Consenting Adults Reading By Robert Pollock. Moral Equivalency? American academia and media were rife with the notion that the United States and the Soviet.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice.
Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Chapter 3 – Liberalism, Pt 3. The Beginnings of Welfare Liberalism By the 1850s, classical liberalism was unable to protect workers and children from.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Kristin Mike Olvina Santigo Cassie Carlson Travis Langolf LP5- Ethical Theories Presentation Performance Assessment Task 6 10/27/2009.
Issues & Policies in US Politics Module 8.1: Theories of Justice.
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
John Rawls' theory of justice ~ slide 1 John Rawls’ theory of justice zIn A Theory of Justice –1. The basis for the theory äA revised version of.
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
A Theory of Justice. “What is justice?” The Code of Hammurabi (Babylon, 18 th c. BCE) Judaism, Christianity, Islam: scales (balance, regulation, harmony),
Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.
Andrea Wellenstein, Jill Kollmann, Heather Lammers, and Britni Klein Monday at 1:30-4:30 Ethical Theories Presentations April 6 th, 2010.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
An Introduction to Ethics Week Nine: Distributive Justice and Torture.
Econ4620 Alexander W. Cappelen
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
 Rawls was influenced by Kant and Aristotle  An American Philosopher  Wrote the Following: A Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism, The Law of Peoples,
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.
Redistribution, Efficiency, Fairness 1. Consider a Possibility Frontier Most government action we have thought about is getting you from inside the frontier.
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Chapter 11 Freedom in a Political and Cultural Context.
Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.
THEORIES OF ETHICS PART 2 OF CHAPTER 12 (ETHICS).
Distributive Justice II: John Rawls Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
CHAPTER EIGHT: SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
Ideas about Justice Three big themes Virtue Ethics Utilitarianism
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Redistributing Income in Theory
1. Give an example not in your book that would illustrate the concept of “compensating differential.” Less desirable places to live Low wage advancement.
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Rawls & Nozick Liberalism & Libertarianism Warwick Debating Society Training, 11/05/2011.
Equity and Sustainability. Roseland and Equity North/South comparison … fairness The developed nations need to consider ‘our own poor’ … Definitional:
Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.
John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
Chapter 3: Ethics for Policy Analysts “If liberty and equality…are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike.
BEJ Lecture Three: Justice and Resources Distribution.
Justice. What is justice? It seems we develop a sense of fairness from an early age and most people would agree with Plato that the only life worth living.
Introduction to Politics and International Studies Reach Summer School
History of Philosophy.
Homework 3 Powerpoints.
Political theory and law
Rawls.
John Rawls Ronald Dworkin
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
John Rawls’ theory of justice
Chapter 3 – Liberalism, Pt 3
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
Homewrk 5 Powerpoints.
Liberalism John Rawls.
A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Justice distribution “Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege of human beings to live under.
Presentation transcript:

Consenting Adults Reading By Robert Pollock

Moral Equivalency? American academia and media were rife with the notion that the United States and the Soviet Union were morally equivalent.

Robert Nozick Nozick founded Columbia University’s chapter of the leftist Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) Graduate study at Princeton Read Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek

Friedman & Hayek Harvard Philosopher Nozick grew convinced that capitalism had moral as well as productive virtues. Wrote “Anarchy, State and Utopia” in 1974

John Rawls Harvard Philosopher Wrote “A Theory of Justice” in 1971

Utilitarianism The dominant moral and political theories of the time were utilitarian. Justice meant maximizing human pleasure and minimizing pain. Individuals might sometimes be sacrificed for the greater good. Rawls found this unacceptable!

Rawlsian View He wanted a theory of justice based on individual rights.

“Veil of Ignorance” He asked readers to perform a thought experiment under a veil of ignorance. Imagine that you don’t know if you’re an man or a woman, rich or poor, smart or dumb. What kind of society would you like to born into? Rawls assumed that everyone would want to play it safe and not risk being at the bottom.

“Veil of Ignorance” cont. Rawls assumed that everyone would want to play it safe and not risk being at the bottom. All basic goods should “be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution…is to the advantage of the least favored.”

Rawlsian Model Welcomed by liberals as a justification of an expansive welfare state.

Nozick Argument Rawls seemed more concerned with material equality than with individual rights. Achievement of such equality through taxation and income redistribution required extensive coercion… The treatment of individuals and their work as a means to others’ ends (a just society).

Nozick What Nozick argued was that Mr. Rawls seemed more concerned with material equality than with individual rights. The achievement of such equality through taxation and income redistribution required extensive coercion

Nozick The treatment of individuals and their work as means to others' ends (a "just" society), a violation of rights