Manager Research and Projects Lloyd’s 7th International Product Tanker Conference London 14 September 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) By: Casey Marshall Period 4 -On March 24, 1989, shortly after midnight, the oil tanker Exxon Valdez struck Bligh Reef in.
Advertisements

Structure of dangerous goods Maritime Office in Gdynia.
MARPOL Annex I Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Oil
Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental Manager
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Up Date of IMO & IACS 15 May 2003 External Affairs Division, ClassNK.
1 Oil Tanker Outlook and Newbuilding Demand in a Changing Environment Fallout from the Prestige Incident.
THE FUTURE OF THE JONES ACT TANK VESSEL FLEET
SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT AT SEA “CONVENTIONAL WISDOM” Barcelona 30 October 2003 Peter Swift.
Environmental Bunker legislation and the Potential Impact on the Vancouver Market May 2014 May
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
1 BG LNG Services LLC 24 th October 2006 Transportation of Ethanol and Vegetable Oils - Understanding the revisions to MARPOL Annex II and the IBC Code.
FFSA Insurance and Legal Committee The Tanker Industry Today “The World’s Tanker Fleet” 12 February 2008 Peter M Swift, MD INTERTANKO.
International Maritime Organization Safety, Security and the Prevention of Pollution- in Shipping.
1 High Level Panel on Double Hull Tankers Ib Matthiesen – Head of Unit INTERTANKO – Athens Tanker Event 2005.
3/15/06 Tripartite Agreements and Bio Fuels Maurice Gordon, P.E. Maritime Systems Engineering, Inc. Engineering, Inc.
Kuwait Petroleum Corporation
Ship-Type Operations UNITAS Session 11 Tankers Introduction Oil tankers Chemical tankers Gas carriers.
Shanghai International Maritime Forum 2007 Oil Transportation and Pollution Prevention Tim Wilkins 国际油轮船东协会 Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental.
TANKERS ADAPTING TO NEW RULES AND REGULATIONS Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
INTERTANKO’s proposal for an Interim Strategy on Ship Recycling EMSA Workshop Lisbon, 21 st September 2006
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 16, 2009 MARINE ISSUES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
The State of the tanker industry IMSF Singapore 17 April 2007 Manager Research and Projects.
Latin American Panel Miami, 24 July 2003 “ POST PRESTIGE ” Peter M. Swift.
PHASE – OUT Dragos Rauta INTERTANKO NORTH AMERICAN PANEL October 4th, 2005 Houston, TX.
Prevention of pollution by harmful substances in packaged form
The Product Tanker Market and Phase-Out Implications by Manager Research and Projects 4th Annual Combined Chemical & Product.
PSPC and the BW Convention Tokyo Tripartite Meeting, 2010.
Leading the way; making a difference GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires.
INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL 2005 Federal and State Legislative Update November 16, 2005 Miami Beach, Florida.
Manager Research and Projects Main issues facing the tanker industry China Logistics 19 October 2005.
Single Hull Tankers Phase-out and conversion Nicholas Fistes Chairman, INTERTANKO Dalian, 6 November 2008 World shipping (China) summit 2008.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
US Coast Guard Implementation of MARPOL Annex IIbbbbb By Tom Felleisen.
“THE NEW WORLD ORDER” Structural Transformation & Changes in the Tanker Trade Peter M. Swift.
Coatings Issues Tripartite Nov08. Key Developments IMO Guideline for Maintenance & Repair of Coatings SOLAS amendment for coating of cargo oil tanks of.
The State of the tanker industry IMSF Singapore 17 April 2007 Manager Research and Projects.
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL PANAMA 8-9 February 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Leading the way; making a difference NOx Tier III requirements 1. 1.The NOx Tier III enforcement date of 1 January 2016 is kept for already designated.
Chemical Distribution Institute MARPOL ANNEX II REVISIONS November 12, 2003 Howard Snaith, Director, Marine and Chemical INTERTANKO.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs Hong Kong, 26 November 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Senior Manager - Environment.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Tanker Market Outlook 2005 Key Concerns Facing the Tanker Industry - An INTERTANKO Perspective By John C. Fawcett-Ellis General Counsel & Regional Manager.
Tanker supply until 2015 Platts Navigating Through Market Challenges by Manager Research and Projects Athens 26 October 2009.
INTERTANKO Council meeting ExCel Centre, London 18 September 2003.
Hazardous Substance Response Plan Regulations Lieutenant Eric A. Bauer, USCG Office of Response Planning & Preparedness Division Industry Preparedness.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:
Tanker Supply & tanker incidents by Manager Research and Projects INTERTANKO Council - London 18 November 2008
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
Sea A SIA CHARTERERS’ FORUM Singapore 2 April 2007 Peter M. Swift INTERTANKO: London, Oslo, Brussels, Singapore, Washington.
WORLD MARITIME DAY PARALLEL EVENT
GCC CODE “THE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR SHIPS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS” THE CABINET RESOLUTION NO.(29) OF 2013.
MOSVOLD SHIPPING LTD Results 1Q 2001
Manager Research and Projects INTERTANKO AGM – Open Market Session,
Tanker supply until 2015 OECD working party on shipbuilding Paris by Manager Research and Projects Paris 4-5 December 2008.
INTERTANKO is the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners INTERTANKO has been the voice of independent tanker owners since 1970, ensuring.
Structural Transformation Changes in the Tanker Trade
MARPOL Annex I Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Oil
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
International Shipping - Carrier of World Trade
International Maritime Organization
North American Panel 17 March 2008 Stamford, CT.
PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations
IMO MSC 96 Summary Report London, 11 to 21 May 2016 BUREAU VERITAS
Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI Convention
Regulating ship waste from a European perspective
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Manager Research and Projects Lloyd’s 7th International Product Tanker Conference London 14 September 2005

Phase out R egulations 13F 13G 13H MARPOL Annex II OPA90 schedule/size limit different S tatistics C onversion to PL/SBT - DH 2010 – final year for SH tankers?

