How to Help Your Evaluation Team Help You: Peer Review and your ACCJC External Visiting team Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Dolores Davison—Area B Representative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

Objectives: At the end of the class, students will (hopefully) be able to: Explain the importance of a good presentation List the steps they will take.
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Follow-Up Reports Linda Suskie Website:
1 Assistant Chair Training Wednesday, September 16, 2009 Please join the audio portion of this training: , Access Code: ReadyTalk Help.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Stephanie M. Glyptis April 5, 2014 Let’s Meet: The Essentials of Great Meetings.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
Accrediting Commission for Schools Western Association of Schools and Colleges Accrediting Commission for Schools Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Faculty WASC Information Session January 18, 2011.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION OF STAFF
Common Sense Customer Service All the people we come into contact with during the day are our customers. Customers include students, parents, visitors,
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care The Site Visitors Are Coming! Transitioning from Successful Self- Study to Successful Site Visit Bradley.
Accreditation Challenges in Multi-College Districts ASCCC Accreditation Institute Friday, February 20, 2015, 3:45 pm - 5:00 pm Bill Scroggins, President,
Chapter 11 Management Skills
 “…the systematic collection, review, and use of information about educational programs undertaken for the purpose of improving student learning and.
Outline Introduction to accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) The criteria and process for accreditation.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Put the Title of the WebQuest Here A WebQuest for xth Grade (Put Subject Here) Designed by (Put Your Name Here) Put Your Address Here Put some interesting.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Changing the Culture – Facilitating Campus Wide Involvement in the Self-Evaluation Process ASCCC Accreditation Institute February, 20, 2015, 2:15 pm –
College-wide Partnerships: Integrated Planning. Once upon a time…
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Going Deeper with Mark Twain A WebQuest for 10th Grade Composition Designed by Sandy Schaufelberger Wes-Del High School, Gaston IN
1 Crawling Out of the Abyss: Sanctioned for the Common Good Tracy Schneider, Solano Community College Louisa Moon, MiraCosta College Angelina E. Stuart,
What CIOs Need to Know.  Meridith Randall – ACCJC ALO for 17 years for 3 different colleges; never had a college receive a sanction; has written multiple.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Accreditation Institute, 3/20/10 Newport Beach, CA Dr. Dan Walden, Dean of Academic Affairs & ALO, LASC Mr. Glenn Yoshida, Department Chair (Natural Sciences/Health/PE),
Evaluation Matt Shreeve 29 July 2009 Relationship Management Programme Meeting.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
Accreditation Update Rebecca Kenney, Ph.D. Vice President of Instruction (Int.) College of Alameda Flex Day August 19, 2010.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Home Introduction Task Resources Process Evaluation Conclusion PUT THE TITLE OF THE LESSON HERE A WebQuest for xth Grade (Put Subject Here) Designed by:
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
FEU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CONDUCTING BUSINESS MEETINGS (PROCEDURES AND ETIQUETTES) De Guzman, Erickson P. ENSP2 Prof. Xavier Aquino Velasco Associate/Lecturer.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
Team Training- Views from Visiting Teams Dr. Bill Scroggins- Mt San Antonio CollegeASCCC Kay Weiss- San Bernardino Valley College Accreditation Julie Bruno-
Judy Beachler, Cosumnes River College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College The Accreditation Team(s)
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Sweet Adelines International
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Dolores Davison—Area B Representative
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
ISER Committee Presentations
Best practices for accreditation at the local level
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’19
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

How to Help Your Evaluation Team Help You: Peer Review and your ACCJC External Visiting team Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Dolores Davison—Area B Representative Maria del Rosario C. Biddenback—Napa Valley College Dr. Norv Wellsfry—Associate Vice President ACCJC Dr Tim Brown—Riverside College and ACCJC Commissioner

Breakout Outcomes Attendees will learn ways to prepare a self evaluation report that is user friendly and anticipate the needs of the visiting teams. Attendees will also learn from the experiences of past team members and share their own experiences. 2

Peer Review 3 Remember visiting teams are your peers: Administrators, Faculty and Classified Members who all have similar experiences. Each of them has been in your shoes when a has team visited his or her institution External visiting teams are on your campus to find or confirm evidence that you meet the standard. They are not there to “find something wrong”

Quick tips for the Self Evaluation The Self-evaluation is not written for the Visiting Team or the Commission. The audience for the Self-evaluation should be the students, faculty, staff and administrators at the college and the public. It is not the role of the college to determine whether it meets the Standard. That role is left to the Visiting Team and the Commission. It is not necessary for the college to state in the self-evaluation whether it meets the Standard. Each Self-evaluation is unique to that college. Using or employing characteristics from another college’s self-evaluation does not serve the college's evaluation process well. 4

More Quick Tips The Descriptive Summary should go beyond describing what the college does to meet the Standard. Specifically, the Descriptive Summary should analyze the processes the college employs to ensure sustained quality improvement. The Self-evaluation should assess the effectiveness of those processes in ensuring quality. For areas where the college has deemed significant improvement is desirable, an action plan should be summarized. Caution should be taken not to develop too many action plans. Action plans should be prioritized through consensus among the stakeholders. The Self-evaluation should include links embedding in the narrative to evidence that supports the assertions being made. It is very important that all of the links are functional. CTE Leadership Institute May 8 - 9, 2015 LaJolla, CA5

Make sure you answer the question …the whole question Make sure you actually answer the question Make sure the reader can understand that you have answered the question. Use question vocabulary in your answer to indicate your are answering the question. Many of the standard questions are multi part. Make sure each part is answered and documented with evidence. Remember your team members focus on one standard and will closely review each question in that standard. 6

EVIDENCE Make sure your evidence is on point. Make sure it shows discussion or action. A mention in one meeting’s notes or minutes does not a standard make. Show evidence of closing the loop on planning processes. Don’t try to bury a problem in evidence Make sure your evidence is not just from the past year. Remember you need to meet the standard all the years of your cycle. Show some longitudinal evidence. Show that meeting the standards is part of your college culture. Don’t just provide data. Analyze it and show how that analysis was used. Plan your evidence early. Have discussions about evidence before you start to gather for your self evaluation. ASCCC Accreditation Institute 20167

Faculty Faculty should lead and drive the college’s Self-Evaluation Process. As many people as possible should be involved The team wants to talk to more than just the same 4-5 people The team will walk around and ask random questions, so everyone on campus should have basic knowledge on why the team is there. Support and promote sending faculty members on teams. Build your campus’s accreditation experience capacity. CTE Leadership Institute May 8 - 9, 2015 LaJolla, CA8

The Visit Good communication between the campus and the team leading up to the visit, including ensuring the team has the proper PRIVATE workspace. Do not disturb the team, in the team room, unless asked by the team that meetings have been arranged per the requests of the team. Make sure that those who are asked to speak to the team are available, provide subs if necessary. There is a reason that the team wants to talk to that person Provide a list of all people at meetings with their titles Make sure the team has access to all online classes and documentation Bring additional documentation to your meetings with the team; anything you think they might need. 9

OPEN FORUMS The Open Forum is a very important component of the Team Visit. These forums are loosely structure and should be designed to encourage candid interaction between the college constituency groups and the team. It is at these sessions that team members can really get a sense of the culture and environment of the college Show off the great things about your college Encourage Faculty, Staff, Admin and Students to attend 10

ATTITUDE Treat the team like Guests not Tax Auditors Teams really do want to learn about your college Be honest about how you address the standards Focus on improvement rather than compliance Snacks and Caffeine– Remember your teams are putting in long hours 11

What I learned as a Team Member 12

“ 13 QUESTIONS ?