1)Evolution and SED shape 2)Complementary tools to establish evolution 3)A possible evolutionary sequence Evolutionary stages of high-mass star formation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUMMARY 1.Statistical equilibrium and radiative transfer in molecular (H 2 ) cloud – Derivation of physical parameters of molecular clouds 2.High-mass.
Advertisements

Searching for disks around high-mass (proto)stars with ALMA R. Cesaroni, H. Zinnecker, M.T. Beltrán, S. Etoka, D. Galli, C. Hummel, N. Kumar, L. Moscadelli,
Massive Young Stars in the Galaxy Melvin Hoare University of Leeds UK.
1)Are disks predicted? Theories of HM SF 2)Are disks observed? Search methods 3)Observational evidence disks VS toroids 4)Open questions and the future:
High Resolution Observations in B1-IRS: ammonia, CCS and water masers Claire Chandler, NRAO José F. Gómez, LAEFF-INTA Thomas B. Kuiper, JPL José M. Torrelles,
Masers and Massive Star Formation Claire Chandler Overview: –Some fundamental questions in massive star formation –Clues from masers –Review of three regions:
Estimate of physical parameters of molecular clouds Observables: T MB (or F ν ), ν, Ω S Unknowns: V, T K, N X, M H 2, n H 2 –V velocity field –T K kinetic.
1)Disks and high-mass star formation: existence and implications 2)The case of G : characteristics 3)Velocity field in G31.41: rotation or expansion?
Ammonia and CCS as diagnostic tools of low-mass protostars Ammonia and CCS as diagnostic tools of low-mass protostars Itziar de Gregorio-Monsalvo (ESO.
A MOPRA CS(1-0) demonstration survey of the Galactic plane G. Fuller, N. Peretto, L. Quinn (University of Manchester UK), J. Green (ATNF ) All dust continuum.
From Pre-stellar Cores to Proto-stars: The Initial Conditions of Star Formation PHILIPPE ANDRE DEREK WARD-THOMPSON MARY BARSONY Reported by Fang Xiong,
NRAO Socorro 05/2009 Radio Continuum Studies of Massive Protostars Peter Hofner New Mexico Tech & NRAO.
Structures of accretion and outflow on small scales in high-mass protostars CIRIACO GODDI.
Portrait of a Forming Massive Protocluster: NGC6334 I(N) Todd Hunter (NRAO/North American ALMA Science Center) Collaborators: Crystal Brogan (NRAO) Ken.
DUSTY04 – Paris ALMA and ISM / Star Formation Stéphane GUILLOTEAU Observatoire de Bordeaux.
Outflow, infall, and rotation in high-mass star forming regions
EGOs: Massive YSOs in IRDCs Ed Churchwell & Claudia Cyganowski with co-workers: Crystal Brogan, Todd Hunter, Barb Whitney Qizhou Zhang Dense Cores in Dark.
Mini Workshop on Star Formation and Astrochemistry. Barcelona, 2006 November 23 1 Robert Estalella, Aina Palau, Maite Beltrán (UB) Paul T. P. Ho (CfA),
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL SCIENCES AMI and Massive Star Formation Melvin Hoare.
Cambridge, June 13-16, 2005 A Study of Massive Proto- and Pre-stellar Candidates with the SEST Antenna Maite Beltrán Universitat de Barcelona J. Brand.
SMA Observations of High Mass Protostellar Objects (HMPOs) Submm Astronomy in Era of SMA June 15, 2005 Crystal Brogan (U. of Hawaii) Y. Shirley (NRAO),
Leonardo Testi: (Sub)Millimeter Observations of Disks Around High-Mass Proto-Stars, SMA, Cambridge 14 Jun 2005 Disks around High-Mass (Proto-)Stars  From.
Submillimeter Astronomy in the era of the SMA, Cambridge, June 14, 2005 Star Formation and Protostars at High Angular Resolution with the SMA Jes Jørgensen.
Centimeter and Millimeter Observations of Very Young Binary and Multiple Systems -Orbital Motions and Mass Determination -Truncated Protoplanetary Disks.
Chemical and Physical Structures of Massive Star Forming Regions Hideko Nomura, Tom Millar (UMIST) ABSTRUCT We have made self-consistent models of the.
Star and Planet Formation Sommer term 2007 Henrik Beuther & Sebastian Wolf 16.4 Introduction (H.B. & S.W.) 23.4 Physical processes, heating and cooling.
Star Formation Research Now & With ALMA Debra Shepherd National Radio Astronomy Observatory ALMA Specifications: Today’s (sub)millimeter interferometers.
TURBULENCE AND HEATING OF MOLECULAR CLOUDS IN THE GALACTIC CENTER: Natalie Butterfield (UIowa) Cornelia Lang (UIowa) Betsy Mills (NRAO) Dominic Ludovici.
MALT 90 Millimetre Astronomy Legacy Team 90 GHz survey
Magnetic Fields Near the Young Stellar Object IRAS M. J Claussen (NRAO), A. P. Sarma (E. Kentucky Univ), H.A. Wootten (NRAO), K. B. Marvel (AAS),
Ionized gas in massive star forming regions Guido Garay Universidad de Chile Great Barriers in High-Mass Star Formation Townsville, September 15, 2010.
