HERA – LHC Workshop, June 08 2006 1 Validation of simulation packages in LCG Validation of simulation packages in LCG M. Kirsanov (INR Moscow)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
Advertisements

Simulation Project Major achievements (past 6 months 2007)
Automated Tests in NICOS Nightly Control System Alexander Undrus Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY Software testing is a difficult, time-consuming.
Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT Application Area Internal.
Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT Application Area Internal.
Gauss: Generator Status Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 6 Oct 2009.
Introduction to the workshop LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest 22 nd & 23 rd November 2012 LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest.
SPI Software Process & Infrastructure GRIDPP Collaboration Meeting - 3 June 2004 Jakub MOSCICKI
Tev4LHC Workshop, QCD, Emily Nurse, UCL for the CEDAR collaboration (Andy Buckley, Jon Butterworth, James Monk, Ben Waugh, Mike Whalley,
Abstract The automated multi-platform software nightly build system is a major component in the ATLAS collaborative software organization, validation and.
SPI Software Process & Infrastructure EGEE France - 11 June 2004 Yannick Patois
Monte Carlo event generators for LHC physics
Usability Issues Documentation J. Apostolakis for Geant4 16 January 2009.
LCG and HEPiX Ian Bird LCG Project - CERN HEPiX - FNAL 25-Oct-2002.
Hadronic Models Problems, Progress and Plans Gunter Folger Geant4 Workshop, Lisbon 2006.
Geant4 Acceptance Suite for Key Observables CHEP06, T.I.F.R. Mumbai, February 2006 J. Apostolakis, I. MacLaren, J. Apostolakis, I. MacLaren, P. Mendez.
HERA/LHC Workshop, MC Tools working group, HzTool, JetWeb and CEDAR Tools for validating and tuning MC models Ben Waugh, UCL Workshop on.
4 November Development, validation and maintenance of Monte Carlo event generators & generator services in the LHC era Development, validation and.
ATLAS and GridPP GridPP Collaboration Meeting, Edinburgh, 5 th November 2001 RWL Jones, Lancaster University.
LCG Generator, October 16 th 2003 Introduction to the October LCG Generator meeting Paolo Bartalini CERN.
Alexander Toropin Generator Services monthly meeting 6 June 2007 GENSER status.
Development, validation and maintenance of Monte Carlo event generators & generator services in the LHC era Dmitri Konstantinov 26 March
MINER A Software The Goals Software being developed have to be portable maintainable over the expected lifetime of the experiment extensible accessible.
LCG Application Area Meeting, March 10 th 2004 Status of LCG Generator Paolo Bartalini, CERN/PH.
June The LCG Generator Project Supporting Monte Carlo Generators in the LHC era P. Bartalini (University of Florida)
20/09/2006LCG AA 2006 Review1 Committee feedback to SPI.
Feedback from the POOL Project User Feedback from the POOL Project Dirk Düllmann, LCG-POOL LCG Application Area Internal Review October 2003.
LCG Generator Meeting, December 11 th 2003 Introduction to the LCG Generator Monthly Meeting.
SEAL Core Libraries and Services CLHEP Workshop 28 January 2003 P. Mato / CERN Shared Environment for Applications at LHC.
SEAL Project Core Libraries and Services 18 December 2002 P. Mato / CERN Shared Environment for Applications at LHC.
Release Validation J. Apostolakis, M. Asai, G. Cosmo, S. Incerti, V. Ivantchenko, D. Wright for Geant4 12 January 2009.
Hadronic Physics Validation II Dennis Wright Geant4 Review CERN April 2007.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Introduction What is detector simulation? A detector simulation program must provide the possibility of describing accurately an experimental setup (both.
