Steering Team: SETTING DATA TARGETS. Add to each specific and broad data field a.target % b. deadline for achieving the target Ex: 66% of 8th graders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
. Information from “Countdown to Accountability” Summer Leadership Institute July 2002 Arizona School Boards Association from presentations by Chris Thomas.
Advertisements

College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The NEW Report Card in Georgia.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS) and State and Federal Accountability Elementary and Middle School Principals November 5, 2009.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
1 Transition to FCAT 2.0, End-of-Course Assessments, and School Accountability and Beyond Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum.
RATIONALE Why should we raise student achievement? EXTERNAL MANDATES Indiana Public Law 221 Federal No Child Left Behind Act.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Oak Hill High School Home of the “Golden Eagles” 2010 PL 221 and AYP Status and Report.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
FOR DELAWARE’S STUDENTS A NEW STANDARD. The test has changed Delaware students are now taking DCAS – the Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System. This.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
1 Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI MEETING 3 SELECTING DATA FIELDS InSAI Raising the bar: Meeting the challenge.
Vision to Action © American Student Achievement Institute 2004 Document 1.13.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
Northwestern Consolidated School District of Shelby County Office of the Superintendent 4920 W. 600 N. Fairland, IN “State of the Corporation” 2013.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
Teaching and Learning Mathematics How did we get to where we are?
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI MEETING 5 STRATEGY SELECTION InSAI Raising the bar: Meeting the challenge.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
1 WARM UP. Vision-to-Action Selecting Data Targets Document 3.3 American Student Achievement Institute ASAI.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI STEERING TEAM TRAINING Writing Strategy Titles & Descriptions.
Teaching and Learning Mathematics How did we get to where we are?
Providing Leadership for Improving Mathematics Achievement NJ Abbott Secondary Initiative, Grades 6-12 Academic Rigor Gayle Mills November 14, 2005 Southern.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI Review & Revise ACHIEVEMENT DATA TARGETS.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI USING DATA TO INFORM DECISION-MAKING Sue Reynolds Executive Director.
Profile of Virginia’s Instructional School Personnel Presented to the Special Education Advisory Committee on September 29, 2011 Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI Review & Revise ACHIEVEMENT DATA TARGETS.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
SELECTING DATA FIELDS FOR IMPROVEMENT Local Presentation.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Quality Annual Assurance Report 2005 What you believe is what you achieve.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 A. Effect Size Can Tell a Lot! B. Future Ready Core NC Accountability.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI STEERING TEAM Setting the Data Targets InSAI Raising the bar: Meeting the challenge.
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI MEETING 2 VISION FOR SUCCESS InSAI Raising the bar: Meeting the challenge Document 2.3.
Data Tracking WHY? In order for us to understand our students well, we must know what their level of growth is. By tracking data over time, we can get.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI INDIANA STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT INSTITUTE Updates.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Proactive Assessments
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Data in Reading Club: Understanding scores, goals, & more Fall 2013
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

Steering Team: SETTING DATA TARGETS

Add to each specific and broad data field a.target % b. deadline for achieving the target Ex: 66% of 8th graders will pass algebra in Notes: Data targets fall between current & vision data Reflect realistic improvement for the time period Data Target Instructions

How much improvement? Realistic, but challenging.

Thinking It Through

Improvement Performance Exemplary Progress Commend- able Progress Academic Progress Academic Watch (Priority) Academic Probation * (High Priority) ≥ 90% Exemplary School ≥ 80%≥ 1% Commendable School ≥ 70%≥ 3%≥ 2%≥ 1%< 1% ≥ 60%≥ 4%≥ 3%≥ 2%< 2% ≥ 50%≥ 5%≥ 4%≥ 3%< 3%< 0% ≥ 40%≥ 6%≥ 5%≥ 4%< 4%< 1% <40%≥ 6%≥ 5%≥ 3%< 3% To Be Placed in a PL221 Category *Schools will not be placed in the lowest improvement category until two years of the 3-year rolling average is in effect. American Student Achievement Institute

To Meet AYP (NCLB) Indiana Improvement Intervals Year (Fall)EngMath 2002, 2003, , 2006, American Student Achievement Institute Cuts score for the secondary indicator = 95%

View Detailed Report

No Child Left Behind

Safe Harbor (NCLB) School does not meet AYP but will not count as a year in sch. improvement To qualify for safe harbor: 1.% of non-proficient students is reduced by 10% from the previous year 2.Demonstrates improvement in the other indicator (or maintains performance at or above goal) American Student Achievement Institute

STUDENTSBENCHMARKCurrentTargetVision Grade 9Pass 2 Sem of Alg I Grade 10Pass ISTEP Math Grade 5 Earn 3 on in-class paragraph assignment Grade 5 Meet writing across the curriculum measure Grade 10 F/RPass 2 Sem of Chem I Grade 12 F/RGraduating with Core Class 2017 Master Indiana Read Comp Standard in 2 nd Class 2017 Pass ISTEP Eng as 3 rd Graders Practice – Setting Data Targets

Steering Team Tasks 1.Facilitate FF and CC Meetings 2.Hold Student Body Breakout 3.Recommend data fields (with data targets) 4.Gain consensus 5.Enter data fields and targets online 6.Print and obtain superintendent’s signature -Put into School Improvement Plan

Steering Team: SETTING DATA TARGETS