A synthesis model for AGN evolution: unveiling SMBH growth with (past and future) X- ray surveys Ringberg Meeting, 2/2008 Andrea Merloni Max-Planck Institut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Formation and cosmic evolution of massive black holes
Advertisements

Growth of massive black holes during radiatively inefficient accretion phases Xinwu Cao Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, CAS.
AGN Eddington Ratio Distributions
5GHz, VLA image of Cyg A by R. Perley Cosmological growth of SMBH: the kinetic luminosity function of AGN IAU Symposium 238Prague22/08/2006 IAU Symposium.
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Accretion and ejection in AGN, Como,
Quasar Luminosity Functions at High Redshifts Gordon Richards Drexel University With thanks to Michael Strauss, Xiaohui Fan, Don Schneider, and Linhua.
Tidal Disruption from Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in Merging Galaxies: Before & After the Coalescence Shuo Li NAOC Collaborated with Rainer Spurzem,
Yoshihiro Ueda (ISAS) Co-Is on construction of the HXLF:
The multiwavelength surveys of the ELAIS-S1 and GOODS fields Fabrizio Fiore & M. Brusa, A. Comastri, C. Feruglio, A. Fontana, A. Grazian, F. La Franca,
Everything you wanted to know about the X-ray background … Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Gilli R., Comastri.
The relation among black holes, their host galaxies and AGN activity INAF ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI ASTROFISICA NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ASTROPHYSICS Galaxies.
Anton Koekemoer AAS 207, Washington DC, 10 January Using COSMOS to Probe the High-Redshift AGN Population Anton Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science.
Boston, November 2006 Extragalactic X-ray surveys Paolo Tozzi Spectral analysis of X-ray sources in the CDFS.
A Unified, Merger-Driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids Hopkins,
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Physics of Galactic Nuclei, Ringberg.
Cosmological evolution of Black Hole Spins Nikos Fanidakis and C. Baugh, S. Cole, C. Frenk NEB-XIII, Thessaloniki, June 4-6, 2008.
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
ACCRETION MODELS FOR BLACK HOLE EVOLUTION Francesco Shankar In collaboration with: D. Weinberg J. Miralda-Escude’ L. Ferrarese A. Cavaliere S. Mathur CCAPP/OSU.
AGN downsizing は階層的銀河形成論で 説明できるか? Motohiro Enoki Tomoaki Ishiyama (Tsukuba Univ.) Masakazu A. R. Kobayashi (Ehime Univ.) Masahiro Nagashima (Nagasaki Univ.)
Demography how many AGN in the sky? - number counts of normal galaxies radio sources optically selected AGN X-ray selected AGN how many AGN per cubic Mpc?
Obscured AGN in the (z)COSMOS survey AGN9, Ferrara, May Angela Bongiorno Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY AND.
BLACK HOLES: FROM STARS TO GALAXIES – ACROSS THE RANGE OF MASSES Felix Mirabel European Southern Observatory. Chile (on leave from CEA. France) In last.
Black Hole Growth and Galaxy Evolution Meg Urry Yale University.
Coevolution of black holes and galaxies at high redshift David M Alexander (Durham)
Gravitational Waves from Massive Black-Hole Binaries Stuart Wyithe (U. Melb) NGC 6420.
Equal- and unequal-mass mergers of disk and elliptical galaxies with black holes Peter Johansson University Observatory Munich 8 th Sino-German workshop.
The Building Up of the Black Hole Mass- Stellar Mass Relation Alessandra Lamastra collaborators: Nicola Menci 1, Roberto Maiolino 1, Fabrizio Fiore 1,
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Supermassive Black Holes at the Centers of Galaxies Singles and Pairs using X-rays to study black holes disruption of stars by massive black holes pairs.
A synthetic view of AGN evolution and Supermassive black holes growth Leiden 25/11/2009 5GHz, VLA image of Cyg A by R. Perley Andrea Merloni Excellence.
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
Spins of supermassive black holes in quasars and galaxies Jian-Min Wang ( 王建民 ) Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Dec.
