Evolution of perturbations and cosmological constraints in decaying dark matter models with arbitrary decay mass products Shohei Aoyama Nagoya University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course III. Structure Formation in the Non-Linear Regime Chris Power.
Advertisements

Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
Å rhus, 4 September 2007 Julien Lesgourgues (LAPTH, Annecy, France)
Curvature Perturbations from a Non-minimally Coupled Vector Boson Field Mindaugas Karčiauskas work done with Konstantinos Dimopoulos Mindaugas Karčiauskas.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Cosmic Microwave Radiation Anisotropies in brane worlds K. Koyama astro-ph/ K. Koyama PRD (2002) Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
CMB as a physics laboratory
Constraints on the Primordial Magnetic Field and Neutrino Mass from the CMB Polarization and Power Spectra G. J. Mathews - University of Notre Dame D..
Gamma-Ray Luminosity Function of Blazars and the Cosmic Gamma-Ray Background: Evidence for the Luminosity-Dependent Density Evolution Takuro Narumoto (Department.
1 On the road to discovery of relic gravitational waves: From cosmic microwave background radiation Wen Zhao Department of Astronomy University of Science.
Probing Dark Matter with the CMB and Large-Scale Structure 1 Cora Dvorkin IAS (Princeton) Harvard (Hubble fellow) COSMO 2014 August 2014, Chicago.
Large Scale Simulations of Reionization Garrelt Mellema Stockholm Observatory Collaborators: Ilian Iliev, Paul Shapiro, Marcelo Alvarez, Ue-Li Pen, Hugh.
Lens Galaxy Environments Neal Dalal (IAS), Casey R. Watson (Ohio State) astro-ph/ Who cares? 2.What to do 3.Results 4.Problems! 5.The future.
MATTEO VIEL THE LYMAN-  FOREST: A UNIQUE TOOL FOR COSMOLOGY Bernard’s cosmic stories – Valencia, 26 June 2006 Trieste Dark matter Gas.
NEUTRINO MASS FROM LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 8 December 2008 e    
Inflationary Freedom and Cosmological Neutrino Constraints Roland de Putter JPL/Caltech CosKASI 4/16/2014.
Non-Gaussianities of Single Field Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling Taotao Qiu Based on paper: arXiv: [Hep-th] (collaborated with.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Yoshiharu Tanaka (YITP) Gradient expansion approach to nonlinear superhorizon perturbations Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Helsinki,
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Different physical properties contribute to the density and temperature perturbation growth. In addition to the mutual gravity of the dark matter and baryons,
Confronting theory with observations workshop, NBIA, Copenhagen, August 18, Analysing the CMB in a model-independent manner Syksy Räsänen University.
1 Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research Testing Gravity on Large Scales Dekel 1994 Ann.
Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) 1 [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine,
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
, Tuorla Observatory 1 Galaxy groups in ΛCDM simulations and SDSS DR5 P. Nurmi, P. Heinämäki, S. Niemi, J. Holopainen Tuorla Observatory E. Saar,
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe: CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Today, matter is assembled into structures: filaments, clusters, galaxies,
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
Constraining SUSY GUTs and Inflation with Cosmology Collaboration : M. Sakellariadou, R. Jeannerot. References : Jeannerot, J. R., Sakellariadou (2003)
1 Determination of Dark Matter Properties in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity Masaki Asano (SOKENDAI) Collaborator: E. Asakawa (Meiji-gakuin), S.
(some) Future CMB Constraints on fundamental physics Alessandro Melchiorri Universita’ di Roma, “La Sapienza” MIAMI2010, Fort Lauderdale December 15th.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
Bin Wang Fudan University Shanghai Signature on the interaction between dark energy and dark matter.
Cosmic Inhomogeneities and Accelerating Expansion Ho Le Tuan Anh National University of Singapore PAQFT Nov 2008.
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
The Pursuit of primordial non-Gaussianity in the galaxy bispectrum and galaxy-galaxy, galaxy CMB weak lensing Donghui Jeong Texas Cosmology Center and.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 2: More about Λ Distances at z ~1 Type Ia supernovae SNe Ia and cosmology Results from the Supernova Cosmology Project, the High.
THE CONNECTION OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS WITH COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 1 OCTOBER 2009 e    
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
The Cosmic Microwave Background
MOND and baryonic dark matter Benoit Famaey (Brussels, ULB)
CMB, lensing, and non-Gaussianities
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Determining cosmological parameters with the latest observational data Hong Li TPCSF/IHEP
+ Quintessence and Gravitational Waves Peng Zhou, Daniel Chung UW-Madison Physics Dept.
Study of Proto-clusters by Cosmological Simulation Tamon SUWA, Asao HABE (Hokkaido Univ.) Kohji YOSHIKAWA (Tokyo Univ.)
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Machian General Relativity A possible solution to the Dark Energy problem and an alternative to Big Bang cosmology ? Robin Booth Theoretical Physics Imperial.
Sam Young University of Sussex arXiv: , SY, Christian Byrnes Texas Symposium, 16 th December 2015 CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF PRIMORDIAL BLACK.
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
3D Matter and Halo density fields with Standard Perturbation Theory and local bias Nina Roth BCTP Workshop Bad Honnef October 4 th 2010.
Collapse of Small Scales Density Perturbations
Jan Hamann Rencontres de Moriond (Cosmology) 21st March 2016
The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey : cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample arXiv:
Observational Constraints on the Running Vacuum Model
Cosmology With The Lyα Forest
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Modifying Gravity to Reduce the
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
“B-mode from space” workshop,
Presentation transcript:

Evolution of perturbations and cosmological constraints in decaying dark matter models with arbitrary decay mass products Shohei Aoyama Nagoya University Collaborators: Toyokazu Sekiguchi, Kiyotomo Ichiki & Naoshi Sugiyama JCAP07(2014)021, arXiv: KIAS workshop (2014) 3 rd November, 2014

CDM and its problem The ΛCDM model can predict numerous cosmological observations on large scales about temperature anisotropy of the CMB C l TT and the large scale structure. However the nature of dark matter (eg. the mass or interactions ) is still unknown. In addition, observations on the small scale, the discrepancies between the observations and the theoretical predictions. (eg. missing satellite problem) Moore et al. (1999) [astro-ph/ ] content/uploads/2013/03/Planck_cosmic_recipe.png

Planck anomaly Planck collaborations pointed out that σ8 which is estimated from C l TT is larger than that from the number counts of cluster by SZ effect on CMB by more than 2σ CL. Planck Collaboration(2013,XX)[ ]

A prescription of these problems Some mechanisms that suppress small scale structure formation may rescue these problems. (Ostriker & Steinhardt (2003) [astro-ph/ ]). Decaying dark matter (DDM) is a candidate of these problems because product particles are generated with large momentum and smear out of the gravitational potential which was originated by progenitor particles. Planck Collaboration(XX)[ ] Moore+ (1999) [astro-ph/ ]

We consider the DDM which decays into two product dark matter particles. In this case, the decaying process and the time evolutions of distribution functions of dark matter particles can be characterized by 4 parameters. In our calculation, by solving Boltzmann equations for these product particles directly, one can take the mass of one of daughter particles arbitrary and obtain the time evolutions of density perturbations, C l TT and σ 8. Our model of DDM

The effect on C l TT peak shift integrated SW

We consider the DDM which decays into two product dark matter particles. In this case, the decaying process and the time evolutions of distribution functions of dark matter particles can be characterized by 4 parameters. In this work, we set the constraint on the lifetime of DDM from σ8 estimated from BOSS III data. σ 8 =0.80±0.02 Sánchez et al.(2012)[arXiv: ]) Our model of DDM

The constraint on the lifetime of DDM The lifetime of the DDM should be longer than 200Gyr in the case relativistic decay. This constraint is consistent with previous works (Ichiki et al. (2004), [astro-ph:astro-ph/ ]). 2σ anomaly This SDSS data excluded σ 8 < 0.76 on 2 σ CL.

Planck anomaly Favored region The DDM whose lifetime of DDM is around 200 Gyr and which decays into two relativistic particles can explain observational C l TT and the number of clusters.

The power spectrum of CMB lens potential C l φφ ―m D1 /m M =0.3 ―m D1 /m M =0.9 ― Λ CDM The DDM which decays into two relativistic particles is not ruled out from the current CMB lensing observation.

Conclusion We consider the decaying dark matter which decays two particles and its effect on the cosmological observables. Even in the case that the finite mass of one of product particles, the lifetime should be larger than 200 Gyr. DDM may reconcile the tension between the observed σ 8 estimated from ClTT and that from number counts of cluster from SZ effect.