® MTAC Workgroup 116 Great Addressing to Increase the Value of Mail MTAC Update November 7, 2007 Postal Co-chairs:Industry Co-chairs: Charles HuntJody.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® USPS MOBILE BARCODE PROMOTIONS. 2 Mobile Barcode Promotions  Mobile BarcodeTechnology Promotions Builds upon previous promotions and continues our.
Advertisements

Mailers+4 The #1 Mailing Software in the Industry.
Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) Task Team 2 General Session Presentation November 16, 2010.
® MTAC Workgroup 116 Great Addressing to Increase the Value of Mail MTAC Update January 31, 2008 Postal Co-chairs:Industry Co-chairs: Charles HuntJody.
United States Postal Service ® ANK Link ™ The New Address Quality Tool Intelligent Mail Address Quality WEBCAST Monday August 15, 2005 National Customer.
Mail Entry and Payment Technology MTAC Pritha Mehra VP Mail Entry & Payment Technology February 17, 2011.
Triangle Management 2012 World Mail & Express Americas Conference and Exhibition The Role of a Regulator in Fostering Trust and Promoting Technology Mark.
MTAC General Session Meeting Electronic Verification System (eVS®)/ Product Tracking System (PTS) User Group #2 Industry co-chair – John Medeiros Postal.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP 111 Status Update Nov 1, Work Group 111 Charter Issue Statement: Identify gaps, define solutions, highlight benefits, and improve.
MTAC Workgroup #105 Efficient Dissemination of Addressing Related Information In Emergencies/Disasters.
MTAC Update November 6, 2002 Larry Goodman USPS Co-Chair Dan Minnick Industry Co-Chair.
® MTAC Workgroup 116 Great Addressing to Increase the Value of Mail MTAC Meeting May 16, 2007.
Fuel Business Growth with Mail.dat J Jeffery Peoples CEO, Window Book, Inc.
MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRSENTATION FEBRUARY 21, 2007 PRESENTED BY Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
Saturation Mail: The Cost Effective Way to Reach More Customers.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher May 18, 2005 Washington DC.
MTAC Workgroup #105 Efficient Dissemination of Addressing Related Information In Emergencies/Disasters.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process October 6, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
MTAC Program Evaluation Survey 2003  Better Understand Membership Needs  Identify Actions Needed to Better Achieve MTAC’s Purpose.
1 Presentation Topics Agenda  January Release  BMA Channel Strategy –eDropship –Expanded Start-the-Clock  MTAC Workgroups.
® Intelligent Mail ® Barcodes for Reply Mail (Business & Courtesy) MTAC Workgroup 128 Jody Berenblatt, Industry Co-chair Linda Stewart, Postal Co-chair.
Mailing 101 EVOLVE 2015 Intelligent Mail Small Business Tool By Carol Rosengren.
Improving COA For Colleges/Universities (MTAC #90) Improving Change-of-Address System For Colleges/Universities.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
MTAC Workgroup # 83 First-Class Business Mail Measurement February 4, 2004.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail May 16, 2007.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION MAY 15, 2007 Presented By Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation February 6, 2003.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
| Inspection Service Revenue Protection Program 1 Revenue Protection Program US Postal Inspection Service Mailers Technical Advisory Committee November.
MTAC Work Group #82 Parcel Delivery Performance Measurement Effectiveness.
“In-Home Delivery” Instructions for Standard Mail MTAC Presentation February 05, 2003.
Advance Notification Streamlined Acceptance and Visibility for First-Class Mail MTAC Workgroup 102.
1 MTAC Work Group 136 Expanding and Enhancing ACS™ Data November 2010.
1 Service Performance Measurement System & Intelligent Mail® Barcodes MTAC – January 31, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Update Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail January 2008.
1 Seamless Acceptance, Performance- Based Verification Implementation, Benefits, Obstacles and Feedback Ty Taylor, JC Penney Pritha Mehra, USPS MTAC 117.
Reaching New Heights... Processing Operational Decisions Chapter IX Integrating Marketing in the Leisure Industry.
Workgroup # 120 Communicating Entry Requirements/ In-Home Delivery Dates Solutions/ Seasonality Impacts INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR DALE MILLER POSTAL CO-CHAIR CHRIS.
® Secure Destruction Service Update Sam Pulcrano Vice President, Sustainability Jim Wilson Manager, Address Management MTAC Washington, DC November 18.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process TBD MTAC Workgroup 138.
® MTAC Workgroup 116 Great Addressing to Increase the Value of Mail MTAC Meeting August 1, 2007.
1 USPS/MTAC Work Group #75 MOVE Update Initiative February 5, 2003 Joel Thomas and Angelo Wider MOVE Update Initiative.
CASS ™ Cycle Changes/Next Update Jan Caldwell Manager, Address Management United States Postal Service MTAC Meeting Oct. 31 – Nov. 2, 2006 Washington DC.
® MTAC Workgroup 104 List Certification MTAC Meeting May 16, 2007.
® Leveraging the NCSC RIBBS ® Site – Understanding What’s Available to You ribbs.usps.gov.
National Postal Policy Council. Celebrating our 25 th Year.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION November 7, 2007 Presented By Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
® MTAC Workgroup #121 Improving the ACS TM / OneCode ACS ® System MTAC Update – February 19, 2009 Postal Workgroup Leader:Industry Workgroup Leader: Lisa.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
1 Start-the-Clock for Non Full-Service Mailings MTAC 139 November 17, 2010 Rose FlanaganChris Simone Data-Mail IncUSPS.
MTAC Consistency Workgroup # 86 Update 1. MTAC Consistency Workgroup Workgroup Leaders Sue Taylor – (Industry Co-Chair) Prudential Michele Denny – (Postal.
February 23, 2006 MTAC Workgroup #87 Improving the Drop Shipment Process Update.
MTAC User Group 1 Task Team 14 Status Update. Overview of the Task Team 14 Task Team Title: ―Electronic documentation solution that enables verification,
MMA presentation for MTAC August 2, MTAC Association Presentation Wednesday, August 2, 2006.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION August 2, 2007 Presented By Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
Association Presentation Mailers Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2007 John A. Sexton.
1 First Class MTAC Workgroup 102 November 1, 2006.
MTAC User Group 1 Weekly Meeting October 10, 2013.
MTAC – November 2006 Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Address Location for FSS Work Group #101 November 1 st, 2006.
® Move Update MLNA and Closed PO Box Process Flow MTAC May 20, 2010.
January 2017 Price Structure Considerations
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS
Data hygiene and Merge Purge
Data hygiene and Merge Purge
Presentation transcript:

® MTAC Workgroup 116 Great Addressing to Increase the Value of Mail MTAC Update November 7, 2007 Postal Co-chairs:Industry Co-chairs: Charles HuntJody Berenblatt James WilsonChris Lien

Issue Statement for Workgroup 116  Mail is an important communication tool for businesses ●Cost effective way to promote goods and services  The Value of mail is lost when the mail does not arrive, arrives late (“stale”), or is delivered to the wrong recipient ●Inaccurate/Inadequate address information ●Individuals have moved or are deceased ●Message is unwanted and/or offensive

Discussion Topics Thus Far  Identified the types of “unwanted” mail  Identified different types of suppression lists and attributes ●Source, costs, purpose, potential benefits  Considered USPS offering a consolidated approach to offering suppression lists via “link” technology ●The workgroup dismissed this approach in favor of the industry offering this and self policing  Considering having the DMA offer their tools via a “link” format to facilitate broader application

Discussion Topics Thus Far - Continued  Noted that certain postage discounts may promulgate unwanted or undesired mailer behavior ●Presort optimization, high-density discounts ●Suggested not counting addresses flagged for suppression when calculating high-density routes  Discussed environmental benefits of mail  Established an outline of a report ●Will include data suppression, mining, and best practices to improve mail value ●Will include environmental and economic value of mail

Concerns Express Related To This Workgroup  Are there unintended consequences? ●Will the illumination of the various suppression lists work against the industry?  Is this workgroup appropriate for MTAC? ●Does it fit within the traditional role of an MTAC workgroup? ●Is there technical advice that this group can provide in the spirit of what MTAC represents?  What will our final product be? ●Are there other resources beyond a report that we can provide or suggest?

Next Steps  Continue working on a report ●The value of mail – economic and environmental ●Setting the record straight – Responding to the myths, misunderstandings, and misguided comments about mail ●Suppression Lists – what they are, how to use them ●Application of available address quality tools  Best practices  Return on investment ●Data Mining – targeting the right person the right way and reducing duplicate mail pieces within the same mailing ●How to get involved – sources for more information and associations  Workgroup is scheduled to conclude February 29, 2008