The overall systematic trends in the kinematics of massive star forming regions Observations of HC 3 N* in hot cores Víctor M. Rivilla 41st Young European.
Rotating Disks around O-type Young Stars in NGC7538 IRS1 3D Gas Dynamics from Methanol Masers observed with the EVN Ciriaco Goddi.
A MINIMUM COLUMN DENSITY FOR O-B STAR FORMATION: AN OBSERVATIONAL TEST Ana López Sepulcre INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri (Firenze, ITALY) Co-authors:
High-mass star forming regions: An ALMA view Riccardo Cesaroni INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri.
Star Formation in our Galaxy Dr Andrew Walsh (James Cook University, Australia) Lecture 1 – Introduction to Star Formation Throughout the Galaxy Lecture.
Massive Star Formation Observational Cassandra Fallscheer PhD Advisor: Henrik Beuther Monday 28. March 2007.
Massive Star Formation: The Role of Disks Cassandra Fallscheer In collaboration with: Henrik Beuther, Eric Keto, Jürgen Sauter, TK Sridharan, Sebastian.
VLBI observations of H 2 O masers towards the high-mass Young Stellar Objects in AFGL 5142 Ciriaco Goddi Università di Cagliari, INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico.
Studying Young Stellar Objects with the EVLA
Methanol maser and 3 mm line studies of EGOs Xi Chen (ShAO) 2009 East Asia VLBI Workshop, March , Seoul Simon Ellingsen (UTAS) Zhi-Qiang Shen.
Masers Surveys with Mopra: Which is best 7 or 3 mm? Simon Ellingsen, Maxim Voronkov & Shari Breen 3 November 2008.
Submillimeter Array CH3OH A Cluster of Highly Collimated and Young Bipolar Outflows Emanating from OMC1 South. Luis A. Zapata 1,2, Luis.
INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri
 1987, Whistler: first time I met Malcolm  , post-doc at MPIfR: study of molecular gas in UC HII regions (NH 3, C 34 S, CH 3 CN) with 100m and.
Maite Beltrán Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri The intringuing hot molecular core G
1)Observations: where do (massive) stars form? 2)Theory: how do (massive) stars form? 3)Search for disks in high-mass (proto)stars 4)Results: disks in.
Multiple YSOs in the low-mass star-forming region IRAS CONTENT Introduction Previous work on IRAS Observations Results Discussion.
Early O-Type Stars in the W51-IRS2 Cluster A template to study the most massive (proto)stars Luis Zapata Max Planck Institut für Radioastronomie, GERMANY.
1)OB star formation: pros and contras of maser studies 2)Are maser (VLBI) studies “obsolete”? 3)Association of masers with jets/disks: some examples 4)Conclusion:
1)The environment of star formation 2)Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars 3)The birthplaces of high-mass stars 4)Evolutionary scheme for high-mass.
Searching for disks around high-mass (proto)stars with ALMA R. Cesaroni, H. Zinnecker, M.T. Beltrán, S. Etoka, D. Galli, C. Hummel, N. Kumar, L. Moscadelli,
1)Are disks predicted?  Theories of HM SF 2)Are disks observed?  Search methods 3)Observational evidence  disks VS toroids 4)Open questions and the.
Jes Jørgensen (Leiden), Sebastien Maret (CESR,Grenoble)
The Evolution of Massive Dense Cores Gary Fuller Holly Thomas Nicolas Peretto University of Manchester.
PI Total time #CoIs, team Silvia Leurini 24h (ALMA, extended and compact configurations, APEX?) Menten, Schilke, Stanke, Wyrowski Disk dynamics in very.
1)The importance of disks in massive (proto)stars 2)The search for disks: methods and tracers 3)The result: “real” disks found in B (proto)stars 4)The.
Cosmic Masers Chris Phillips CSIRO / ATNF. What is a Maser? Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation Microwave version of a LASER Occur.
1)The recipe of (OB) star formation: infall, outflow, rotation  the role of accretion disks 2)OB star formation: observational problems 3)The search for.
Massive Star-Formation in G studied by means of Maser VLBI and Thermal Interferometric Observations Luca Moscadelli INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico.
High-mass star formation
Possible evolutionary sequence for high-mass star formation
The IR-Radio Correlation in High-Mass Young Stellar Objects
The MALT90 survey of massive star forming regions
Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri
High Resolution Submm Observations of Massive Protostars
Infrared study of a star forming region, L1251B
MASER Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation
Chasing disks around massive stars with Malcolm
-Orbital Motions and Mass Determination
Presentation transcript:

1)Evolution and SED shape 2)Complementary tools to establish evolution 3)A possible evolutionary sequence Evolutionary stages of high-mass star formation from the observational viewpoint Riccardo Cesaroni INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri

Evolution from SED more difficult than for low-mass: High-mass stars born embedded  SED changes less prominent than in low-mass stars Formation in clusters  affects theory and observations Large distances  confusion Two important parameters from SED:  L bol from integral of SED (basically for λ ~ λ peak ): major contribution from OB stars  M gas from (sub)mm emission (λ > λ peak ) and T estimate Evolution and SED shape

Star formation  gas converted into (OB) stars  L/M grows  SED shape changes SED shape ↔ L vs M ↔ evolution E.g. Molinari et al. (2008): IRAS colour selected sample of massive YSOs (Palla et al. 1991, Molinari et al. 1996, 1998, 2000) (sub)mm cont. maps of southern sub-sample with SEST (Beltran et al. 2006) plus MSX data Analysis of morphology and SED

Result: 3 source types 1.mm only, no IR  modified black body SED 2.Prominent mm and IR  complex SED 3.IR with marginal mm  complex SED Is this and evolutionary sequence? L vs M plot: Different distributions for different types Distributions fitted with evolutionary model

Type 1 IRAS H II regions 850µm 15µm

Type 2 IRAS H II regions

Type 3 IRAS H II region

Result: 3 source types 1.mm only, no IR  modified black body SED 2.Prominent mm and IR  complex SED 3.IR with marginal mm  complex SED Is this and evolutionary sequence? L vs M plot: Different distributions for different types Distributions fitted with evolutionary model

M gas (M O ) L bol (L O ) =type 1 =type 2 =type 3 * time ZAMS ? Molinari et al. (2008)

Herschel/Hi-GAL (Elia et al. 2010) Robitaille SED grey-body SED ! Complex SED Grey-body SED

What can we learn? Precise estimate of L crucial  Herschel far- IR coverage & angular resolution needed Measurement of both L and M  Herschel wavelength coverage needed Theoretical models for L vs M with clusters needed

Complementary tools H II regions: association and physical properties Masers: detection rates and milli-arcsec images Chemistry: molecular abundance variations Kinematics: presence/structure of bipolar outflows, infall, disks  However… no silver bullet!