Firmware - 1 CMS Upgrade Workshop October SLHC CMS Firmware SLHC CMS Firmware Organization, Validation, and Commissioning M. Schulte, University.
Feedback from LHC Experiments on using CLHEP Lorenzo Moneta CLHEP workshop 28 January 2003.
Software Engineering Overview DTI International Technology Service-Global Watch Mission “Mission to CERN in Distributed IT Applications” June 2004.
G.Govi CERN/IT-DB 1 September 26, 2003 POOL Integration, Testing and Release Procedure Integration  Packages structure  External dependencies  Configuration.
Computing R&D and Milestones LHCb Plenary June 18th, 1998 These slides are on WWW at:
Computing Performance Recommendations #10, #11, #12, #15, #16, #17.
Geant4 CPU performance : an update Geant4 Technical Forum, CERN, 07 November 2007 J.Apostolakis, G.Cooperman, G.Cosmo, V.Ivanchenko, I.Mclaren, T.Nikitina,
Fabiola Gianotti, 13/05/2003 Simulation Project Leader T. Wenaus Framework A. Dell’Acqua WP Geant4 J.Apostolakis WP FLUKA Integration A.Ferrari WP Physics.
LCG – AA review 1 Simulation LCG/AA review Sept 2006.
Generator Services planning meeting Witek Pokorski
12 March, 2002 LCG Applications Area - Introduction slide 1 LCG Applications Session LCG Launch Workshop March 12, 2002 John Harvey, CERN LHCb Computing.
Physics Performance. EM Physics: Observations Two apparently independent EM physics models have led to user confusion: –Different results for identical.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova and CERN1 Geant4 highlights of relevance for medical physics applications Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova and CERN.
Simulation Project Overview (Very condensed) Torre Wenaus, BNL/CERN Simulation Project Leader LHCC Comprehensive Review.
MC4LHC w/s July Activities promoted by LCG-Generator Supporting Monte Carlo Generators in the LHC era P. Bartalini (University of Florida)
Atlas Software May, 2000 K.Amako Status of Geant4 Physics Validation Atlas Software Week 10 May, Katsuya Amako (KEK)
Follow-up to SFT Review (2009/2010) Priorities and Organization for 2011 and 2012.
Experiences on Grid production for Geant4 EGEE User Forum, CERN, 1st March 2006 P. Mendez Lorenzo, A. Ribon CERN CERN.
20 October 2005 LCG Generator Services monthly meeting, CERN Validation of GENSER & News on GENSER Alexander Toropin LCG Generator Services monthly meeting.
LCG Generator Monthly Meeting, September 25 th 2003 Status Of The Generator Project And Feedbacks From The MC4LHC Steering Group Paolo Bartalini CERN EP.
The interface to EvtGen in CMS Roberto Covarelli University of Rochester EvtGen workshop, 06/12/2010.
SPI Software Process & Infrastructure Project Plan 2004 H1 LCG-PEB Meeting - 06 April 2004 Alberto AIMAR
JRA1 Meeting – 09/02/ Software Configuration Management and Integration EGEE is proposed as a project funded by the European Union under contract.
Introduction to FCC Software FCC Istanbul 11 March, 2016 Alice Robson (CERN/UNIGE) on behalf of / with thanks to the FCC software group.
12 March, 2002 LCG Applications Area - Introduction slide 1 LCG Applications Session LCG Launch Workshop March 12, 2002 John Harvey, CERN LHCb Computing.
Why do F77 always spoil the landscape ?. Several ideas … slide 2.
Comments on SPI. General remarks Essentially all goals set out in the RTAG report have been achieved. However, the roles defined (Section 9) have not.
LCG Generator Services project
CPU Benchmarks Parallel Session Summary
Simulation Project Structure and tasks
Generator Services planning meeting
LCG Monte-Carlo Events Data Base: current status and plans
P. Bartalini (University of Florida)
Testing Geant4 with a simplified calorimeter setup
Simulation Project Structure and tasks
Simulation Project Structure and tasks
Presentation transcript:

