March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference over clouds Differences correlate with snow/ice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KNMI Ozone Satellite Observations
Advertisements

Products from the OMPS Limb Profiler (LP) instrument on the Suomi NPP Satellite Pawan K. Bhartia Earth Sciences Division- Atmospheres NASA Goddard Space.
A New A-Train Collocated Product : MODIS and OMI cloud data on the OMI footprint Brad Fisher 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Alexander Vasilkov 1, Pepijn Veefkind.
NASA NPP OMPS Science Team meeting August 15, 2013
Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 Institute.
Evaluation of Satellite NO2 Stratospheric Columns with the SAOZ/NDACC UV-Vis Network J.-P. Pommereau 1, F. Goutail 1, A. Pazmino 1, D. Ionov 1,3, F. Hendrick.
Results from the OMPS Nadir Instruments on Suomi NPP Satellite
DIRECT TROPOSPHERIC OZONE RETRIEVALS FROM SATELLITE ULTRAVIOLET RADIANCES Alexander D. Frolov, University of Maryland Robert D. Hudson, University of.
The GSM merging model. Previous achievements and application to GlobCOLOUR Globcolour / Medspiration user consultation, Dec 4-6, 2006, Villefranche/mer.
1 Ozone Profile Retrieval from SBUV/2 Sweep Mode Data---Preliminary Results Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Matthew.
Xiong Liu Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics December 20, 2004 Direct Tropospheric Ozone Retrieval from GOME.
Xiong Liu Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Kelly Chance, Christopher Sioris, Robert Spurr, Thomas Kurosu, Randall Martin,
Comparisons of TES v002 Nadir Ozone with GEOS-Chem by Ray Nassar & Jennifer Logan Thanks to: Lin Zhang, Inna Megretskaia, Bob Yantosca, Phillipe LeSager,
1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)
Reflected Solar Radiative Kernels And Applications Zhonghai Jin Constantine Loukachine Bruce Wielicki Xu Liu SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.
1 Comparisons of Daily SST Analyses for NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Dudley B. Chelton.
Cloud algorithms and applications for TEMPO Joanna Joiner, Alexander Vasilkov, Nick Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Eun-Su Yang, Sunny Choi (NASA GSFC)
Occurrence of TOMS V7 Level-2 Ozone Anomalies over Cloudy Areas Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 and Jae Kim 1,3 1. Department of Atmospheric Science,
OMI total-ozone anomaly and its impact on tropospheric ozone retrieval Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, K. J. Ha 1, and Mike Newchurch Department of Atmospheric.
A. Bracher, L. N. Lamsal, M. Weber, J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, FB 1, Institute of Environmental Physics, P O Box , D Bremen, Germany.
S5P tropospheric ozone product: Convective Cloud Differential method First German S5P Verification Meeting Bremen, November 2013 Pieter Valks DLR,
Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.
SAO OMI formaldehyde, water vapor and glyoxal retrievals Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad Helen Wang Christopher Miller Kelly Chance Xiong Liu Thomas Kurosu OMI Science.
Retrieval of Ozone Profiles from GOME (and SCIAMACHY, and OMI, and GOME2 ) Roeland van Oss Ronald van der A and Johan de Haan, Robert Voors, Robert Spurr.
Satellite and Ground-based Total Column Ozone Comparisons- Latest Results and Remaining Issues Gordon Labow 1, Rich McPeters 2, P.K. Bhartia 2 1 =Science.
HIRDLS Ozone V003 (v ) Characteristics B. Nardi, C. Randall, V.L. Harvey & HIRDLS Team HIRDLS Science Meeting Boulder, Jan 30, 2008.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
Retrieval of Methane Distributions from IASI
Validation of SCIAMACHY total ozone: ESA/DLR V5(W) and IUP WFDOAS V2(W) M. Weber, S. Dikty, J. P.Burrows, M. Coldewey-Egbers (1), V. E. Fioletov (2), S.
OMI Science Team 2014, Anders Lindfors / FMI OMI cloud optical depth contributes to the observed positive bias in surface UV Anders V. Lindfors, T. Mielonen,
Intercomparison of OMI NO 2 and HCHO air mass factor calculations: recommendations and best practices A. Lorente, S. Döerner, A. Hilboll, H. Yu and K.
Evaluation of OMPS sensor and EV SDR performance Conclusions: Sensors are performing well Calibrations are very good; no sign of degradation Comparisons.
