(the how)

A Theory of Action is a hypothesis stating what we think could result from an identifiable practice. Put another way, it’s a set of underlying assumptions, informed by a research-based strategy, telling how we will move our organization from its current state to its desired state. It always specifies what will result.

A strong Theory of Action should give us a clear vision of what practice to implement as we strive to meet initiatives.

Why are team members failing to make free-throws? What might a T.O.A. sound like, if we know the problem? Why do drivers speed? What might a T.O.A. sound like, if we know the problem?

Specific statement of a causal relationship between actions and desired result Empirically falsifiable (can prove when actions are not leading to desired result) CQI rounds (requires data collection) Single, open-ended path Leaves room to identify new causal relationships as a result of CQI

If we treat all students equally then every student will be given the opportunity to succeed educationally resulting in a closing of our achievement gaps. If we purchase new literacy interventions then materials will be available to assist students who aren’t succeeding in the regular classroom resulting in fewer students reading below grade level. What qualities do you notice that might help make these T.O.A.s weak?

Specificity: If-then statement “If we find research based alternatives to traditional paradigms of teaching and learning then students will be more engaged and exposed to deeper content…” “If we use data systematically as a vehicle for examining school, classroom, and individual student progress, then interventions will be targeted in focused ways and achievement will increase.” What qualities might make these strong T.O.A.s?

Make it uber-specific, because the devil’s in the details.

Empirically Falsifiable: Adequate data need to be collected revealing when our practice is not working A strong Theory of Action statement should afford us the capability to identify what’s not working so we can revise our Theory of Action and implement new practices. Safe, confidential sharing of what’s not working and idea-sharing, giving and receiving feedback critically, without hostility.

Double-loop learning: Single-loop learning would occur if we created our Theories of Action, and persisted implementing them with no revisiting, regardless of the result, successful or not. We want an iterative set of permutations, or a diary – a written record of evolution as we revise our Theory of Action based on falsifiable hypotheses. Learning communities sharing celebrations, face-plants, and ideas for deepening and increasing learning produce enduring learning for both educators and students. C.Q.I.