HERA – LHC Workshop, June Validation of simulation packages in LCG Validation of simulation packages in LCG M. Kirsanov (INR Moscow)

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Plan of the talk LCG Generator project: event generators in the LHC era LCG Generator project: event generators in the LHC era Validation of Geant4 Validation of Geant4

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June LCG Generator LCG Generator Florida (Coordination) CERN (Library, Event Interfaces) LCG-Russia (Library, Data Base) LCG-Spain (Framework) Collaboration with independent projects: LCG-UK (Validation, New MCs) Contact persons/Collaborators in MC Projects and LHC Experiments GOAL: to guarantee the generator support for LHC Started May 2003 Long Term Project WP1: GENERATOR SERVICES LIBRARY (GENSER) WP2: EVENT FORMATS AND EVENT INTERFACES WP3: SHARED EVENT FILES: FRAMEWORK & DATA BASE (MCDB) WP4: TUNING AND VALIDATION

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. The LCG Generator Library (GENSER)GENSER  Mandate:  To collaborate with MC authors to prepare LCG Compliant Code  To maintain older MC packages on the LCG supported platforms  Clients:  Addressed to LHC experimentalists and theorists both at CERN and in external laboratories (Other users welcome!) CVS Repository, AFS Distribution MC Packages & Example/Test Package Tested by all the LHC experiments Quarterly Release Scheme + bugfix (“light”) releases once per quarter. GOAL: to replace the obsolete CERN Library for what concerns the Generator Services ATLAS & LHCb PRODUCTIONS RELY ON GENSER CMS Joining… Others welcome Documentation: Savannah Portal: AFS: /afs/cern.ch/sw/lcg/app/releases/GENSER

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. The GENSER Team Liaisons with authors and LHC experiments ~.25 FTE Liaisons with authors and LHC experiments ~.25 FTE A. Ribon (CERN) based at CERN A. Ribon (CERN) based at CERN P. Bartalini (University of Florida) based at CERN P. Bartalini (University of Florida) based at CERN Coordinator of GENSER Releases (Librarian) ~.25 FTE Coordinator of GENSER Releases (Librarian) ~.25 FTE A. Pfeiffer (CERN) based at CERN A. Pfeiffer (CERN) based at CERN GENSER Integrators & MC Experts ~1FTE GENSER Integrators & MC Experts ~1FTE M. Kirsanov INR (Moscow) Master Integrator M. Kirsanov INR (Moscow) Master Integrator I. Katchaev IHEP (Protvino) Integrator I. Katchaev IHEP (Protvino) Integrator A. Toropin INR (Moscow) Integrator A. Toropin INR (Moscow) Integrator S. Slabospitsky IHEP (Protvino) MC Expert S. Slabospitsky IHEP (Protvino) MC Expert O. Zenin IHEP (Protvino) Integrator (new) O. Zenin IHEP (Protvino) Integrator (new)

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. GENSER status and plans 2006 GENSER_1_3_0 – last major release, March packages. GENSER_1_3_0 – last major release, March packages. Pythia8 and Herwig++ inside GENSER (M.Kirsanov) Pythia8 and Herwig++ inside GENSER (M.Kirsanov) Two levels of release tests, development of level 1 (M.Kirsanov, O.Zenin) Two levels of release tests, development of level 1 (M.Kirsanov, O.Zenin) Heavy ions generators: HIJING, PYQUEN, HYDJET Heavy ions generators: HIJING, PYQUEN, HYDJET Release policy and tools (A.Pfeiffer) Release policy and tools (A.Pfeiffer) Number of generators starts to saturate; accent being shifted towards convenience, tests, validation Further development of procedures for Light Bug Fix Releases Further development of procedures for Light Bug Fix Releases Develop the package TESTS Develop the package TESTS User support (versions 1_3_0 – 1_4_0) User support (versions 1_3_0 – 1_4_0) Increase support for Makefiles Increase support for Makefiles Continue testing with gcc 4 Continue testing with gcc 4 Migrate to HepMC in the package TESTS to provide a general approach to c++ and Fortran generators. Migrate to HepMC in the package TESTS to provide a general approach to c++ and Fortran generators. Update of already introduced Sub-package versions Update of already introduced Sub-package versions Requests from the LHC experiments are welcome Requests from the LHC experiments are welcome

