CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEA Course Lecture III – Outline
Advertisements

MEG 361 CAD Finite Element Method Dr. Mostafa S. Hbib.
Finite element method Among the up-to-date methods of stress state analysis, the finite element method (abbreviated as FEM below, or often as FEA for analyses.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
FE analysis with shell and axisymmetric elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Element Loads Strain and Stress 2D Analyses Structural Mechanics Displacement-based Formulations.
Beams and Frames.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
LECTURE SERIES on STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION Thanh X. Nguyen Structural Mechanics Division National University of Civil Engineering
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Practical considerations in FEM modeling Prof. Suvranu De.
By S Ziaei-Rad Mechanical Engineering Department, IUT.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
Section 4: Implementation of Finite Element Analysis – Other Elements
Finite Element Primer for Engineers: Part 2
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
2D Analyses Mesh Refinement Structural Mechanics Displacement-based Formulations.
Bars and Beams FEM Linear Static Analysis
FEA Simulations Usually based on energy minimum or virtual work Component of interest is divided into small parts – 1D elements for beam or truss structures.
Copyright © 2002J. E. Akin Rice University, MEMS Dept. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress.
Thermal analysis There is a resemblance between the thermal problem and the stress analysis. The same element types, even the same FE mesh, can be used.
Theory of Elasticity Theory of elasticity governs response – Symmetric stress & strain components Governing equations – Equilibrium equations (3) – Strain-displacement.
Introduction to Finite Element Analysis for Structure Design Dr. A. Sherif El-Gizawy.
One-Dimensional Problems
CST ELEMENT STIFFNESS MATRIX
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES
MECH593 Introduction to Finite Element Methods
EMA 405 Introduction. Syllabus Textbook: none Prerequisites: EMA 214; 303, 304, or 306; EMA 202 or 221 Room: 2261 Engineering Hall Time: TR 11-12:15 Course.
The Finite Element Method
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Plate and shell elements All the following elements enable to create FE mesh of a thin-walled body, with the thickness being one of the important input.
Conservation Laws for Continua
ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
9 Torsion.
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
APPLIED MECHANICS Lecture 13 Slovak University of Technology
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice Inverse approach for identification of the shrinkage gap thermal resistance in continuous casting of metals.
Finite Element Analysis
3 Torsion.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
CHAP 3 WEIGHTED RESIDUAL AND ENERGY METHOD FOR 1D PROBLEMS
1 HOW MANY ELEMENTS? How to choose element size? –Critically important in obtaining good results –Mesh refinement improves solution accuracy. –How small.
Two loading Conditions
General Analysis Procedure Chapter 4. Training Manual October 30, 2001 Inventory # Chapter 4 - General Analysis Procedure Overview The objective.
Combined Loadings Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels Stress caused by Combined Loadings.
4. Local strength calculation
MESF593 Finite Element Methods
1 FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION Rayleigh-Ritz method approximate solution in the entire beam –Difficult to find good approximate solution (discontinuities.
1 CHAP 3 WEIGHTED RESIDUAL AND ENERGY METHOD FOR 1D PROBLEMS FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Nam-Ho Kim.
Pipe Integrity Check using Finite Element Analysis
Introduction to Finite Element Method
11 Energy Methods.
11 Energy Methods.
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
Mechanics of Solids I Energy Method.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
FEM : Finite Element Method 2017.
Deflections using energy methods
Chapter X: Sheet Forming (Membrane Theory) 1 Content of Membrane Analysis Basic Assumptions Static Equilibrium Equations Strain State Application 1: Hole.
FEA convergence requirements.
11 Energy Methods.
FEA Simulations Boundary conditions are applied
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
3 Torsion.
OVERVIEW OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
Presentation transcript:

CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) –Electromagnetics Analysis –...

General Approach for FE, 1 Select verification tools –analytic, experimental, other fe method, etc. Select element type(s) and degree –3-D solid, axisymmetric solid, thick surface, thin surface, thick curve, thin curve, etc. Understand primary variables (PV) –Statics: displacements & (maybe) rotations –Thermal: temperature –CDF: velocity & pressure

General Approach for FE, 2 Understand source (load) items –Statics: point, line, surface, and volume forces –Thermal: point, line, surface, and volume heat generation Understand secondary variables (SV) –Statics: strains, stresses, failure criterion, error –Thermal: heat flux, error

General Approach for FE, 3 Understand boundary conditions (BC) –Essential BC (on PV) Statics: displacement and/or (maybe) rotation Thermal: temperature –Natural BC (on SV) Statics: null surface traction vector Thermal: null normal heat flux One or the other at a boundary point.

General Approach for FE, 4 Understand reactions at Essential BC –Statics: Force at given displacement Moment at given rotation (if active) –Thermal: Heat flux at given temperature

General Approach for FE, 5 1. Estimate the solution 2. Select an acceptable error (1 %) 3. Mesh the model 4. Solve the model (PV), post-process (SV) 5. Estimate the error –A. Unacceptable error: Adapt mesh, go to 3 –B. Acceptable error: Validate the analysis

FE Mesh (FEM) Crude meshes that “look like” a part are ok for mass properties but not for FEA. Local error is proportional to product of the local mesh size (h) and the gradient of the secondary variables. PV piecewise continuous polynomials of degree p, and SV are discontinuous polynomials of degree (p-1).