Coeval Evolution of Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes : Cosmological Simulations J. A. de Freitas Pacheco Charline Filloux Fabrice Durier Matias Montesino.
HOW WHAT Conclusions Barausse E., 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2533 De Rosa G., Decarli R., Walter F.,Fan X., Jiang L., Kirk J., Pasquali A., Rix H. W., 2011, ApJ,
Astrophysics from Space Lecture 6: Supermassive black holes Prof. Dr. M. Baes (UGent) Prof. Dr. C. Waelkens (KUL) Academic year
AGN feedback in action: constraints on the scaling relations between BH and galaxy at high redshift Andrea Merloni (EXC, MPE) A. Bongiorno (MPE), COSMOS.
HST Workshop Bologna Jan 31, 2008 Heavily obscured SMBH at high redshift Andrea Comastri INAF - OABologna C. Vignali, R. Gilli, K. Iwasawa, F. Civano,
Cosmological growth of supermassive black holes: a synthesis model for accretion and feedback OAR Monteporzio, 17/3/2008 Andrea Merloni Max-Planck Institut.
Observations of Obscured Black Holes
An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution An alternative track of Black hole – galaxy co-evolution Smita Mathur The Ohio State University.
Black hole accretion history of active galactic nuclei 曹新伍 中国科学院上海天文台.
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration Ezequiel Treister (ESO) Meg Urry (Yale) Julian Krolik (JHU)
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Evolution of Accretion Disks around Massive Black Holes: Constraints from the Demography of Active Galactic Nuclei Qingjuan Yu UC Berkeley April 21, 2006.
Robust identification of distant Compton-thick AGNs IR AGN Optical AGN Need for deep optical-mid-IR spectroscopy: multiple lines of evidence for intrinsic.
X-ray selected Type-2 QSOs and their host galaxies Vincenzo Mainieri with A. Bongiorno, A. Merloni, M. Bolzonella, M. Brusa, M. Carollo, G. Hasinger, K.
Ezequiel Treister Advisors: Meg Urry (Yale) José Maza (U. de Chile)
The History of Black Hole Accretion from X-ray Stacking Ezequiel Treister (IfA, Hawaii) Collaborators: Meg Urry, Priya Natarajan, Kevin Schawinski (Yale),
The History of Active Galaxies A.Barger, P. Capak, L. Cowie, RFM, A. Steffen, and Y. Yang Active Galaxies (AKA quasars, Seyfert galaxies etc) are radiating.
Piecing Together the X-ray Background: The Bolometric Output of AGN Ranjan Vasudevan Supervisor: Prof. A. C. Fabian.
Evolution of Absorption in AGN Günther Hasinger NGC 3079 Sy2 + SB Gal HST & Chandra Ringberg HE Meeting February,
“Black hole spin and radioloudness in a ΛCDM universe” Claudia Lagos (PUC, Chile) Nelson Padilla (PUC, Chile) Sofía Cora (UNLP, Argentina) SOCHIAS 2008.
Tools for computing the AGN feedback: radio-loudness and the kinetic luminosity function Gabriele Melini Fabio La Franca Fabrizio Fiore Active Galactic.
Multiwavelength AGN Number Counts in the GOODS fields Ezequiel Treister (Yale/U. de Chile) Meg Urry (Yale) And the GOODS AGN Team.
Active Galactic Nuclei Origin of correlations.
Why is the BAT survey for AGN Important? All previous AGN surveys were biased- –Most AGN are ‘obscured’ in the UV/optical –IR properties show wide scatter.
Evolution of massive binary black holes Qingjuan Yu Princeton University July 21, 2002.
T. J. Cox Phil Hopkins Lars Hernquist + many others (the Hernquist Mafia) Feedback from AGN during Galaxy Mergers.
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
Jounal Club 04/04, Sunmyon Chon [1a]Gravitational Waves from the Remnants of the First Stars, T. Hartwig et al. [arXiv: ]arXiv: and.
Growth of SMBH studied through X-ray surveys
AGN evolution: a panchromatic view
Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes and AGN: a synthesis model for accretion and feedback Andrea Merloni Excellence Cluster Universe &
Risolvere il Background X al suo picco
Black Holes and Accretion: Observational Frontiers
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16.
Presentation transcript:

A synthesis model for AGN evolution: unveiling SMBH growth with (past and future) X- ray surveys Ringberg Meeting, 2/2008 Andrea Merloni Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany

This talk: What do we know about evolution of SMBH population (mass function, accretion rates, etc.) A lot! (up to z~4-5) Evolution of mass and accretion rte density Constraints on radiative efficiency and avg. BH spin Anti-hierarchical evolution (downsizing) Where are the frontiers? Obscured AGN High-z AGN, first BH Iron line spectroscopy: spin evoluton

Black Holes in the local Universe Ω SMBH ≈2.7  Ω *BH ≈7  [Fukugita & Peebles (2007)] Sgr A*M87 Stellar physics, SN explosions, GRB Accretion over cosmological times, Active Galactic Nuclei, galaxy evolution Ω baryon ≈4.5  ; Ω stars ≈2.5  Density of stellar mass BHs increases w/galaxy mass Metallicity evolution may cause a shift in the typical BH mass How does the high- mass (Supermassive) peak grow?

(Silverman et al. 2007) Solid lines: mod. PLE Dotted lines: LDDE Corrected for absorption with Gilli et al N H distribution (including Compton Thick sources) 2-10 keV Luminosity Functions of AGN

AGN and Cosmology: a shift of paradigm Merloni and Heinz 2008 Hopkins and Beacom (2006)

Note: radiative efficiency vs. accretion efficiency Non Spinning BHMaximally Spinning BH radiative efficiency accretion efficiency (BH spin) Determined by the complex physics of gas accretion

Integral constraints BHAR(z) = (Normalized SMBH mass density) Soltan (1982) first proposed that the mass in black holes today is simply related to the AGN population integrated over luminosity and redshift

Constraints on avg. radiative efficiency  rad  Merloni and Heinz 2008  0 =  BH,0 /(4.2x10 5 )  i =  BH (z=z i )/  BH,0 (Input from seed BH formation models needed!) Begelman & Rees: Gravitiy’s fatal attraction 0.065/[  0 (1+  lost )]  rad  0.069/[  0 (1-  i +  lost )]  lost =  BH,lost /  BH,0 (Mass density of SMBH ejected from galactic nuclei due to GW recoil after mergers)

Constraints on avg. SMBH spin  a*  0.065/[  0 (1+  lost )]  rad  0.069/[  0 (1-  i +  lost )]

Constraints on avg. SMBH spin  a*  ( SMBH more easily ejected If avg. spin higher

AGN/SMBH downsizing: clues from X-rays Ueda et al. 2003; Fiore et al. 2003; Barger et al. 2005; Hasinger et al AGN downsizing

Cavaliere et al. (1973); Small & Blandford (1992); Marconi et al. (2004) Continuity equation for SMBH growth 1- Need to know simultaneously mass function  M (M,t 0 ) and accretion rate distribution 2- At any z (or t), it is possible to combine mass function and bolometric luminosity function to calculate accretion rate distribution Picture from Di Matteo et al. (2007)

Merloni and Heinz Solved continuity equation backwards in time Mass function must get narrower with z L/L edd function gets wider

The anti-hierarchical evolution at low z seems reversed at high z Heckman et al ~ 3 Log M BH 23,000 type 2 AGN at z<0.1 Growth Time SMBH downsizing

Merloni and Heinz (2008) Radiated energy density by BH mass We can follow the history of progenitors of local black holes

“Active” BH Mass Functions/ Number counts Consequences of broad accretion rate distributions: Number density and mass functions of AGN are very sensitive to survey selection function Merloni and Heinz (2008)

“Active” BH Fractions/Mass Sensitivity curves Consequences of broad accretion rate distributions: Number density and mass functions of AGN are very sensitive to survey selection function The concept of “active” BH must be defined observationally Merloni and Heinz (2008)

Based on the current XRB synthesis models and N H distribution, we can trace evolution of SMBH mass density Tight constraints on radiative efficiency and avg. spin Couple spin evolution and ‘seed’ BH distribution SMBH grow with a broad accretion rate distribution The anti-hierarchical trend is clearly seen in the low-z evolution of SMBH mass function. Reversal at higher z? Conclusions

eROSITA questions Tighten N H (z,L) Bolometric corrections: SED variance Symbol X questions Where are the Compton Thick AGN? Spin properties of AGN from iron line spectroscopy XEUS question Seed Black holes distribution Open questions