A new Nomogram Development POM- based tool - Application results in the Idaho Power System. Orlando Ciniglio, IPC Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy WECC TSS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
Advertisements

Spinning Reserve from Load Consideration of a Trial at Xcel Energys Cabin Creek Station Presentation to CMOPS January 7, 2005 John Kueck ORNL Brendan Kirby.
WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE June 18, 2009 Salt Lake City, UT Base Case Coordination System (BCCS) Request For Information.
Use of Node-Breaker Model in POM Suite/ROSE Software
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
SSG-WI System Model Data Requirements [PART 1] September 5, 2002 Las Vegas, NV.
DETAILED DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATIONA AND TESTING Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy
NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Study Cycle.
Preliminary Review of July 24 th Extreme Temperature Event & Implications for Pilot Capacity Standard Mary Johannis & Wally Gibson PNW Resource Adequacy.
Available Transfer Capability Determination Chen-Ching Liu and Guang Li University of Washington Third NSF Workshop on US-Africa Research and Education.
1 Simulation Modeling and Analysis Verification and Validation.
Testing an individual module
Phase Angle Alarming in ROSE for Steady-State Stability Analysis Marianna Vaiman V&R Energy JSIS Meeting Salt Lake City, UT March 5, Copyright ©
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014.
Borah Mitigators Remedial Action Scheme for the Borah West Path Sponsored by: IDAHO POWER Team Members: Kyle Jones Mark Magee Jason Rippee.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Supervisory Systems.
Small Signal Stability Analysis Study: study prepared by Powertech Labs Inc. for ERCOT Vance Beauregard AEP 9 April 2002.
Review of BPA Voltage Control Conference
Chapter 19 Linear Programming McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Energy Gateway Gateway West Project Gateway South Project
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Optimization for Operation of Power Systems with Performance Guarantee
Introduction to Standard Reports. Standard Reports 2 How to get information out of AQS Standard Reports Site / Monitor Metadata Detail Data Reports “
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
Monthly TCR Calculation DRAFT 3 James J. Teixeira 05/11/02 Also review ERCOT Protocols Section 7 for more details and additional data.
Enhanced State Estimation by Advanced Substation Monitoring PSerc Project Review MeetingTexas A&M University November 7, 2001 College Station, TX PIs:
V&R Energy’s Project under PRSP: Grid Operator’s Monitoring & Control Assistant (GOMCA) Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy JSIS Meeting.
April 16, 2010 RPG Meeting ERCOT Five-Year Transmission Plan Update Jeff Billo.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
Linear Programming McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Application and Implementation of State Estimator at Idaho Power Company S. Kincic and M. Papic.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
AFC METHODOLOGY EMS USER GROUP SEP 12, 2004 AFC – New Developments EMS USER GROUP Sep
MISO Northwest Exploratory Study Presented to National Wind Coordinating Committee Participants in study – MISO, Various utilities in Minnesota, North.
© Property of ERCOT 2001 ERCOT Limit Calculation Process John Adams Operations Engineer.
“DRAFT” RMATS 2008 Base Case (To be presented at the RMATS Stakeholders Meeting) March 17, 2004.
Reliability Must-Run Analysis 2006 – th BTA Presentation Bob Smith Manager Transmission Planning June 6, 2006.
PS ERC 1 Reactive Power Considerations in Linear Load Flow with Applications to Available Transfer Capability Pete Sauer (With a lot of help from Santiago.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Supplement 6 Linear Programming.
Managing of Limits during Loss of Analysis Tools/ EMS April 23, 2014.
2010 CSC & Zone Selection: 6 Lines W-N & 4 Zones (WN2_SN0-4Z) Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) August 19,
Current Operational Challenges Computing the West – North Limits Potential IROLs Local Voltage & Thermal issue (OOME) High Voltage Outages.
Western Area Power Administration Transmission Customer Meeting October 17, 2007.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 13: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
WECC-0100 Scope, Content & Status Update Rikin Shah, PAC Orlando Ciniglio, IPC WECC TSS Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT January ,
ROSE Updates Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy WECC JSIS Meeting Salt Lake City, UT September 9 – 10, 2014 Copyright © V&R Energy.
Part Definitions Chapter 3. Training Manual March 15, 2001 Inventory # Chapter Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, students will be.
09/20/20061 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Dumas September 20, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Dynamic Transfer Limits Study WIST Update 12/17/09 Brian Tuck, BPA.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 5/09/2011 West of Cascades – North (WOCN) Path BPA Studies Path Definition (for studies) 
TEP RMR Workshop Presentation1 Workshop on ACC RMR study submitted with 2004 ten year plan Tucson Electric Power January 15, 2004 Ed Beck Supervisor Transmission.
Announcements Please read Chapter 6
Columbia Grid Wind Integration Study Team Dynamic Transfer Capability Studies Update 9/10/09.
Team Members: Kyle Jones Mark Magee Jason Rippee
ISO New England System R&D Needs
Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017
Jonathan young ColumbiaGrid
TAS Quarterly Meeting November 2-3, 2016 Michael Bailey, P.E. WECC
Chapter 6 Network Flow Models.
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014
Presentation transcript:

A new Nomogram Development POM- based tool - Application results in the Idaho Power System. Orlando Ciniglio, IPC Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy WECC TSS Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT January ,

OUTLINE 1.Some background information 2.What is a Nomogram? 3.Basic Approach 4.Case Studies –  Midpoint West Vs COI  Idaho – NW Vs Limiting element 5.Conclusions 2

Background Information Large GI work prompted need to study interaction between existing path. It was determined that new project could be accommodated on Midpoint West path and not impact existing transfer commitments as long as heavy COI flows N-S were not concurrent. A 90% value for COI (only 10% of the time were COI flows greater than this value) was determined, for the time period of interest, based on historical records It was determined that a Nomogram between these two Paths would help assess the potential interaction. 3

Generic Problem Outline Want to find a Nomogram relation (boundary of operation) between two “Paths” subject to thermal, voltage, flowability and/or stability constraints. –“Paths” can be paths Single Line Generator(s) output Load(s) level –And observing limits in all other paths inside areas of interest By controlling load and generation within pre-specified constraints in the areas of interest. For points at or inside the Nomogram boundaries, system performance is acceptable (marginal at the boundaries) for all credible outages. 4

Generic Problem Outline (Basic Case) 5

Generic Problem Outline (Basic Case – cont) 6

The Concept of a Nomogram Given: –The paths of interest (x & y axes), and By utilizing: –A specified set of generators/loads in pre-defined areas In general, all of the generators/loads in the areas; The generation and loads in the selected areas are allowed to vary within a pre-defined range ( i.e., [Pmax,Pmin], [Lmax,Lmin], for each generator and load in the areas); Determine: –The boundary of operation for simultaneous flows on both paths. Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 7

Basic Approach Constraints for Source/Generators: Pmin for the generators (normally set to zero in the power flow cases) need to be adjusted so that the following condition is met: if(MinGenMW = 0, if(MaxGenMW > 0, min ( 0.5*MaxGenMW,MWGen),MinGenMW),MinGenMW) –where if(( condition=true) x,y), means logical statement is evaluated to x if condition is true, and to y otherwise. Establishes [Pmax, Pmin] for generators to that may be adjusted in the process. 8

Basic Approach (cont) Constraints for Sink/Loads: Load min, for each load in the areas of interest is defined as: if(MinLoadMW=0,LDMIN*MIN(MaxLoadMW,MW),MinLoadMW) Where LDMIN is a factor, normally set to 0.8 MW = actual load level Load max, for each load in the areas of interest is defined as: if(MaxLoadMW>0,LDMAX*MaxLoadMW,MaxLoadMW) Where LDMAX is a factor, normally set to 1.15 Establishes [Lmin,Lmax] for loads that may be adjusted in the process 9

