Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration AMS-02 ROAD TO COFR Mike Fohey July 15, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

Battery Safety and Design Manual for Payloads presented by Jerri S. Ling September 13, 2004 presented by Jerri S. Ling September 13, 2004.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR Project Management.
AMS-02 Rebaselining Outbrief ISS PIA/ICD & SSP MIP/ICD ISS Payload Mission Integration & Planning/OZ2 Space Shuttle Mission & Cargo Integration Office/MO3.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Systems Engineering (SE) Tools National Aeronautics and Space Administration Example.
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
1 Change Management FOR University Medical Group Saint Louis University Click this icon for Audio.
LSU 07/24/2004Defining Project Tasks1 Defining the Project Tasks Project Management Unit, Lecture 4.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
FIELDS iCDR Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Introduction 1Peter Harvey.
Standard WBS Version 1.0 WBS2-3.pptPage 1 Standard Work Breakdown Structure Legend = Decomposes to lower level WBS elements 4.0 Implementation 4.0 Implementation.
Technological Design STS-118 Lunar Plant Growth Chamber Challenge © 2013 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association STEM  Center for.
Page 1 MODEL TEST in the small GENERALIZE PROGRAM PROCESS allocated maintenance changes management documents initial requirement project infrastructure.
Expendable Launch Vehicle Payload Safety Program Cal Staubus.
From Research Prototype to Production
Current Safety Status Phase III Flight Safety Review 12 Jan 2009.
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
May 21-25, 2007Phase II FSR1 ISS Hardware Magnetic Susceptibility Testing and Analysis Trent Martin NASA AMS Project Manager
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
10/14/ :25:29 PM ISSP On-Orbit QA To share with QLF the ISS approach to the On-Orbit Quality Assurance process and the current status NASA QLF
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
1 Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer – 02 Phase III Flight Safety UPS Overview Jan John A. Heilig ESCG/Jacobs.
Project Management Models
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Barry Boehm, USC CS 510 Software Planning Guidelines.
NASA Office of Safety & Mission Assurance IV&V Cost Estimation – A Joint NASA & US Navy Collaboration to Model & Automate the Process Software Assurance.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
DPE CSSW Process Model Annex A WP-400 ECSS Case Study.
Space Shuttle Program Transition Structure SSP/ Lee Norbraten February 15, 2006 TCB.
Integration of Safety into the Design Process Overview of DOE-STD-1189 Richard Black, Director Office of Nuclear & Facility Safety Policy.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.
Software QA Safety Systems at SLAC Enzo Carrone Controls Department – Safety Systems SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
ESA ODFCB # 4 Peter Granseuer1 ESA ODFCB Charter Peter Granseuer MSM-EOI
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
JWST PRDS Project Mangement Case Study Jesse Doggett Project Engineer, ITEB/OED.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Payload Safety Review Plan and Issues Leland D. Hill.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Launch System Phase I Safety Review Preparation for GT #2 Topic: Phase I Safety Review.
Art Nelson, Jr.AMS-02 Technical Interchange Meeting - JSC - January Ground Safety Status.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Permanent Magnet Impacts to STS/ISS/MOD Chris Tutt 5 May 2010.
Safety and Mission Assurance Plan AMS-02 R EBASELINING O UTBRIEF July 15, 2004 NT/David Kaplan
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
GOES-R Series User Readiness Planning and Development May 12, 2004.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Mission Integration OZ2/Winston J. Reid/(281) Page No. 1 International Space Station Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer-02 AMS-02 Ops TIM - Ops Assessment.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
July 26, 2005 Nelda Allen/Colsa1 Configuration Management Process 2 Minor Changes (pages 2 & 5)
NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory Increment 19/18 Soyuz.
O. Kester, NuSTAR annual meeting, 27/02/2013
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
POIC Safety Payload Operations & Integration Center Mitchell Moore Marshall Space Flight Center ARES Corporation POIC Safety 1.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center SAMS KU Forward Lessons Learned 1 Kevin McPherson NASA GRC Payload Operation.
Page No. 1 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) Process Updates/Status International Space.
Payload Inventory Management & Stowage Operations Processes 10/19/99 Point of Contact Gordon Boswell MSFC/POIF/OI (256)
I&T&C Organization Chart
Software Verification and Validation
THEMIS Mission Assurance
Systems Engineering Management
ISSP On-Orbit QA To share with QLF the ISS approach to the On-Orbit Quality Assurance process and the current status NASA QLF
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
PSS verification and validation
Executive Project Kickoff
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration AMS-02 ROAD TO COFR Mike Fohey July 15, 2004

