US ALCT / AFEB Analog Test Results N.Bondar, T.Ferguson, N.Terentiev* EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
Advertisements

Readout Electronics Alexander Karakash & Natalia Kondrat’eva MEPHI for DESY.
Muon Tracking FEE R.E. Mischke Los Alamos 10 September, 1999 presentation to the PHENIX Muon Arm Technical Advisory Committee.
With Real Detector: The MIP Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan Ped:  ADC cnts MIP: 39.0  12.6 ADC cnts S/N should be better with 3 time samples, better.
Announcements Assignment 8 posted –Due Friday Dec 2 nd. A bit longer than others. Project progress? Dates –Thursday 12/1 review lecture –Tuesday 12/6 project.
Specific requirements for analog electronics of a high counting rate TRD Vasile Catanescu NIHAM - Bucharest CBM 10th Collaboration Meeting Sept 25 – 28,
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* EMU Meeting University of Florida 01/09/2004.
US Beam Test Results and ORCA validation for CMS EMU CSC front-end electronics N. Terentiev Carnegie Mellon University CMS EMU Meeting, CERN June 18, 2005.
Anode Front-End Electronics current status Presented by Nikolay Bondar. Fermilab. 09/08/00.
US Some Preliminary Test Beam Results T. Ferguson, N. Terentiev*, I. Vorobiev CMS EMU Meeting Fermilab Oct , 2004.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, UC Riverside, May 19, Endcap Muons John Layter US CMS Collaboration Meeting May 19, 2001.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
US FAST site EMU CSC test results – a global view from ROOT N. Terentiev (Carnegie Mellon University) Fermilab July 23, 2004.
20 Feb 2002Readout electronics1 Status of the readout design Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Basic concept Features of proposal VFE interface issues.
US Test Beam Results Of Front End Timing T. Ferguson, N. Terentiev* (Carnegie Mellon University) CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb 25.
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* EMU Meeting University of Florida 01/09/2004.
US Test beam data analysis & validation of OSCAR/ORCA Tim Cox, UC Davis Nikolai Terentiev*, CMU CMS Physics Week Fermilab Apr , 2005.
Commissioning of CSCs and Peripheral Crates Task L M. Ignatenko UCLA October
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
Status of Oxford Setup Matthew Chalk, Erik Devetak, Johan Fopma, Brian Hawes, Ben Jeffery, Nikhil Kundu, Andrei Nomerotski University of Oxford ( 18 August.
1 ME 234/2 HV noise investigation N.Bondar CMU. 12/18/02.
US LPC Muon Group CMSSW code development efforts N. Terentiev Carnegie Mellon University CMS EMU Meeting, Florida Institute of Technology February 17-18,
VELO ADC vs Charge Calibration Jianchun Wang April 16, 2008 This is an update to the presentation at April 11 st VELO Group Meeting. A new scan data of.
Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 10/16/99 CLEO Meeting Outline DAQ problems solved Recent results Status of DAQ Work to be done.
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
US News from the LPC Muon Group E. James, M. Mulders, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb , 2005.
Power Distribution Studies at Fermilab Aida Todri, FNAL ATLAS/CMS Power WG Meeting March 31 st, 2010.
FE8113 ”High Speed Data Converters”
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
20 Oct 2009G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Powering on… Last week: CMS off to give evaporation time to dry out the experiment Monday – Tuesday: Began powering on CSCs.
Endcap Integration Workshop: June 11-14, CSC Commissioning Andrey Korytov.
Progress on STS CSA chip development E. Atkin Department of Electronics, MEPhI A.Voronin SINP, MSU.
CMOS Analog Design Using All-Region MOSFET Modeling 1 Chapter 11 MOSFET parameter extraction for design.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Dressing Test for the LHCb Muon MWP Chambers LECC 2006 Valencia Speaker: Rafael Antunes Nobrega (INFN Roma1) INFN Roma1: V. Bocci, R. Nobrega INFN Roma2:
Development of the Readout ASIC for Muon Chambers E. Atkin, I. Bulbalkov, A. Voronin, V. Ivanov, P. Ivanov, E. Malankin, D. Normanov, V. Samsonov, V. Shumikhin,
CARDIAC production tests G. Auriemma, M. Martino & C. Satriano.
Calibration of the gain and measurement of the noise for the apv25 electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, C.Gu, K. Saenboonruang From INFN Italy: E. Cisbani,
Digital to Analog Converter (DAC)
Summary of FPIX tests Tom Zimmerman Fermilab May 16, 2007.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
FEE card validation M. Raggi, T. Spadaro. The problem Validate FEE production – threshold determination at < 1mV accuracy – comparator time effects: Overdrive.
US AFEB timing in CSCs in splash events, run N. Terentiev, CMU CSC Synchronization meeting Nov. 16, 2009, CERN.
Août 09 ECAL EUDET Measurements of SKIROC Maurice Cohen-Solal.
UCLA Group Meeting March 20, 2014 Andrew Peck Shayan Rastegari 1 Updates from Lab Andrew Peck & Shayan Rastegari March 20, 2014.
CSC Ops/DPG meeting, 05-Oct-2011 Hauser1 ALCT boards for ME4/2 etc.
1 Status report 2011/8/12 Atsushi Nukariya. 2 Progress ・ FPGA -> Revision is completed. -> Obtained data from front-end chip. ・ Software.
CBM 12 th Meeting, October 14-18, 2008, Dubna Present status of the first version of NIHAM TRD-FEE analogic CHIP Vasile Catanescu and Mihai Petrovici NIHAM.
TRIPLEGEM and VFATs at The Test Beam Area TRIPLEGEM and VFATs at The Test Beam Area N. Turini……reporter Eraldo Oliveri! Eraldo Oliveri main worker! N.
Digitization at Feed Through R&D (2) Digitizer Performance Evaluation Student: John Odeghe ; SC State, Fermi Lab Intern Supervisor: JinYuan Wu; Fermi Lab.
TOTEM CSC construction and Quality Control Status report A.Krivshich Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute March 07, 2006 CERN.
Transient Waveform Recording Utilizing TARGET7 ASIC
Setup for automated measurements (parametrization) of ASD2 chip
University of Wisconsin
Edinei Santin CERN, April 27th 2017
on behalf of the AGH and UJ PANDA groups
Timing/Synchronization Status
Colliding Beams Group Involvement In CMS (see also M
News on second coordinate readout
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
Multi-Anode ReadOut Chip for MaPMTs: MAROC3 MEASUREMENTS
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
BESIII EMC electronics
Conversation between Analogue and Digital System
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
BUCKEYE has internal shift register which controls calibration
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
Presentation transcript:

US ALCT / AFEB Analog Test Results N.Bondar, T.Ferguson, N.Terentiev* EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/2003

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ Outline Introduction. ALCT Threshold ADC Calibration. ALCT Threshold DAC Calibration. ALCT Test Pulse. AFEB Parameters (FAST site vs Stand). Summary.

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ Introduction Testing analog part of ALCT on CSC at UF FAST site (Proposal of Oct. 31, 2002). ALCT672, ALCT384 and ALCT288, one board of each type (are the results the same?). ALCT672 and ALCT288 on ME2/1, ALCT384 on ME234/2. For each AFEB – threshold DAC settings and ADC readings. Test pulses for AFEBs and six Cathode Test Strips. AFEB thresholds and noise at UF FAST site and on CMU stand.

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ ALCT Threshold ADC Calibration Set all AFEB thresholds (U) with ALCT DAC of 0,5,10,50,100 and 200. Measure U on AFEBs with multimeter and read back ADC (actp code, V.Barashko). Approximate U vs ADC count by the straight line drawn through the first point at DAC=0 (~30 mV) and the last point at DAC=200 (~960 mV). For all 3 types of ALCT the ADC calibration is (Fig. 1 – 2): –Offset = – 0.9 mV –Slope = mV/count –Max. nonlinearity = 1 mV Recommended ADC calibration: –Offset = 0 mV –Slope = 1.2 mV/count

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ ALCT Threshold DAC Calibration Set all AFEB threshold U with ALCT DAC of 0,5,10,20,30,50,100,200 and 255. Measure U on AFEB by reading back calibrated ADC. Approximate U vs DAC count by the straight line drawn through the first point at DAC=0 (~30 mV) and the last point at DAC=255 (~1227 mV). For all 3 types of ALCT the threshold DAC calibration is (Fig. 3 – 4): –Offset = mV –Slope = mV/count –Max. nonlinearity = 3 mV Recommended DAC calibration: –Offset = 31 mV –Slope = 4.7 mV/count

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ ALCT Test Pulse for AFEB Scope traces of pulses at AFEB test inputs for DAC=0,25,100 (Fig. 5 – 6), fit for max. amplitude. Fit model and person dependent results ( up to mV). Small variation of max. amplitude from AFEB to AFEB at given DAC (Fig. 7a – c). Saturation of max. amplitude at DAC > 150 (Fig. 7d). FEB test pulse max. amplitude vs DAC calibration for DAC=0-100 (Fig. 8a – c): –Offset = mV –Slope = mV/count –Small nonlinearity of max. amplitude vs DAC at DAC = 25 (up to 10 mV)

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ ALCT Test Pulse for AFEB thru the Test Cathode Strips Scope traces of pulses at test cathode strip inputs for DAC=0,25,100 (Fig. 9a - b), fit for max. amplitude. Almost no variation of max. amplitude from plane to plane. Test pulse max. amplitude vs DAC calibration: –Offset = mV –Slope = mV/count

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ AFEB parameters at UF FAST site and on stand Run test #13 (AFEB thresholds and noise) on ME2/1 (ALCT672) and ME234/2 (ALCT384). AFEB noise: –1.5 fC for ME234/2 –0.9 fC for ME2/1 (smaller CSC) –1.3 – 1.5 fC at Cdet=180 pF on CMU/Fermilab AFEB test stand AFEB nominal threshold of 20 fC: –Use of certified Cint from AFEB Database is crucial –Better to use ADC readout instead of DAC settings (4 times more accurate) for comparison –Remaining difference is (Fig. 10a – b): fC for ALCT672 on ME2/ fC for ALCT384 on ME234/2

N.Terentiev EMU Meeting UCLA 01/10/ Summary ALCT Reference Voltages (ADC, DAC) 1225 – 1227 mV. Measured Parameters: –Threshold ADC Offset = 0 mV, Slope = 1.2 mV/ADC count –Threshold DAC Offset = 31 mV, Slope = 4.7 mV/DAC count –Test Pulse Max. Amplitude vs DAC AFEB Test Input: Offset = 23 mV, Slope = 4.5 mV/DAC count Cathode Test Strip: Offset = 21 mV, Slope = 4.1 mV/DAC count The parameters of the analog part of 3 tested ALCTs are within the design specifications. The AFEB’s thresholds and noise in the tests on the AFEB test stand and at UF FAST site agree within the tolerance of 10-15%.