How the Nomogram is Constructed in POM? For a Path X flow that is not less than a given value: –Determines the required generation/load adjustments within their limits in the user-defined areas, to cause Path Y to be maximally increased until a violation (voltage/thermal/other path flows/stability) is found. –This will define one point on the nomogram. Changes Path X flow by a given amount, and repeats this process to determine the corresponding Path Y level that can be reached before a violation is found. Computes actual path flow limitations by using available generators/loads, within their user-defined limits Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 10

Nomograms vs. Boundary of Operating Region (BOR) Two different computations: –BOR is AC transfer analysis simulation for 2 (or 3) simultaneous transfers –Nomograms is an optimization computation BOR: –Sources and sinks are defined –Changes load/generation in sources and sinks until a violation of monitored constraints occurs –Computes flows on the interfaces (paths) Nomograms: –Selects which combination of generators/loads to adjust and by how much from the specified list –Maximizes the interface (path) Y flow, while keeping interface (path) X greater than a given value, before reaching a violation Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 11

Input Data to Build a Nomogram The following information is necessary to build a Nomogram: –A Power Flow Case. –Description of the two paths; flow on one of them is maximized. –Description of other limiting paths with their flows limits. –List of generators/loads that can be adjusted in order to maximize flows on selected paths, as well as their allowed variation range. For example, for generators Pmin/Pmax specified in the base case can be used –Monitored elements (for voltage and thermal constraint monitoring) and limits. –Contingency list. –Solution options (enable/disable control of ULTCs, phase shifters, SVDs, etc.) Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 12

Output Files Program outputs results of computations to four files File #1: –The file contains information about the calculation step at which power flow through Path 1 reaches its maximum for a given limit value of power flow through Path 2. –Each record contains three space-delimited fields: Limit value of power flow through Path 2; Step number; Power flow through Path 1 calculated by script BuildNomogramFinal.txt Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 13

Output Files (cont.) File #2: –The file contains detailed information about the calculation step at which power flow through Path 1 reaches its maximum for a given limit value of power flow through Path 2. –The file consists of several types of records: The first record contains: –Limit value of power flow through Path 2; –Step number; –Power flow through Path 1 calculated by script BuildNomogramFinal.txt. The second record contains information about particular loads/generators used at calculation step listed in the first record, including bus number, generator/load ID, and the value of real power at this calculation step. The last record contains a list of violations that limit increase in power flow through Path 1. Result for Violation: Midpoint-Hemingway 500kV MW (not in ) Swing Bus MW (not in ) Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 14

Output Files (cont.) File #3: –The file contains computation results for all steps at which power flow through Path 1 is computed for a given limit value of power flow through Path 2. –File format is the same as the file format shown above. Program also creates and saves new Power Plow Cases in.epc format for each point on the nomogram: –User defines which point(s)/step(s) to save. Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 15

Graphical Output: POM Nomograms Nomograms are built automatically: –In this example, computations are done with a 50 MW step Voltage/Thermal Constraint Not Monitored Voltage Constraint Monitored / Thermal Constraint Not Monitored Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 16

Conclusions The process is automated Computes and plots the entire boundary, not just one single point Identifies the mix of generation and loads that should be used to maximize the path flow –Optimization algorithm allows to maximize path flow Copyright © V&R Energy Systems Research, Inc. All rights reserved. 17

18

Case Study #1 Want to find a Nomogram relation between Midpoint West and COI (N-S) flows, subject to: –Midpoint – Hemingway < 1500MW –Hemingway – Summer Lake < 1500MW –COI flow >= 1920MW ( North to South). –And observing limits in all other Paths inside areas of interest By controlling load and generation within pre-specified constraints in the areas of interest: –60 Idaho –62 Montana –64 Sierra –65 Pace –40 Northwest –30 PG & E –26 LADWP –73 WAPA R.M. 19

Midpoint West Vs COI 20

COI flows > ~1930MW (10% of the time under light load hours) 21

22 Midpoint West / COI Nomogram (no voltage/no thermal constraints)

Midpoint West / COI Nomogram (voltage/no thermal constraints) 23

24 Midpoint West / COI Nomogram (voltage and thermal constraints)

Questions ? 25