Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
Advertisements

06/04/2009 TAC 2009 Long-term Demand and Energy Forecast (LTDEF) and Capacity, Demand and Reserves (CDR) Calculation Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
February 25, 2011 Demand Side Working Group EILS Update Mark Patterson ERCOT, Manager Demand Integration.
Houston Region Import Capacity Project August 27, 2013 Regional Planning Group Meeting.
ROS Meeting November 8 th, 2012 SSWG 13DSB Case Preparation Extraordinary Dispatch.
TPTF Presentation Registration of PUN Facilities December 19, 2007.
GENFLEX TARIFF AND INCOPORATION OF THE MEC INTO THE NMD RULES
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Intermittent Resources and Demand Response Integration 2007–2016 Long-Term Reliability Assessment Workshop Bill Bojorquez VP, System Planning August 16,
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 8, 2008.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
1 ERCOT 2007 Strategic Financial Plan & Budget Proposal _____________________ Board of Directors November 14, 2006.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee March 4, 2010.
August 17, 2012 Solar PV Inverters Anuj Dixit Planning Engineer Resource Integration RPG Meeting.
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
Wind ELCC Calculation Comparisons and ERCOT’s NERC LTRA Capacity Forecasts GATF Meeting, June 24, 2014.
ERCOT PUBLIC 5/20/ RTP Inputs and Assumptions May 20, 2014.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
Generation assets important to the reliable operation of the Bulk Electric System What does this mean?
Project Cyber Security Order 706 Version 5 CIP Standards Potential to Adversely Impact ERCOT Black Start Capability.
COMPLIANCE ROLLOUT Vann Weldon Compliance Training Administrator March 23, 2005 NERC FUNCTIONAL MODEL REVIEW.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS November 18, 2009.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee Update May 2 nd, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
Report to TAC March In Brief Voting Items Voting Items GATF – WMS endorsed the recommendations of the GATF GATF – WMS endorsed the recommendations.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
ERCOT TAC11/2/ CREZ Study Update ERCOT TAC 11/2/2006.
BAL-001-TRE-01 ERCOT CPS2 R2 Waiver Regional Variance April 16, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Workshop on the Staff Draft 2006 Summer Outlook Report December 8, 2005 Hearing Room B.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April 2007 (which is in March)
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez May 4, 2007.
2006 Report on the Capacity, Demand, & Resources for the ERCOT Region Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006 Kenneth A. Donohoo. P.E. Manager, Transmission.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
2006 CDR Status Report Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2006 Bill Bojorquez.
1 Project Prioritization Review May 14, Approved Revision Requests “Not Started” – Planned to Start in Future Months Revision Request Target Start.
Long Term Transmission Integration Planning at the California ISO Intermittency Analysis Project (IAP) Energy Commission Staff Workshop February 13, 2007.
LOLEv Methodology Details GATF April 5, Calculation of the Target Reserve Margin in the LOLEv study The reserve margin is calculated by the following.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee July 1, 2010.
Jan 22, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 22, 2003.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Meeting April 10, 2014.
April 13, 2007 Regional Planning Group Meeting Wind Impact/Integration Analysis Warren Lasher Regional Planning.
03/06/2008 TAC CREZ Transmission Optimization (CTO) Study Update Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
Impact of not including proposed generators lacking RARF data in the planning models Planning Guide Section 6.9 Issues February 17, 2016.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
October 15, 2012 PV & Storage Workshop ERCOT’s Interconnection Process John Adams Principal Engineer.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
1 NPCC – A-2 Dr. Mayer Sasson Transmission Planning Consolidated Edison of New York June 1, 2006 Presented to the NYSRC-RRS.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors April 18, 2007.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Agenda TSOG 8th November
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
August 25, 2016 TAC Update to COPS
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS
NERC Reliability Standard EOP 001
Presentation transcript:

Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007

Approved CDR Methodology Changes Treatment of new generation: –Signed generation interconnection agreement and air permit. Change capacity value for wind: –Base wind capacity value on Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) from ERCOT’s Loss of Load Probability Study (LOLP)— currently measured at 8.7% of installed capacity.

