Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy EMSL Update: Reviews, Action Plan & Progress BER Advisory Committee Fall 2005
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Outline Routine review of BER facilities to ensure proper and effective operation BERAC & SC Office of Project Assessment conducted reviews of EMSL Outcomes Responses Accomplishments Paths forward
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Two-headed review May 2005 BERAC (Michelle Broido, Chair) Relationship, Science, Structure, User Model, Prioritization, Capital Equipment, non-BER funding SC Office of Project Assessment (Daniel Lehman) Management, Oversight, Resources, non- BER funding, Self assessment
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Results BERAC review of EMSL science found: “The science conducted in the EMSL is of very high quality, and a significant amount is, indeed, cutting edge. It is appropriate for BER to support this Laboratory that is a national resource.” Need for reinvigorated User & Scientific advisory committees BERAC and OPA found: Lack of a shared vision for EMSL Need for prioritization/decision making plan Need for standardized user access protocol OPA found: Need for enhanced managerial resources Need for improved communications among all parties Need for improved financial reporting systems Need to understand the impact of non-BER funding within EMSL Need for extensive benchmarking
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Responses Charged by Ray Orbach with resolving identified issues within six months (i.e., by close of 2005) EMSL brought on additional administrative and managerial staff EMSL developed a formal Action Plan Implemented project management process Approved and monitored by PNSO & BER
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Responses (continued) BER, PNSO, PNNL and EMSL became much better acquainted Weekly conference calls, monthly visits November 2005 BER/PNSO Progress Assessment visit EMSL quarterly visits to Germantown EMSL Action Plan was added to Dr. Decker’s “Watch List” Monthly briefings by PNSO/BER on progress
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Path forward Shared vision/mission is in place EMSL valued as a National Scientific User Facility BER, PNSO, PNNL & EMSL are well connected and aligned Numerous plans & documents revised, updated and/or created Action Plan will be complete on time (12/31/2005) Next step is implementation BER will revisit EMSL this spring to evaluate implementation