DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medium-range Ensemble Streamflow forecast over France F. Rousset-Regimbeau (1), J. Noilhan (2), G. Thirel (2), E. Martin (2) and F. Habets (3) 1 : Direction.
Advertisements

AMS 25th Conference on Hydrology
Hydrologic Outlook for the Pacific Northwest Andy Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering for Washington Water.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental.
Experimental Real-time Seasonal Hydrologic Forecasting Andrew Wood Dennis Lettenmaier University of Washington Arun Kumar NCEP/EMC/CMB presented: JISAO.
Seasonal outlooks for hydrology and streamflow in the western U.S. Andy Wood, Alan Hamlet and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental.
Recap of Water Year 2008 Hydrologic Forecast and Forecasts for Water Year 2009 Francisco Munoz-Arriola Alan F. Hamlet Shraddhanand Shukla Dennis P. Lettenmaier.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Seethu Babu Marketa McGuire Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Climate Impacts Group and the Department of Civil Engineering University.
Seasonal outlooks for hydrology and water resources: streamflow, reservoir, and hydropower forecasts for the Pacific Northwest Andy Wood and Alan Hamlet.
Recap of Water Year 2009 Hydrologic Forecast and Forecasts for Water Year 2010 Francisco Munoz-Arriola Alan F. Hamlet Shraddhanand Shukla Dennis P. Lettenmaier.
Washington State Climate Change Impacts Assessment: Implications of 21 st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington Marketa M Elsner 1 with.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
Current Website: An Experimental Surface Water Monitoring System for Continental US Andy W. Wood, Ali.
Andy Wood, Ted Bohn, George Thomas, Ali Akanda, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington west-wide experimental hydrologic forecast system OBJECTIVE.
1 Youlong Xia 1, Mike Ek 1, Eric Wood 2, Justin Sheffield 2, Lifeng Luo 2,7, Dennis Lettenmaier 3, Ben Livneh 3, David Mocko 4, Brian Cosgrove 5, Jesse.
Global Flood and Drought Prediction Nathalie Voisin and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington.
Experimental seasonal hydrologic forecasting for the Western U.S. Dennis P. Lettenmaier Andrew W. Wood, Alan F. Hamlet Climate Impacts Group University.
National Weather Service Application of CFS Forecasts in NWS Hydrologic Ensemble Prediction John Schaake Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA National.
Global Flood and Drought Prediction GEWEX 2005 Meeting, June Role of Modeling in Predictability and Prediction Studies Nathalie Voisin, Dennis P.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
The NOAA Hydrology Program and its requirements for GOES-R Pedro J. Restrepo Senior Scientist Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA’s National Weather.
Strategic Plan for HEPEX John Schaake, Eric Wood and Roberto Buizza AMS Annual Meeting Atlanta February 2, 2006.
Retrospective Evaluation of the Performance of Experimental Long-Lead Columbia River Streamflow Forecasts Climate Forecast and Estimated Initial Soil Moisture.
CBRFC Stakeholder Forum February 24, 2014 Ashley Nielson Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 CBRFC Forecast Verification.
Potential for medium range global flood prediction Nathalie Voisin 1, Andrew W. Wood 1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental.
Sources of Skill and Error in Long Range Columbia River Streamflow Forecasts: A Comparison of the Role of Hydrologic State Variables and Winter Climate.
Hydrologic Forecasting Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and the Department.
Nathalie Voisin 1, Florian Pappenberger 2, Dennis Lettenmaier 1, Roberto Buizza 2, and John Schaake 3 1 University of Washington 2 ECMWF 3 National Weather.
Real Time Nowcasting In The Western Us OR Why you can’t use nodes C0-2 George Thomas Andy Wood Dennis Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental.
Implementing Probabilistic Climate Outlooks within a Seasonal Hydrologic Forecast System Andy Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental.
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
EVALUATION OF A GLOBAL PREDICTION SYSTEM: THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN AS A TEST CASE Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Civil and.
A medium range probabilistic quantitative hydrologic forecast system for global application Ph.D. defense - Nathalie Voisin March Civil and Environmental.
Long-lead streamflow forecasts: 2. An approach based on ensemble climate forecasts Andrew W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Alan.F. Hamlet University of.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Salt Lake City, Utah 11 The Hydrologic.
Evaluation of TRMM satellite precipitation product in hydrologic simulations of La Plata Basin Fengge Su 1, Yang Hong 2, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1.
Long-Range Streamflow Forecasting Products and Water Resources Management Applications in the Columbia River Basin Alan F. Hamlet, Andy Wood, Dennis P.
Nathalie Voisin1 , Andrew W. Wood1 , Dennis P. Lettenmaier1 and Eric F
Andrew Wood, Ali Akanda, Dennis Lettenmaier
Hydrologic Considerations in Global Precipitation Mission Planning
Issues in global precipitation estimation for hydrologic prediction
THE POTENTIAL FOR MEDIUM-RANGE GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION
Precipitation Products Statistical Techniques
THE POTENTIAL FOR MEDIUM-RANGE GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION
Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Andrew W. Wood, Ted Bohn, George Thomas
Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Hydrologic ensemble prediction - applications to streamflow and drought Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering And University.
2006 Water Resources Outlook for Idaho and the Western U.S.
THE POTENTIAL FOR FLOOD AND DROUGHT PREDICTION
Kostas M. Andreadis1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier1
Hydrologic Forecasting
Hydrology and Water Management Applications of GCIP Research
Andy Wood and Dennis Lettenmaier
Hydrologic response of Pacific Northwest Rivers to climate change
Long-Lead Streamflow Forecast for the Columbia River Basin for
Advances in seasonal hydrologic prediction
A. Wood, A.F. Hamlet, M. McGuire, S. Babu and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Application of a global probabilistic hydrologic forecast system to the Ohio River Basin Nathalie Voisin1, Florian Pappenberger2, Dennis Lettenmaier1,
N. Voisin, J.C. Schaake and D.P. Lettenmaier
Andy Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Results for Basin Averages of Hydrologic Variables
Global Flood and Drought Prediction
Andrew W. Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Evaluation of the TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in La Plata Basin Dennis P. Lettenmaier and.
Dennis P. Lettenmaier Andrew W. Wood, and Kostas Andreadis
UW Hydrologic Forecasting: Yakima R. Discussion
Results for Basin Averages of Hydrologic Variables
Presentation transcript:

DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington, Seattle 3 rd HEPEX Workshop, June 27-29, 2007, Stresa Italy

Background Flood prediction systems exist in developed Countries What about developing countries? The potential for global flood prediction system exists Global weather prediction models : analysis and forecasts are available Practical Issues: mismatch between the spatial resolution of weather and hydrology models ( until recently)

Objectives 1.Objective of the scheme: Predict streamflow and associated hydrologic variables, soil moisture, runoff, evaporation and snow water equivalent :  At a global scale Spatial consistency Especially in ungauged or poorly gauged basins  Lead time up to 2 weeks 2. Objective of this talk: Mississippi Basin case study.  Good data to validate and check the scheme  Verification of forecast error statistic predictions resulting from application of the downscaling sequence on the weather forecasts

Outline 1. The prediction scheme 2. Processing on the weather forecasts 3. Bias Correction validation 4. Forecast verification before and after Bias Correction 5. Conclusions

1.The global prediction scheme Hydrologic model spin up (0.5 degree global simulation) Several years back Hydrologic forecast simulation Nowcasts INITIAL STATE Medium range forecasts (up to 2 weeks) NCEP Reforecasts 15 ensemble members – 15 day forecast – 2.5 degree (fixed GFS version of 1998) Bias correction at 2.5 degree, with respect to ERA-40 (Ensures consistency between spinup and the reforecasts) Downscaling from 2.5 to 0.5 degree using the Schaake Shuffle with higher spatial resolution satellite GPCP 1dd and TRMM 3B42 precipitations (0.5 degree global simulation: stream flow, soil moisture, SWE, runoff ) Atmospheric inputs VIC Hydrology Model (here in retrospective mode) Downscaling to 0.5 degree Daily ERA-40, surrogate for near real time analysis fields Forecast verification Several years back, spin up Medium range forecasts (up to 2 weeks)