FEA Stress Models 3-D Solid, PV: 3 displacements (no rotations), SV: 6 stresses 2-D Approximations –Plane Stress (  zz = 0) PV: 2 displacements, SV: 3 stresses –Plane Strain (  zz = 0) PV: 2 displacements, SV: 3 stresses (and  zz ) –Axisymmetric (  /  = 0) PV: 2 displacements, SV: 4 stresses

FEA Stress Models, 2 2-D Approximations –Thick Shells, PV: 3 displacements (no rotations), SV: 5 (or 6) stresses –Thin Shells, PV: 3 displacements and 3 rotations, SV: 5 stresses (each at top, middle, and bottom surfaces) –Plate bending PV: normal displacement, in- plane rotation vector, SV: 3 stresses (each at top, middle, and bottom surfaces)

FEA Stress Models, 3 1-D Approximations –Bars (Trusses), PV: 3 displacements (1 local displacement), SV: 1 axial stress –Torsion member, PV: 3 rotations (1 local rotation), SV: 1 torsional stress –Beams (Frames), PV: 3 displacements, 3 rotations, SV: local bending and shear stress Thick beam, thin beam, curved beam Pipe element, pipe elbow, pipe tee

FEA Accuracy PV are most accurate at the mesh nodes. SV are least accurate at the mesh nodes. –(SV are most accurate at the Gauss points) –SV can be post-processed for accurate nodal values (and error estimates)

Local Error The error at a (non-singular) point is the product of the element size, h, the gradient of the secondary variables, and a constant dependent on the domain shape and boundary conditions. –Large gradient points need small h –Small gradient points can have large h Plan local mesh size with engineering judgement.

Error Estimators Global and element error estimates are often available from mathematical norms of the secondary variables. The energy norm is the most common. It is proven to be asymptotically exact for elliptical problems. Typically want less than 1 % error.

Error Estimates Quite good for elliptic problems (thermal, elasticity, ideal flow), Navier-Stokes, etc. Can predict the new mesh size needed to reach the required accuracy. Can predict needed polynomial degree. Require second post-processing pass for localized (element level) smoothing.

Primary FEA Assumptions Model geometry Material Properties –Failure Criterion, Factor of safety Mesh(s) –Element type, size, degree Source (Load) Cases –Combined cases, Factors of safety, Coord. Sys. Boundary conditions –Coordinate system(s)

Primary FEA Matrix Costs Assume sparse banded linear algebra system of E equations, with a half-bandwidth of B. Full system if B = E. –Storage required, S = B * E (Mb) –Solution Cost, C  B * E 2 (time) –Half symmetry: B  B/2, E  E/2, S  S/4, C  C/8 –Quarter symmetry: B  B/4, E  E/4, S  S/16, C  C/64 –Eighth symmetry, Cyclic symmetry,...

Symmetry and Anti-symmetry Use symmetry states for the maximum accuracy at the least cost in stress and thermal problems. Cut the object with symmetry planes (or surfaces) and apply new boundary conditions (EBC or NBC) to account for the removed material.

Symmetry (Anti-symmetry) Requires symmetry of the geometry and material properties. Requires symmetry (anti-symmetry) of the source terms. Requires symmetry (anti-symmetry) of the essential boundary conditions.

Structural Model Symmetry –Zero displacement normal to surface –Zero rotation vector tangent to surface Anti-symmetry – Zero displacement vector tangent to surface – Zero rotation normal to surface

Thermal Model Symmetry –Zero gradient normal to surface (insulated surface, zero heat flux) Anti-symmetry –Average temperature on surface known

Local Singularities All elliptical problems have local radial gradient singularities near re-entrant corners in the domain. Re-entrant, C Radius, r u = r p f(  ) Strength, p =  /C  u/  r = r (p-1) f(  ) Corner: p = 2/3, weak Crack: p = 1/2, strong  u/  r   as r  0

Stress Analysis Verification, 1 Prepare initial estimates of deflections, reactions and stresses. Eyeball check the deflected shape and the principal stress vectors.

Stress Analysis Verification, 2 The stresses often depend only on the shape of the part and are independent of the material properties. You must also verify the displacements which almost always depend on the material properties.

Stress Analysis Verification, 3 The reaction resultant forces and/or moments are equal and opposite to the actual applied loading. For pressures or tractions remember to compare their integral (resultant) to the solution reactions. Reactions can be obtained at elements too.

Stress Analysis Verification, 4 Compare displacements, reactions and stresses to initial estimates. Investigate any differences. Check maximum error estimates, if available in the code.

Thermal Analysis Verification, 1 Prepare initial estimates of the temperatures, reaction flux, and heat flux vectors. Eyeball check the temperature contours and the heat flux vectors. Temperature contours should be perpendicular to an insulated boundary.

Thermal Analysis Verification, 2 The temperatures often depend only on the shape of the part. Verify the heat flux magnitudes which almost always depend on the material properties.

Thermal Analysis Verification, 3 The reaction resultant nodal heat fluxes are equal and opposite to the applied heat fluxes. For distributed heat fluxes remember to compare their integral (resultant) to the solution reactions. Reactions can be obtained at elements too.

Thermal Analysis Verification, 4 Compare temperatures, reactions and heat flux vectors to initial estimates. Investigate any differences. Check maximum error estimates, if available in the code.