State of Kansas Senate Bill 350 Telecom Reform Bill Overview David Kerr AT&T Kansas.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CANADIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN TRANSITION Ariane Siegel.

Advertisements

Regulation & Deregulation

Rep. Blair Thoreson - ND House of Representatives Chairman, House Appropriations Committee (Gov’t. Operations Division)

1 Telecom Industries of Korea and Japan Brian Toll Greg Zelenka Aaron Cowen Jennifer Barker.

Telecommunications and Natural Gas Industry. Telecommunications Voice (landline, wireless) Video (cable, satellite) Data (cable, wireless) Convergence.

Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.

The Old Rules Just Don’t Fit Anymore: A Panel Discussion on the Proposed Revision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 John Windhausen, Jr., Past President,

Federal Communications Commission Intergovernmental Advisory Committee

SPECIAL ACCESS DATA COLLECTION 1 High-Level OverviewHigh-Level OverviewWebinar October 30, 2014 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.

The SBC Transformation From local service provider to premier communications and entertainment services provider.

ECO 436 Industry Seminar Dr. David G. Loomis Illinois State University

Stacie Stuart (VZ) November 8, Criteria As of 11/7/2011 Holding return 23.86% YTD return.4% 3.6% of portfolio ~Third of Tele. Services sector Reuters.

Company 4 David Roy Case Study: Chapter 8 12/9/2005.

1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005

Policies for the Broadband Digital Migration Barbara A. Cherry Senior Counsel Office of Strategic Planning & Policy Analysis Federal Communications Commission.

Business Local (Wireline) and Long Distance Up To Five Voice Lines Competitive Rates No Need To Switch Out Equipment Can be bundled with High Speed Internet.

ACN Product Overview Phone Service Australia Information correct as at March 23, 2015.

April 15, 2005 Objective Marketing Implementing and Marketing VOIP Services Presented by: Diane Hicks, Partner John.

Ben Hsu and Sangwon Kim VERIZON (VZ). RECOMMENDATION Buy at current price (~35-36) Sell at around 42.

Chp. 3 – Industry Overview Traditional Telephone Companies & Cable TV Providers Mobile Providers Smaller Competitors Internet Based Competitors Why Governments.

New Networks The Man-Made Perfect Storm. Sound the Alarm! Join with us to protect the rights of alarm companies and customers.

An Investigation into the Optimum way Forward for the South African Telecommunications Industry By: Luke Hardman Supervisor: John Ebden 2 November 2004.

Network Neutrality By: Jacob Hansen CPE 401. Introduction What is network neutrality? Who wants to get rid of it? Why is it important? What is at stake?

Minnesota Telecom Alliance Customer Service Conference April 8, 2010.

1 Special Access “Dispelling the Myths” Wendy M. Moser Vice President Public Policy, Qwest July 14, 2007.

The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Gas Utilities In Today’s Markets Presented by: Hank Linginfelter Executive Vice President, Utility Operations.

Telecom Summit. 2 Darren Entwistle a member of the TELUS team.

U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.

ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.

A T & T Wireless Are you looking to buy a stock? Look Here.

National Communications Commission 2006 International Digital Cities Convention - Broadband Policies and Regulatory Reform - NCC Chairman, Dr. Su Yeong-Chin.

Some questions to consider Do we need regulation? Does history matter? Why is one-stop shopping important? Why didn’t the U.S. Telecom Act of 1996 work?

The End of Long Distance Telephony?: the converging telco landscape Bill Blessing Senior Vice President – Corporate Strategy and Development October 19,

Wireline Competition Bureau State of the Bureau Presentation January 20, 2006.

FROM TRADITIONAL LANDLINE TO IP TELEPHONY: A POSSIBLE ANOTHER WAY Bill Levis Colorado Consumer Counsel June 10, 2013.

Company Presentation June 1, 2010 Jiying Wang YongHui Wu.

Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.

Copyright  2003 Global Insight, Inc. Telecommunications Industry Teleconference Technology and Substitution: The End of Boundaries in Telecommunications.

1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.

P 1 confidential/proprietaryp 1p 1 confidential/proprietary Leap Wireless International, Inc. October 2009.

© 2007 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Confronting Tough Questions About.

McGraw-Hill©2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter 8 Telephone and Cable TV Networks: Residential Connection to the Internet.

TOWARDS A FREE TELECOM MARKET Paul Beaudry Istituto Bruno Leoni Mises Conference October 4, 2008, Sestri Levante.

Name College Course Tutor Date Introduction Verizon communication Inc is the company of choice. The company is the second biggest telecom service provider.

Overview of Network Neutrality Kyle D. Dixon Senior Fellow & Director, Federal Institute for Regulatory Law & Economics The Progress & Freedom Foundation.

Universal Service and USF Reform: Establishing a Rational and Efficient System Presentation to NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Antonio, TX June 28, 2011.

What the New FCC (and other regulators) Can Do To “ Get it Right” MARC - Traverse City, MI Jeff Gardner - President and CEO June 16, 2009.

Marketing 333 Introduction to Marketing Chapter 18 Developing Innovative Marketing Plans.

Telecom Game By Gaming At Rice (Play Cards). Price : 5 Gold Infrastructure : Phone Network RegionProfitVict Price : 5.

[Product Name] Marketing Plan

Overview Present the past, present & future of VoIP. Focus: –Technology –Cultural Factors –Economic Factors –Regulatory Factors.

Monopoly Pros –Easier to effect social policy (universal service for example) –Economies of scale and scope Cons –Lack of incentive for innovation –Inefficiencies.

Network Neutrality: An Internet operating principle which ensures that all online users are entitled to access Internet content of their choice; run online.

Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.

Structural Problems & Firms’ Observed Conduct: Economic Prescriptions for Future Growth or “Is it the Long Run Yet?” John W. Mayo Georgetown University.

1 OVERVIEW OF TISP WORK: Analysis of Policies and Regulations Carrier Selection and Pre-selection Indicators of the Assessment of Telecommunications.

MARKETING MIX. What is Marketing Mix? The marketing mix is the combination of marketing activities that an organisation engages in so as to best meet.

The IP Transition – What is it, and why is it important? Prepared for NASUCA Mid-year meeting, New Orleans, LA June 7, 2016 David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy.

ITS 602 Purposes of the course

Rural Communities Broadband Roundtable October 24, 2013 Tupper Lake NY

Regulation & Deregulation

Telecommunication Sector

Regulation and Deregulation

CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005

Media Content Providers

How We Got Here: A Brief History of Utility Competition

Ohio – Electricity & Natural Gas

Competition in the Telecommunications Industry

Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.

Presentation transcript:

State of Kansas Senate Bill 350 Telecom Reform Bill Overview David Kerr AT&T Kansas

Choices in voice communications Traditional wireline companies Competitive Local Exchange Companies (CLECs) Wireless (cellular) Cable Providers Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)

During the past year… Competition continues to develop Regulatory process Surrounding states updated laws –CO, IA, MO, OK, TX

SB 350--Highlights Price deregulates bundles statewide Price deregulates cities with more than 75K access lines Creates bright line (competitive trigger) test for pricing freedoms in cities less than 75K lines –For residential customers: facilities-based competitors required

Consumer protection Competition will keep prices in check Lifeline service remains price cap regulated KCC resumes price regulation if competitive criteria is not met All services remain subject to KCC oversight for quality of service, 911, KUSF, etc.

Consumer benefits Market pricing works. The marketplace is a better regulator than the government –Long distance: 32 cents/minute to unlimited for $20 or less –Wireless: 47 cents/minute to less than 10 cents –Broadband: $50/month to less than $20 None of these services face pricing regulations