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. New compilers gcc4. Default CERN Linux SLC4 is built on it. gcc4. Default CERN Linux SLC4 is built on it. g77 gfortran. Not all Fortran 77 features supported. g77 gfortran. Not all Fortran 77 features supported. Small problems in PYTHIA, a lot of problems with HERWIG (return to label, entry points). GENSER team collaborated with authors. gcc4 compliant versions prepared by GENSER release Preliminary tests made. Note that platforms with gcc4 are not yet supported by LCG, hence by GENSER, but we prepare to them beforehand Small problems in PYTHIA, a lot of problems with HERWIG (return to label, entry points). GENSER team collaborated with authors. gcc4 compliant versions prepared by GENSER release Preliminary tests made. Note that platforms with gcc4 are not yet supported by LCG, hence by GENSER, but we prepare to them beforehand Other generators and packages to be tested with gcc4. Work started (Rafael Yaari at CERN) Other generators and packages to be tested with gcc4. Work started (Rafael Yaari at CERN) 64 bits platforms come soon. Tests will be needed (heard about problems with fortran codes) 64 bits platforms come soon. Tests will be needed (heard about problems with fortran codes)

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. Testing Large scale MC productions involve a lot of manpower, they are are expensive A bug in MC generator, depending on its severity, can make a production mostly useless Detailed validation of MC, comparison of distributions with previous versions and data, can take a lot of time. Test thoughroly! Test quickly! Several levels of tests and validations can help

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. Testing Level 0 test. Special script checks the existence of libraries according to definite rules (one, several or no libraries should correspond to the generator (the latter in case of external generator) Level 0 test. Special script checks the existence of libraries according to definite rules (one, several or no libraries should correspond to the generator (the latter in case of external generator) Level 1 test. Dedicated package in GENSER. It compiles one or several applications for each generator to be tested and runs them one by one. Each applications writes some numbers in a file. At the end this file is compared with the standard file, the problems and differences are reported. Level 1 test. Dedicated package in GENSER. It compiles one or several applications for each generator to be tested and runs them one by one. Each applications writes some numbers in a file. At the end this file is compared with the standard file, the problems and differences are reported. Next tests are outside WP1. Additional levels can be used. Next tests are outside WP1. Additional levels can be used. Level 2 tests. Dedicated projects (WP4). Level 2 tests. Dedicated projects (WP4). Level 3 tests. Tests inside the experiments. Level 3 tests. Tests inside the experiments.

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. Level 1 testing, more details Dedicated package in GENSER: TESTS, additional dependencies, like ROOT, moved here Dedicated package in GENSER: TESTS, additional dependencies, like ROOT, moved here The results are often correct, but not identical, even if random numbers sequence is repeated: it is Monte Carlo! Need to look for significant changes, taking into account statistical errors. The results are often correct, but not identical, even if random numbers sequence is repeated: it is Monte Carlo! Need to look for significant changes, taking into account statistical errors. Comparison is made by a program. It detects missing results in case of test crash and continue Comparison is made by a program. It detects missing results in case of test crash and continue 10 most important generators out of 27 are now involved in this testing. The work is to be continued. The plans for 2006 are to increase the number of tests by a factor of 4 (at least) 10 most important generators out of 27 are now involved in this testing. The work is to be continued. The plans for 2006 are to increase the number of tests by a factor of 4 (at least) The full testing takes about 1 hour (shared and archive libraries are tested separately, generators with HEPEVT common block with sizes and 4000 also separately) The full testing takes about 1 hour (shared and archive libraries are tested separately, generators with HEPEVT common block with sizes and 4000 also separately) In 2005 – 2006 at least 4 bugs and unexpected “features” found with level 1 testing, at least one bug in PYTHIA found with level 3 (CMS). GENSER is going to take part of the latter to level 1. In 2005 – 2006 at least 4 bugs and unexpected “features” found with level 1 testing, at least one bug in PYTHIA found with level 3 (CMS). GENSER is going to take part of the latter to level 1.

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP1. Improve/centralize bug reports The GENSER meeting in May was devoted to this The GENSER meeting in May was devoted to this Sjostrand: The authors of the generators have to process a lot of information, most of which (> 70%) is useless Sjostrand: The authors of the generators have to process a lot of information, most of which (> 70%) is useless ThePEG/Herwig++ use Hepforge: ThePEG/Herwig++ use Hepforge: GENSER adopted the wide use of savannah portal GENSER adopted the wide use of savannah portal Filtering the problems (many problems are related to the experiments SW) Filtering the problems (many problems are related to the experiments SW)

