Electroweak precision observables in the LHC epoch A.Zaitsev, Protvino Gomel, July 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phi-Psi, Feb.-Mar., 2006, S.Uehara1 Experimental studies of charmonia in two-photon collisions at Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration e +
Advertisements

1 Higgs Mechanism Cyril Topfel. 2 What to expect from this Presentation (Table of Contents) Some very limited theory explanation Higgs at.
Precision EW measurements at Future accelerators ‘Will redo te LEP program in a few minutes…. ’ 15 July 2015 Alain Blondel Precision EW measurements at.
15 november 2004SAC presentation1 LEP programme Final report Peter Kluit Thanks to: Wes Metzger, Jan Timmermans and my LEP collegues.
Electroweak b physics at LEP V. Ciulli INFN Firenze.
MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
5 th Rencontres du Vietnam - Aug. 7, 2004 Polarized Positrons…E166 A.W.Weidemann 1 Introduction (What, who) Motivation (Why) Experiment and Polarimetry.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Beam Energy Measurement: SLC-style Energy Spectrometer Stan Hertzbach University of Massachusetts LCWS 2000, Fermilab.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
W Mass & Width Measurement at LEP II BEACH 04, IIT Chicago, 08/03/04 Ambreesh Gupta, University of Chicago.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
Discovery Potential for MSSM Higgs Bosons with ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration International Europhysics Conference on.
WIN'05, June A. Klier - Muon Collider Physics1 Physics at a Future Muon Collider Amit Klier University of California, Riverside WIN’05 – Delphi,
Parity Violation in Electron Scattering Emlyn Hughes SLAC DOE Review June 2, 2004 *SLAC E122 *SLAC E158 *FUTURE.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
EW Corrections for CMS Z and Drell-Yan Measurements Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration Working Group on Electroweak precision.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
CDF Experiment in JFY2002 Shin-Hong Kim (University of Tsukuba) May 30, 2003 at KEK.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
1 Higgs : keV precision and CP violation W. J. Murray RAL.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Alain Blondel TLEP -6 Polarization TLEP Beam Polarization and Energy Calibration Jowett Wenninger Wienands Assmann Koutchouk Placidi Buon Keil.
1 Precision measurements at the LHC (ATLAS and CMS) Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory Bastei/Konigstein, 12 April 2000 Monica Pepe Altarelli (INFN.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
June, 14th, 2006Mo Xiaohu1  Mass Measurement at BESIII X.H.MO Workshop on Future PRC-U.S. Cooperation in High Energy Physics Beijing, China, Jun
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Precision electroweak physics Roberto Tenchini INFN-Pisa 5th Rencontres du Vietnam Particle Physics and Astrophysics Hanoi August 5 to August 11, 2004.
W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
SLAC Summer Institute August 13-24, 2001 Probes of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking at LEP and SLC 1 Direct and Indirect Probes of EWSB in e + e - Annihilation.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
Electroweak physics at the LHC with ATLAS APS April 2003 Meeting – Philadelphia, PA Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK (on behalf of the ATLAS.
Plan for Review of FCC- ee Optics and Beam Dynamics Frank Zimmermann FCC-ee Design Meeting 31 August 2015.
Simonetta Gentile Gomel School of Physics 2005 Physics at hadron collider with Atlas 2nd lecture Simonetta Gentile Università di Roma La Sapienza, INFN.
IWLC10, Geneva, 20/10/10 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick 1 Impact of polarized positrons for top/QCD and electroweak physics Gudrid Moortgat-Pick Hamburg University.
Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.
Physics at FCC-ee Design principle and event rates When the Higgs boson mass became known at the end of 2011, the possibility of a High Luminosity e+e-
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Top/QCD program (b) Higher Order EW + QCD Fixed order vs resummed Normalization (and peak position) stabilised by higher orders; –summation of leading.
SM Higgs decay to dimuons Ashok Kumar, Suman Beri Panjab University – Chandigarh INDIA-CMS meet March 3-5, 2005 Chandigarh.
Higgs Factories: Present and Future Chris Tully Princeton Higgs Physics Beyond Discovery April 26,
ALEPH Status Report LEPC - July Gary Taylor, UC Santa Cruz SM processes Higgs searches SUSY searches.
First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.
A. Blondel precision measurements at TLEP HEP-EPS Stockholm TLEP Precision physics at the Electroweak scale TeraZ, OkuW, MegaHiggs and Megatops.
Marc M. Baarmand – Florida Tech 1 TOP QUARK STUDIES FROM CMS AT LHC Marc M. Baarmand Florida Institute of Technology PHYSICS AT LHC Prague, Czech Republic,
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
RHIC-PV, April 27, 2007 M. Rijssenbeek 1 The Measurement of W ’s at the CERN and FNAL hadron colliders W ’s at RHIC ! W ’s at CERN – UA2 W ’s at FNAL -
Polarized positrons at low energies: Physics goal and source requirements Sabine Riemann, DESY Zeuthen Outline: ILC as Higgs factory At the top-quark threshold.
Transverse polarization for energy calibration at Z-peak M. Koratzinos With valuable input from Alain Blondel ICFA HF2014, Sunday, 12/10/2014.
Future Colliders Gordon Watts University of Washington/Seattle APS NW Meeting May 12-14, 2016.
Physics at FCC-ee The TLEP design study is now part and parcel of the FCC design study as FCC-ee Design principle and event rates When the Higgs boson.
Photon-Photon Colliders ( Photon-Photon Colliders (  C) Mayda M. Velasco.
Please check out: K. Ohmi et al., IPAC2014, THPRI003 & THPRI004 A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P. Piminov, IPAC2014, THPRI008 Work in progress FCC-ee accelerator.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Hong-Jian He Tsinghua University Physics Case for Circular Colliders Physics Case for Circular Colliders International WS on FHECC, IHEP, Beijing, Dec.16-17,
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Budker INP, Novosibirsk
Physics Potential of the High Energy e+e- Linear Collider
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
PHYSICS MOTIVATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
PHYSICS MOTIVATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
CMS Physics Analysis in China
CMS Physics Analysis in China
The Effects of Beam Dynamics on CLIC Physics Potential
Presentation transcript:

