Fit Results in terms of observed events

As error test fitted different 500 MC samples with 137 Lc, 267 D+, 84 Ds

D0 events: MC/Data checks Charm momentum Flight length

Analysis input Flight length (measured in emulsion) Charm momentum (estimation with daughter’s opening angle) Momentum resolution

MC test: some example input fraction output result f  c + fD+fD+ fD+fD+ f D s + =0.2 f D s + =0.3

D0 events: MC/Data checks on the variable FL/P

Background

Topological BR BR(  c +  1 prong) =21.4% BR(  c +  3 prong) =26.6% BR(D +  1 prong) =29.8% BR(D +  3 prong) =32.4% BR(D s +  1 prong) =24.7% BR(D s +  3 prong) =28.2% 36.8 % 44.6 % 51.7 % preCHORUS status unknown part

Energy dependence of total charm cross-section