H II regions Pin-point OB stars on ZAMS  age lower limit Not in pressure equilibrium: size ~ age ? HC  UC  Comp. Free-free flux  N Lyman  spectral type… but surprises are still possible!  radio excess? Caveats: Confusion with extended radio emission Absorption of ionizing photons by dust Density gradients/infall squeeze/quench H II region (Keto 2002) “Flickering’’ of H II region (Peters et al. 2010) Confusion with thermal jets  good radio spectrum needed

H II regions Pin-point OB stars on ZAMS  age lower limit Not in pressure equilibrium: size ~ age ? HC  UC  Comp. Free-free flux  N Lyman  spectral type… but surprises are still possible!  radio excess? Caveats: Confusion with extended radio emission Absorption of ionizing photons by dust Density gradients/infall squeeze/quench H II region (Keto 2002) “Flickering’’ of H II region (Peters et al. 2010) Confusion with thermal jets  good radio spectrum needed

radio excess? dist. x 2 Herschel Hi-GAL SDP Cesaroni et al. in prep. cluster single star

H II regions Pin-point OB stars on ZAMS  age lower limit Not in pressure equilibrium: size ~ age ? HC  UC  Comp. Free-free flux  N Lyman  spectral type… but surprises are still possible!  radio excess? Caveats: Confusion with extended radio emission Absorption of ionizing photons by dust Density gradients/infall squeeze/quench H II region (Keto 2002) “Flickering’’ of H II region (Peters et al. 2010) Confusion with thermal jets  good radio spectrum needed

Masers Tight association between high-mass star forming regions and maser emission (H 2 O, OH, CH 3 OH class I and II) Good correlation L H2O with L IRAS Good positional association of masers with (hot) molecular cores (Codella et al. 1997, 2010) No CH 3 OH class II maser detected in low-mass YSOs (Minier et al. 2003) High detection rates of H 2 O masers towards UC H II regions (e.g. 67%, Churchwell et al. 1990) Low detection rates (12%) of H 2 O masers in IR-dark clouds (Wang et al. 2006)

Class II methanol Proposed evolutionary sequence (Breen et al. 2010): H2OH2O Type 1 Type 2 Type 3

Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 ATCA H 2 O maser det. rates: Type 1: 13% Type 2: 59% Type 3: 21% Sanchez-Monge et al.

Caveats: Statistics mostly based on low angular resolution surveys Detection rates affected by maser variability (days, months)

Kinematics Three main phenomena in star formation: infall, expansion (=outflows), rotation (=disks) Plausible evolutionary sequence: infall  …  infall+outflow+disk  …  disk Observational evidence of evolution?

Infall Difficult to detect: V free-fall ~ FWHM only on small scales (< 0.1 pc) Evidence from red-shifted (self-)absorption  skewed line profiles  blue asymmetry Asymmetries more common in IR-dark than IR- luminous  infall/outflow decrease with time Inverse P-Cyg profiles in HMCs  infall still active at HMC stage i.e. on early ZAMS

infallexpansion Sample of massive (>100M O ) clumps with dist. < 4 kpc: line asymmetries more common in IR-dark clumps Lopez-Sepulcre et al. (2010)

Infall Difficult to detect: V free-fall ~ FWHM only on small scales (< 0.1 pc) Evidence from red-shifted (self-)absorption  skewed line profiles  blue asymmetry Asymmetries more common in IR-dark than IR- luminous  infall (& outflow) decrease with time Inverse P-Cyg profiles in HMCs  infall still active at HMC stage i.e. on early ZAMS

G T B (K) G G NGC7538 IRS1 CO(2-1) 13 CO(2-1) CN(2-1) Klaassen et al. (2011) Furuya et al. (2011) Beltran et al. (2011) Beltran et al. (2006) Girart et al. (2009) G Infall in HMCs G NH 3 (2,2) 13 CO(3-2)

 Infall dominant in Type 1 (IR-dark) sources  Infall still present in Type 2 (HMC) sources

Outflow Easy to detect: broad wings, large (pc) scales Possible evolutionary sequence (Beuther & Shepherd 2005): loss of collimation. Some evidence from IR imaging (Qiu et al. 2008) and maser proper motions (Torrelles et al. 2003) SiO outflows get fainter with L/M, i.e. with evolution (Lopez-Sepulcre et al. 2011)