Electroweak precision observables in the LHC epoch A.Zaitsev, Protvino Gomel, July 2007

EWPO High precision measurements of EW parameters give the way to probe new physics via virtual effects of additional objects. Most of EW precision data were obtained at LEP and SLD. The progress in accelerators and detectors gives the chance for construction of dedicated Z-factory. It can provide us with information on new physics complimentary to that at LHC.

Examples of new physics discovered with EWPO N ν =2.984 ± M t = GeV

Examples of new physics discovered with EWPO

Dedicated Z - factory Suggested parameters E GeV R=2,8 km (UNK tunnel C=20,7 km) Beam-beam tune shift ξ y 0,05 0,09 Beta function β* y = 0,02 m Synchrotron power P=60 MW Energy loss per turn GeV 0,14 1,4 Luminosity cm -2 s -1 0,5 0,2 LEP D Brandt, H Burkhardt, M. Lamont, S Myers et al e+e- COLLIDER IN THE VLHC TUNNEL A.Barcikowski, G. Goeppner, J. Norem et al A Z-factory in the VLLC tunnel E. Keil ZF A.Skrinsky et al

Transverse polarization Transverse polarization at M Z can reach 55% with polarization time t<1h. It gives excellent possibilities for precise energy calibration From R.Asmann Polarization at LEP CERN 1988

Longitudinal polarization Transverse polarization can be transformed to longitudinal one Experiment has to be inclined by 1 0 Some loss of luminosity: 5·10 33 cm -2 s -1 → 1·10 33 cm -2 s -1 Longitudinal polarization at LEP D.Treille C.Bovet, H.Burkhardt, F.Couchot et al

Statistics Z peak 0 ∫ 5years L dt = 2.5·10 41 cm -2 N Z =10 10 Longitudinal polarization in Z peak 0 ∫ 1year L dt = 1·10 40 cm -2 N Z =4·10 8 WW at threshold (164 GeV) 0 ∫ 2years L dt = 4·10 40 cm -2 N WW = 2.5·10 5 From P.Wells

Z peak M Z, Γ Z, σ had, R l, R b, R c, A l FB, A b FB, A c FB, A l (P τ ) Energy calibration:

Systematic errors in E n ZF goal: δM Zsyst < 1 MeV

Monitoring ZF goal: Absolute error: δL ≈ 3·10 -4 Relative error: δL ≈ 1·10 -4

ZF at Z peak δM Z ≈ 1 MeV δΓ Z ≈ 1 MeV δσ had /σ had ≈5·10 -4 δR l / R l ≈ 5·10 -4 δR b ≈0,0002 δ R c ≈0,001 δ A l FB ≈0,0002 δ A b ≈0,001 δ A c ≈0,002 δ A l (P τ ) ≈0,001 At ZF the precision in EW parameters can be improved significantly in comparison with LEP/SLD owing to: 3 orders of statistics Advanced technologies in detectors (especially in vertex detectors) and data analysis Better energy calibration R. Hawkings K. M¨onig. P.Rowson M.Woods

A LR with longitudinal polarization N=4·10 8 P=55% δL/L= 1·10 -4 δP/P= 1·10 -4 ↓ δA LR = 1,6·10 -4 (compare: SLD δA LR = 2·10 -3 ) δSin 2 θ W = 1/8 δA LR = 2 ·10 -5 A LR = 2(1 − 4 sin 2 θ eff )/(1 + (1 − 4 sin 2 θ eff ) 2 ) Blondel scheme

W mass A The crossection of WW pair production near the threshold in the region of 2E=164 GeV is very sensitive to W mass: dσ/dM / σ = 0,5 GeV -1 δM stat = 4 MeV δM Ebeam = 5 MeV δ M other syst = 5 MeV δ M W ≈ 8 MeV

EWPO for new physics (1) S T J. Erler, S.Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, G.Weiglein, P.M. Zerwas

EWPO for new physics (2) δsin 2 θ W = 2 ·10 -5 → δM H / M H = 5% It requires: δM t <0.4 GeV δΔα had (M Z )<

EWPO for new physics (3)

EWPO for new physics (4)

Decays Z → γγγ FCNC: Z → eμ, eτ, μτ, s̃b Z → W f ̃f Z → Q̃Q γ, Pγ γγ → x N b̃b = 1.5·10 9 Z` M> 200÷1400 GeV → θ mix < → V.Obraztsov Y.Khokhlov

ZF vs GigaZ ZF vs GigaZ ZF GigaZ Cost x << 10x Lum [cm -2 s -1 ] 5·10 33 ≈ 5·10 33 ∫ Lum dt [cm -2 ] 5·10 41 >> 5·10 40 δ E [MeV] 10 Beamstrahlung [MeV] 10 Events/bunch ≈10 -6 << ≈10 -3 Background x < y ↓ ZF !

Tunnel Tunnel 20.8 km circumference ~50 m underground 5.1 m diameter