Turbulent transport coefficients from numerical experiments Axel Brandenburg & Matthias Rheinhardt (Nordita, Stockholm) Extracting concepts from grand.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Turbulent transport of magnetic fields Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical.

Advertisements

Chicago, October 2003 David Hughes Department of Applied Mathematics University of Leeds Nonlinear Effects in Mean Field Dynamo Theory.

Non-Fickian diffusion and Minimal Tau Approximation from numerical turbulence A.Brandenburg 1, P. Käpylä 2,3, A. Mohammed 4 1 Nordita, Copenhagen, Denmark.

September 2005 Magnetic field excitation in galaxies.

Turbulent Models.  DNS – Direct Numerical Simulation ◦ Solve the equations exactly ◦ Possible with today’s supercomputers ◦ Upside – very accurate if.

LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 10 (ME EN )

Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam The existence of the Λ effect indicated by SDO data G. Rüdiger, M. Küker Göttingen 2014.

1. 2 Apologies from Ed and Karl-Heinz

Coronal Mass Ejections - the exhaust of modern dynamos Examples: systematic swirl (helicity) Measuring it quantitatively Connection with the dynamo Axel.

Chapter 2 Reynolds Transport Theorem (RTT) 2.1 The Reynolds Transport Theorem 2.2 Continuity Equation 2.3 The Linear Momentum Equation 2.4 Conservation.

New Mechanism of Generation of Large-Scale Magnetic Field in Turbulence with Large-Scale Velocity Shear I. ROGACHEVSKII, N. KLEEORIN, E. LIVERTS Ben-Gurion.

Boundary Layer Meteorology Lecture 3 Review summation (Einstein) notation Introduce some Non-Dimensional Numbers Reynolds averaging and Reynolds Stresses.

1 Physics of turbulence muna Al_khaswneh Dr.Ahmad Al-salaymeh.

Influence of turbulence on the dynamo threshold B. Dubrulle, GIT/SPEC N. Leprovost, R. Dolganov, P. Blaineau J-P. Laval and F. Daviaud.

Lecture of : the Reynolds equations of turbulent motions JORDANIAN GERMAN WINTER ACCADMEY Prepared by: Eng. Mohammad Hamasha Jordan University of Science.

Plasma Dynamos UCLA January 5th 2009 Steve Cowley, UKAEA Culham and Imperial Thanks to Alex Schekochihin, Russell Kulsrud, Greg Hammett and Mark Rosin.

Conservation of momentum also known as: Cauchy’s equation Relation between stress and strain rate 4 equations, 12 unknowns; need to relate flow field and.

High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.

Magnetic models of solar-like stars Laurène Jouve (Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie) B-Cool meeting December 2011.

Sunspots: the interface between dynamos and the theory of stellar atmospheres Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) 70 yr Guenther.

Origin, Evolution, and Signatures of Cosmological Magnetic Fields, Nordita, June 2015 Evolution of magnetic fields in large scale anisotropic MHD flows.

Magnetic field generation on long time scales Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.

Magnetic dynamo over different astrophysical scales Axel Brandenburg & Fabio Del Sordo (Nordita) with contributions from many others seed field primordial.

0 Local and nonlocal conditional strain rates along gradient trajectories from various scalar fields in turbulence Lipo Wang Institut für Technische Verbrennung.

Critical issues to get right about stellar dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Shukurov et al. (2006, A&A 448, L33) Schekochihin et al. (2005,

Effect of Magnetic Helicity on Non-Helical Turbulent Dynamos N. KLEEORIN and I. ROGACHEVSKII Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, ISRAEL.

Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.

Large scale magnetic fields and Dynamo theory Roman Shcherbakov, Turbulence Discussion Group 14 Apr 2008.

Overshoot at the base of the solar convection zone What can we learn from numerical simulations? Matthias Rempel HAO / NCAR.

1 This is how it looks like… Magnetic helicity at the solar surface and in the solar wind Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Properties of magn helicity.

Mass Transfer Coefficient

R.D. Simitev School of Mathematics & Statistics F.H. Busse Institute of Physics Convection-driven spherical dynamos: bistability and attempts to model.

Solar activity as a surface phenomenon Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.

Dynamo theory and magneto-rotational instability Axel Brandenburg (Nordita) seed field primordial (decay) diagnostic interest (CMB) AGN outflows MRI driven.

Large Scale Dynamo Action in MRI Disks Role of stratification Dynamo cycles Mean-field interpretation Incoherent alpha-shear dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita,

Catastrophic  -quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Christer Sandin (Uppsala) Collaborators: Eric G.

Astrophysical Magnetism Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm)

Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of stellar differential rotation and meridional circulation (submitted to A&A, arXiv: ) Bidya Binay Karak (Nordita.

Numerical simulations of astrophysical dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Dynamos: numerical issues Alpha dynamos do exist: linear and nonlinear.

Team Report on integration of FSAM to SWMF and on FSAM simulations of convective dynamo and emerging flux in the solar convective envelope Yuhong Fan and.

Ch 4 Fluids in Motion.

