Verification of model wind structure and rainfall forecasts for 2008 Atlantic storms Tim Marchok NOAA / GFDL Collaborators: Rob Rogers (NOAA / AOML / HRD)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIX INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON TROPICAL CYCLONES 2006 IWTC-VI SAN JOSE, COSTA RICA NOVEMBER 2006 TOPIC 0.1 QUANTITATIVE FORECASTS OF TROPICAL CYCLONES LANDFALL.
Advertisements

Operational Hurricane Model Diagnostics at EMC Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop NHC, Miami, FL 4 May 2009 – 6 May 2009 Vijay Tallapragada,
Frank Marks NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division 11 February 2011 Frank Marks NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division 11 February 2011 Hurricane Research.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Creation of a Statistical Ensemble for Tropical Cyclone Intensity Prediction Kate D. Musgrave 1, Brian D. McNoldy 1,3, and Mark DeMaria 2 1 CIRA/CSU, Fort.
Ensemble Forecasting of Hurricane Intensity based on Biased and non-Gaussian Samples Zhan Zhang, Vijay Tallapragada, Robert Tuleya HFIP Regional Ensemble.
Assessment of Tropical Rainfall Potential (TRaP) forecasts during the Australian tropical cyclone season Beth Ebert BMRC, Melbourne, Australia.
Validation of the Ensemble Tropical Rainfall Potential (eTRaP) for Landfalling Tropical Cyclones Elizabeth E. Ebert Centre for Australian Weather and Climate.
GFDL Hurricane Model Ensemble Performance during the 2010 Atlantic Season 65 th IHC Miami, FL 01 March 2011 Tim Marchok Morris Bender NOAA / GFDL Acknowledgments:
HFIP Ensemble Products Subgroup Sept 2, 2011 Conference Call 1.
Tropical Cyclone Rainfall - Southwest United States and Northwest Mexico David Roth NOAA Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Camp Springs, MD September.
Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop Opening Remarks Mark DeMaria May 4-6, 2009 National Hurricane Center Miami, Florida.
1 Sensitivity of air-sea exchange coefficients (Cd and Ch) on hurricane size and intensity of HWRF Young Kwon and Robert Tuleya EMC/NCEP/NWS/NOAA HFIP.
4-6 May 2009 Co-hosted by Naomi Surgi, Mark DeMaria, Richard Pasch, Frank Marks 4-6 May 2009 Co-hosted by Naomi Surgi, Mark DeMaria, Richard Pasch, Frank.
Convective-scale diagnostics Rob Rogers NOAA/AOML Hurricane Research Division.
CLIQR Rainfall analog David Roth & Kyle Griffin NOAA Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Camp Springs, MD Last Updated: June 4, 2009.
Is Integrated Kinetic Energy a Comprehensive Index to Describe Tropical Cyclone Destructiveness? Emily Madison.
Improvements to GFDN Planned for Operational Implementation in 2008 Morris Bender, Timothy Marchok (GFDL) Isaac Ginis, Biju Thomas, Richard Yablonsky (URI)
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 1 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Stan Kidder 2, Robert.
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Robert DeMaria 2, Andrea.
Improving the Prediction of Inland TC Wind Field Anantha Aiyyer Bryce Tyner North Carolina State University.
Applications of ATMS/CrIS to Tropical Cyclone Analysis and Forecasting Mark DeMaria and John A. Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Fort Collins, CO Andrea Schumacher,
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Wind Predictions: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Comparison of Airborne SFMR, Best Track and Dvorak ADT Maximum Surface Wind Estimates in Atlantic Tropical Cyclones Peter G. Black (1), Stephanie Mullins.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Predictions Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Status Report Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
1 Requirements for hurricane track and intensity guidance Presented By: Vijay Tallapragada and Sam Trahan (NWS/NCEP) Contributors: HWRF Team at EMC, NHC.
Towards an object-oriented assessment of high resolution precipitation forecasts Janice L. Bytheway CIRA Council and Fellows Meeting May 6, 2015.
Implementation of New Air-Sea Exchange Coefficients(Cd/Ch) into the Operational HWRF Model: Impact on Hurricane Intensity Forecast Skill Young C. Kwon,
Evaluation and Development of Ensemble Prediction System for the Operational HWRF Model Zhan Zhang, V. Tallapragada, R. Tuleya, Q. Liu, Y. Kwon, S. Trahan,
AMSR3/DFS Joint Research and Operational Users Working Group Meeting Tokyo, Japan - 20 April 2009 Requirements for Mid and High Latitude Applications Joe.
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
Verification Approaches for Ensemble Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones Eric Gilleland, Barbara Brown, and Paul Kucera Joint Numerical Testbed, NCAR, USA
Statistical Evaluation of the Response of Intensity to Large-Scale Forcing in the 2008 HWRF model Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Fort Collins, CO Brian.