Phase out history  In the aftermath of Exxon Valdez, 0n 18 August 1990, the US President signed into law the US Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90). This was the first regulation which has mandated double hull design for tankers with a building contract after 30 June 1990 and with a delivery after 31 Dec  First IMO phase out initiated by the US OPA 90 - ratified by IMO March enforced as from July 1993  Accelerated IMO phase out initiated by Europe as a result of the ERIKA accident outside France - ratified by IMO April enforced as from September 2001  Further acceleration of IMO phase out initiated by Europe as a result of the PRESTIGE accident outside Spain - ratified by IMO December 2003, enforced as from April enforced by Europe as from October 2003  The European Union’s Regulation (1726/2003) on single hull tankers took effect on 21st October 2003  Both ERIKA and PRESTIGE carried Heavy Fuel Oils that can pollute up to ten times more than crude oil. IMO therefore adopted a new regulation – Regulation 13H of Annex I of MARPOL 73/78 – banning the carriage of heavy grade oil as cargo in single hull oil tankers as from 5 April 2005.

Phase out by segment

Phase out SH tankers (5-9,999 dwt) No Phase out year ships 02 SH 432

Phase out SH tankers (10-19,999 dwt) No Phase out year ships 542 SH 186 order 149 Phase out overhandg : 44

Phase out SH tankers (20-29,999 dwt) Number Phase out year ships 253 SH 142 Orders 18 Phase out overhang : 23

Phase out SH tankers (30-44,999 dwt) Number Phase out year Ships 637 SH 216 Orders 121 Phase out overhang : category 1 tankers built DB/DS phased out

Phase out SH tankers (45,000 – 59,999 dwt) Number Phase out year Ships 425 SH 75 Orders 229 Phase out overhang : 2 14 category 1 tankers built

Phase out SH tankers (60,000 – 79,999 dwt) Number Phase out year Ships 264 SH 98 Orders category 1 tankers built

Phase out SH tankers (10,000 – 79,999 dwt) m dwt Phase out year Ships 75 m dwt SH 28 m dwt Orders 28 m dwt 63% (976 tankers 17.6 m dwt) phase out below 30,000 dwt 32% (401 tankers 8.9 m dwt) orders below 30,000 dwt 4-10 m due for phase out 2010

Tanker fleet development m dwt

Implementation policies of special provisions

Phase out s pecial provisions 13 G (5) - double bottom/sides - CAS requirement 13 G (7) - SH trading beyond 2010/25 years 13 G (8) (b) – entry into ports or offshore terminals (provisions (5), (7) 13 H (5) - double bottom/sides - trading beyond 2010/25 years 13 H (6) (a) - crude oil having a density at 15ºC higher than 900 kg/m3 but lower than 945 kg/m3 13H (6) (b) tons dwt and above but less than 5,000 tons dwt - SH until 25 years 13 H (7) - exclusively within an area under its jurisdiction, 13 H (8) (b) – entry into ports or offshore terminals (provisions (5), (6)

Implementation policies Flag / Port States 13G (5) 13G (7) 13G (8)(b)13H (5) 13H (6)(a) 13H (6)(b) 13H (7) 13H (8)(b) AustraliaY1Y1 NYNNNNY BahamasYYN/AYYYY BarbadosYYNYYY7N EU MembersY1Y1 NYNNNNY GreeceNNNYYYYN Hong KongY1Y1 Y2Y2 NNNNNY IndiaYYNYYYYN JapanY1Y1 YNY1Y1 NY3Y3 -N4N4 LiberiaYYN/AYYYY Marshall Isl.YYN/AYYYY MexicoYNYNNNNY Panama Canal-- case by case---- Panama FlagYYNYYYNN ChinaYNYY2Y2 NNNY Republic of Korea- --N5N5 N5N5 N5N5 N5N5 Y RomaniaYNYNNNNY SingaporeYYNYYYYN United StatesN/A Source:

Annex II revision

MARPOL Annex II Revisions After 1 January 2007 products defined as "floaters" and "persistent floaters", which include the vegetable oils, will be assigned to Category Y. Vegoils will have to be carried in IMO Type 2 or 3 space. Oil-like substances will not exist (xylene will require chemical code certificate). All ships loading IBC Cargoes will need to hold a Certificate of Fitness (CoF) issued under the revised requirements.

MARPOL Annex II Revisions The vegetable oils listed in Chapter 17 of the IBC Code will be regulated as Pollution Category Y and ship Type 2, and contain a limit on free fatty acid content. The IMO agreed that the individually identified vegetable oils should in principle be carried in Ship Type 2. However, via regulation of the revised MARPOL Annex II, an administration might allow the carriage of these substances in a ship Type 3 “ONLY” if the ship complies with all requirements for a ship Type 3, as identified in the IBC Code, except for cargo tank location. The cargo tank location shall be in accordance with regulation of the revised MARPOL Annex II but these ships must be constructed with double sides meeting the requirements for IMO ship Type 2 vessels and double bottom requirements of B/15 or 2 metres (whichever is the lesser) and the CoF shall indicate the exemption granted.

Tanker fleet by hull by m dwt

Conclusion

P hase on schedule with no major problems 2010 situation unclear OPA re-schedule different Annex II revision will affect single hull product tankers