Some first thoughts to substract the underlying event under a jet ? Tancredi Carli, CERN Pavel Starovoitov, Minsk Kt-algorithm is conceptually simply.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July , 2003.
Advertisements

Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
Régis Lefèvre Analysis done with Mario Martínez and Olga Norniella IFAE Barcelona Inclusive Jet Production using the k T Algorithm at CDF IMFP2006 XXXIV.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Dijet Transverse Thrust cross sections at DØ Veronica Sorin University of Buenos Aires.
DØ Run II jet algorithms E. Busato (LPNHE, Paris) TeV4LHC Workshop 12/1/2004 Outline:  Introduction  The Ideal Jet Algorithm  DØ Run II Cone Jet Algorithm.
Jet Reconstruction Algorithms Eric Vazquez PHENIX- Journal Club.
Jet Physics at the Tevatron Sally Seidel University of New Mexico XXXVII Rencontres de Moriond For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
Elena Bruna, for the STAR Collaboration Yale University Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Big Sky Feb
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Jet finding Algorithms at Tevatron B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction The Ideal Jet Algorithm Cone Jet Algorithms:
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Brief Introduction to Missing Transverse Energy Reconstruction at LHC Peter.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
S.D. Ellis: West Coast LHC Theory Network 2/3/06 1 PREPARING for the Future QCD for LHC What We Need to Know/Learn: About Long Distances Go!
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , 2009 Aug 23, 2009 Introduction To Jet Reconstruction In ATLAS Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona.
Collider Physics and QCD Phenomenology Mike Seymour (based at CERN) HERWIG Monte Carlo event generator –Current version ~ frozen (bug fixes and minor new.
Measurement of Inclusive Jet cross section Miroslav Kop á l University of Oklahoma on behalf of the D Ø collaboration DIS 2004, Štrbské pleso, Slovakia.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #14.
ISMD 2005 August 11, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 XXXV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics 2005 Rick Field University of Florida (for.
Working group C summary Hadronic final states theory Mrinal Dasgupta.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
Monte Carlo event generators for LHC physics
Measurement of α s at NNLO in e+e- annihilation Hasko Stenzel, JLU Giessen, DIS2008.
2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 
Cambridge 19 th April1 Comparisons between Event Generators and Data Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University.
AcerMC and ISR/FSR systematics at ATLAS Liza Mijovic, Borut Kersevan Jozef Stefan Inst. Univ. of Ljubljana ATLAS approach: Generator level studies Parameters.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.
1 P. Loch U of Arizona July 22, 2011 Experimental aspects of jet reconstruction and jet physics at the LHC (Part II) What Are Jets? The experimentalist’s.
June 25, 2004 Jianwei Qiu, ISU 1 Introduction to Heavy Quark Production Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University CTEQ Summer School on QCD Analysis and Phenomenology.
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
David Milstead – Experimental Tests of QCD ITEP06 Winter School, Moscow Experimental Tests of QCD at Colliders: Part 1 David Milstead Stockholm University.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
David Berge – CAT Physics Meeting – 9 May Summary Hadronic Calibration Workshop 3 day workshop 14 to 16 March 2008 in Tucson, Arizona
Recent jet measurements at the Tevatron Sofia Vallecorsa University of Geneva.
1 Jets in PHENIX Jiangyong Jia, Columbia Univerisity How to measure jet properties using two particle correlation method (In PHENIX)? Discuss formula for.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
Event Shapes, A. Everett, U. WisconsinZEUS Meeting, March 6, Some Slides for Michele There is no subtitle.
View From a(n Old!) Theorist Stephen D. Ellis University of Washington MC4LHC CERN July 2006 A lot of Philosophy From Long Experience – See the Next talk.
F Don Lincoln f La Thuile 2002 Don Lincoln Fermilab Tevatron Run I QCD Results Don Lincoln f.
Experimental Aspects of soft QCD N. van Remortel Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium Jet workshop Boston, Jan
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
Energy Dependence of the UE
Jet shape & jet cross section: from hadrons to nuclei
Jet Production Measurements with ATLAS
From Hadronic Energy Scale to Jet Energy Scale
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Decomposing p+p Events at √s = 200 GeV with STAR
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Hard Core Protons soft-physics at hadron colliders
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Investigation on QCD group
Event Shape Variables in DIS Update
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
The Tevatron Connection
Rick Field - Florida/CDF
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Some first thoughts to substract the underlying event under a jet ? Tancredi Carli, CERN Pavel Starovoitov, Minsk Kt-algorithm is conceptually simply and is infra-red und collinear safe (has been proposed to be used in pp-collisions by Ellis/Soper and Catani/Seymour) This algorithm has been successfully used at HERA in gamma-p frame …but only since recently it has been really used for QCD cross-section at Tevatron Main difficulty: because of the varying jet area, difficult to subtract minimum bias (MB) events and the underlying events (UE) This talk: Study what are the problems in UE subtraction… See, if jet constituents can be used in case of cone algorithm Aim: If this works, the same can be done in Kt

