Kehittämistehtävä Students’ perceptions of highly interactive, reflective and process oriented eLearning courses Dr. Matti J. Haverila.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ETL339: E-Learning Is it all just smoke and mirrors... bells and whistles?

Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.

INTEGRATING THEORY AND PRACTICE

A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.

PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING

From the Mediterranean Tradition – Spanish case of Study Education 2.0: implications in terms of key competences for promoting LLL Andrea Rossi.

E-Learning Can it replace the traditional classroom? A Case Study at A Private High School Jennelle Irene Spurlock-Johnson Wendy Zhang Leeta Allen-Haynes.

Adult learning principles Planning a successful workshop.

Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall

E-LEARNING IN 21ST CENTURY

Overview of Digital Content Evaluation. Domains of Content Evaluation Quality and comprehensiveness of content Ease of use, functionality, navigation.

Teaching in e-learning environment Nataša Hoić–Božić University of Rijeka (Croatia)

Chapter 12 Instructional Methods

Carolyn Awalt University of Texas at El Paso Paul Resta

Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Idea Purpose ◦ Organize and classify educational goals ◦ Provide a systematized approach to course design Guided.

Microsoft 2013 All Rights Reserved. Partners in Learning School Research Background.

Managing an Online Course Personal Philosophy of Josh Eastwood.

Aligning e-learning with assessment and learner support Janet Macdonald Open University in Scotland QAA Assessment Series, Edinburgh, April 2004.

The Synergy of Technology with Basic Learning Theories, Principles and Practices Synergy is compounded words taken from synchronize and energy which can.

Noynay, Kelvin G. BSED-ENGLISH Educational Technology 1.

The Impact of On-line Teaching Practices On Young EFL Learners' Instruction Dr. Trisevgeni Liontou RHODES MAY

 DAY 5 Using Scratch to Develop Numeracy © PDST Technology in Education/Lero 2013.

Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.

Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.

Bloom’s Cognitive and Affective Taxonomies Cognitive and Affective Taxonomies.

The Finnish Strategy in Teacher Education at the 2nd cycle level

Project-Based Learning Training What is the problem with current education methods?

TEN LESSONS LEARNED FROM TEN YEARS OF RESEARCH ON K-12 ONLINE TEACHING AND LEARNING Dr. Susan Lowes Director, Research and Evaluation Institute for Learning.

Engaging Students in Learning Activities Mark H. Gelula, Ph.D. Director of Faculty Development Department of Medical Education

ONLINE VS. FACE-TO-FACE: EDUCATOR OPINIONS ON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DELIVERY METHODS BY TERESA SCRUGGS THOMAS Tamar AvineriEMS 792x.

Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.

P REPARING T EACHERS FOR O NLINE AND B LENDED L EARNING presented by B ARBARA T REACY Education Development Center EdTech Leaders Online and S TAN F REEDA.

Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.

ELearning 2008 Day 1 Julie Collareda. TAFE NSW – Sydney Institute.

The Use of Marketing Variables and their Perceived Effectiveness in International Context Dr. Matti J. Haverila.

Jenni Parker, Dani Boase-Jelinek Jan Herrington School of Education Murdoch University Western Australia.

Developing an Effective Web-Based Learning Resource that Support Lifelong Learning of Thai Learners Within K-12 ASEAN Environment Presented by Dr. Watsatree.

The DID Model of the Technology-Based Instructional Design EDU 529 Computer-Based Instructional Technology.

Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition

Using virtual collaboration tools for designing innovative education scenarios Gabriel Dima University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Romania.

Teaching young EFL learners; factors that make a difference Dr Joanna Rodiki Petrides (PhD) Presented at Egypt TESOL conference, December 2005.

Boys’ Literacy Me Read? No Way!. Modules ConsistentFlexible Introductory Module:Module 2: Resources #1 Key MessagesModule 3: Oral Language #5 Barriers.

The Future of Online Learning for Teachers and Students Chris Dede Harvard University

CHILDREN’S PERCEPTIONS OF LEARNING WITH EDUCATIONAL GAMES USING IPOD TOUCHES Yasemin Allsop ICT Coordinator, Wilbury Primary School (UK)

Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...

Benefits & Advantages of an Interdisciplinary Curriculum Students become more involved and excited. The seem to remember more, believed in the importance.

Preparing Future Teachers for 21 st Century Learning Partnerships that enhance the capacity of pre-service education 2008 Deakin University Faculty of.

March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.

Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: April 12, 2008 Liaw, S., Huang, H.,

Technology Workshop 2 June 22, Extent of Technology Integration in Instruction by ABE Teachers.

Collaborative Writing Abdul Hadi. Writing and Collaborative Writing  Writing Vs. Collaborative writing?  “…writing is collaborative by nature…”( ASHE-ERIC.

Bloom’s Taxonomy Benjamin Samuel Bloom He was one of the greatest minds to influence the field of education. He was born on February 21, 1913 in Lansford,

An AAC Professional Learning Module Book Study based on the AAC publication Scaffolding for Student Success Scaffolding for Student Success Module 3: A.

The DID Model of the Technology-Based Instructional Design EDU 529 Computer-Based Instructional Technology.