IASI CH 4 Operational Retrieval Feasibility - Optimal Estimation Method Task 1+3: Updates Richard Siddans, Jane Hurley PM2, webex 10 October 2014.
SMOS QWG-9, ESRIN October 2012 L2OS: Product performance summary v550 highlights 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
A Long Term Data Record of the Ozone Vertical Distribution IN43B-1150 by Richard McPeters 1, Stacey Frith 2, and Val Soika 3 1) NASA GSFC
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
S5P cloud products Sebastián Gimeno García, Ronny Lutz, Diego Loyola German S5P Verification Meeting 1 Bremen, November Chart 1>
C. Lerot 1, M. Koukouli 2, T. Danckaert 1, D. Balis 2, and M. Van Roozendael 1 1 BIRA-IASB, Belgium 2 LAP/AUTH, Greece S5P L2 Verification Meeting – 19-20/05/2015.
1 Monitoring Tropospheric Ozone from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Xiong Liu 1,2,3, Pawan K. Bhartia 3, Kelly Chance 2, Thomas P. Kurosu 2, Robert.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Study Overview R.Siddans.
1 COST 723 WG1 Meeting 1 October 6-7, 2003 University of Bern, CH Availability of UTLS relevant SCIAMACHY data C. von.
Comparisons of LER/MLER Cloud Pressures with a Model of Mie Scattering Plane-Parallel Cloud Alexander Vasilkov 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Pawan K. Bhartia 2,
S5P tropical tropospheric ozone product based on convective cloud differential method Klaus-Peter Heue, Pieter Valks, Diego Loyola, Deutsches Zentrum für.
AMFIC Progress Meeting, Barcelona, 24 June Space-nadir observations of formaldehyde, glyoxal and SO 2 columns with SCIAMACHY and GOME-2. Isabelle.
AGU Highlights Vijay Natraj. CO 2 Retrieval Simulation from GOSAT Thermal IR Spectra 15 um CO 2 band; 0.2 cm -1 res, ~ 300 S/N 110 layers for forward.
OMI Soft Calibration P. K. Bhartia, Glen Jaross, Steve Taylor, Xiong Liu, Tom Kelly, Changwoo Ahn, Dave Haffner NASA GSFC, Maryland, USA.
Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.
Kelly Chance Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Xiong Liu, Christopher Sioris, Robert Spurr, Thomas Kurosu, Randall Martin,
1 Xiong Liu Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics K.V. Chance, C.E. Sioris, R.J.D. Spurr, T.P. Kurosu, R.V. Martin, M.J. Newchurch,
Lok Lamsal, Nickolay Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Edward Celarier, William Swartz, Wenhan Qin, Alexander Vasilkov, Eric Bucsela, Dave Haffner 19 th OMI Science.
Spatial patterns in the seasonal evolution of ozone and CO as seen by TES, and the effects of the geographically variable a-priori used in the TES retrieval.
Barbuda Antigua MISR 250 m The Climatology of Small Tropical Oceanic Cumuli New Findings to Old Problems (Analysis of EOS-Terra data) Larry Di Girolamo,
Progress on the unification of the SO 2 retrieval for GOME-2A/B and OMI C. Hörmann, S. Beirle, K. Mies and T. Wagner First German S5P Verification Meeting.
OMI Total Column Ozone compared with the Suomi NPP OMPS Mapper OMI Science Team Meeting, De Bilt, Netherlands 31 August – 2 September, 2015 Richard McPeters.
Impact of 3D Clouds on Aerosol Retrievals Guoyong Wen 1,2 Alexander Marshak 1 Robert F. Cahalan 1 Lorraine Remer 1 Richard Kleidman 1,3 1 NASA/Goddard.
Global Ozone and Surface UV Climatology Data Products for NASA Earth Observations (NEO) and Science on the Sphere (SOS) 1) Tropospheric Column Ozone in.
Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,
Tests on V500 Sun On versus Sun Off 1)Tbmeas. –Tbmodel in the FOV X. Yin, J. Boutin Inputs from R. Balague, P. Spurgeon, A. Chuprin, M. Martin-Neira and.
AIRS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Validation Bob Knuteson Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson, Chia Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison Space.
Impact of OMI data on assimilated ozone Kris Wargan, I. Stajner, M. Sienkiewicz, S. Pawson, L. Froidevaux, N. Livesey, and P. K. Bhartia   Data and approach.
OMI BSDF Validation Using Antarctic and Greenland Ice Glen Jaross and Jeremy Warner Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, Maryland, USA Outline.
OMI Nitrogen Dioxide Workshop Ellen Brinksma, Folkert Boersma.
Cloud workshop wrap-up OMI science team meeting, 21 June 2006.
Need for TEMPO-ABI Synergy
The Aqua-MODIS calibration transfer using DCC
Intercomparison of tropospheric ozone measurements from TES and OMI
The new Pandora total ozone algorithm including the retrieval of
Presentation transcript:

March 21, ‘06 comp

May 5, ‘06 comp

Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference over clouds Differences correlate with snow/ice maps Known issue in OMTO3: O 3 underestimation by up to 3% at large SZAs due to straylight at 313 nm.

Comparison of OMTO3 v1, OMDOAO3 v and OMDOAO3 v1 Zonal Means Er-Woon Chiou And Daniel Kahn SSAI

Monthly Gridded Map Criteria 1 degree x 1 degree grid using all 60 pixels OMTO3 screening criteria (1)Total ozone > 0 (2)Error flag = 1, 1, 2 OMDOAO3 screening criteria (1)Total ozone > 20 (2)Precision ÷ (total ozone) < 90% (3)Ascending part of the orbit

January 2005 Gridded Maps

March 2005 Gridded Maps

May 2005 Gridded Maps

July 2005 Gridded Maps

September 2005 Gridded Maps

November 2005 Gridded Maps

8-Weekly Zonal Means Uses the nadir pixel only 5-degree zones 8-week period –Week 1: 3/19 – 3/25 –Week 8: 5/13 – 5/17 OMTO3 screening criteria: 1.50 < total ozone < Error flag 0, 1, 2, 8, 9, 10 OMDOAO3 screening criteria both versions: 1.50 < total ozone < 700

DOAS v0.942  DOAS v1.01  OMTO3

DOAS v0.942  DOAS v1.01  OMTO3

DOAS v0.942  DOAS v1.01  OMTO3

Summary For 60 S through 60 N, OMDOAO3 v is larger than OMTO3 by about 8 ~ 9 DU For 50 S through 50 N, OMDOAO3 v1 is very close to OMTO3 for all 8 weeks with differences of 1 ~ 2 DU Differences between OMDOAO3 v1 and OMTO3 are larger during the first 4 weeks at 60 N and the last 2 weeks at 60 S For 30 S to 30 N, OMDOAO3 v1 is always slightly less than OMTO3

Cloud-top pressure climatology assumed by OMI Total O 3 Products OMTO3 January (R>0.6) OMDOAS January ‘05 (f c >0.75) Cloud hts are lower

Comparison of Cloud-top Pressures Raman clouds are higher than O 2 -O 2, but similar to THIR except in downwelling areas of the tropics. THIR O 2 -O 2 Raman

Comparison of IR Cloud Heights Nimbus-7 THIR (R>0.6) Note: color scales are different Aqua MODIS Jan ‘05 (all R) MODIS clouds are somewhat lower, particularly over water. Similar features were seen in THIR without R cutoff.

Summary O 2 -O 2 derived cloud hts are generally too low compared to both IR and Raman. Raman values are similar to IR (after removing low reflecting clouds from the IR climatology) except in the downwelling areas of the tropics.

Possible Improvements to OMTO3 Replace cloud climatology with OMI-”measured” cloud-top pressures. Fix (apparent) straylight related problem at large SZAs. Improve O 3 climatology using MLS data. Improve Raman scattering table. Improve profile correction scheme. –optimal estimation using several wavelengths? Degrade OMI resolution to 1-2 nm before doing retrieval. –To reduce noise and Ring signal Replace Bass & Paur (1981) with Malicet, Daumont et al. (1995) O 3 cross-section.