Outline 1. The prediction scheme 2. Processing on the weather forecasts 3. Bias Correction validation 4. Forecast verification before and after Bias Correction 5. Conclusions

2. Processing of the weather forecasts Bias correction: Quantile-Quantile technique with respect to ERA-40 climatology - GFS reforecast, daily CDF for the 15 ensembles, for each lead time, based on time of the year - ERA-40 (Obs), daily CDF, based on time of the year - Extreme values: fitted distributions Figure adapted from Wood and Lettenmaier, 2006: A testbed for new seasonal hydrologic forecasting approaches in the western U.S.

2. Processing of the weather forecasts Mississippi Basin: ERA-40 usually has lower estimates of precipitation  Bias correction (quantile – quantile technique) CDF for the Mississippi basin, daily mean precipitation January July Annual

2. Processing of the weather forecasts Mississippi Basin: Difference in the number of precipitation events >= 1mm in the period GFS refcst avg - Obs Annual CDF for Cell (40 o N, 90 o E)Annual CDF for Cell (35 o N, o E) Number of days

Outline 1. The prediction scheme 2. Processing on the weather forecasts 3. Bias Correction validation 4. Forecast verification before and after Bias Correction 5. Conclusions

BC is independent for each lead time:  The mean is flattened for all lead time, long lead time are not wetter than short lead time anymore.  Ensemble standard deviation decreased Both  correction for intermittency AND  distribution fitting for extreme values add water : BC GFS refcst mean does not match exactly the ERA- 40 mean 3. Bias Correction Validation Mississippi Basin: Mean and standard deviation, annual daily values Threshold is GFS refcst avg & Obs >= 0mm 8386 events Improvement ?

3. Bias Correction Validation Mississippi Basin: CDF of precipitation forecast MAE  Improvement of the MAE of daily precipitation forecast Non Exceedence probability plot for the precipitation forecast Mean Absolute Error, Mississippi Basin average, daily annual mean

Outline 1. The prediction scheme 2. Processing on the weather forecasts 3. Bias Correction validation 4. Forecast verification before and after Bias Correction 5. Conclusions

4. Forecast Verification Skill maintained or improved? Ensemble statistics that make sense for an hydrology application ( spread, reliability, mean …)? Validation of skill related statistics:  Bias  RMSE  Rank histogram  Continuous Rank Probability Score (CRPS)

4. Forecast verification Bias for the Mississippi Basin Improvement 8386 events >= 0mm 3212 events >= 1mm 488 events >= 10mm No Improvement

4. Forecast verification RMSE for the Mississippi Basin 8386 events >= 0mm 3212 events >= 1mm 488 events >= 10mm Improvement

4. Forecast verification Rank histograms for the Mississippi Basin More reliability in the ensemble spread? Improvement NO Improvement 8386 events 3212 events488 events

4. Forecast verification Continuous Rank Probability Score (CRPS) Probabilistic weighted average error Related to the rank histogram and to the mean absolute error Index for predictability  The smaller the CRPS, the better Improved predictability 8386 events >= 0mm 3212 events >= 1mm 488 events >= 10mm

5. Conclusions Validation of the bias correction : reduced mean errors Impact of bias correction on forecast verification:  Improved RMSE  Improved intermittency (rank histograms)  No improvement in ensemble reliability, especially with longer lead times (rank histograms)  Improved predictability (CRPS) Does forecast calibration as a subsequent step improve both reliability AND predictability? Poster: Zambeze and Danube Basins case studies Thank you!