Major Reviews Flight Safety Reviews Ground Safety Reviews Processing Readiness PIH 1149 Reviews CoFR/FRR Operations Review AMS Master Schedule Roll up of Tasks Programmatic Schedule Margin Management Delivery Dependencies HW SW Analysis Safety Data Process, Planning & Reporting Earned Value Methods Budget Manpower Phasing Risk Management Configuration Management Schedule Facilities Project Reporting Collaboration Commitments & Schedules Integration Reviews Personal Witness Delivery of NASA PIH Collaboration support of Launch & Flight External dependencies affect product deliveries Control Points (AMS, DOE, HQ, EA, SEAT) AMS WBS WBS Task Breakdown Products Integration Mentoring Task Breakdown Sub-products Cost Code Resource Loaded Road to CoFR Starts Here AMS-02 Road to CoFR

Certificate of Flight Readiness (CoFR) AMS/ISS Government Certification Approval Request (GCAR) Closure AMS Equipment Certification AMS Verification & Validation Document and Acceptance Data Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE AMS-02 Road to CoFR National Aeronautics and Space Administration

 NASA Developed Payload Integration Hardware (PIH) System Requirements and Integrated Payload Requirements  AMS Payload Safety Requirements  AMS Experiment Component Mission Assurance Requirements Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE AMS-02 Road to CoFR National Aeronautics and Space Administration Three main sets of requirements must be met in order to certify the AMS Payload for flight:

Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration PIH System Requirements & Integrated Payload Requirements are documented in:  JSC 29789, Project Technical Requirements Specification for the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer-02 (AMS-02) Payload Integration Hardware (PIH)  JSC 29095, Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer - 02 (AMS-02) Experiment/Payload Integration Hardware (PIH) Interfaces (Part II)  JSC 29202, Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer 02 (AMS-02) Experiment/Vacuum Case Payload Integration Hardware (PIH) Interfaces  SSP 57213, Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer-02 (AMS-02) Hardware Interface Control Document (ICD)  SSP 57003, Attached Payload Interface Requirements Document  NSTS TBD, AMS to STS ICD  NSTS IDD-ISS, Core ICD with Shuttle PIH System Requirements & Integrated Payload Requirements

Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration  A Verification and Validation Document (V&VD): Plan and Report will be created per EA-WI-023 to document the verification and validation activities for the AMS-02 Payload.  The V&VD will contain a verification matrix for tracking verification/validation of the PIH System Requirements and Integrated Payload Requirements PIH System Requirements & Integrated Payload Requirements

Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE AMS Payload Safety Requirements National Aeronautics and Space Administration  AMS Payload Safety Requirements are developed as a part of the payload safety process.  The Payload is subjected to phased (0, I, II, III) flight and ground safety reviews.  Safety Data Packages (SDPs) are prepared and submitted in accordance with NSTS/ISS 13830, Payload Safety Review and Data Submittal Requirements

Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE AMS Payload Safety Requirements National Aeronautics and Space Administration  Payload hazards are documented and tracked to closure in the Hazard Reports  Payload is approved for flight when the Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) signs off on the Phase III SDP and all Hazard Reports are closed  For any items that do not get closed out at Phase III, a Verification Tracking Log will be implemented and tracked to CoFR

Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE AMS Experiment Component Mission Assurance Requirements National Aeronautics and Space Administration  AMS Experiment component mission assurance requirements are defined by the AMS Experiment Component teams and are not the responsibility of the NASA AMS Project Office.  NASA/EA does have some insight into these requirements and will create an Experiment Milestone Log that will be maintained until all items are closed and the CoFR is issued.  The Experiment Milestone Log will contain key verification and integration milestones for the experiment hardware.

IRD/ICD PARAGRAPH NO. CLASSIFICATION IDENTIFIER (REFERENCE #) DESCRIPTIONSTATUS IRD ICD ExceedanceAMS-02 / 01AMS-02 Exceedance of the On-Orbit Operational Envelope Open See note 1 IRD A ICD ExceedanceAMS-02 / 02AMS-02 Exceedance of the EVA/Robotics Operational Envelope - EVA Open See note 2 IRD (TBR-4) ICD ExceedanceAMS-02 / 03AMS-02 Magnetic Field Limits Open See note 3 AMS-02 EXCEPTIONS TO SSP REQUIREMENTS Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE Required Waivers National Aeronautics and Space Administration

AMS-02 EXCEPTIONS TO SSP REQUIREMENTS Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE Required Waivers National Aeronautics and Space Administration NOTES: 1.MAGIK Analysis complete. Programmatic decision to not use adjacent PAS site while the AMS-02 Payload is attached to the station. Approval Pending. 2.NBL evaluation and analysis complete. Actions from Crew Consensus Report closed. Approval Pending. 3.Testing on U.S. and Russian Spacesuits, Safer, and PGT complete. Keep-out zones will be established where required. SPDM & SSRMS testing/analysis pending.