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP2. Event Formats and Event Interfaces The MC truth Interface The MC truth Interface HEPMC: HEP event format, widely used by experiments and developers HEPMC: HEP event format, widely used by experiments and developers  January 2006: installed in LCG external, based on the version 1.26 from M. Dobbs. Interfaces to generators split in a separate library. Further development started  Discussion about the migration to MathCore vectors instead of CLHEP ones. No decision yet. Painful HEPML (XML - Les Houches Agreement compliant) HEPML (XML - Les Houches Agreement compliant)  Meta-data format facilitating automated documentation  Intensive discussions in preparation of the proposal. The same manpower as MCDB (WP3). The modularization The modularization Basic idea in ThePEG, HERWIG++, SHERPA Basic idea in ThePEG, HERWIG++, SHERPA From April 2004 LCG Generator participates to the development of ThePEG From April 2004 LCG Generator participates to the development of ThePEG  ThePEG is in GENSER (internally used by Herwig++) GOAL: standardize interfaces, support the new OO MCs

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP4. Monte Carlo Validation and Tuning GOAL: to cross-check MCs and compare with data Reference distributions (multiplicities, P T Spectra etc.) Promoting common LHC activity on MC Tuning Standalone Studies Work on GENSER subpackages ALPGEN Validation (Perugia)  Essential to verify ALPGEN in GENSER HIJING Validation (JINR, Dubna)  Encouraged to contribute to JetWeb  Generator analysis framework (together with CMS) H. Naves, Oviedo. Working prototype, limited number of generators. In future GENSER could switch partly to it in testing.  JetWeb : Automated data comparisons Comp. Phys. Comm. vol 153/ (2003). In production. Moving under Comp. Phys. Comm. vol 153/ (2003) CEDAR. To be switched to GENSER for libraries and codes  HZTOOL: next talk

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Conclusions on Generators GENSER and MCDB in production GENSER and MCDB in production Validation package TESTS in GENSER taking shape Validation package TESTS in GENSER taking shape Fruitful collaboration with generators authors Fruitful collaboration with generators authors Activity smoothly moving from integration to testing, validation and user support. Activity smoothly moving from integration to testing, validation and user support. Feedback, requests from users are welcome. Feedback, requests from users are welcome.

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Geant4 Geant4 is a toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter Geant4 is a toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matterhttp://geant4.cern.ch Last version is 8.0-Patch01 Last version is 8.0-Patch01 Validation: Validation:

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Geant4: Recent developments The range cut dependences significantly improved after the improvements of the multiple scattering code. The range cut dependences significantly improved after the improvements of the multiple scattering code. The work done by Laszlo Urban, Vladimir Ivanchenko, Michel Maire. Presented by Michel Maire 30 November The work done by Laszlo Urban, Vladimir Ivanchenko, Michel Maire. Presented by Michel Maire 30 November 2005.

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Sampling calorimeter : cut dependance Evis constant if msc off Evis constant if msc off

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Step Limitation from MSC Limit the step from the beginning of track Limit the step from the beginning of track Not only after a boundary Not only after a boundary Step = fr. Max (range, lambda) Step = fr. Max (range, lambda) New default fr = 0.02 (instead of 0.2) New default fr = 0.02 (instead of 0.2) Strong constraint only for low energy particles Strong constraint only for low energy particles Ensure that a track always does few steps in any volume Ensure that a track always does few steps in any volume more than 1 more than 1

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Result of Upgrades

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Atlas HEC : Cu (25mm) -lAr (8.5mm) Most recent report by A Kiryunin May Used Physics lists LHEP 5.0, QGSP 3.0, Packaging PACK 5.0

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June LHCb : Pb (2mm) -Sc (4mm)

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June ILC : W (2.5mm) -Si (0.32mm) cpu penalty : cpu penalty : 70 % at 1mm 70 % at 1mm 10 % at 1um 10 % at 1um

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June The problem At high energies (> 100 GeV) shower shape is not reproduced well At high energies (> 100 GeV) shower shape is not reproduced well LHEP is best LHEP is best QGSP is much worse QGSP is much worse We are investigating the causes, current candidates We are investigating the causes, current candidates Cross sections Cross sections Neutron production Neutron production Multiplicities Multiplicities Hadron elastic scattering Hadron elastic scattering The data from CMS test beam are used: The talks by J.Damgov, S.Piperov, S.Kunori, T.Yetkin. The data from CMS test beam are used: The talks by J.Damgov, S.Piperov, S.Kunori, T.Yetkin.