Beuther & Shepherd (2005)

Outflow Easy to detect: broad wings, large (pc) scales Possible evolutionary sequence (Beuther & Shepherd 2005): loss of collimation. Some evidence from IR imaging (Qiu et al. 2008) and maser proper motions (Torrelles et al. 2003) SiO outflows get fainter with L/M, i.e. with evolution (Lopez-Sepulcre et al. 2011)

Lòpez-Sepulcre et al. (2011): jet/outflow (i.e. SiO) strength decreases with age (i.e. L bol /M gas ) Note: L SiO /L bol and L bol /M gas are distance independent evolution IRD IRL

Disks Known only around B-type (proto)stars (Cesaroni et al. 2007) Elusive in O-type (proto)stars  Short lived? Observational bias?  ALMA will tell (Cesaroni 2008) Type 3: Disks of a few AU found in young B stars (Bik & Thi 2004)  remnant disks? Type 2: Disk+outflow systems in HMCs  embedded ZAMS phase Type 1: Accretion disk+outflow in an IR-dark core (Fallscheer et al. 2009)  could be difficult to detect (faint, thick envelope)  ALMA needed

IRDC (IR-dark cloud) Fallscheer et al. (2009) CH 3 OH 5000 AU disk model small-scale velocity field large-scale bipolar outflow disk-model velocity field 0.2 pc

Possible evolutionary sequence Pre-stellarProtostellarHMC ZAMSZAMS IR emission darkdark λ<70µmluminous FIRluminous SED grey body (mm-FIR)grey bodymulti-comp. H II region NO(thermal jet) ?  HC  UCCompact  masers NOCH 3 OH, H 2 OallOH infall NO?>10 -3 M O /yr YES (but no accretion?) NO outflow NOstrongfadingNO disk NOYES?YESremnant? TemplateΣ > Σ min Mol160 alias IRAS23385 Mol119 alias IRAS20126 IRAS Type 1 Type 2Type 3

Type 1

24µm Molinari et al. (2008) Herschel

G Herschel Hi-GAL Stramatellos et al. (2011) 8µm Spitzer 70µm160µm 500µm350µm 250µm

Type 2

MSX Herschel images

IRAS Herschel MSX 10 4 L O

IRAS Cesaroni et al. Hofner et al. Sridharan et al. Moscadelli et al. Image: 2µm cont. --- OH maser H 2 O masers 1000 AU Keplerian rotation+infall: M * =10 M O Moscadelli et al. (2010) CH 3 OHH2OH2O 200 AU jet disk+jet disk

Type 3

IRAS H II region

Possible evolutionary sequence Pre-stellarProtostellarHMC ZAMSZAMS IR emission darkdark λ<70µmluminous FIRluminous SED grey body (mm-FIR)grey bodymulti-comp. H II region NO(thermal jet) ?  HC  UCCompact  masers NOCH 3 OH, H 2 OallOH infall NO?>10 -3 M O /yr YES (but no accretion?) NO outflow NOstrongfadingNO disk NOYES?YESremnant? TemplateΣ > Σ min Mol160 alias IRAS23385 Mol119 alias IRAS20126 IRAS Type 1 Type 2Type 3

RMS sample (Hoare et al. 2004, Urquhart et al. 2007) dist. x 3 radio det. radio non-det. Reliable luminosity estimate needed to confirm radio excess in B-type stars Herschel  radio excess?

non-radio radio RMS sample (Hoare et al. 2004, Urquhart et al. 2007)

H 2 O masers Li et al. in prep.

