Verification Requests Citizen Advisory Committee –Repeated requests for BMP verification Chesapeake Executive Order Strategy –USDA and EPA commitment to.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.

Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Requests for Decisions on Panel Membership and Revised Schedule CBP Partnership Management Board September 13,

CBP Partnership Proposal for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented CBP WQGIT Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Briefing.

Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension - College Park.

Christopher Brosch University of Maryland Modeling Subcommittee Meeting January 11, 2012.

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.

Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.

Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Local Government Advisory Committee March 14, 2014.

CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Citizens Advisory Committee December 6, 2013 Meeting Rich Batiuk,

BMP Verification Process Progress to Date Frank Coale, AgWG Chair Mark Dubin, AgWG Coordinator 06/19/12.

Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.

2006 Network Users’ Meeting Chesapeake Bay Program Regional Exchange for Non Point Source Best Management Practices April 18, 2006 Nancie L. Imler PA DEP.

GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.

Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.

CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee December 3, 2013.

Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.

Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.

Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Progress to Date and Forthcoming Issues CBP Management Board Briefing May 9, 2012 Meeting.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.

CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.

Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.

Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.

James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware.

Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.

Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.

Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.

1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,

Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office

James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.

Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.

Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,

Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.

EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?

Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.

Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.

Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Agriculture Workgroup (AgWG) AgWG Membership Workshop December 17, 2015.

Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.

Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.

Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ensuring Full Access to Federal Cost Shared Conservation Practices W. Dean Hively, Ph.D. U.S. Geological.

Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership Management Board Meeting 9/13/12 Carin Bisland.

JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final

Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee

Chesapeake Bay Program

The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next

Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due

What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?

CBP Citizen Advisory Committee Briefing February 22, 2013 Meeting

Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.

CBP Principals’ Staff Committee Briefing May 14, 2012 Meeting

Draft BMP Verification Protocols for Non-significant WWTPs Combined Sewer Overflows On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems CBPO Wastewater Workgroup.

Citizens Advisory Committee Discussion & Program Update Dana Aunkst Director USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 22,2019 Baltimore, MD.

2018 BMP Verification Assessment

Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.

Presentation transcript:

Verification Requests Citizen Advisory Committee –Repeated requests for BMP verification Chesapeake Executive Order Strategy –USDA and EPA commitment to develop/implement mechanism for tracking/reporting ‘voluntary conservation practices’ by July 2012 NRC’s Ches Bay Independent Evaluation Report –Five science-based conclusions focused on ‘accurate tracking of BMPs’ Chesapeake Bay TMDL’s Appendix S –EPA expectations for offset credit verification 1

Verification Work Underway NEIEN –Successful submission of 2010 progress data NACD –2-year project for development of data collection/ verification protocols for non-cost shared ag practices USGS MOU’s with NRCS/FSA –Improving access to federal cost shared practice data USDA Office of Environmental Markets –Synthesis of verification of environ. credits Responses to NRC CB Indep. Evaluation Report –MB’s recommended responses sent to PSC 2

Proposal to Partnership Build and work integrated set of recommendations up through CBP Partnership (FWG: Feb-Mar) –Source Workgroups WQGIT MB PSC Address full array of practices across all sources –Agricultural lands, forest lands, developed lands, on- site treatment systems, wastewater dischargers, stream corridors, tidal shorelines Factor in innovative approaches taken by jurisdictions, local municipalities, and conservation districts –Recognize unique circumstances across the partnership and that one size does not fit all 3

Verification Framework Verification principles –Partnership agreement on principles to guide the jurisdictions’ development of verification programs Source sector-specific verification protocols –Developed through the WQGIT’s source sector workgroups and approved by the Partnership Verification panel –Verification experts charged by the Partnership to review/make recommendations on jurisdictions’ proposed verification programs (aka BMP panels) 4

Draft Verification Principles Partnership support Clear definition of verification Credible/defensible Consistent application across source sectors Build off cost-share verification protocols No lowest common denominator 5

6

7

8

9

10