Additional April Board Meeting Comments Remove total “potential resources” at bottom of report Break down “uncommitted” resources and consider a new title Clarify units in Full Interconnection Study phase are included in the uncommitted category Clarify (or consolidate) multiple “mothball” capacity and wind capacity lines in the report Explain Private Networks Eliminate footnotes Treatment of nuclear plants How often should the ELCC for wind be computed? How often should the CDR be prepared?

Format Changes Combine Other Potential List Mothball Capacity, DC ties and planned units in Full Interconnection study subtotals

Proposed Format

CDR Preparation Frequency TAC and ERCOT propose December and May reports –May report will include new load forecast and all worksheets –December report will only include summer summary table and list of resources – no updated load forecast Requirements to support two CDR reports each year: –Mothball return probability updated twice per year (PRR 713)

Board Requested Actions Endorse the CDR format changes Endorse the proposed frequency of the CDR report preparation to twice per year in December and May

BACKUP SLIDE (Terminology) Available Mothballed Generation The probability that a mothballed unit will return to service multiplied by the capacity of the mothballed unit. BULs Balancing up load. Loads capable of reducing the need for electrical energy when providing Balancing Up Load Energy Service as described in the ERCOT Protocols, Section 6, Ancillary Services. BULs are not considered resources as defined by the ERCOT Protocols. LaaRs (Loads acting as resource) Load capable of reducing or increasing the need for electrical energy or providing Ancillary Services to the ERCOT System, as described in the ERCOT Protocols, Section 6, Ancillary Services. These Resources may provide the following Ancillary Services: Responsive Reserve Service, Non-Spinning Reserve Service, Replacement Reserve Service, and Regulation Service. The Resources must be registered and qualified by ERCOT and will be scheduled by a Qualified Scheduling Entity. Mothballed Capacity The difference in the available mothballed generation (see definition above) and the total mothballed capacity. Mothballed Unit A generation resource for which a generation entity has submitted a Notification of Suspension of Operations, for which ERCOT has declined to execute an RMR agreement, and for which the generation entity has not announced retirement of the generation resource. Net Dependable Capability Maximum sustainable capability of a generation resource as demonstrated by performance testing. Net Dependable Wind Generation The amount of wind generation that the Generation Adequacy Task Force (GATF) has mandated to be included in the CDR. The value is 8.7% of the capacity, both installed capacity and planned capacity. Non-synchronous Tie Any non-synchronous transmission interconnection between ERCOT and non-ERCOT electric power systems

BACKUP SLIDE (Terminology) Other Potential Resources Capacity resources that include one of the following: Remaining “mothballed” capacity not included as resources in the reserve margin calculation, Remaining DC tie capacity not included as resources in the reserve margin calculation, and New generating units that have initiated full transmission interconnection studies through the ERCOT generation interconnection process (note that new wind generating units would be included based on the appropriate discounted capacity value applied to existing wind generating units). Planned Units in Full Interconnection Study Phase To connect new generation to the ERCOT grid, a generation developer must go through a set procedure. The first step is a high-level screening study to determine the effects of adding the new generation on the transmission system. The second step is the full interconnection studies. These are detailed studies done by the transmission owners to determine the effects of the addition of new generation on the transmission system Private Networks An electric network connected to the ERCOT transmission grid that contains load that is not directly metered by ERCOT (i.e., load that is typically netted with internal generation). Reliability Must-Run (RMR) Unit A generation resource unit operated under the terms of an agreement with ERCOT that would not otherwise be operated except that they are necessary to provide voltage support, stability or management of localized transmission constraints under first contingency criteria. Signed IA (Interconnection Agreement) An agreement that sets forth requirements for physical connection between an eligible transmission service customer and a transmission or distribution service provider Switchable Unit A generation resource that can be connected to either the ERCOT transmission grid or a grid outside the ERCOT Region.