Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Baltimore, MD Todd Drager Faculty Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
Advertisements

A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
OVERLOOK TOWERS AT DULLES CORNER HERNDON, VIRGINIA Anthony Perrotta AE Senior Thesis – Structural Option.
Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Kaylee Damico – Mechanical Option April 12 th, 2011 Presentation Outline Project Team Project Overview.
University Health Building Thesis Final Presentation
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
The Warrenton Aquatics and Recreation Facility Warrenton, Virginia Derek DiPiazza Construction Management.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
LOCKWOOD PLACE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Monica Steckroth- Structural Option.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Kenneth G. Langone Athletic and Recreation Center Kyle Oberdorf Structural Option Thesis April 2007.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
All Hakuna Resort photos in courtesy of LMN Development LLC Young Jeon Structural Option Advisor: Heather Sustersic Hakuna Resort AE Senior Thesis 2015.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option Office Building Washington, DC Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
First Baptist Church of Doylestown Senior Thesis Structural Emphasis James Chester Preliminary Phase II Design.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Structural System Redesign Existing Conditions Proposal Gravity Design Lateral Design Cost Comparison Schedule Impact Conclusions.
Duquesne University Forbes Expansion
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
300 North La Salle Liam McNamara BAE / MAE Senior Thesis April 13 th, 2010.
Helios Plaza Houston, TX Advisor - Dr. Hanagan Kevin Zinsmeister Structural Option.
Seth M. Moyer Office Buildin g Sayre, PA Structural OptionAdvisor: Dr. Thomas E. Boothby.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Third Avenue NY, New York Michelle L. Mentzer Structural Option.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Nicholas Reed Structural Option Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition AE Senior Thesis 2013 Courtesy of Jim Boje, PE.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Andrew Diehl The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Department Structural Option 5 th Year Senior Thesis Project “The Comparison of.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
Computer Associates International, Regional Office
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
James C. Renick School of Education PSU AE Senior Thesis 2006 Mick Leso - Structural North Carolina A&T State University - Greensboro.
Chagrin Highlands Building One Beechwood, Ohio Branden J. Ellenberger - Structural Option Senior Thesis 2004.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
John Pillar Hampton Inn & Suites National Harbor, Md Advisor: Dr. Memari Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007.
William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio Michelle Benoit Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2007 Structural Option.
Albany Medical Center Patient Pavilion Albany, Ny Thomas J. Kleinosky – Structural Senior Thesis 2012 | Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
Structural Systems Design for a Laramie Office Building
CBD Chemical Production Building Virginia, USA Christina DiPaolo │ Structural Option.
Mountain State Blue Cross Blue Shield Headquarters
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center
Acterna Headquarters John M Sekel, EIT Germantown, Maryland
Outline Introduction Structural Redesign Gravity System
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Project: 250 West Street, Columbus, Ohio
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Presentation transcript:

Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Baltimore, MD Todd Drager Faculty Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Baltimore, MD Structural Option

Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Topic Overview Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage

Building Information Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Building RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Owner: Maryland Stadium Authority Architect: Conchran, Stephenson & Donkervoet, inc. Associate Architect: Sasaki Associates, inc. Structural Engineer: Hope Furrer, Associates, inc. Mechanical Engineer: James Posey Associates, inc. Electrical Engineer: Diversified Engineering, inc. Civil Engineer: Site Resources, inc. CM Firm: Gilbane Building Co. Coppin State University Physical Education Complex

Building InformationBuilding RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Owner: Maryland Stadium Authority Location: North Baltimore (Baltimore City) Height: Varies 30’-60’ Size: 155,200 Sqft. Expected Completion: 2009 Project Delivery Method : Design-Bid Build Estimated Cost: $102 million Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Building Information Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Building RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage - Exterior: red brick, glass -Exposed steel trusses over 4100 seat arena -Spaces Include basketball arena, 8-lane swimming pool, racquetball courts, gym, classrooms, management facilities -Surrounds Soccer Field -Structurally sub-divided by 3 expansion joints Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Existing Structural SystemsBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Composite Steel Floor System -W-shapes widespread as Beams and Columns -Typical Beam -Typical Girder -Concrete Strength f’c=4000psi -Lateral System Composed of Braced Frames and Moment Frames -Foundation Composed of Spread Footings Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Existing Arena Structural SystemsBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Columns: W10’s, W12’s, W14’s -Floor Height = 15’ -Braced Frames T1 – T4 (E-W direction) -Moment Frames T5 – T9 (N-S direction) -Roof Trusses transfer Lateral Load Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

ProposalBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Both Gravity and Lateral Systems proved successful -Baltimore City has been underfunded and slow to update buildings -Goal was to revitalize the area and improve architecture by changing structural elements -Primary Focus: Arena Trusses -Breadths: Architecture, Construction Management Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Architectural Breadth IntroBuilding PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex - Goal: Make Arena more prominent -Current Height: 60’ -Surrounding Building Heights: 30’-60’ -Current Arena Capacity: 4100 Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Architectural Breadth Intro Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Lateral System RedesignArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Current Moment Frames(N-S) use heavy, expensive shapes -Replacing with shear walls could save money