Evolution from SED more difficult than for low-mass: High-mass stars born embedded  SED changes less prominent than in low-mass stars Formation in clusters  affects theory and observations Large distances  confusion Two important parameters from SED:  L bol from integral of SED (basically for λ ~ λ peak ): quite reliable because OB stars dominate cluster  M gas from integral of (sub)mm emission (λ > λ peak ) and T from peak of SED

time λFλλFλ 2M O 20M O Robitaille et al. (2006)

Caveats: Statistics mostly based on low angular resolution surveys Detection rates affected by maser variability (days, months) However, VLBI imaging may be rewarding: Proper motions  3-D velocity field, timescale Parallax  distances up to a few kpc

G Hypercompact H II region Moscadelli et al. (2007) Beltran et al. (2007) 7mm free-free & H 2 O masers 500 AU O9.5 star radio SED

7mm free-free & H 2 O masers 30 km/s G Hypercompact H II region t exp = 50 yr !!! distance independent Beginning of expansion phase? Flickering? 500 AU

Caveats: Infall does not always imply accretion! E.g. G24.78: infall on 0.1 pc, but expansion of H II region on 1000 AU (Beltran et al. 2006, 2008) However, accretion may go on even through H II region! E.g. G10.62: Keto & Wood (2006) H66α recomb. line

Molinari et al. (2008) 3.6 cm (H II regions) 850 µm (protostellar core) 24µm IRAS

Possible evolutionary sequence Pre-stellarProtostellarHMC ZAMSZAMS IR emission darkdark λ<70µmluminous FIRluminous SED grey body (mm-FIR)grey bodymulti-comp. H II region NO(thermal jet) ?  HC  UCCompact  masers NOCH 3 OH, H 2 OallOH deuteration large smallNO infall NO?>10 -3 M O /yr YES (but no accretion?) NO outflow NOstrongfadingNO disk NOYES?YESremnant? TemplateΣ > Σ min Mol160 alias IRAS23385 Mol119 alias IRAS20126 IRAS

MIPS 70µm

10 4 L O = L IRAS

Toroids M > 100 M O R ~ AU L > 10 5 L O  O (proto)stars small t acc /t rot  non-equilibrium, circum- cluster structures Disks M < a few 10 M O R ~ 1000 AU L ~ 10 4 L O  B (proto)stars large t acc /t rot  equilibrium, circumstellar structures disks toroids Beltran et al. (2010)

tidal destruction rotational period photo-evaporation Cesaroni et al. (2007)

Assumptions: HPBW = R disk /4 FWHM line = V rot (R disk ) M disk  M star same in all disks T B > 20 K obs. freq. = 230 GHz 5 hours ON-source spec. res. = 0.2 km/s S/N = 20 edge-on i = 35° circumstellar disks Keplerian

Assumptions: HPBW = R disk /4 FWHM line = V rot (R disk ) M disk  M star same in all disks T B > 20 K obs. freq. = 230 GHz 5 hours ON-source spec. res. = 0.2 km/s S/N = 20 no stars edge-on i = 35°

non-radio radio Molinari et al. (2008) RMS sample (Hoare et al. 2004, Urquhart et al. 2007) M gas (M O ) L bol (L O ) time L bol (L O )

ZAMS M gas (M O ) L bol (L O ) =type 1 =type 2 =type 3 * time H 2 O masers: type 1: 13% type 2: 59% type 3: 21%

Chemistry Abundance variations expected with time due to: Freezing on dust grains (e.g. CO depletion)  Evaporation when stars form Reactions on grains and in gas phase (e.g. deuteration) Changes of gas/dust density and temperature

Evolution and SED shape Proposed criteria to identify evolutionary phases of high-mass star forming regions: IR colours: IRAS, MSX, 2MASS (e.g. Wood & Churchwell 1989, Palla et al. 1991, Sridharan et al. 2002, Lumsden et al. 2002) IR-darkness: MSX, Spitzer (e.g. Rathborne et al. 2006)  SED conveys all infos: Herschel!

Evolution from SED more difficult than for low-mass: High-mass stars born embedded  SED changes less prominent than in low-mass stars Formation in clusters  affects theory and observations Large distances  confusion Two important parameters from SED:  L bol from integral of SED (basically for λ ~ λ peak ): quite reliable because OB stars dominate cluster  M gas from integral of (sub)mm emission (λ > λ peak ) and T from peak of SED

24µm Molinari et al. (2008)

L O << L IRAS L IRAS = L O Herschel