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Approach Shower development Shower development Improve understanding of key components of shower Improve understanding of key components of shower Physics Models in various physics lists Physics Models in various physics lists Document how interactions are modeled Document how interactions are modeled Cross sections Cross sections Hadron elastic scattering Hadron elastic scattering Revision started end 2005 Revision started end 2005 General checks of processes General checks of processes Energy conservation, … Energy conservation, …

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Conclusions on Geant4 First cycle of the electromagnetic physics validation is completed at the percent level First cycle of the electromagnetic physics validation is completed at the percent level Significant improvements in the multiple scattering code since 8.0 (dynamic step limitations and other changes, without changing the model) Significant improvements in the multiple scattering code since 8.0 (dynamic step limitations and other changes, without changing the model) Concentrating on the hadronic physics validation (more difficult). Develop criteria for the validation for LCG: what can be the maximal allowed disagreement? (Check within physics analyses in experiments, use fast simulation etc.) Concentrating on the hadronic physics validation (more difficult). Develop criteria for the validation for LCG: what can be the maximal allowed disagreement? (Check within physics analyses in experiments, use fast simulation etc.) First round of validations shows good results for the most popular observables: e/pions, energy resolution. First round of validations shows good results for the most popular observables: e/pions, energy resolution. Problems with shower profile: too short in QGSP at energies above 30 – 50 GeV Problems with shower profile: too short in QGSP at energies above 30 – 50 GeV Detailed study of the models, the revision of some of them underway: checking particles spectra, energy conservation etc. Detailed study of the models, the revision of some of them underway: checking particles spectra, energy conservation etc.

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June Background slides

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP3. The MCDB Team MCDB developers MCDB developers L. Dudko (SINP MSU Moscow) L. Dudko (SINP MSU Moscow) S.Makarychev (ITEP Moscow) S.Makarychev (ITEP Moscow) S. Belov (JINR Dubna) S. Belov (JINR Dubna) Other contributors (previous shifters, designers etc.) Other contributors (previous shifters, designers etc.) A. Kryukov, I. Seluzhenkov, A. Sherstnev, A. Vologdin (SINP MSU Moscow) A. Kryukov, I. Seluzhenkov, A. Sherstnev, A. Vologdin (SINP MSU Moscow) P. Bartalini (Florida U.) P. Bartalini (Florida U.)

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June  Production framework June 2004 Proposal June 2004 Design Available. Prototype Stage Active institutions: CERN, Santander, Oviedo  Production centre  Configuration & Book-keeping ~ 0.75 FTE from LCG Russia (MSU, ITEP, JINR) LCG-MCDB: Deployed! WP3: Production of Shared Event Files GOAL: to produce certified generator level events In collaboration with CMS Tested At Fermilab Tested By CMS  Use them for benchmarks, comparisons & combinations in LHC W.G.  Improve the quality of shared samples with respect to LEP W.G. era !!!

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WP3. Monte Carlo Data Base (MCDB) Motivations Motivations To Provide Configuration, Book-keeping, Documentation, Storage for the Shared Event Files To Provide Configuration, Book-keeping, Documentation, Storage for the Shared Event Files To keep track of the full generation chain, Exploiting the Competences of Monte Carlo Experts and Monte Carlo Authors To keep track of the full generation chain, Exploiting the Competences of Monte Carlo Experts and Monte Carlo Authors In Production. Some things to be finalized. To be populated. In Production. Some things to be finalized. To be populated.

M. Kirsanov, HERA – LHC Workshop, CERN, June WEB page  Links to relevant documentation, CVS repository, release.notes etc. CDS Agenda HomeCDS Agenda Home > Projects > LHC Computing Grid > Physics GeneratorsProjectsLHC Computing GridPhysics Generators  Minutes of meetings, slides of presentations Meetings:  First Tuesday of the month at 5 PM in CERN-32-1-A24 & VRVS Simulation project mailing list: Permanent Forum on Physics and Software Issues related to Monte Carlo development & usage Organisational Issues