Ireland and the WFD The Dangerous Substances Surveillance Monitoring Programme Ciaran O’Donnell Environmental Protection Agency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implications of the Surface Water and Groundwater Environmental Objectives Regulations for the EPA Dr. Karen Creed Environmental Licensing Programme.
Advertisements

How close are we in the Water Framework Directive’s Implementation ? Paul C.M. Frintrop Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste-Water Treatment.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
LATVIAN ENVIRONMENT, GEOLOGY AND METEOROLOGY AGENCY Ilze Kirstuka Deputy Director Workshop of the Twinning project on Water Quality, 4-6 September, 2006.
Table 3 SWMI – Water Matters –Topics – 1Dangerous Substances 2Forestry 3Septic Tanks (Unsewered Properties) Shannon International River Basin District.
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
Daniel Baláž, Ján Černecký State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic Nature Conservation and River Monitoring in Slovakia.
Groundwater Directive 80/68/EEC Multilateral Screening Meeting - Croatia and Turkey Chapter 27 – Environment – Water quality Brussels, 4 April 2006.
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
IPPC Discharges Monitoring Workshop Water Framework Directive Overview (and its implications for Industry) Peter Webster Regional Chemist (EPA Cork)
South Eastern River Basin District - Environmental Quality Standard Development-
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (4), Brussels, 14/10/2008 slide 1 Agenda Item 6.2 : (a) New data collection. Overview of the new.
LVĢMA, 2006 LATVIJAS VIDES, ĢEOLOĢIJAS UN METEOROLOĢIJAS AĢENTŪRA Water data availability Normunds Kadiķis.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Strategic Co-ordination Group meeting May 2011 Jorge Rodriguez.
Water Quality & Pollution Water Quality Parameters Sources of Water Pollution EU Legislation on Water Quality Management Turkish Legislation on Water.
1. Outline 2 Earlier Groundwater Management Approaches of Turkey European Union: An Example for Groundwater Management Turkey Current Situation and Distances.
AWJ MARINE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS Water Framework Directive Opportunities & Threats.
International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 1 Agenda Item 5 : (a) Data collection, associated data treatments.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Water quality and water pollution – data for old and new policy questions 5th World Water Forum Session Data integration and dissemination: From.
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
Groundwater Watch List Meeting
Agenda Item 8(b): Progress with data collection template
Dangerous Substances Assessment under Art
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Bruxelles 17 october-2007 WG E Meeting
EU Water Framework Directive
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Agenda Item 6(a): Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-17/10/INERIS - Data collection.
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Preliminary feedback on analysis of Article V reports
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Priority substances Water Directors meeting Paris November 2008
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
Agenda Item 10: Feedback on dangerous substances workshop and Implementation Guidance WG-E(1)-07/04/INERIS - Implementation guidance.
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
(a) Overview of the database and the comments received
Part I.
PRIORITY (HAZARDOUS) SUBSTANCES
WG E on Priority Substances
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
A general introduction
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

Ireland and the WFD The Dangerous Substances Surveillance Monitoring Programme Ciaran O’Donnell Environmental Protection Agency

Contents nPlanned approach nSelection of Relevant Pollutants nScreening survey nPreliminary results nMonitoring plan nEQS nFuture challenges

Relevant Polllutants - Background nIreland largely enjoys relative clean waters nDue, at least in part, to its less industrialised history nTransboundary inputs are relatively insignificant nThe usage of chemicals throughout all sectors of society has become increasingly widespread during the past century

River Basin Districts 4 Internal RBDs South-Eastern South-Western Western Eastern 3 Cross-border RBDs North-Western Neagh-Bann Shannon 1 in RBD Northern Ireland North-Eastern

Water Framework Directive nSurveillance Monitoring Programme: nPriority list pollutants which are discharged….. nAnnex X nMonthly sampling nOther Pollutants discharged in significant quantities…… nAnnex VIII: 1-10 n3-monthly sampling

Monitoring Plan nSelect Relevant Pollutants nChoose surveillance monitoring programme sites nCommence Monitoring programme 2007 nAnnex IX and X nRelevant pollutant list

Relevant Pollutant Selection 1.Top-down Approach Consider all substances potentially introduced to the environment in Ireland Prioritise based on Knowledge of usage Available monitoring data 2. Bottom-up Approach Consider known water quality impacts Little information available on organics effects 3. Check selected list by a screening survey

Candidate list of relevant pollutants Selection of compounds: WFD Annex VIII – “universe of chemicals” as starting point WFD Annex X and Annex IX compounds included automatically Pollutant lists considered: 76/464/EC List II candidate substances UNEP POPs OSPAR EPER Register Dangerous Substances tracking project Locally Relevant Pesticides Aquatic environment control products Endocrine disrupting products Total number of substances/groups161

Screening Programme nWide range of Parameters to be measured n12 Month programme 41 Priority Action Substances 161 Relevant Pollutants 227 parameters reported (including sums) nReview Relevant Pollutants list after six months nContinue with shortened list for remaining six months nCompare results with working EQS values

Screening Programme Sites nMonitoring programme - 23 sites 17 Surface water sites 4 Groundwater sites 1 site at WWTP - Ringsend, Dublin 1 site at Landfill - Ballyeally, Dublin nWater samples taken monthly at each site. nOne sediment and one biota sample taken at the 17 surface water sites

Screening Programme Assessment Because EQS are not finalised at this stage Results were compared with Limit of Detection (LOD) First phase – 43 parameters dropped after 6 months Not found Not appropriate for water column work Detection limit too high to be useful (LOD>>EQS) Continued with new pesticides for 6 months

Results of Screening Programme - Provisional Surface Waters (17 sites) Test substance for relevance: Means compiled for each site Test for any mean > LOD 56 compounds found Metals18 VOC13 Organics8 Pesticides13 PAH2 Inorganic2

Results of Screening Survey - Provisional Ground Waters (4 sites) Test substance for relevance: Means compiled for each site Test for any mean > LOD 31 compounds found Inorganic2 Metals13 Organics7 Pesticides4 PAH1 VOC4

Results of Screening Survey - Provisional Landfill Leachate (1 site) Test substance for relevance: Means compiled for each site Test for any mean > LOD 109 compounds found Inorganic3 Metals19 Organics26 Pesticides34 PAH7 VOC20

Results of Screening Survey - Provisional Treated Wastewater (1 site) Test substance for relevance: Means compiled for each site Test for any mean > LOD 54 compounds found Inorganic2 Metals13 Organics14 Pesticides16 PAH3 VOC6

Results Summary - Provisional Priority Pollutants Relevant Pollutants Surface Waters (56)1838 Groundwater (31)724 Leachate (109)2782 WWTP (54)1440 Total of targets found3189

Monitoring Targets (Provisional) Surveillance Programme Targets: Priority Pollutants EQS Directive41 Relevant PollutantsMetals17 VOC16 Pesticides27 Other Organics26 Inorganic ions 3 Total targets130

Monitoring Programme Surveillance Programme sites: Water typeMonitoring points Rivers189 Lakes 73 Transitional and Coastal 37 Total299

Environmental Quality Standards Priority Substances: Commission Proposal July 2006 Annex I Part A: 33 parameters Part B: 8 parameters Relevant Pollutants: No final decision Working group on EQS Adopt EQS used in screening work? Look for common applications in other MS

Future Challenges Analytical resources Cost Set-up time Development of EQS for Relevant Pollutant list EQS levels will define the monitoring activity Some toxicologically derived EQS unattainable by existing monitoring techniques Some discussion on equipment level is desirable to ensure proper investment of resources eg Metals - ICPMS Organics?

End Thank You for Listening