Lateral System RedesignArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Trusses use similar formation as current trusses -Shear Walls at 4 corners -Few openings due to doors -Roof diaphragm shuffles load into shear walls

Lateral System RedesignArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Roof TrussesArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Trusses different for interior and exterior -Sized using ETABS and SAP and checked by hand -Designed with both lateral and gravity load -Typical Members: W14x68 W14x61 HSS6x6x.5

Shear WallsStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Wind Load Paths (From North) Total Input Load=208.3k x 1.6= 333.3k Load CaseWall ElementShear(k)Overturning Moment('k)Drift Total319.4 Wind Load Paths (From South) Total Input Load=281.9k x 1.6= 451k Load CaseWall ElementShear(k)Overturning Moment('k)Drift Total Governing Load Combination: 0.9D +1.6W

Shear WallsStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - All Reinforcement 20in. o.c. except where noted *Area 1: Contains 2#7 at the end and 2 sets of 2#4 spaced at 10” *Area 2: Contains 2#5 at 10in. o.c. *Area 3: Contains #4 at 10in. o.c

Additional 5 th FloorTypical Framing PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Use RAM Structural System to analyze new floor -All relevant load cases considered Deflection Limited to L/360 LL and L/240 TL DLLL Area Load60psf100psf Area Load60psf20psf Line Load0.39klf Line Load0.5klf Occupiable Space

Girder OptimizationTypical Framing PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Under the assumption that cost of 10lb. Of steel ~ 1 shear stud 5th Floor Girder Optimization G1SpanMoment('k)Shear(k)Section# StudsTotal Equiv 31' W16x W18x W16x G2SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 38.3' W16x G3SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 31' W12x W14x G4SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 34' W18x G5SpanMomentShearSection# StudsTotal Equiv 34' W14x W16x W16x

5 th Floor Framing PlanTypical Framing PlanTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Architectural BreadthArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion USC - The Coliseum Duke – Cameron Indoor Stadium OSU – The Horseshoe UNM - The Pit

Architectural BreadthArchitectural GoalTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

New Plans Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

New Plans Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

New PlansExisting ElevationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

New ElevationsExisting ElevationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

ModelExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion **THIS IS WHERE THE 3D WALKTHROUGH BELONGS, BUT WILL NOT PLAY IN POWERPOINT.**  - SEE AVI VIDEO ON WEBSITE.

New RenderingExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

View From 5 th FloorExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

View From 5 th FloorExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Model on MapExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Campus

Construction Management BreadthExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion - Primary Focus: Cost, Scheduling Implications -Considerations: Materials, Labor, Time

Cost Analysis Topic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion

Cost AnalysisExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Lateral Changes: -$680,000 + Gravity Changes: $560,000 = Total: -$120,000 ……………………………………….$120,000 Savings

Scheduling AnalysisExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Schedule Modifications Duration(days) Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 11 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 12 Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 21 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 22 Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 31 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 32 Formwork for Shear Walls Floor 41 Replace Moment Frames with Shear Walls Floor 42 Modified Truss Installment0 Additional Framing (5th floor)2 Pour Additional Slab2 Erection of Additional Columns1 Building of extra 15' of exterior wall14 Installment of roof glass panels1 Modification to footing sizes0 Total 32

Scheduling AnalysisExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Cost due to delayed schedule: Assumption: General Conditions Fees ~ 1% through duration of project $102 million project = $34,000/mo. 32 day delay => $50,000 additional cost Material/Labor + Time = -$120,000 + $50,000 = $70,000 Savings

ConclusionExisting RenderingTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Lateral System: N-S system from moment frames to shear walls Modified Arena Trusses w/ less steel Gravity System: Additional 5 th Floor CM: Less Material Costs, Extended Schedule Architecture: Arena more monumental

Questions?AcknowledgementsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion ? Thanks to: -Hope Furrer Associates -The Maryland Stadium Authority -Gilbane -Dr. Lepage, Dr. Parfitt & the rest of the AE faculty -My classmates, friends and family

Foundation ChangesStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Spread Footings enlarged from 10’ x 10’ x 38” to 12’ x 12’ x 38” See Appendix D in report for calculations

TorsionStructural ModificationsTopic Overview Todd Drager Structural Option Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Introduction -Building Information -Existing Systems -Proposal Structural Depth -Lateral System redesign -Gravity System Modifications Architectural Breadth CM Breadth Conclusion Torsion Shear W1: 4.8k W2: 4.4k W3: 4.4k W4: 4.8k Direct Shear W1: 33.7k W2: 36.3k W3: 183.5k W4: 184.4k Total Shear W1: 38.5k W2: 31.9k W3: 187.9k W4: 176.6k