Some Definitions 1) Underlying Event (UE): collision of beam remnants  Subtraction is needed to compare to NLO calculation (non-perturbative correction) 2) Minimum bias event (MBE): soft hadron-hadron collision in same bunch crossing  Subtraction needed to measure cross-section (hadron level) Can also exploit number of vertices in event 3) Pile-up (PUE): soft hadron-hadron collisions in different bunch crossing  Subtraction needed to Have to understand E vs time behaviour of detector Here we just study UE…it is the easiest case

Underlying Event Generation We use SHERPA to generate UE UE: flat in , large  suppressed by phase space

Leading Jet Cross-section Jet cut:use the D0 version of the Midpoint algorithm Use only hadrons from hard scattering Use all hadrons (including UE) Difference  UE causes sizeable change of jet cross-section

How to deal with UE ? Assumption: Hard scattering and UE are largely uncorrelated (correlation has been observed, but is weak Minimum bias event are completely uncorrelated) Nevertheless: Any strategy to substract UE energy has to deal with possible biases: 1. Jet algorithm sees UE when defining jet e.g. decision to merge to a certain parton configuration into 2 or 3 jets might depend on the presence of UE, therefore the Et of the individual jets can be different 2. UE has structure on an event by event basis e.g. probability to see a hadron in a certain eta/phi range is higher if there is already a hadron

Energy Flow around Leading Jet Use only parton from hard scattering plus parton shower Use all partons (including UE) Use only partons from hard scattering Use all hard partons (including UE) Jets are in most cases back-to-back (limit deta=0 for LO) Leading jet is mostly one parton UE reduces energy in core and widens (jet axis might be changed a bit..)

dR Energy Flow around Leading Jet Difference: with-without UE UE partons only (strange shape due to phase space cone/sphere) Jet algorithm pulls in UE partons and changes jet axis Why cross-section difference is very different from mean UE energy ??

dPhi Energy flow around Leading Jet Use only partons from hard scattering Use all hard partons (including UE) Use only parton from hard scattering plus parton shower Use all partons (including UE) Jets algo pull in UE partons and changes jet axis Why this difference ? Why effect different for hard partons/showers ? Difference: with-without UE UE partons only

UE Subtraction Possible strategies: Measure minimum bias events: 1) -determine mean Et in cone around random axis -subtract this number from each jet (not possible for Kt-algorithm, since jet area is not well defined) 2) -Determine mean Et in eta/phi tower, -sum of mean Et of jet constituents (possible for Kt, if no holes) Mean Et using method 1 and 2 Is not the same ! Why ? Correlation event-by-event ? Need to fold in eta-jet distribution ?

Conclusion UE subtraction is rather tricky for all algorithms Jet algorithm see UE during jet clustering  cross-section with-without UE not equal mean UE energy It seems that jet algorithm pulls in UE and changes axis … effect to be quantified Next step: define a cross-section (or mass of a particle) and quantify how a give correction method works For Kt-need to define area e.g. via constituents (e.g. calo cells/towsers) or as proposed by M.Cacciari/G. Salam using large number of soft particles Potenial problem:

Energy Flows around Jets