Virtual Schooling Mallory Buzun-Miller, Judith Considine, Will Puvalowski, Blair Sawyers.

E-Learning: components of e-learning Mohammed Hassan 1.

A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.

Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.

Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.

Interim report from the ELFE 2 study visits in Slovenia, Poland and Latvia: analysis of practices and experiences in schools and Teacher Education Institutions.

MASTER CURRICULUM DESIGN PROGRAMME - curriculum proposal of the University of Niš - TEMPUS IV MASTS Niš, 30 th November-1 th December 2011.

The Internet Learners By: Manal Alabsy Shinas College of Technology.

Information Retention in e-Learning De Leon Kimberly Obonyo Carolyne Penn John Yang Xiaoyan.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN AND SOCIAL CIENCES APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN ENGLISH CAREER “THE INFLUENCE OF TEACHER’S ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS INTO TECHNOLOGY-RELATED.

Teaching Chinese as Second Language in the Schools of Yunnan An Exploration in Constructivism Liwei Liu.

Implementing interactive technologies

Design of eLearning applications

Can E-learning Replace the Traditional Classroom

Presentation transcript:

Kehittämistehtävä Students’ perceptions of highly interactive, reflective and process oriented eLearning courses Dr. Matti J. Haverila

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Purpose The purpose of this research thesis was to research the perceptions of students and requirements for a highly interactive and process oriented virtual learning environment.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy The participants Software business course at Tampere Polytechnic University, in Tampere England eLearning Professional course at Open University in United Kingdom.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Method A qualitative research approach was used.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy The two important angles 1.Pedagogical options 2.eLearning and its possibilities to enable various learning opportunities.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Bloom’s classifications of learning objectives 1.Knowledge - remembering previously learned material. 2.Comprehension - grasping the meaning of material. 3.Application - using learned material in new and concrete situations. 4.Analysis - breaking down material into its component parts and understand its organizational structure. 5.Synthesis - assembling parts together to form a new whole. 6.Evaluation - judging the value of material for a given purpose.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Traditional approach vs. eLearning Traditional approachTechnology allows more of Teacher centered learningStudent centered learning One size fits all instructionCustomization to meet individual needs One pace applies to all studentsFlexible pacing based on student needs Classrooms and school buildingsDistributed learning from anyplace Learning during school hoursLearning at anytime Facts and recitationCritical thinking and real world context Individual student performanceCollaboration and dialogue among students and between teachers and student TextbooksUp to date primary information resources Parent teacher meetings each semester Parent teacher communication daily

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Background of the students The Open University (OU) respondents worked primarily in the teaching profession, while the Tampere Polytechnic University students worked in technical (IT) profession.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Other characteristics of the respondents The groups were rather similar regarding the following issues (1=low, 7= high): Uncertainty tolerance (OU mean 4,84 and TPU mean 4,60) Time management skills (OU mean 4,23 and TPU mean 4,48) Motivational level (OU mean 5,92 and TPU mean 5,78)

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Other characteristics of the respondents The groups were rather different regarding the following issues (1=low, 7= high): Learning style suitability to eLearning (OU mean 5,92 and TPU mean 4,78) Active learner and self-starter. (OU mean 5,84 and TPU mean 4,82)

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Prior educational conditions The field of degree of the respondents was different. The time elapsed from the last degree was also somewhat different so that the degree of OU respondents was a bit more recent. The OU students were more experienced with eLearning.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Prior educational conditions Comprehension of the basic terms prior to entering the course both groups were rather indifferent so that the TPU respondents indicated lower scores in this question. The attitude towards eLearning in both groups was rather positive and remarkably high among the OU respondents. Attitude has been shown to be one of the key indicators of success in online training.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Perceptions of the respondents regarding eLearning Both groups thought that eLearning enabled somewhat faster learning with OU respondents agreeing more with this statement. Both groups also somewhat agreed with the statement that eLearning improves learning again so that the OU respondent agreed more with this statement.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Perceptions of the respondents regarding eLearning The groups were a bit divided regarding if learning is easier in the eLearning mode that in the traditional learning mode. OU respondents were more positive. Both groups thought that eLearning improves productivity with more positive responses by the OU respondents.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Perceptions of the respondents regarding eLearning Both groups thought that their backgrounds are suitable to eLearning. Bothcourses taken are suitable to eLearning, particularly in the case of OU students. Collaboration seems to help learning in both cases.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Perceptions of the respondents regarding eLearning Both groups thought that physical meetings would contribute positively towards learning. eLearning facilitates the use of up-to-date information and data. Both groups confirmed the need for synchronized and asynchronized meetings.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Perceptions of the respondents regarding eLearning Both groups agreed that the responsibility of the student is greater than in the traditional learning. Both groups agreed that eLearning is more suitable to the individual needs than traditional learning.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Perceptions of the respondents regarding eLearning eLearning is more effective than traditional learning ( slightly supported by both groups ). The responses of the OU and TPU groups differed regarding the question “Is learning better in the traditional mode if both modes are used.

©Matti Haverila, Infacs Oy Perceptions of the respondents regarding eLearning Both groups preferred eLearning to traditional learning and more so in the case of the OU respondents Critical thinking skills ( both groups somewhat agreed ).