Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

Professional Growth and
A Guide to Implementation
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Model
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Professional Growth and
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Governor’s Office of Early Childhood Teacher-Child Interactions in Early Childhood Settings CLASS is in session:
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Mississippi Student Services Coordinators Appraisal Rubric (M-SSAR)
Hanmer School – Margaret Zacchei Highcrest School – Maresa Harvey Webb School – Michael Verderame Emerson-Williams School – Neela Thakur Charles Wright.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
TEM 4.0 For School Librarians Laurie Butler, Library Services Advisor 2014.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
TCRP TEACHER TRAINING TCRP Overview. Agenda Objective By the end of the session all teachers will be able to: TCRP Pverview Agenda and Objectives 2 1.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Recertification TEAM Teacher Evaluation Process.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting

Learning Goals O At the end of this session, the teacher will be able to: O Make the connection between the importance of the unit meeting to the Educator Effectiveness Process O Understand Role of the Unit Meeting O Participate Effectively in Unit Meetings O Create Effective Unit Meetings

Overview Four Core Processes O A: Differentiated Performance–based Compensation System (PBCS) O B: Transparent, Rigorous, and Fair Observations O C: Practical Targeted Professional Development O D: Professional Career Options Think-Pair-Share

Core Process A O A differentiated performance based compensation system (PBCS) that allows for differentiated payments to educators based on teacher value-added student performances, and principal and teacher observations. O 3 Models: Tested Core Subject, Non-Tested Subjects, Principal

Payout Models

Core-Subject Not Tested ObservationsValue-Added

EnglishMath Class Value-Added School Value-Added Observations

Value-Added O Statistical measurement of student gains in achievement over a year based on performance on state assessment O EVAAS – analyzes student data and predicts student performance O Battelle for Kids – links student data to teachers O Measures how much value a teacher added to a student’s academic growth over a year.

Core Process A O Which payout category do you fall into? O What is your payout scheme?

Core Process B O Transparent, rigorous, and fair observations that occur throughout the year and use pre and post observer- teacher conferences that focus on the standards-based instructional rubrics including plans for growth.

Core Process B O Observations that are O Transparent O Fair O Rigorous O Based on Observation Rubric O Occur three times in the year

Observations O Observers are trained and certified by EEP and Region 20. O Teachers are observed by three different observers O Recorded in TEDS (Teacher Evaluation Data System) O Inter-rater reliability assured O Aligned to value-added scores

Observations O One announced, Two unannounced O Reinforcement Goal O Refinement Goal Observation Pre- Conference ScoringPost-Observation Conference Walk through Observations

Observation Rubric O Domain I – Facilitating Student Learning O Domain II – Planning For Learning O Domain III – Mental, Physical, Emotional Learning O Domain IV – Campus Responsibilities

Observation Rubric O Guide to measure teacher effectiveness O Scored in each Indicator O Scores: 1 – 5 O Recorded in TEDS O Need an average score of 3 to qualify for payout. O Accounts for 50% of payout for all teachers. O Focus of Unit Meetings

Domain 1. Facilitating Student Learning 1.Learning Goals 2.Rigor 3.Differentiation 4.Hands-On Learning 5.Comprehensible Input 6.Time Management 7.Formative Assessment 8.Checking for Understanding 9.Student Engagement 10.Cooperative Learning 11.Student HOTS 12.Active Learning Domain 2. Planning for Learning 1.Learning Structure 2.Learning Tasks 3.Evidence of Learning Domain 3. Mental Physical & Emotional Learning 1.Behavior Norms 2.Positive Mental Attitude 3.Learning Climate 4.Learning Interactions

Observation Rubric O Designed to evaluate teachers’ planning, instruction and assessment skills O Post-conference provides opportunity to reflect on their lessons. Levels of Performance 5 = Outstanding; Observation indicates all or more than all of the criteria was met 4 = Above Effective; Observation indicates all or most of the criteria was met 3 = Effective; Observation indicates most of the criteria was met 2 = Below Effective; Observation indicates some of the criteria was met 1 = Unsatisfactory; Observation indicates little or none of criteria was met

Core Process B O What is the purpose of the post-conference? O Which indicators do you think you will need the most help with? O Which indicators are your strengths? O How many evaluations will you have by the end of the year?

Core Process C O A comprehensive practical-use professional development system O Based on each high-need school's educator evaluative and student assessment data.

Core Process C O Job-embedded Professional Development O Targeted development Training O Include weekly Unit Meetings O Based on School Plan O Include Individual Growth Plans

The School Plan O Developed by Leadership Team and based on data O Goal is to improve student achievement O Used to monitor progress O Include cycle goals and unit goals O School goal: broad, identify gaps O Unit goal: specific, measurable O Unit cycle goal: total 6

The Unit Meeting O Professional Learning Community (PLC) O Weekly O Instructional Strategies to address student needs and increase effectiveness O Aligned to goals O Modeling and Practicing

The Unit Meeting O Suggested Roles O Leader O Facilitator O Scribe O Time Keeper O Gate Keeper O Meeting Participant

The Unit Meeting O Meeting Norms O Start on time O Active Participation O Cell Phones on Silent O Take Care of your needs O Agree to Disagree O Be efficient and concise O End on time

The Unit Meeting O Powerful Learning Framework O Authentic O Interactive O Learner-Centered O Inclusive O Continuous O Guide to common language and understanding for thinking and talking about Powerful Learning for teachers and students

The Unit Meeting Protocol O Review Need O Learn/Facilitate O Powerful Learning O Develop/Plan O Schedule O Reflect

Effective Unit Meetings O Review of student work samples (high, medium, and low) O Research based-strategies and/or EEP indicator(s) O Connections to school goal(s) O Planning time for Unit meeting participants to work on lesson planning O EEP Observation Rubric

Effective Unit Meetings 1. Student Analysis - Analyzing student work samples to identify gaps. 2. Develop New Strategies - New strategies can be an extension of other strategies based on a gap that was identified in the student work samples. Therefore, “tweaking” a portion of a strategy is acceptable. 3. Time Management - Time must be provided to teachers, and must be effectively managed, to develop new teaching strategies and incorporate the strategies into their lesson plans.

Core Process D O Professional options for educators that lead to recruitment and retention. O CT, CTL, ETL O Individual Growth Plans

Closing the Loop O What are the four grant components? O Identify at least 5 Indicators of the Observation Rubric. O What are possible scores on the rubric? O What score is needed for payout? O What is a unit meeting? O What is covered during a unit meeting? O What can you do to make a unit meeting effective?

Questions? Comments, Concerns, Random Thoughts