Reynolds Analogy It can be shown that, under specific conditions (no external pressure gradient and Prandtle number equals to one), the momentum and heat.

Numerical simulations of the SN driven ISM Axel Brandenburg (NORDITA, Copenhagen, Denmark) Boris Gudiksen (Stockholm Observatory, Sweden) Graeme Sarson.

NATO ASI Conference, Kyiv MODELING AND SIMULATION OF TURBULENT PENETRATIVE CONVECTION AND POLLUTANT DISPERSION ABOVE THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND IN STABLY.

Self-assembly of shallow magnetic spots through strongly stratified turbulence Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Brandenburg+13 Warnecke+11.

1 This is how it looks like… The solar dynamo and its spots Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Solar & stellar dynamos: differences? Magnetic helicity:

Self-organized magnetic structures in computational astrophysics Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+13Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.

ARSM -ASFM reduction RANSLESDNS 2-eqn. RANS Averaging Invariance Application DNS 7-eqn. RANS Body force effects Linear Theories: RDT Realizability, Consistency.

Prograde patterns in rotating convection and implications for the dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen  Stockholm) Taylor-Proudman problem Near-surface.

ANGULAR MOMENTUM TRANSPORT BY MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC TURBULENCE Gordon Ogilvie University of Cambridge TACHOCLINE DYNAMICS

Prandtl number dependence of magnetic-to-kinetic dissipation 1.What gets in, will get out 2.Even for vanishing viscosity 3.What if magnetic fields 4. contribute?

H. Isobe Plasma seminar 2004/06/16 1. Explaining the latitudinal distribution of sunspots with deep meridional flow D. Nandy and A.R. Choudhhuri 2002,

Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.

1 LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 13 (ME EN ) Prof. Rob Stoll Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Spring 2011.

THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.

SOHO/ESA/NASA Solar cycle - modeling and predicting Petri Käpylä NORDITA AlbaNova University Center Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm, 2nd Feb 2007 SST NASA.

Stockholm, 3 Aug 2011 R.D. Simitev School of Mathematics F.H. Busse Institute of Physics Are thin-shell dynamos solar like? Part I Dynamo, Dynamical Systems.

Overview of dynamos in stars and galaxies

Is solar activity a surface phenomenon?

THEORY OF MERIDIONAL FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION

Paradigm shifts in solar dynamo modelling

C. F. Panagiotou and Y. Hasegawa

The k-ε model The k-ε model focuses on the mechanisms that affect the turbulent kinetic energy (per unit mass) k. The instantaneous kinetic energy k(t)

Introduction to Space Weather

Conservation of momentum

Heat Transfer Coefficient

Fluid Kinematics Fluid Dynamics.

Scale-dependence of magnetic helicity in the solar wind

Catastrophic a-quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear

Reconnection of Loops and Open Field Lines

Presentation transcript:

Turbulent transport coefficients from numerical experiments Axel Brandenburg & Matthias Rheinhardt (Nordita, Stockholm) Extracting concepts from grand challenge DNS –Alpha effect –Test-field method –Integral kernel Test-flow method: Reynolds stress Results for passive scalar

2 Steve’s contributions to dynamo theory PEPI 1979

3 Last chapter: interest in DNS results 1995

4 … at a time of grand challenge … Need tools to interprete results Origin of large-scale magnetic field? an  effect after all? Glatzmaier & Roberts (1995)

5  -effect dynamos (large scale) Differential rotation (surface layers: faster inside) Cyclonic convection; Buoyant flux tubes Equatorward migration New loop    - effect

6 Mean-field theory Define suitable averages Fully analogous to passive scalar! still exact!

7 Test-field method:  ij and  ij tensors Original equation (uncurled) Mean-field equation fluctuations Response to arbitrary mean fields

8 Test fields Example:

9 Validation: Roberts flow SOCA normalize SOCA result Brandenburg, Rädler, Schrinner (2009, A&A)

10 Kinematic  and  t independent of Rm (2…200) Sur et al. (2008, MNRAS)

11 Scale-dependence: nonlocality

12 Time-dependent case Hubbard & Brandenburg (2009, ApJ)

13 Importance of time-dependence

14 Momentum equation: nonlinear cf. Rheinhardt & Brandenburg (2010, A&A) linear in u U

15 Results for Roberts flow Rheinhardt & Brandenburg (2010, in prep) ansatz

16 Results for passive scalar transport Rotation Magnetic fields Linear shear flow

17 Effects of rotation Brandenburg, Svedin, Vasil (2009, MNRAS)

18 Effects of magnetic field Brandenburg, Svedin, Vasil (2009, MNRAS)

19 Effects of linear shear Madarassy & Brandenburg,, (2009, PRE) U=(0, Sx, 0) Sh=S/uk=-0.13 Sh=-0.2

20 Conclusions Test fields provide detailed insight into grand challenge DNS Non-locality in space and time – effects of boundaries –strong stratification? Reynolds and Maxwell stresses –Differential rotation of the Sun –Active regions? Applications to LES? –Averages still 3-D