1 ICTP 27/05/02 How can extremism prevail ? A study based on the Relative agreement model G. Deffuant, G. Weisbuch, F. Amblard, T. Faure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP Statistics Course Review.
Advertisements

An Abstract Agent-based Simulation – the “relative agreement” opinion dynamics model Bruce Edmonds Centre for Policy Modelling Manchester Metropolitan.
Sections 7-1 and 7-2 Review and Preview and Estimating a Population Proportion.
Plausible values and Plausibility Range 1. Prevalence of FSWs in some west African Countries 2 0.1% 4.3%
Stephen McCray and David Courard-Hauri, Environmental Science and Policy Program, Drake University Introduction References 1.Doran, P. T. & Zimmerman,
Chapter 19: Confidence Intervals for Proportions
A Model of Opinion Dynamics Among Firms Volker Barth, GELENA research group, Oldenburg University Potentials of Complexity Science for Business, Governments,
Estimating a Population Proportion
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
Why Globalized Communication may increase Cultural Polarization Paper presented at 2005 International Workshop Games, Networks, and Cascades Cornell Club.
1.  Why understanding probability is important?  What is normal curve  How to compute and interpret z scores. 2.
Section 1: World Population
Chapter 6 Random Error The Nature of Random Errors
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Estimating the Value of a Parameter Using Confidence Intervals 9.
Chapter 7 Estimation: Single Population
Populations, Samples, Standard errors, confidence intervals Dr. Omar Al Jadaan.
Sections 6-1 and 6-2 Overview Estimating a Population Proportion.
Population All members of a set which have a given characteristic. Population Data Data associated with a certain population. Population Parameter A measure.
Random Sampling, Point Estimation and Maximum Likelihood.
Evolution.  This unit explains the scientific aspect of evolution.  There are multiple views on evolution all of which have significant evidence for.
ENGR 610 Applied Statistics Fall Week 5 Marshall University CITE Jack Smith.
Critically assessing and analysing simulation results Bruce Edmonds Centre for Policy Modelling Manchester Metropolitan University.
Confidence Interval Proportions.
● Uncertainties abound in life. (e.g. What's the gas price going to be next week? Is your lottery ticket going to win the jackpot? What's the presidential.
Ch 9.8: Chaos and Strange Attractors: The Lorenz Equations
PREAICE GEOGRAPHY POPULATION AND SETTLEMENT. POPULATION DYNAMICS 1 MILLION YEARS AGO: 125,000 PEOPLE. 10,000 YEARS AGO WHEN PEOPLE DOMESTICATED ANIMALS,
Tipping Points in Opinion Spread in Social Networks Boleslaw Szymanski Casey Doyle, Sameet Sreenivasan, Jierui Xie, Andrew Thompson, Chjan Lim and G. Korniss.
2-Day Introduction to Agent-Based Modelling Day 2: Session 6 Mutual adaption.
PUT THE FOLLOWING TEST SCORES IN ORDER AND GROUP THEM INTO FOUR GROUPS; Question of day.
Populations and Samples Central Limit Theorem. Lecture Objectives You should be able to: 1.Define the Central Limit Theorem 2.Explain in your own words.
Mean, Median, and Mode 3.1 Measures of Central Tendency.
Sections 7-1 and 7-2 Review and Preview and Estimating a Population Proportion.
Population Proportions The model used is the Binomial Distribution. p represents the proportion of successes in the population. represents the proportion.
STA Lecture 171 STA 291 Lecture 17 Chap. 10 Estimation – Estimating the Population Proportion p –We are not predicting the next outcome (which is.
ME Mechanical and Thermal Systems Lab Fall 2011 Chapter 3: Assessing and Presenting Experimental Data Professor: Sam Kassegne, PhD, PE.
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Essentials of Business Statistics: Communicating with Numbers By Sanjiv Jaggia and.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Putting Statistics to Work.
Confidence Intervals Inferences about Population Means and Proportions.
Chapter 7 Statistical Inference: Estimating a Population Mean.
What is a Confidence Interval?. Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean The statistic estimates the population mean We want the sampling distribution.
Margin of error. Bootstrapping The margin of error is half of the interval.
Summarizing Risk Analysis Results To quantify the risk of an output variable, 3 properties must be estimated: A measure of central tendency (e.g. µ ) A.
4.4.2 Normal Approximations to Binomial Distributions
PUBLIC OPINION AND POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION. Public opinion – the aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs shared by some portion of the adult population.
Frédéric Amblard - RUG-ICS Meeting - June 12, 2003 How can extremism prevail? An opinion dynamics model studied with heterogeneous agents and networks.
Conditions and Formulas Are you confident?. 1 proportion z-interval what variable(s) need to be defined? write the formula.
Higher National Certificate in Engineering Unit 36 –Lesson 4 – Parameters used to Describe the Normal Distribution.
Chapter 7 Data for Decisions. Population vs Sample A Population in a statistical study is the entire group of individuals about which we want information.
Confidence Intervals INTRO. Confidence Intervals Brief review of sampling. Brief review of the Central Limit Theorem. How do CIs work? Why do we use CIs?
Planning Strategies RSS II Lecture 6 September 21, 2005.
The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution 10. Variations and Case Studies Summarized by In-Hee Lee
Populations Chapter 19. Understanding Populations Section 19.1.
Statistics for Business and Economics 7 th Edition Chapter 7 Estimation: Single Population Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice.
Estimation and Confidence Intervals. Point Estimate A single-valued estimate. A single element chosen from a sampling distribution. Conveys little information.
ESTIMATION.
The Matching Hypothesis
Module 22: Proportions: One Sample
Sampling Distribution of Sample Means Open Minitab
Week 10 Chapter 16. Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Chapter Review Problems
AP Human Geography Central Place Theory.
Amblard F.*, Deffuant G.*, Weisbuch G.** *Cemagref-LISC **ENS-LPS
Statistical Inference
OPINIONS DYNAMICS WITH RELATIVE AGREEMENT
Estimation and Confidence Intervals
Section 12.2 Comparing Two Proportions
Estimation and Confidence Intervals
Facultés universitaires Notre Dame de la Paix à Namur (FUNDP)
From Samples to Populations
T. Faure, G. Deffuant, G. Weisbuch, F. Amblard
Presentation transcript:

1 ICTP 27/05/02 How can extremism prevail ? A study based on the Relative agreement model G. Deffuant, G. Weisbuch, F. Amblard, T. Faure

ICTP 27/05/02 Influence of extremists The extremists win : –Majority to one extreme (Germany in the thirties, islamic revolution…) –Bipolarisation (affaire Dreyfus, religion wars…) The extremists remain marginal

ICTP 27/05/02 Bounded confidence An opinion x has an uncertainty u. First model : all agents have the same uncertainty if : then : No dynamics on the uncertainty

ICTP 27/05/02 [w/2u]=1[w/2u]=2 nb attractors approximately the integer part of w/2u With a uniform distribution of the opinions of width w

ICTP 27/05/02 New model with dynamics of uncertainties Give more influence to more confident agents Avoid the discontinuity of the influence when the difference of opinions grows Explore the influence of extremists

ICTP 27/05/02 Relative agreement j i h ij h ij -u i xjxj xixi Relative agreement :

ICTP 27/05/02 The modification of the opinion and the uncertainty are proportional to the relative agreement : if  More certain agents are more influential Relative agreement dynamics

ICTP 27/05/02 Variation of the relative agreement xjxj x j + u j x j - u j xixi u i < u j u i > u j 1 u i > 2u j (i influences j)

ICTP 27/05/02 Same uncertainty for all agents (0.5)

ICTP 27/05/02 Same uncertainty for all agents

ICTP 27/05/02 Population with extremists u x U : initial uncertainty of moderate agents ue : initial uncertainty of extremists pe : initial proportion of extemists  : bias between positive and negative extremists

ICTP 27/05/02 Central convergence (U=0.4, pe=0.2)

ICTP 27/05/02 Both extremes convergence (U=1.4, pe=0.2)

ICTP 27/05/02 Single extreme convergence (U=1.4, pe=0.05)

ICTP 27/05/02 Convergence indicator p’ + and p’ - are the proportion of initially moderate agents which were attracted to the extreme opinion regions y = p’ p’ - 2 central convergence : y close to 0 both extreme convergence : y close to 0.5 single extreme convergence : y close to 1

ICTP 27/05/02 Exploration of the parameter space

ICTP 27/05/02

Conclusion In the model, the convergence to the extremes takes place : –when the initially moderate agents hare very uncertain –by the action of the medium opinion attracted by the extremes The convergence to a single extreme occurs when the uncertainty is even higher, and results of fluctuations of medium opinion agents