Beam Position Reconstruction Pengjia Zhu 02/15/2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Monitors Info from John Musson on new cavity receivers Other monitor issues.
Advertisements

Orbit Feedback NSLS-II stability workshop Visitor committee April 20, 2007.
Ian Kirkman and Graham Cox July 29 th EMMA commissioning shifts so far June 21 st, 22 nd, 23 rd and July 12 th, 13 th, 14 th, 15 th “Analogue” BPM.
LCABD WP 4.2 Review, 24 th September Mark Slater Motivation Final Results from 2006 Upgrades for 2007 Conclusions The Collaboration LCABD WP 4.2.
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Y. R. Roblin, G2P review, 1/17/ HALLA G2P readiness review Yves Roblin, CASA.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
G2p/GEp Beamline Tim Michalski Project Lead. Overview Facilitate the design, procurement, and build of the beamline – up to the target chamber g2p/GEp.
Magnetometer calibration and detection Robert Szewczyk, Alec Woo Nest Retreat June 17, 2002.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
Real-time Parity Feedback John Hansknecht & Riad Suleiman April 28, 2009.
05/30/08J. Dunne -- SANE Collaboration Meeting 1 Beamline Status Upstream beamline –Chicane –SEM –Rasters –Girder Downstream beamline –Helium bag –Extension.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Sept 24, JLab.
Hall A BCM Infrastructure Dave Mack July 21, 2015.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Draft HPS Run Plan March 30, Next Steps Beamline Setup Trigger Commissioning Beam Stability Studies SVT Commissioning Data Taking Checking the.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Nuruzzaman ( Hampton University Group Meeting 1 st November 2011 Beamline Optics Using Beam Modulation for the Q-weak Experiment.
G2p/GEp Beamline Tim Michalski Project Lead. Beamline Overview Slow Raster Tungsten Calorimeter Upside Down Girder (correctors, BCM, superharp) FZ1 Magnet.
Debuncher “phase jump” project Decouple Debuncher RF frequency from MI 120 GeV frequency – MHz could move by ~1-2 kHz –Can center beam in Debuncher.
G 0 Coordinator Update & “To-Do List” Joe Grames William & Mary, June 5-6, 2006  Hall C Beam Line Tasks  Accelerator Preparation Tasks  Beam Halo 
Preliminary results with the Alibava Telescope G. Casse, S. Martì, J. Rodriguez, I. Tsurin and the Alibava collaboration 1 G. Casse,20th RD50 Workshop,
G2p/gep Beamline Project Overview Tim Michalski Project Lead.
Stability of the electron energy Recycler department meeting April 5 th, 2006 A. Shemyakin, M. Sutherland.
Objectives Determine Detector offsets in hall B reference frame and thus absolute beam position at Hycal Examine Flux calculation and see if beam trips.
1 ATF2 Q BPM electronics Specification (Y. Honda, ) Design System –Hardware layout –Software –Calibration Testing Production schedule ATF2 electronics.
5 MeV Mott Polarimeter Progress Riad Suleiman April 10, 2012.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW. Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Transversity Readiness and Timeline Xiaodong Jiang, March 17th, This document specifies the overall readiness for Hall A experiments E06-010/E
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
HAPPEX DAQ / ADC Tests Luis Mercado UMASS 4/17/09.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
2/20/2016J-PARC1 Virtual Accelerator An Accelerator Simulator.
Craig Drennan Linac and 400 MeV BPMs January 7, 2011.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Run Coordnator Report 2012/04/ /04/10 Jixie Zhang
Run Coordinator Report February 5 to 8 Stepan Stepanyan JLAB 1.
Electron energy stability (observations after the HV regulation repairs) Recycler Meeting April 30, 2008 A. Shemyakin.
Test Beam Meeting Monday, January 31, 2000 Fpix1 Calibration Status 1.What we have 2.What to do Monitor Software to use now 1.Current Version 2.Calibration.
1Ben ConstanceCTF3 working meeting – 09/01/2012 Known issues Inconsistency between BPMs and BPIs Response of BPIs is non-linear along the pulse Note –
Overview of Onsite Progress Jian-ping Chen g 2 p /G ep Collabroation Meeting.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
R. Michaels, JLab PREX Mtg, July 2008 Recent Cavity Monitor Tests Credit: John Musson, Anna Boehle, Vince Sulkosky Good position & current for 10 nA to.
Polarized Injector Update
LCABD WP 4.2 – Spectrometer and BPM Studies
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Operational Description
DCH calibrations 2013 Gordon Lim, UCI.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB)
Latency measurements on the ALBA Electron units
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
QWeak Collaboration Meeting
Qweak Coordination Meeting
G0 Beam Polarization T. Horn, D. Gaskell Jefferson Lab
Polarized Source Development Run Results
Current status Minjung Kim.
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
BCM test in low current for g2p
HALLA APEL REPORT Yves Roblin Hall A colllaboration Meeting
Hall A Beam Parameters Table
Presentation transcript:

Beam Position Reconstruction Pengjia Zhu 02/15/2012

bcm signal split problem Solution Left Happex Crate Right Happex Crate V2F BCM electronic reflection signal reduce asymmetry resolution …. Solution BCM Receiver 1234 UpstreamDownstream HappexV2F Happex V2F Happex Solution

Beam Position Reconstruction Unrastered beam reconstruction Just using BPM information to get beam position in target Also can be used for checking beam size while raster on THaG2PUnrasteredBeam class in doing this job Rastered beam reconstruction Using BPM and raster magnet current information to get beam position in target THaG2PRasteredBeam class doing this job

1.BPM Calibration 1. Change the chicane setting to straight beamline, turn off target field, chicane field, septum field 2. Use 2 harps to get the absolute position in 2 harps in hall A coordinate 3. Calculate the absolute position in 2 BPMs in hall A coordinate 4. Use surveyed BPM hardware position to get relative position, center is BPM's center 5. Get the relationship between the relative position and ADC value, update the configuration file in database. 2. Calculate Beam Position in target 1. Use BdL to get a crop of tracks from the first BPM to target, get the position in 2 BPMs(x1,y1,x2,y2) and target(x,y,theta,phi ), save it to a file as mudifi input format 2. Use mudifi fit to get the relationship between (x1,y1,x2,y2) and (x,y,theta,phi ), save the fit data to a configuration file and copy it to database 3. Use this fit data(it is a fit function) to calculate the target beam position by using 2 BPMs information 4. Note everytime changes the BPM's hardware position, target's hardware position, target field, chicane setting, this fit procedure is needed to do again Unrastered beam reconstruction Procedure

Rastered beam reconstruction 1.THaRasteredBeam’s behaviour Just using raster’s magnet current information to reconstruction Assuming beam center is always in target center and stable 2.Method used in GEn X= +m*(I- ) from 1000 events BPM information m from calibration of raster’s magnet current ADC value with beam size 3.Method used in E93050 Rephase BPM information real position: B_im is measured beam position from BPM, B_a is bean amplitude R_im is measured value of raster,R_a is raster amplitude Useless for us

Magnet From fast raster to target: Fast Raster Magnet Slow Raster Magnet Moller Magnet FZ1 Magnet FZ2 Magnet Yves said there will have no x y interaction For these Magnets, and the linearity problem can be ignored Every Magnet will have about 0.1% uncertainty

To check the x y interaction.. BPM Spec: 10~30nA beam, 2.6kHz bandwidth->resolution:300um 1uA beam,2.6MHz bandwith->resolution:300um It is easy to change bandwith by using BPM control board UI (increase bandwith will reduce position resolution) We can use BPM to check if there have x y interaction and the linearity Procedure: 1.Move target to empty 2.Increase beam to 1uA and increase BPM bandwith to 1MHz,also can reduce slow raster’s frequency 3.Turn on slow raster and turn off fast raster 4.Take data Uncertainty=(2*π*2cm)*(100Hz)*(10e-6s)=13um<BPM resolution (if frequency is 100Hz for slow raster) Also we can get the relationship between Slow raster’s Magnet Current and Beam Position in 2 BPMs

If there is no x y interaction and ignore linearity: X= +m_sr*(I_sr- )+m_fr*(I_fr- ) is average beam position in 1000~2000 events gotten from BPM and is average raster current ADC value in 1000~2000 events m_sr and m_fr is calibration constant from raster current ADC value with beam size If there is no x y interaction and has nonlinearity: X= +X(I_sr)+X(I_fr) X(I_sr) is the position offset from slow raster current, can be gotten from the method in last slide X(I_fr), because fast raster’s frequency is high, we can not simply get it from that method, but we can take the comparation between fastraster and slow raster and use the same relationship as slow raster.(equivalent value for slow raster’s current that can cause the same size for fast raster got) If there has x y interaction...