A Comparison of Two Microwave Retrieval Schemes in the Vicinity of Tropical Storms Jack Dostalek Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere,
NHC Activities, Plans, and Needs HFIP Diagnostics Workshop August 10, 2012 NHC Team: David Zelinsky, James Franklin, Wallace Hogsett, Ed Rappaport, Richard.
Importance to the Off-Shore Energy Industry James Done Chad Teer, Wikipedia NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR.
Upgrades to the GFDL/GFDN Operational Hurricane Models Planned for 2015 (A JHT Funded Project) Morris A. Bender, Matthew Morin, and Timothy Marchok (GFDL/NOAA)
Ligia Bernardet 1*, E. Uhlhorn 2, S. Bao 1* & J. Cione 2 1 NOAA ESRL Global Systems Division, Boulder CO 2 NOAA AOML Hurricane Research Division, Miami.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Improving Hurricane Intensity.
DATA ASSIMILATION FOR HURRICANE PREDICTION Experimental system and results of semi-operational implementation during the 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season.
Review of NOAA Intensity Forecasting Experiment (IFEX) 2008 Accomplishments and Plans for 2009 Eric Uhlhorn, Frank Marks, John Gamache, Sim Aberson, Jason.
2/10/03F.Marks1 Development of a Tropical Cyclone Rain Forecasting Tool Frank D. Marks NOAA/AOML, Hurricane Research Division, Miami, FL QPE Techniques.
Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP): Where do we stand after 3 years? Bob Gall – HFIP Development Manager Fred Toepfer—HFIP Project manager Frank.
The Impact of Lightning Density Input on Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasts Mark DeMaria, John Knaff and Debra Molenar, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS AIRS Profile Assimilation - Case Study results Shih-Hung Chou, Brad Zavodsky Gary Jedlovec,
Atlantic Simplified Track Model Verification 4-year Sample ( ) OFCL shown for comparison Forecast Skill Mean Absolute Error.
Stream 1.5 Runs of SPICE Kate D. Musgrave 1, Mark DeMaria 2, Brian D. McNoldy 1,3, and Scott Longmore 1 1 CIRA/CSU, Fort Collins, CO 2 NOAA/NESDIS/StAR,
Feature-based (object-based) Verification Nathan M. Hitchens National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Do the NAM and GFS have displacement biases in their MCS forecasts? Charles Yost Russ Schumacher Department of Atmospheric Sciences Texas A&M University.
Development of a Rapid Intensification Index for the Eastern Pacific Basin John Kaplan NOAA/AOML Hurricane Research Division Miami, FL and Mark DeMaria.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
Doppler Lidar Winds & Tropical Cyclones Frank D. Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 7 February 2007.
Applications of ATMS/AMSU Humidity Sounders for Hurricane Study Xiaolei Zou 1, Qi Shi 1, Zhengkun Qin 1 and Fuzhong Weng 2 1 Department of Earth, Ocean.
Predicting Hurricanes with Explicit Convection: The Advanced Hurricane-research WRF (AHW) Chris Davis NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale and Microscale.
Developing an Inner-Core SST Cooling Parameter for use in SHIPS Principal Investigator: Joseph J. Cione NOAA’s Hurricane Research Division Co-Investigators:
1 Naomi Surgi and the HWRF Team NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center WHERE AMERICA’S CLIMATE AND WEATHER SERVICES BEGIN.
Shuyi S. Chen Rosenstial School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami (DRAFT only!!! Improving Hurricane Structure and Intensity Forecast:
New Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Tools for the Western North Pacific Mark DeMaria and John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU.
1 Current and planned research with data collected during the IFEX/RAINEX missions Robert Rogers NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division.
Impacts of Land Effects and Improvements in Modeling Landfall Using HWRF A Joint Hurricane Testbed (JHT) Program Robert E. Tuleya, Yihua Wu, VijayTallapragada,
Improving the Validation and Prediction of Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Robert Rogers NOAA/AOML/HRD Tim Marchok NOAA/GFDL Bob Tuleya NCEP/EMC/SAIC Funded.
Ocean Vector Wind Experience Joe Sienkiewicz NOAA Ocean Prediction Center.
NOAA Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project Development Fred Toepfer, HFIP Manager Bob Gall, HFIP Development Manager.
Tropical cyclones and climate change Bob Tuleya (NOAA visiting scientist-CCPO/ODU) Collaborators: (GFDL/NOAA) Tom Knutson Morris Bender Hyeong-Seog Kim.
Evaluating HWRF Forecasts of Tropical Cyclone Intensity and Structure in the North Atlantic Basin Dany Tran 11/2/2011.
Joseph Fitzwater, Senior Analyzing Hurricane Intensity with a New Classification for the 21 st Century.
NOAA Intensity Forecasting Experiment (IFEX)
Statistical Evaluation of the Response of Intensity
Michael J. Brennan National Hurricane Center
Verification of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts
Presentation transcript:

Verification of model wind structure and rainfall forecasts for 2008 Atlantic storms Tim Marchok NOAA / GFDL Collaborators: Rob Rogers (NOAA / AOML / HRD) Bob Tuleya (NCEP/EMC & Old Dominion Univ.) Mark Powell (NOAA / AOML / HRD) HFIP Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop NHC, Miami, FL 04 May 2009

Motivation Inland flooding from TC rainfall accounts for a significant percentage of deaths from U.S. landfalling TCs. Storm size / structure has a major impact on the amount of damage at landfall. …both aspects have only recently begun to receive attention in terms of model evaluation

Outline Rainfall validation & techniques Application of TC QPF validation techniques to 2008 U.S. landfalling storms Development of model wind structure validation techniques Application of wind structure validation techniques to 2008 Atlantic TCs

Rainfall patterns Rainfall mean & volume Extreme amounts Rainfall validation: What to focus on?

The TC track: An anchor for QPF validation

GFDL NAM GFS R-CLIPER HWRF Stage IV Example: Hurricane Gustav 72-h total rainfall

2008 Landfalling Storms

Rainfall Patterns Equitable Threat Scores Pattern Correlations:GFS (r = 0.78) HWRF (r = 0.60) GFDL (r = 0.53) NAM (r = 0.52) R-CLIPER (r = 0.51) (2008)

Mean Rainfall

Rainfall volume Comparison of rain volume bias by model

2008 Landfalling Storms 50% level Difference between obs rain value and fcst rain value at 50% level determines index

Track-relative rain flux analyses

Rain volume: Rain flux in select bands 0–100 km km GFDL, HWRF GFS, NAM

Skill Indices: Pattern Matching GFS performs the best in both samples All models have skill relative to R-CLIPER

Skill Indices: Mean / Volume

Skill Indices: Extreme Amounts GFDL overforecasts the large amounts, HWRF underforecasts them, resulting in comparable indices GFS performs best despite lowest resolution

Rainfall Summary Validation techniques address unique TC rainfall attributes:  Pattern matching  Rainfall volume  Extreme amounts TC QPF skill indices for operational forecast evaluation GFS most skillful in 2008 (similar to 2005)

Outline Rainfall validation & techniques Application of TC QPF validation techniques to 2008 U.S. landfalling storms Development of model wind structure validation techniques Application of wind structure validation techniques to 2008 Atlantic TCs

The importance of near-surface wind structure Area_TS Katrina Area_TS Charley = Factor of 9

Focus is on continuous / homogeneous methods Distribution of Winds  Fractional areal coverage  PDFs of the winds Radial Structure  Earth-relative profiles  Storm motion-relative profiles  Radius of max winds Storm Destructive Potential  IKE, SDP, WDP (Powell and Reinhold 2007) Others?

Cases included in study…

Distribution: Fractional Areal Coverage (34-kt winds) Storm- sample average at tau=00h NW SWSE NE

Distribution: Fractional Areal Coverage (34-kt winds) Storm- sample average at tau=48h NW SWSE NE

Distribution: Fractional Areal Coverage (64-kt winds) Storm- sample average at tau=00h NW SWSE NE

Distribution: Fractional Areal Coverage (64-kt winds) Storm- sample average at tau=48h NW SWSE NE

Radial profiles of the wind (all cases) NW SWSE NE Tau= 00h

Radial profiles of the wind (all cases) NW SWSE NE Tau= 48h

Radial profiles of the wind (Hurricanes only) NW SWSE NE Tau= 00h

Radial profiles of the wind (Hurricanes only) NW SWSE NE Tau= 48h

Radius of Maximum Winds

Forecasts of Integrated Kinetic Energy GFDL Ike Intensity ForecastsHWRF Ike Intensity Forecasts Max Wind (kts) IKE (TJ) GFDL Ike IKE (V>18 m/s) Forecasts HWRF Ike IKE (V>18 m/s) Forecasts

Forecasts of Integrated Kinetic Energy

Wind Structure Summary Methods complementary to wind radii validation Focus on various aspects of wind field  Distribution  Radial structure  IKE / Storm destructive potential  Others…? Some biases already evident